8 Teacher Evaluation Criteria 8 Principal Evaluation Criteria 4-Tiered Rating System E2SSB 6696 (2010) 3 Criteria must include student growth Up to 3.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Survey of Super LEAs Evaluation Systems Performance Evaluation Advisory Council July 16 th, 2010.

Advertisements

Student Growth Goals Sorting it out. Over- arching Goal 2.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update.

PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.

ESSB 5895: Language In New Evaluation Bill

Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.

 Reading School Committee January 23,

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation RIG II PSESD October 31st, 2012 Jim Koval Michaela Miller.

TPEP Teacher and Principal Evaluation Process Bellevue Chamber of Commerce Presentation January 15, 2015 Presented by: Dr. Patty Siegwarth: Bellevue School.

Welcome Our presentation will begin shortly. TPEP: Taking it to the next level Send your questions via chat to be answered in our Q&A session at the end.

ESD 112 Professional Growth Cycle

Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared to each.

Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.

JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)

© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.

Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Context setting, assessment scenarios, and communications.

Teacher/Principal Evaluation Overview (Digging a bit deeper) April 19, 2011 Dana Anderson, ESD 113 Teaching and Learning.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update March 2013 Presented by: Alan Burke, Ed.D. Deputy Superintendent of K-12 Education Office.

Student Growth 2.0 Fall, 2014 Note to Facilitator – See Facilitator Directions on Agenda Document.

Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.

Slide 1 TPEP Implementation: Structures, roles and policy implications ESD 112 March 12, 2015.

Virginia Foundation for Educational Leadership Virginia Department of Education Webinar Series 2012 Welcome to Webinar 2.

Module 4: Unit 2, Session 2 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 2.

TPEP November 2, 2012 RIG 1 & TPEP Districts Session 1,

Update on Teacher Principal Evaluation System (TPEP) Implementation July, 2014.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.

MULTIPLE MEASURES What are they… Why are they… What do we do… How will we know… Dr. Scott P. Myers KLFA Wednesday, August 28, 2013.

Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Legislative Update Michaela Miller TPEP Program Manager OSPI TPEP RIG Update March 15th, 2012 Jim Koval TPEP Program.

PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.

Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards Connections  District Agreement.

ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.

East Valley School District Powerpoint located: staff resources.

EVALUATIONS, STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES & KEEP AUG 25, 2014 BILL BAGSHAW, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR.

Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. April 4, 2006.

Student Growth in Teacher Evaluations Sept. 25

Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….

Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD

Teacher/Principal Eval. Pilot Schools 17 districts/schools Will pilot both the teacher and principal evaluations during Based on the voluntary.

Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.

Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.

Gathering Evidence Charlene Allen & Todd Johnson.

Teacher & Principal Professional Growth and Evaluation Overview Presentation Michaela Miller OSPI Jim Koval OSPI.

Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.

Session Materials  Wiki

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.

TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.

Entry Task As you enter, please take a moment to place a blue dot on the continuum on the wall that represents your perception of the following: Consider.

XXXXX School District Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project: Instructional Framework Selection.

Student Learning Objectives. Introductions Training Norms Be present Actively participate in activities Respect time boundaries Use electronics respectfully.

BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,

Student Learning and Growth Goals Foundations 1. Outcomes Understand purpose and requirements of Student Learning and Growth (SLG) goals Review achievement.

Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.

Teacher Evaluation Process Update March 13, 2015 SCASPA Roundtable.

BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,

Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.

Auburn School District Student Growth Goals June

Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!

Identifying and Using Multiple Measures Bill Bagshaw.

PADEPP PROGRAM FOR ASSISTING, DEVELOPING, AND EVALUATING PRINCIPAL PERFORMANCE CHANGES FOR 2015 – 2016 SCHOOL YEAR.

Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated Professional Practices, Measures of Student Learning/ Outcomes- Calculating Scores & Translating SLOs/SOOs.

XXXXX School District Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project:

Team Project Showcase Presentation: 15 to 20 minutes Peer evaluation

Title I Schoolwide Programs

Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth

بنام خدا مقدم همکاران محترم شرکت کننده در کارگاه آموزشی راهنمایی ونظارت بالینی را خیر مقدم عرض می نماییم.

Survey of Super LEAs Evaluation Systems

Presentation transcript:

8 Teacher Evaluation Criteria 8 Principal Evaluation Criteria 4-Tiered Rating System E2SSB 6696 (2010) 3 Criteria must include student growth Up to 3 instructional and leadership frameworks Experienced teachers and principals cannot be basic Evaluations will be used in HR decisions SB 5895 (2012) Summative Scoring Formula Separate analysis of Student Growth Criteria Matrix for analyzing summative and student growth scores Options for low student growth scores NCLB Waiver (Summer 2012)

8 Teacher Evaluation Criteria 8 Principal Evaluation Criteria 4-Tiered Rating System E2SSB 6696 (2010) 3 Criteria must include student growth Up to 3 instructional and leadership frameworks Experienced teachers and principals cannot be basic Evaluations will be used in HR decisions SB 5895 (2012) Summative Scoring Formula Separate analysis of Student Growth Criteria Matrix for analyzing summative and student growth scores Options for low student growth scores NCLB Waiver (Summer 2012) NCLB Waiver (Summer 2013)

(1)(f) Student growth data that is relevant to the teacher and subject matter must be a factor in the evaluation process and must be based on multiple measures that can include classroom-based, school-based, district-based, and state- based tools. Student growth data elements may include the teacher's performance as a member of a grade-level, subject matter, or other instructional team within a school when the use of this data is relevant and appropriate. Student growth data elements may also include the teacher's performance as a member of the overall instructional team of a school when use of this data is relevant and appropriate. As used in this subsection, "student growth" means the change in student achievement between two points in time. RCW 28A

(1)(f) Student growth data that is relevant to the teacher and subject matter must be a factor in the evaluation process and must be based on multiple measures that can include classroom-based, school-based, district-based, and state-based tools. Student growth data elements may include the teacher's performance as a member of a grade-level, subject matter, or other instructional team within a school when the use of this data is relevant and appropriate. Student growth data elements may also include the teacher's performance as a member of the overall instructional team of a school when use of this data is relevant and appropriate. As used in this subsection, "student growth" means the change in student achievement between two points in time. RCW 28A Wait a minute!!

What are the implications for principals, as we frontload the future?