Fta circular background PIERCE TRANSIT’S NEW TITLE VI POLICIES Jay Peterson Senior Manager, Transit Development 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome! RGRTA Title VI & Public Participation Plans.
Advertisements

Campaign for a Fair Transfer Vivian Satterfield, OPAL Associate Director Jared Franz, OPAL Law & Policy Associate Eavan Moore, BRU Research & Advisory.
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Principles Policies Guidance to FTA Recipients FTA Circular A, “Title VI and Title VI-Dependent Guidelines.
Title VI and Fares March 18, 2013 Jonathan Ocana Equal Opportunity Specialist.
IndyGo Proposed Title VI Policies.  Education, Transparency, Public Feedback  Agenda ◦ Introduction to Title VI  Federal Transit Administration Circular.
Limited English Proficiency and the Fair Housing Act
Eco Pass Program Evaluation Update SVLG Transportation Policy Committee October
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
Welcome! Introductions Agenda: 1.General Title VI requirements 2.LEP 3.Urbanized Area Title VI Requirements 4.Service and Fare Equity Analysis 2.
GIS for Title VI Compliance
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
Cheryl Thole, Jennifer Flynn CUTR/NBRTI, Senior Research Associates Transit in GIS Conference September 14, 2011 St. Petersburg, Florida.
Environmental Justice: Policies, Guidance, and Answers to Frequently Asked Questions FTA Region VII Civil Rights Training.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Service Recommendations September 9, 2014.
Public Transportation & Persons With Special Transportation Needs House Transportation Committee February 12, 2013 Tom Hingson Transportation Services.
Public Transit in Sacramento
Advancing equity through Thrive MSP 2040 Equity: The Superior Growth Model.
PLEASE SIGN IN 1 Welcome to the Title VI Plan Workshop.
Human Services Coordinated Transportation Plan Thursday July 20, 2006 GF City Hall Rm A102.
Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Study Overview and Initial Existing Conditions September 2011 In association with: LSA Design and Public Solutions.
“No person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of,
What is HST Coordination? Human Services Transportation Transportation for three distinct population groups: older adults, individuals with disabilities,
Access Services Inc. Access Paratransit Operations.
ADA Complimentary Paratransit in the Atlanta Region TCC Presentation March 09, 2012.
Introductions Introduction to TCAG Federal Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Responsible for long-term planning for all modes of surface transportation.
FARE STUDY ECOPASS RECOMMENDATION Operations & Customer Service Committee September 8, 2015.
Sullivan County Coordinated Transportation Plan Proposed Coordinated Transportation Plan.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
Jacksboro Highway Walmart Supercenter Opening Fall 2014.
1 TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REVIEW Balancing Transit Service with Travel Demand and Available Resources.
Title VI “No person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits.
Cost-Effective Accessible Transportation Alternatives in Rural Areas: Examples from the US Transed 2012 Delhi, India September 17-21, 2012.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Title VI and Public Transit Service and Fare Equity Analyses APTA Marketing Seminar February 2015.
A MBER O NTIVEROS (O NTIVEROS & A SSOCIATES ) E THAN C ONNER -R OSS (E CONSULT S OLUTIONS ) July 13, 2015 Title VI Implications of State of Good Repair.
Title VI Program Overview Benjamin Limmer Valley Metro Corridor & Facility Development Manager Phoenix, AZ.
Morgan County Transit Discussion UTA Corporate Staff Presentation November 19, 2013.
Title VI “No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits.
00 Metropolitan Transit System Transit Serving Point Loma September 23, 2008.
1 TPB Access for All Committee’s Recommendations on Transit Services for People with Disabilities John Hudson TPB Access for All Advisory Committee Presentation.
A Simple Methodology to Evaluate the Disproportionate Impacts of Fare and Service Changes on Protected Populations in a Fixed Guide-way System By Vijay.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
Ride in Kane Paratransit Service Kane County. Ride in Kane was established in 2008 through the efforts of the Kane County Paratransit Coordinating Counsel.
Jennifer Dill Marc Schlossberg Linda Cherrington Suzie Edrington Jonathan Brooks Donald Hayward Oana McKinney Neal Downing Martin Catala.
Transit Choices BaltimoreLink Ad-hoc Committee Meeting January 12, 2016.
Increasing Success & Credibility of Your Service Through End-User Involvement.
Access Pasco 10-Year Transit Development Plan ( ) October 2013.
System Highlights Community Coach. Who We Are History and Milestones Who We Serve Future Transit Opportunities CTD Report Indian River Transit GoLine.
Transportation Fee FY2016 January 16, Services Provided by Transportation Stinger Buses - Three routes with 10 buses operating weekdays and two.
Indianapolis Public Public Hearing – Proposed 2014 Budget Thursday, August 15, 2013 Transportation Corporation.
Transit-Oriented Communities Division 2016 Title VI Program Update Overview.
Transportation Fee MSFAC Meeting 12/06/ Transportation Summary Typical Service Day during Semester: Tech Trolley – 6,200 riders & 240 trips Red.
MODULE 2 - LESSON 3 The Americans with Disabilities Act and Civil Rights Dr. Jill Hough Public Transportation Class.
Sponsored by: Equitable Access to Transportation – Connecting Residents to Jobs and to Healthcare.
Comprehensive Route Network Analysis
Title VI Program Overview
Presentation Objectives
Prince George Transit : Fall 2017 Expansion
HB 2017 Transit Advisory Committee January 19, 2018
Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA)
An Overview Title VI Applicability Public Outreach Fare Policy
Data Collection: Title VI and Environmental Justice Requirements
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
Fta circular background
GMT NextGen Update CVRPC TAC
Shenandoah County Public Transit Feasibility Study
Draft Fiscal Year Bus Service Plan
Embracing Your Title VI Program
Presentation transcript:

