Studying Volcanoes With InSAR: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? Howard Zebker, Cody Wortham Stanford University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 ENVISAT Press Day - ESTEC, 1 February 2001 Fabio Rocca Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione Politecnico di Milano Envisat for the physics.
Advertisements

The Community Geodetic Model (CGM): What is it and how does it relate to studies of lithospheric rheology? Jessica Murray, David Sandwell, and Rowena Lohman.
On Estimation of Soil Moisture & Snow Properties with SAR Jiancheng Shi Institute for Computational Earth System Science University of California, Santa.
Forest Monitoring of the Congo Basin using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) James Wheeler PhD Student Supervisors: Dr. Kevin Tansey,
Batch processing, stacking and time series analysis
The Mw 6.5 Bam earthquake of 26 Dec 2003: Precise source parameters from D-InSAR by R. Wang, Y. Xia, H. Grosser, H.-U. Wetzel, H. Kaufmann, M. Motagh,J.
ALOS PALSAR interferometry of Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand Sergey Samsonov 1,3, John Beavan 1, Chris Bromley 2, Bradley Scott 2, Gill Jolly 2 and Kristy.
IGARSS 2011 > Christian Minet > Slide 1 Haiti Earthquake ( , M7.0) surface shift estimation using TerraSAR-X data Christian Minet (1),
Ice Sheets GNSS (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Beidou, QZSS) Matt King.
Key Stage 5 - Volcano Eruption!
USEReST Workshop - Naples, Italy, November 11-14, 2008 The SiGRiS pilot project: producing value-added, EO-based information for the management of the.
IPY Legacy Data Set Mission Planning Examples. Antarctic Ice Sheet InSAR South Looking Satellite: RADARSAT-1 Beam: Fine 1, Mixed Standard, Extended high.
RADARSAT Constellation  Evolution of the RADARSAT Program (i.e. 3 satellites – 32 minutes separation);  Average daily global access of land and oceans.
TOR TanDEM-X 16th International Workshop on Laser Ranging, Poznan, October 2008 ILRS Support for TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X - Status and Future Prospects.
Scaling Relationships Sources –Events from the literature –16 SSE in Cascadia July 1998Aug 1999 Dec 1999Dec 2000 April 2001Feb 2002 Feb 2003Jan 2004 May.
ICESat dH/dt Thinning Thickening ICESat key findings.
Remote sensing is up! Inventory & monitoring Inventory – To describe the current status of forest Landcover / landuse classification Forest structure /
EARTHQUAKE TSUNAMI NATURAL-TECH HAZARDS SWAC Module 12: Case Study: JAPAN.
India Tibetan Plateau 5 cm/yr S N. Looking Inside the Continents from Space: Insights into Earthquake Hazard and Crustal Deformation.
Time-series InSAR with DESDynI: Lessons from ALOS PALSAR Piyush Agram a, Mark Simons a and Howard Zebker b a Seismological Laboratory, California Institute.
Global Inter-agency IPY Polar Snapshot Year (GIIPSY): Goals and Accomplishments Katy Farness & Ken Jezek, The Ohio State University Mark Drinkwater, European.
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia SCIENTIFIC EXPLOITATION OF EO DATA FOR EARTHQUAKES AND TECTONICS Stefano Salvi National Earthquake Center.
Remote Sensing & Geodesy. What is remote sensing? History of satellite remote sensing Satellite orbits Geophysical Examples: Multispectral, GPS, Radar/INSAR,
Remote Sensing and Active Tectonics Barry Parsons and Richard Walker Michaelmas Term 2011 Lecture 4.
IGARSS 2011 – July, Vancouver, Canada Investigating the seismic cycle in Italy by multitemporal analysis of ALOS, COSMO-SkyMed and ERS/Envisat DInSAR.
Andrea Manconi, T.R. Walter M. Motagh, J. Ruch, M. Shirzaei, R. Wang & J. Zschau Helmholtz Centre GFZ Potsdam, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam (Germany)
Henri Laur, IPY Space Task Group SAR meeting, 5-6 March 2008 Since 20+ years, ESA is increasingly supporting the Cryosphere communities with the provision.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Multispectral Remote Sensing of Benthic Environments Christopher Moses, Ph.D. Jacobs Technology.
Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories Report to DLR Falk Amelung, GEO task leader September 2011.
Sea Level Change Measurements: Estimates from Altimeters Understanding Sea Level Rise and Variability June 6-9, 2006 Paris, France R. S. Nerem, University.
GISMO Simulation Study Objective Key instrument and geometry parameters Surface and base DEMs Ice mass reflection and refraction modeling Algorithms used.
