Spokane River Dissolved Oxygen Total Maximum Daily Load WRIA 54 Planning Unit Drea Traeumer, Spokane River TMDL Lead February 28, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

(your state) Master Farmer Program
Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Howard County, MD Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan October 6, 2011 Howard Saltzman Howard County Department of Public Works.
Final Construction Stormwater General Permit Issued November 16, 2005 Jeff Killelea Department of Ecology.
Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Standards Program Status of Numeric Nutrient Criteria (NNC) Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration.
Phosphorus Loads from Streambank Erosion to Surface Waters in the Minnesota River Basin D. J. Mulla Professor, Dept. Soil, Water, Climate University of.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Public Workshop Implementation and Enforcement of Nutrient TMDLs for Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake CA Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water.
Dissolved Oxygen TMDL Dispute Resolution Hayden Area Regional Sewer Board, Idaho April 5, 2010.
“Universe” of potential phosphorus for trading Tributaries (Hangman, Little Spokane, Coulee) Mainstem groundwater Lake Spokane groundwater/surface water.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Questions to answer What is the overall modeling approach (after calibration and background scenarios)? What are the WLA assumptions? How will Avista’s.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
Introduction to TMDLs for Nutrients Presented by: Dr. Scott Emery January 15, 2009.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Anthony Whiley Environmental Engineer WA Department of Ecology ( ) Spokane River Phosphorus Ratios Preliminary.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Update: Spokane River DO TMDL Implementation ________________________ David Moore Washington State Department of Ecology Eastern Regional Office.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
Module 1: Stormwater Permit Program Robert Pitt Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL.
Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Upper Ocklawaha River DRAFT Basin Management Action Plan For the Implementation of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) Adopted by the Florida Department.
Orange County Board of County Commissioners Update on USEPA Rulemaking for Numeric Nutrient Criteria Utilities Department January 26, 2010 Utilities Department.
Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.
Eric Agnew Environmental Regulations February 15, 2006.
Introduction to the Clean Water Act And Water Quality Regulation Tracy Hester Environmental Law Fall 2015 September 15, 2015.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
MWCOG Water Resource Workshop “Preparing for Regulatory Change” February 20, 2004 Track 2: Panel #4 - Storm Water MS4 Regulation Paula Estornell, USEPA,
Some Context behind the Implementation of Numeric Nutrient Criteria or Why do we have these Water Quality Regulations? Mark W. Clark and Thomas Obreza.
VACo Environment and Agriculture Steering Committee VML Environmental Policy Committee June 2, 2010 Charlottesville, VA Chesapeake Bay Watershed Roanoke.
Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit.
DO TMDL Subcommittee Meeting June 19, A Bit of History ( ) Summer-Fall 2008 BAP discussion begins Study Proposal formulated Summer-Fall.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
FY 2016 EAP Proposals 1.Groundwater Sampling at Coulee Creek 2.Deep & Coulee Straight to Implementation Project 3.Little Spokane DO/pH TMDL 4.Lake Spokane.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Prepared By: Amaliyar Kamleshkumar ( ) Rathod Nikunj ( ) Parmar mukesh ( ) Patel Raj ( ) Ode Kiran ( )
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
1 Staff Public Workshops Fall 2011 Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Management of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems San Luis Obispo: October.
8/9/2011 CV-SALTS 1 Triennial Review Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins Betty Yee, Senior Engineer 9 August 2011.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective
Water Quality Credit Trading
Triennial Review Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins Betty Yee, Senior Engineer 9 August /9/2011 CV-SALTS.
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Presentation transcript:

Spokane River Dissolved Oxygen Total Maximum Daily Load WRIA 54 Planning Unit Drea Traeumer, Spokane River TMDL Lead February 28, 2007

Clean Water Act Section 303(d) States, territories, and authorized tribes must develop lists of impaired waters that do not meet water quality standardsStates, territories, and authorized tribes must develop lists of impaired waters that do not meet water quality standards Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) must be developed for the impaired watersTotal Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) must be developed for the impaired waters EPA is responsible for approving or disapproving TMDLsEPA is responsible for approving or disapproving TMDLs Goal of TMDLs is to ensure that impaired waters will attain water quality standardsGoal of TMDLs is to ensure that impaired waters will attain water quality standards

Clean Water Act Section 303(d) Specifies maximum amount (load) of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standardsSpecifies maximum amount (load) of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standards Allocates pollutant loads among point and nonpoint pollutant sourcesAllocates pollutant loads among point and nonpoint pollutant sources Point sources are discharged directly into surface waters from the end of a pipePoint sources are discharged directly into surface waters from the end of a pipe Nonpoint sources indirectly enter surface waters through surface runoff and erosion, and subsurface flowNonpoint sources indirectly enter surface waters through surface runoff and erosion, and subsurface flow

