Mississippi Principal Evaluation System (MPES) 2014-2015 Circle Survey Training November 2014 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome to Home Base. Why Home Base? Improving teacher effectiveness by providing tools aligned to NC’s Standard Course of Study that promote efficiency.
Advertisements

Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Mississippi Principal Evaluation System (MPES) Summative Assessment and Professional Growth Goals Conferences June 2014 Webinar.
Mississippi Principal Evaluation System (MPES) Circle Survey Training November 2014.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Teacher Evaluation Update
Perkins 202 Dr. Michelle Crary – Staff Development and Accountability Coordinator Nori Cannell – Director – Guidance & Career and Technical Education.
LEADAlabama Implementation Training EDUCATEAlabama/LEADAlabama Section
MPES: The Circle Survey Conference March 27,
TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING December 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach
Mississippi Principal Evaluation System (MPES): Goal-Setting and Quantification August 2014.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness in [DISTRICT NAME/ BUILDING NAME] Date/Presenter.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
TCRS Concord Project Employer Training. Agenda 2 Topic Objectives Why Are You Here? Project Overview What’s New Your Resources Questions Demonstration.
Verona Public Schools DEAC Meeting Agenda February 6, 2014  AchieveNJ  Official Waiver Process…  Assessing and Adjusting SGOs (see attachment)  Marzano.
Copyright © 2011 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved.Copyright © 2013 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Indiana” ? The TELL Indiana.
SGOs for Educators Providing Educational Services March 12, 2014 AchieveNJ Website Wireless connection at DOE Guest – doeit/wireless.
Information on Grades 3-8 Testing Steven Katz Director Office of State Assessment.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
CHEA GENERAL MEETING August 31, 2011 STATE SALARY SCALE Professional Learning Community (PLC) NEGOTIATIONS DPAS II CHANGES STATE SALARY SCALE Professional.
P arent I nvolvement A nalysis? The Parent Involvement Analysis is designed and developed by Academic Development Institute What is.
Assessment Coordinator Webinar September 2013 Copyright ©2013 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 1.
Mississippi Teacher Evaluation System (MTES) Updates
Honors Level Course Implementation Webinar Honors Rubric and Portfolio Review Process October 7, 2013.
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter:. Training Overview Introduction Participation requirements FET Tool Orientation Distribution of username & passwords.
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
CIMP & DUE PROCESS POINTERS It’ that time again… Anoka-Hennepin participates in the Continuous Improvement Monitoring Process supported by.
Using Student & Staff Feedback in Educator Evaluation November 5, 2014 MASC/MASS Joint Conference.
Staff Evaluation Data Reporting September 30, 2014.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
User Management: Understanding Roles and Permissions for Schoolnet Schoolnet II Training – September 2014.
The Middle Years Development Instrument (MDI) Steps to Teacher Administration.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Guide to Test Interpretation Using DC CAS Score Reports to Guide Decisions and Planning District of Columbia Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
1 Standard Test Administration Testing Ethics Training PowerPoint Spring 2011 Utah State Office of Education.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Certified Evaluation Orientation Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System LaRue County.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.
Developing Personal and Academic Excellence in the Catholic Tradition Developing Leaders Through the AdvancED Accreditation Process Rapid City Catholic.
School Improvement Activities Accreditation (AdvancED) Process Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
1. Orientation to the Performance Planning, Feedback and Development (PPFD) Process for Confidential Staff
TESTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT New Hanover County Schools September 2012 ACT and PLAN.
Climate Survey Training Training for Planning and Administration Leader Keys Effectiveness System 1.
GEA TOOL KIT PRESENTATION STAR ORULLIAN – EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GRANITE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
BASELINE EDGE DOVER SHERBORN PUBLIC SCHOOLS SEPTEMBER 2013.
Copyright © 2011 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved.Copyright © 2013 New Teacher Center. All Rights Reserved. What is “TELL Indiana” ? The TELL Indiana.
Student Perception Survey: Survey Coordinator Training Office of Policy and Evaluation Spring 2016.
[School Name]’s Student Perception Survey Results This presentation is a template and should be customized to reflect the needs and context of your school.
Student Perception Survey: Survey Coordinator Training Office of Policy and Evaluation April 2016.
Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June
NAM Talent Development & Performance Management Brought to you by your friendly Human Resources Team! Success Factors Performance Management System Training.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Overview of Network Team Plan.  Deliverable Metrics are being finalized  Assessment of Network Team Deliverables ◦ Principals ◦ Teachers ◦ District.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
CBT Update NYSAA NYS 3 – 8 Assessments
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Compass Information System (CIS)
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
New Program Re-Approval System Overview
Teacher Evaluation Training
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Aspiring School Leaders Information Session
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
Presentation transcript:

Mississippi Principal Evaluation System (MPES) Circle Survey Training November

1.Circle Survey overview 2.How to access and complete the survey 3.Key Circle Survey business rules 4.Circle Survey reports Goals for Today’s Training 2

The Circle Survey: Is a multi-rater tool administered by MSU’s Research & Curriculum Unit on behalf of MDE Is provided to all districts free of charge Has 3 equally weighted components 1)Certified staff feedback (33% of overall survey score) 2)Principal self evaluation (33% of overall survey score) 3)Supervisor evaluation (33% of overall survey score) Circle Survey Overview 3

