IDEIA 20041 Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

Updates in IDEA NCLB is the symbol of the paradigm shift to a new mission of universal high achievement From: All children will have universal access.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Implementation of NCLBs Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements November 2003.
DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
1 Transition FUTURE. 2 WHY FOCUS ON TRANSITION? One of the primary purposes of Public Law , the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA),
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
Copyright © 2007 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Special Education Teacher Certification and Highly Qualified Requirements.
1 Key Components of the “New IDEA”: IDEIA CAPHI Conference February 19, 2007 Sherwood Best, Ph.D.
ADVOCATING FOR A CHILD WITH SPECIAL NEEDS
Individual Education Program (IEP) Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
1 The Individualized Education Program (IEP) Yell / The Law and Special Education, Second Edition Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
1 Massachusetts DOE IEP Transition Process FUTURE.
Top ten non compliance findings from the Office for Exceptional Children from their Special Education Onsite Reviews.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
PED 383: Adapted Physical Education Dr. Johnson.  Who needs them?  Students with Disabilities  Students with Unique needs  Individualized Education.
1 The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) Implementation Training Spring/Summer 2005.
1 IDEA REAUTHORIZATION 1997 AND IDEA REAUTHORIZATION 1997 Emphasized access to general education curriculum Strengthened role of parents Increased.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
IEP Definition The Individualized Education Program (IEP) is developed for a student with an identified disability by an IEP team that includes the.
Legal and Ethical Issues
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
An Overview of the Law 1 Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Laura Matson, Ph.D. Director, Special Services Puget Sound Educational Service District Navigating the School Culture September 25, 2014.
Special Education Policies, Practices, and Programs
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
The 411 on IEPs and Section 504s Claudia Otto, Ph.D. Oklahoma Department of Career & Technology Education March 10, 2015.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
MNU 7063 Ethical & Legal Issues in Sped Session 1 Tuesday, January 7, 2014 Dr. Judy Martin.
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Getting Oriented to Exceptionality and Special Education There is no single accepted theory of normal development, so relatively few definite statements.
Schools, Families, Communities and Disabilities Rebecca Durban and Jessica Martin.
Assessment in Early Childhood Legislation. Legislation for Young Children The need for measurement strategies and tests to evaluate federal programs led.
INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION IMPROVEMENT ACT: SELECTED HIGHLIGHTS OF THE 2004 REAUTHORIZATION US Department of Education Office of Special Education.
Pre-referral Process Student support team Student support team –General education teacher identifies a student –Meets with the SST to discuss strategies.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
I.D.E.A LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of the IEP Team, School Staff, and Parents LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of.
H ighly Qualified Teachers IDEA This module will look at: “Highly qualified” teachers as found in the ESEA “Highly qualified” special educators.
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 McKinney-Vento and Special Education  Overview  Revocation of Consent  FAQ’s  Resources.
The New IDEA: Major Changes Presentation to the Charter Schools Summit November 7, 2006 Nancy Reder, Esq. Deputy Executive Director NASDSE.
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
1 IDEA REAUTHORIZATION PRESENTATION OF COMPLAINT A district must have a procedure that gives any party the opportunity to present a complaint.
New IEP Process and Product March/April/May/June 2008 Barrie Grossi, Lynne Ryan RI Department of Education RI Technical Assistance Project.
IUSD Special Education Department October 14, 2015.
Understanding Special Education Services
The New IDEA in Special Education
New IEP Process and Product Preschool Special Education Conference Series #3 May 22, 2008 Barrie Grossi, Lynne Ryan RI Department of Education RI Technical.
SPECIAL EDUCATION BASICS Adrienne Volenik Education Rights Clinic University of Richmond School of Law
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Individualized Education Programs Evaluations and Reevaluations.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
American Institutes for Research
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Presentation transcript:

IDEIA Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004

IDEIA IDEIA 2004 – Five Parts A.General Provisions B.Assistance for Education of All Children with Disabilities C.Infants and Toddlers with Disabilities D.National Activities to Improve Education of Children with Disabilities E.National Center for SPED Research

IDEIA Part A: General Provisions Describes the purpose of the law (section 1400) Legal definitions (section 1401) States not immune from suit for violations of IDEIA (section 1403) Requirements and timelines for federal SPED regulations (section 1406) Paperwork reduction (section 1408)

IDEIA Section Purpose “…to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepare them for further education, employment, and independent living…” The phrase “further education” focuses on the increased emphasis on transition services.

IDEIA Section Definitions Six new definitions added: Core academics subjects Highly qualified teachers Homeless children Limited English proficient Universal design Ward of the state

IDEIA Highly Qualified The requirement for highly qualified special educators are new and brings IDEIA in line with NCLB. A “highly qualified teacher” has full state certifications (no waivers), holds a license to teach, and meets the state requirements. Requirements are slightly different for new v. veteran teachers; for elementary, middle and high school teachers; for teachers of multiple subjects; and for teachers who teach to alternative standards.

IDEIA Highly Qualified (cont.) Special educators who teach core academic subjects must meet the highly qualified teacher requirements in NCLB and must demonstrate competence in the core academic subjects they teach. Special educators who do not provide instruction in core academic subjects do not have to meet the highly qualified teacher requirements.