Spokane River DO TMDL Timeline Water quality standard for dissolved oxygen not metWater quality standard for dissolved oxygen not met Ecology’s TMDL set water quality target for phosphorus based on its relationship to DO (October 2004)Ecology’s TMDL set water quality target for phosphorus based on its relationship to DO (October 2004) Petitioners’ UAA defined attainable uses and criteria to protect use (December 2004)Petitioners’ UAA defined attainable uses and criteria to protect use (December 2004) Petitioners and Ecology agree to avoid lawsuit and negotiate settlement over UAA and TMDL (February 2005)Petitioners and Ecology agree to avoid lawsuit and negotiate settlement over UAA and TMDL (February 2005) Negotiation produced Foundational Concepts: 20-yr agreement to reduce phosphorus to target (July 2006)Negotiation produced Foundational Concepts: 20-yr agreement to reduce phosphorus to target (July 2006)

Foundational Concepts: Phosphorus Target TMDL uses a phosphorus concentration in units of millionths of grams per liter (µg/L)TMDL uses a phosphorus concentration in units of millionths of grams per liter (µg/L) 10 µg/L is the phosphorus target in Long Lake during the critical season (Apr – Oct) and for discharger effluent10 µg/L is the phosphorus target in Long Lake during the critical season (Apr – Oct) and for discharger effluent 10 µg/L phosphorus target is expected to be achieved by dischargers in first 10 years of implementation plan10 µg/L phosphorus target is expected to be achieved by dischargers in first 10 years of implementation plan 10 µg/L phosphorus target is enforceable at 20 th year of implementation plan10 µg/L phosphorus target is enforceable at 20 th year of implementation plan

Key Findings Foundational Concepts: Key Findings Current treatment technology cannot consistently meet target of 10 µg/L at end of pipe for dischargersCurrent treatment technology cannot consistently meet target of 10 µg/L at end of pipe for dischargers The difference between what treatment technology can meet and the target is called the ‘Delta’The difference between what treatment technology can meet and the target is called the ‘Delta’ Dischargers will have to work to eliminate the Delta to meet target of 10 µg/L in Long LakeDischargers will have to work to eliminate the Delta to meet target of 10 µg/L in Long Lake After 10 years, process is reviewedAfter 10 years, process is reviewed

10 µg/L How Will 10 µg/L Target Be Met? Aggressive, managed approach to remove phosphorus from variety of sources over next 20 yearsAggressive, managed approach to remove phosphorus from variety of sources over next 20 years Managed Implementation Plan (based on Foundational Concepts) that provides reasonable assurance phosphorus target 10 µg/L of will be met in first 10 yearsManaged Implementation Plan (based on Foundational Concepts) that provides reasonable assurance phosphorus target 10 µg/L of will be met in first 10 years

Managed Implementation Plan Install most effective, feasible treatment technologies with objective to meet 50 µg/L interim targetInstall most effective, feasible treatment technologies with objective to meet 50 µg/L interim target Plan and schedule actions aimed at eliminating the DeltaPlan and schedule actions aimed at eliminating the Delta Critical 10 th year assessment of DO response to reduced phosphorusCritical 10 th year assessment of DO response to reduced phosphorus Required actions for dischargers are enforceable over 20-yr life of MIPRequired actions for dischargers are enforceable over 20-yr life of MIP

Required Actions –Develop treatment technology selection protocol –Prepare engineering reports –Interim limits based on engineering reports –Develop Delta Elimination Plan: Water conservationWater conservation Water re-useWater re-use Source controlSource control Nonpoint source controlNonpoint source control –Ecology reviews and acts expeditiously

Available Actions Re-use “Class A” reclaimed water instead of sending it to the riverRe-use “Class A” reclaimed water instead of sending it to the river Phosphorus source control opportunities like limiting urban fertilizer and dishwashing detergent usePhosphorus source control opportunities like limiting urban fertilizer and dishwashing detergent use Regional nonpoint source reduction programRegional nonpoint source reduction program Septic tank elimination programSeptic tank elimination program

10 th Year Assessment Assess DO status using best available dataAssess DO status using best available data Assess which actions have/have not been productiveAssess which actions have/have not been productive Consider completed research on sediment oxygen demand, episodic events (summer storms), river oxygenationConsider completed research on sediment oxygen demand, episodic events (summer storms), river oxygenation Determine if standards can be met with further action or if they need to be modifiedDetermine if standards can be met with further action or if they need to be modified Using collaborative approach, set actions for the time remaining until 2027Using collaborative approach, set actions for the time remaining until 2027

Next Steps 30-day public comment period Spokane River DO TMDL (April 2007)30-day public comment period Spokane River DO TMDL (April 2007) EPA finalizes TMDL (June 2007)EPA finalizes TMDL (June 2007) Technology Selection ProtocolTechnology Selection Protocol Delta Elimination PlansDelta Elimination Plans Engineering ReportsEngineering Reports Interim LimitsInterim Limits Creation of Oversight CommitteeCreation of Oversight Committee

Contacts and Information Spokane River Webpages _basin.htmhttp:// _basin.htm Ecology Publications