Survey contains 30 leadership indicators divided into 6 categories Each indicator is equally weighted The Circle Survey counts a total of 30% of an administrator’s MPES Summative Assessment Score Indicators were developed and screened by multiple focus groups consisting of your peers Indicators align with the MS Standards for School Leaders Indicators are available on the MDE’s website Average survey response time was 8 minutes last year Circle Survey Overview, Cont. 4

The Circle Survey is REQUIRED by the MDE for all districts in and beyond. Other tools, such as the VAL-ED, may NOT be used in place of the Circle Survey for MPES. Circle Survey Overview, Cont. 5

Key Dates Nov. 14:Data pulled from ELMS Dec. 1: Districts receive Circle Survey codes Dec. 1: Circle Survey opens Jan. 31: Circle Survey closes (cannot be reopened) Mar. 31: Circle Survey reports issued Apr. 30: Circle Survey Conference completed, Circle Survey Conference report and MPES form filed in personnel file, and Circle Survey Conference date reported in ELMS Circle Survey Overview, Cont. 6

For principals completing the survey as a self-assessment: You will receive the survey link and your key code from your district’s central office Your first completed survey response will be kept; incomplete attempts and duplicate attempts to complete the survey will be automatically discarded Your individualized response will be disaggregated from the feedback from other participants so that it can be weighted for a third of the overall Circle Survey score (i.e., you and your supervisors will see your self-evaluation scores on the Circle Survey report) To Access the Survey 7

For supervisors completing the survey: Only the official supervisor of record for an MPES participant should log in and use a supervisor code to complete the Circle Survey for an MPES participant Only one person may be designated an official supervisor of record per MPES participant (i.e., cannot have dual supervisors of record) If you supervise multiple MPES participants, you will need to complete a separate Circle Survey for each participant (selecting each MPES participant by name and using a separate key code for each one) Your individualized response will be disaggregated from the feedback from other participants so that it can be weighted for a third of the overall Circle Survey score (i.e., MPES participants will see your scores on the Circle Survey report) Your first completed survey response will be kept; incomplete attempts and duplicate attempts to complete the survey will be automatically discarded To Access the Survey, Cont. 8

For staff completing the survey: Staff members are being provided with a separate training webinar Full- and part-time certified staff (e.g., teachers, counselors, librarians) are eligible to participate Staff responses will be aggregated to ensure confidentiality and will be weighted a third of the overall Circle Survey score (i.e., MPES participants will not see staff key codes on the Circle Survey report) Staff members’ first completed survey response will be kept; incomplete attempts and duplicate attempts to complete the survey will be automatically discarded To Access the Survey, Cont. 9

It is VERY IMPORTANT that districts distribute the correct access websites and key codes to survey participants. READ THE SURVEY INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY and contact the RCU with questions BEFORE you take the survey. To Access the Survey, Cont. 10

Missing subscores become zeroes unless the district successfully completes the MDE’s appeal process (details available in the MPES Process Manual). Key Business Rules 11

The number of staff codes issued per MPES participant is based on data each administrator submitted in ELMS during the goal-setting process. No minimum staff n-count No minimum staff participation rate, but the number of staff who complete the survey for each MPES participant will be reported to the MDE Tip: Use school computer labs and the fishbowl method to ensure high staff participation and confidentiality Key Business Rules 12

Important Reminders: District officials (not MPES participants) should assist schools in distributing the codes to certified staff members. MPES participants should NOT have access to staff codes because it erodes staff trust in the confidentiality of their survey responses. Key Business Rules 13

A certified staff member should complete the Circle Survey for the school administrator(s) who oversees the staff member’s performance.* *E.g., All certified staff should complete the Circle Survey for the head principal. Additionally, if an assistant principal oversees a certain grade (e.g., 7-8 th grade teachers only) or a select subgroup of teachers (e.g., math and science teachers only), then those certified staff should complete his/her Circle Survey. If the assistant principal’s role is schoolwide, then all certified staff in the school should complete the Circle Survey for the assistant principal. *E.g., All CTE teachers should complete the Circle Survey on the CTE director. Key Business Rules 14

The MDE’s expectation is that all certified staff overseen by an administrator will participate in the administrator’s Circle Survey. The MDE recognizes that some certified staff may wish to “opt out” of the survey (e.g., certified staff who have been employed at the school for fewer than 60 calendar days), and the MDE recommends that these staff members be permitted to “opt out,” if requested. However, all staff must be given the opportunity to participate. Key Business Rules 15

. Q: What if I reported in ELMS that my school has 100 staff members, but only 50 of them actually report to me and complete my Circle Survey? Will that reflect negatively on my Circle Survey participation rate? A: No, the MDE understands that many factors affect an administrator’s staff population throughout the year. Just document this issue in your personnel file so that you can explain your staff participation rate if it were ever questioned. Key Business Rules 16

District superintendents will receive detailed reports with Circle Survey scores in March. District superintendents are responsible for ensuring these reports are distributed to MPES participants prior to or during the Circle Survey Conference. (Districts must release the Circle Survey reports to the MPES participants.) The Circle Survey report is then filed in the MPES participant’s personnel file, and the date of the Circle Survey conference is recorded by the MPES participant in ELMS. Let’s view a sample report. Circle Survey Reports 17

Please contact the RCU helpdesk. Circle Survey Questions 18 RCU Helpdesk

evaluations/mpes General MPES Questions 19 Lisa White, Ed.S