Fta circular background PIERCE TRANSIT’S NEW TITLE VI POLICIES Jay Peterson Senior Manager, Transit Development 1

2

Fta circular background 3 Service Hours

4

Fta circular background  New Adopted Policies  Development of Policies  Public Outreach  Equity Analysis 5 PIERCE TRANSIT’S NEW TITLE VI POLICIES OVERVIEW

Fta circular background New Policies Required by FTA 6 Major Service Change – What is “major” to your agency’s service area? Disparate Impact – Unintentional discrimination based on race, color, or national origin resulting from a neutral policy Disproportionate Burden – Affects low income populations more than non-low income populations as a result of neutral policy PIERCE TRANSIT’S NEW TITLE VI POLICIES

Fta circular background 7 TITLE VI EQUITY ANALYSIS

Fta circular background 8 MAJOR SERVICE CHANGE POLICY A major service change is defined as any change in service on any individual route that would add or eliminate more than twenty percent of the route revenue miles or twenty percent of the route revenue hours. >20% change=equity analysis required Adverse effect =reduction in service based on time or geography 20 %

Fta circular background 9 PIERCE TRANSIT’S NEW TITLE VI POLICIES  New circular  Webinars  Other transit agencies  Coordinate with FTA  Our demographics  Our ridership

10 Our Community Service Area Minority Population 41% Service Area Low Income Population 12.4%

Fta circular background 11 DISPARATE IMPACT POLICY A disparate impact occurs when the minority population adversely affected by a fare or service change is ten percent more than the average minority population of Pierce Transit’s service area. PHOTO 10 %

Fta circular background 12 DISPROPORTIONATE BURDEN POLICY A disproportionate burden occurs when the low-income population adversely affected by a fare or service change is five percent more than the average low-income population of Pierce Transit’s service area. PHOTO 5%

13 Our Community Service Area Minority Population 41% Service Area Low Income Population 12.4%

Fta circular background 14 PUBLIC OUTREACH Thurs., Jan.31, 4:30-6:30pm Community Transportation Advisory Group Pierce Transit Training Center Served by Routes 48 & 300 Tue., Feb 5, 4:30-6:30pm Community Open House Sheridan Elem. School Served by Routes 42, 54 & 56 Wed., Feb. 6, 11:30 - 1:30pm Community Open House Centro Latino Served by Routes 28 & 57 Mon., Feb. 11, 4:00pm Public Hearing Pierce Transit Training Center Served by Routes 48 & 300

Revised Service Reductions 417,000 annual service hours to 300,000 Board Adopted: Weekday and Limited Weekend Weekdays 36 routes operating 1250 daily trips Limited service after 7 pm Limited mid-day service Saturdays 24 routes operating 456 trips No service after 7:00 pm Limited service during mid-day Sundays 15 routes operating 244 trips No service after 7:00 pm Limited service during mid-day HolidaysNo Service EliminatedRoute 62 SHUTTLE SHUTTLE paratransit service for eligible people with disabilities operates during the same days and times as local bus service. As bus service is reduced or eliminated, SHUTTLE service will also be reduced or eliminated.

16 SERVICE REDUCTIONS BY ROUTE Route No Reduction in HOURS (%) Reduction in MILES (%) Route No System Reduction in HOURS (%) Reduction in MILES (%)

17 Summary of Service Change Minority Proportion of Population Census Blocks Along Routes Average Population in Service Area Difference Frequency and/or Span of Service Reductions 42.8%41.0%1.8% Disparate Impact Analysis Routes with a reduction of 20% or more in revenue hours and / or revenue miles Difference>10%? No = No Disparate Impact

Disproportio nate Burden Analysis Summary of Service Change Low Income Proportion of Population Census Tracts Along Routes Average Population in Service Area Difference Frequency and/or Span of Service Reductions 13.2%12.4%0.8% 18 Routes with a reduction of 20% or more in revenue hours and / or revenue miles Difference >5%? No = No Disproportionate Burden

19 Summary of Service Change Minority Proportion of PopulationLow Income Proportion of Population Census Blocks Along Routes Average Population in Service Area Difference Census Tracts Along Routes Average Population in Service Area Difference Route Elimination 38.9%41.0%-2.1%6.3%12.4%-6.1%

Fta circular background 20 TITLE VI ANALYSIS SUMMARY September 2013 Service Change:  “Major” (i.e. a change of >20%) for 23 of 37 routes  Time based changes to 22 routes and elimination of one route result in:  No disparate impact to minority populations  No disproportionate burden to low income populations