Long Time Span Interferograms and Effects of Snow Cover on Interferometric Phase at L-Band Khalid A. Soofi (ConocoPhillips), David Sandwell (UCSD, SCRIPPS)
The University of Mississippi Geoinformatics Center NASA MRC RPC – 11 July 2007 Greg Easson, Ph.D. Robert Holt, Ph.D. A. K. M. Azad Hossain University.
1 Requirements Gathering, Validation, and Concept Studies GOES Users’ Conference Boulder, CO October 1-3, 2002.
IPY STG SAR Workshop Day 1 Summary GIIPSY thematic science objectives presented along with a strawman acquisition strategy Agency representatives from.
1 / 20 Managing Volcanic Unrest: the Mobile Volcano Fast Response System Matthias Hort, Klemen Zakšek Institute of Geophysics University of Hamburg.
Advanced InSAR Processing Applications & Modeling the data Matthew Pritchard Cornell University Practical questions: How to get DEM & visualize data in.
SWOT Near Nadir Ka-band SAR Interferometry: SWOT Airborne Experiment Xiaoqing Wu, JPL, California Institute of Technology, USA Scott Hensley, JPL, California.
CryoSat: ESA’s Ice Mission CryoSat: ESA’s Ice Mission Measuring change in the Earth’s ice fields Jérôme Benveniste slides from Mark R. Drinkwater & Richard.
InSAR and LIDAR Lecture 8 Oct 13, 2004.
The global hydrologic cycle Ground water, surface water, soil moisture, snow pack, glaciers, ocean, atmosphere.
Sea ice thickness from CryoSat – A new data set for operational ice services? Christian Haas German CryoSat Office AWI.
I hope its ok to do these InSAR exercises as the lab
Scott Hensley, Howard Zebker, Cathleen Jones, Paul Lundgren, Eric Fielding, Thierry Michel and Bruce Chapman.
Progress in Geoid Modeling from Satellite Missions
Persistent Scatterers in InSAR
Environmental Remote Sensing GEOG 2021 Lecture 8 Observing platforms & systems and revision.
Volcano observations with ASTER and ASTER image database for volcanoes Urai, Minoru Geological Survey of Japan, AIST.
0 Riparian Zone Health Project Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Grant S. Wiseman, BS.c, MSc. World Congress of Agroforestry Nairobi, Kenya August 23-28,
How does InSAR work? Gareth Funning University of California, Riverside.
InSAR Processing and Applications
Challenges and Strategies for Combined Active/Passive Precipitation Retrievals S. Joseph Munchak 1, W. S. Olson 1,2, M. Grecu 1,3 1: NASA Goddard Space.
Introduction to Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar - InSAR
Improved Marine Gravity from CryoSat and Jason-1 David T. Sandwell, Emmanuel Garcia, and Walter H. F. Smith (April 25, 2012) gravity anomalies from satellite.
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data … also, use ENVISAT (C-band) data from the same time period to resolve vertical/horizontal components of surface velocity.
Time Dependent Mining- Induced Subsidence Measured by DInSAR Jessica M. Wempen 7/31/2014 Michael K. McCarter 1.
2002/05/07ACES Workshop Spatio-temporal slip distribution around the Japanese Islands deduced from Geodetic Data Takeshi Sagiya Geographical Survey Institute.
South East Strategic Regional Coastal Monitoring Programme – Annual Review Meeting, November 2009 Satellite Data for Coastal Monitoring Trevor Burton Fugro-BKS.
Fault Plane Solution Focal Mechanism.
Norris subsidence Caldera-wide uplift Figure 1 – ENVISAT beam mode 1 interferogram spanning and showing deformation in the region of Yellowstone.
Layover Layover occurs when the incidence angle (  ) is smaller than the foreslope (  + ) i.e.,  <  +. i.e.,  <  +. This distortion cannot be corrected!
39 th Conference of Directors of EU Paying Agencies ESTEC, 25 May 2016 M. Drusch, Principal Scientist Earth Observation Programmes Directorate Science,
Figure 1 - Possible inflation of Augustine (about 2 cm, outlined in white) during August – October 2005, before the Jan 2006 eruptions. Atmospheric artifacts.
GEOGG141 / GEOG3051 Principles & Practice of Remote Sensing (PPRS) RADAR II: Interferometry Dr. Mathias (Mat) Disney UCL Geography Office: 113, Pearson.
Class tutorial Measuring Earthquake and volcano activity from space Shimon Wdowinski University of Miami.
Figure 1 ENVISAT beam mode 2, track 61 interferogram covering June 26, 2004 to Febrary 26, Inflation amounts to several tens of centimeters and.
Active Remote Sensing for Elevation Mapping
Figure 1. ENVISAT beam mode 4, track 136 interferogram spanning 11 April to 20 June Bulls-eye-shaped subsidence at the summit was caused by withdrawal.
Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer
ESTEC Contract N° 4000/10/NL/AF
Presentation transcript:

Studying Volcanoes With InSAR: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? Howard Zebker, Cody Wortham Stanford University

10 Years Ago: Where Were We? Anticipated several new space radar systems for monitoring and forecasting of volcanic events Developing inverse methods to reveal the details of faulting or pressure changes at depth, and better describe precise magma chamber geometries Beginning reliable interferometric imaging, m-scale resolution of mm-scale deformation over wide areas Proposed high-res stereo radar for 3-D topographic maps fast events, e.g. rapid dome growth Foresaw data collection over all of Earth’s 600 potentially active volcanoes weekly or even daily Designing satellite constellations in along-track interferometric formation to map flow velocities

Reality: What actually happened Anticipated several new space radar systems for monitoring and forecasting of volcanic events Developing inverse methods to reveal the details of faulting or pressure changes at depth, and better describe precise magma chamber geometries Beginning reliable interferometric imaging, m-scale resolution of mm-scale deformation over wide areas Proposed high-res stereo radar for 3-D topographic maps fast events, e.g. rapid dome growth Foresaw data collection over all of Earth’s 600 potentially active volcanoes weekly or even daily Designing satellite constellations in along-track interferometric formation to map flow velocities

Reliable imaging Technology has advanced to where we know how to do this Want long wavelength, high resolution, rapid repeat times Systems beginning to reflect community knowledge Still waiting for the “perfect” system

Longer wavelengths yield higher correlation ALOS Kilauea interferogram: 460 day separation, 1490 m baseline Wortham et al., 2010

Time series volcano observations Eyjafjallajokull PS deformation SBAS deformation Time series From Hooper, 2008

PS image of San Andreas Fault - ERS satellite PS spacing is ~1km PS performance RMS error ~1 mm/yr Precision of PS method

Higher resolution promotes time series analyses A coarse resolution cell Brightest scatterer A fine resolution cell Same brightest scatterer, much less background Pixel does not scintillate, is “persistent” Bright scatterer perhaps less than rest of background Pixel scintillates over time from background signal

New spaceborne systems Radar systems launched this decade have expanded the data modalities for InSAR New frequency bands and orbit repeat geometries ALOS PALSAR (Japan) launched 2006 TerraSAR-X (Germany) launched 2007, Tandem-X satellite launched 2010 Some commercial systems as well

ALOS/PALSAR ALOS satellite, PALSAR radar instrument L-band, wavelength 24 cm Repeat period 46 days Multipolarization m resolution Very high correlation Just ended successful mission

TerraSAR-X X-band, wavelength 3 cm Repeat period 11 days Multipolarization 1-20 m resolution Ideal for time- series observations

Current research … Most exciting area is time series analysis Modeling continues to advance Tandem satellites supersede previous desire for radar stereo New measurements and methods will yield new descriptors

Time series mimics GPS imaging From Lundgren et al.

Modeling of Yellowstone caldera Interferograms: C-band Interpretation: Inflating sill From Wicks et al., 2006

Modeling Uzon caldera, Kamchatka Radarsat measurements (a) Distributed opening model, (b) distributed crack model, (c) depth slice of model b Lundgren and Lu, 2006

Probabilistic modeling of Etna activity Predict eruptive activity from observed deformation and thermal flux Highest activity from coincident increases PDF derived from spaceborne data only From Patrick et al., 2006

Tandem observations for DEMs Higher resolution and accuracy than traditional stereo Could produce radar stereo, but this method is superior Mt. Merapi Digital Elevation Model from Tandem TerraSAR-X observations From DLR

New local measurements From C. Werner, Gamma Res.

… but some things still lacking Enabling technology is coverage, temporal and geographic Optimizing designs for InSAR – Orbits: poor north retrieval – System parameters – High resolution, long wavelength helps Future mission prospect good/bad/?

Vector deformation SBAS vector solution for average deformation rate at Kilauea, HI ALOS yields fairly high correlation over 2 year time span Near polar orbit results in poor northing component retrieval Wortham et al., 2010

Poor retrieval – northing component Kilauea: GPS – black line, InSAR – Red symbols Up North East Wortham et al., 2010

Multiple Aperture InSAR (MAI) Method N. Bechor, PhD Thesis (2006) SLCs formed from forward and backward squinted beams Beam filtered in Doppler Interferograms formed from each beam MAI phase gives along-track displacement from differencing forward/backward interferograms

Average north displacement using MAI North component of displacement averaged over all InSAR acquisitions

Coverage ALOS L-band yields high correlation over challenging volcanoes South America data show comprehensive coverage possible 46 day repeat is too long- misses many signals PALSAR data rate/volume too low to monitor 600 volcanoes From: Fournier et al., 2010

NASA DESDynI-R Mission Launch in 20XX L-band, potential 2 m resolution Free and open data policy Specifically designed for InSAR Volcano hazards one of the major science objectives Artist’s concept from JPL

Additional exciting missions ALOS-2 (Japan): L-band follow-on to ALOS, launch 2013?, 1-10 m resolution, 14 day repeat But likely will be commercially oriented with data hard to get Tandem-L (Germany): Similar in philosophy to Tandem-X, but companion to DESDynI, no money yet Sentinel-1 (ESA): C-band heir to Envisat, 12 day repeat, 5 m resolution, 201w? Launch There are others…

Summary and looking ahead InSAR continues to evolve better accuracy and temporal/spatial coverage Volcano hazard applications benefit Future satellites converging on ~12 day repeats and m-scale resolution Limiting factor is probably data policy- agencies still don’t get the science message and pursue commercialization If data are acquired, volcanologists will come