ECE 874: Physical Electronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“velocity” is group velocity, not phase velocity
Advertisements

Definition of a Field Field Lines Electric Fields Superposition
ECE : Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE : Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
Energy and Energy Transfer
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
CHAPTER 3 Introduction to the Quantum Theory of Solids
1 Motivation (Why is this course required?) Computers –Human based –Tube based –Solid state based Why do we need computers? –Modeling Analytical- great.
2. 2s /eo between, ±s /eo outside. 3. zero both between and outside.
Quantum Numbers How to find your atom’s address in the Periodic Table Hotel.
Project topics due today. Next HW due in one week
Physics 355. Consider the available energies for electrons in the materials. As two atoms are brought close together, electrons must occupy different.
1 Chapter Hydrodynamics and Electromagnetism Much of the terminology is the same Some concepts can be applied between the two fields.
9.1 The Particle in a box Forbidden region Forbidden region 0 a x Infinitely high potential barriers Fig Potential barriers for a particle in a box.
EEE Electrical Properties of Materials Lecture 6.
Electron Configuration
ECE 4339 L. Trombetta ECE 4339: Physical Principles of Solid State Devices Len Trombetta Summer 2007 Chapter 2: Carrier Modeling Goal: To understand what.
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
Electrical Energy and Potential IB Physics. Electric Fields and WORK In order to bring two like charges near each other work must be done. In order to.
Electrostatics Properties of Electric Charges.
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
Weds., Jan. 29, 2014PHYS , Dr. Andrew Brandt 1 PHYS 1442 – Section 004 Lecture #5 Wednesday January 29, 2014 Dr. Andrew Brandt CH 17 Electric Potential.
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
Electronic Band Structures electrons in solids: in a periodic potential due to the periodic arrays of atoms electronic band structure: electron states.
ECE : Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE 875: Electronic Devices
ECE : Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
Something Smaller Than An Atom? Atomic Structure.
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE : Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
For review of Schrodinger equation: monroecc
ECE 875: Electronic Devices Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE 874: Physical Electronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE 875: Electronic Devices
ECE 874: Physical Electronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE : Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
Quantum theory Electron Clouds and Probability. Bohr’s model of the atom is unable to describe electron (e - ) behavior in an atom Problem: multiple spectral.
Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 6e
ECE 874: Physical Electronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE : Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
ECE : Nanoelectronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University
1924: de Broglie suggests particles are waves Mid-1925: Werner Heisenberg introduces Matrix Mechanics In 1927 he derives uncertainty principles Late 1925:
Kronig-Penney model and Free electron (or empty lattice) band structure Outline: Last class: Bloch theorem, energy bands and band gaps – result of conduction.
Chapter 3 Energy Band Theory.
ECE 875: Electronic Devices
Electron Clouds and Probability
Physics 342 Lecture 28 Band Theory of Electronic Structure in Solids
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
BELLWORK 10/26/17 What is a photon? Is light a particle or a wave?
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
Electron Configuration Guided Notes
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
ECE 875: Electronic Devices
Energy Band 7 In free electron model, electrons occupy positive energy levels from E=0 to higher values of energy. They are valence electron so called.
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
Physics 014 Electric fields 1.
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
ECE 874: Physical Electronics
ECE 875: Electronic Devices
V (in Volts) = Potential EPE (in Joules) = Electric Potential Energy
Atilla Ozgur Cakmak, PhD
Presentation transcript:

ECE 874: Physical Electronics Prof. Virginia Ayres Electrical & Computer Engineering Michigan State University

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 Lecture 15, 18 Oct 12

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 Example problem: (a) What are the allowed (normalized) energies and also the forbidden energy gaps for the 1 st -3 rd energy bands of the crystal system shown below? (b) What are the corresponding (energy, momentum) values? Take three equally spaced k values from each energy band. k = 0 k = ±  a + b

VM Ayres, ECE874, F k = 0 k = ±  a + b

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 (a)

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 (b)

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 “Reduced zone” representation of allowed E-k states in a 1-D crystal

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 k = 0 k = ±  a + b

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 (b)

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 “Reduced zone” representation of allowed E-k states in a 1-D crystal This gave you the same allowed energies paired with the same momentum values, in the opposite momentum vector direction. Always remember that momentum is a vector with magnitude and direction. You can easily have the same magnitude and a different direction. Energy is a scalar: single value.

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 Can also show the same information as an “Extended zone representation” to compare the crystal results with the free carrier results. Assign a “next” k range when you move to a higher energy band.

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 Example problem: There’s a band missing in this picture. Identify it and fill it in in the reduced zone representation and show with arrows where it goes in the extended zone representation.

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 The missing band: Band 2

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Notice that upper energy levels are getting closer to the free energy values. Makes sense: the more energy an electron “has” the less it even notices the well and barrier regions of the periodic potential as it transports past them.

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 Note that at 0 and ±  /(a+b) the tangent to each curve is flat: dE/dk = 0

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 A Brillouin zone is basically the allowed momentum range associated with each allowed energy band Allowed energy levels: if these are closely spaced energy levels they are called “energy bands” Allowed k values are the Brillouin zones Both (E, k) are created by the crystal situation U(x). The allowed energy levels are occupied – or not – by electrons

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

(b)

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

 What happens to the e- in response to the application of an external force: example: a Coulomb force F = qE (Pr. 3.5):

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 (d)

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 (d) [100] type 6 of these type 8 of these Warning: you will see a lot of literature in which people get careless about versus [specific direction] SymmetricConduction energy bands

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 (d) and type transport directions certainly have different values for a Block spacings of atomic cores. The , X, and L labels are a generic way to deal with this.

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 Two points before moving on to effective mass: Kronig-Penney boundary conditions Crystal momentum, the Uncertainty Principle and wavepackets

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 Boundary conditions for Kronig-Penney model: Can you write these blurry boundary conditions without looking them up?

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 Locate the boundaries: [transport direction p 56] ba KP a KP + b = a Block -ba0 a

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 Locate the boundaries: into and out of the well. [transport direction p 56] ba KP a KP + b = a Block -ba0 a

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 Boundary conditions for Kronig-Penney model, p. 57: Is the a in these equations a KP or a Bl ?

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 Boundary conditions for Kronig-Penney model, p. 57: Is the a in these equations a KP or a Bl ? It is a KP.

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 Two points before moving on to effective mass: Kronig-Penney boundary conditions Crystal momentum, the Uncertainty Principle and wavepackets

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12

Chp. 04: learn how to find the probability that an e- actually makes it into - “occupies” - a given energy level E.

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 k2k2 k  wavenumber Chp. 02

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 Suppose U(x) is a Kronig-Penney model for a crystal.

VM Ayres, ECE874, F12 On E-axis: Allowed energy levels in a crystal, which an e- may occupy h bar k = crystal momentum So a dispersion diagram is all about crystal stuff but there is an easy to understand connection between crystal energy levels E and e- ‘s occupying them. The confusion with momentum is that an e-’s real momentum is a particle not a wave property. Which brings us to the need for wavepackets.