IDEIA Transition Services The definition of transition services was changed to a “results-oriented process” that improves “the academic and functional achievement of the child with a disability” and facilitates the child’s transition from school to employment and further education.

IDEIA Paperwork Reduction New to IDEIA. DOE may grant waivers to 15 states for pilot programs to reduce paperwork and other “non-instructional burdens.” Two years after IDEIA is enacted, DOE must report to Congress on the effectiveness of these waivers.

IDEIA Part B – Assistance … Governs SPED and related services for children ages Includes sections 1411 through 1419 New section “Risk Pool.” To help school districts meet the “needs of high need children with disabilities” states may reserve funds for “risk pools.”

IDEIA Section 1412 – State Eligibility Catch-all statute. Includes diverse topics including child find, LRE, transition to preschool programs, equitable services for children in private schools, unilateral placement, tuition reimbursement, and assessments.

IDEIA Child Find IDEIA was amended to include children who are homeless, wards of the state, and children who attend private schools. IDEIA includes new requirements about equitable participation of children who attend private schools and consultation between public and private school officials. Note that SPED and related services may be provided on the premises of private religious schools

IDEIA Personnel Qualifications Aligns with NCLB IDEIA requires states to take measurable steps to “recruit, hire, train, and retain highly qualified personnel to provide SPED and related services.

IDEIA Participation in State and District Assessments NCLB requires that schools teach all children, including children with disabilities, to proficiency in reading, math, and science by NCLB also requires that all students in grades 3- 8 will participate in the annual proficiency testing of reading and math. IDEIA changed language to read “…all children, including children with disabilities, are included in all general State and district-wide assessment … with appropriate accommodations…”

IDEIA Assessment (continued) Child with an IEP Statement of individual accommodations. IEP team can determine that child shall take an alternative assessment on a particular state of district-wide assessment of student achievement and why child cannot participate in the regular assessment and why particular alternative assessment is appropriate.

IDEIA Over-identification of Minority Children Overidentification and disproportionality is new to IDEIA. Congress found that African-American children are identified with MR and ED at far greater rates than white children. Schools with predominantly white students and teachers place disproportionately high numbers of minority students in SPED. States must develop policies to correct problem.

IDEIA Mandatory Medication Prohibited School personnel are prohibited from requiring a child to obtain a prescription for a controlled substance (i.e., Ritalin, Adderal) to: Attend school Receive an evaluation Receive SPED services

IDEIA Early Intervening Services Early intervening services are new to IDEIA. Early intervening services focus on “proven methods of teaching and learning” based on “replicable research.”

IDEIA Specific Learning Disability IDEIA moved away from using discrepancy models to ID children with SLD. The school is not required to determine if the child has a severe discrepancy between achievement and intellectual ability to find the child has a SLD and needs SPED. The school may use “response to intervention” to determine if the child responds to scientific, research-based intervention as part of the evaluation process.

IDEIA Changes to IEP Content of IEP IEP team members IEP meeting attendance Consolidated meetings Review and revision of IEPs Alternative means of participating in meetings

IDEIA Content of IEP PLOP – IEP must now include “a statement of the child’s present level of academic achievement and functional performance…” Must be objective data from assessments.

IDEIA Content (cont.) Annual Goals Previous IEPs required annual goals, including benchmarks or short-term objectives. IDEIA eliminated requirement for “benchmarks and STOs.”, except for IEPs of children who take the alternative assessments. IDEIA also added “a statement of measurable annual goals, including academic and functional goals…”

IDEIA Content (cont.) Educational Progress Previous – requires statement of child’s progress toward annual goals… Now, child’s IEP must include a “description of how the child’s progress toward meeting the annual goals…will be measured and when periodic reports on the progress the child is making toward meeting the annual goal (e.g., quarterly reports, report cards).

IDEIA Content (cont.) SPED and Related Services New language about research-based instruction.  Child’s IEP must include “a statement of SPED and related services and supplementary aids and services, based on peer-reviewed research to the extent practical, to be provided to the child… and a statement of the program modifications or supports for school personnel.”

IDEIA Content (cont.) Accommodations and Alternative Assessment New language about “individual appropriate accommodations” on state and district testing and new requirements for alternative assessments.

IDEIA Transition IDEIA has extensive changes to the legal requirements for transition. Previously, the law required “a statement of transition service needs” (beginning at age 14), and “a statement of needed transition services for the child (beginning at age 16). IDEIA eliminated age 14 (now starts at 16).

IDEIA Transition (cont.) new statement: “…appropriate measurable post secondary goals based upon age appropriate transition assessments related to training, education, employment, and, where appropriate, independent living skills…and the transition services (including course of study) needed to assist the child in reaching these goals.

IDEIA Reviewing and Revising the IEP IDEIA changed to process by which IEPs can be amended or modified. If the parent and school agree to amend or modify the IEP, they may revise the IEP by agreement without convening an IEP meeting. The team must create a written document describing the changes and noting that, by agreement of the parties, an IEP meeting was not held.

IDEIA Multi-year IEPs 15 states may request approval to implement optional “comprehensive, multi-year IEPs” for periods of no longer than three years. IEP review dates must be based on “natural transition points.”