Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality 701.328.5242.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Advertisements

O Adopted in 1972, the CWA is known mostly to the public by its mandate for “swimmable and fishable” waterways. o With the CWA, states evaluate all of.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee August 24, 2010 Metro Permit Reissuance Proposed.
Water Quality Standards-based Effluent Limitations: Fate versus Self-determination Bill Van Derveer.
1 Mixing Zones, Reasonable Potential Analysis, and Permit Limits A Quick Overview Steve Schnurbusch Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
Truckee River Water Quality: Current Conditions and Trends Relevant to TMDLs and WLAs Prepared for: Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility. City of.
The WQCD Permitting Perspective Janet Kieler Permits Section Manager.
WWTF’s MPCA Permit Renewal January 14,  Our current NPDES permit expired Sept. 30,  NPDES permits are a 5 year term.  Upon expiration,
Controlled Discharge Lagoons 2 Cell vs. 3 Cell Bacteria & Ammonia Performance.
EPA’s Guidance on Nutrient Criteria Development
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
Lake Studies Impaired Waters Waters are classified as impaired when they fail to meet state water quality standards and have been placed on the federal.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin Alabama Water Resources Conference September 6, 2012 A Feasibility Study of Nutrient Trading in Support of.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Questions to answer What is the overall modeling approach (after calibration and background scenarios)? What are the WLA assumptions? How will Avista’s.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Justification of Review of Water Quality Standards for Nutrients and other Constituents Randy Pahl, NDEP.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
Nutrient Standards – Where will they lead? OWEA / WEF Webinar February 24, 2011 Dan Dudley, Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Water Policy in the US and the EU K H Reckhow and C Pahl-Wostl Part I: US Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
Watersheds on Wall Street? Water Pollutant Trading Becky Shannon, Missouri Department of Natural Resources Craig Smith, University of Missouri Extension.
Paonia/Collbran Low Flow Presentation Water Quality Work Group Meeting June 9, 2004.
Nutrient and Sediment Concentrations, Yields and Loads in Impaired Streams and Rivers in the Taunton River Basin, Massachusetts, Jeffrey R. Barbaro.
JT Petty: WMAN 445 Lecture Notes Lecture 5.2: STATE POLICY.
Implementation of Antidegradation Policies for Indiana Waters.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Ministry of the Environment Certificates of Approval for an Anaerobic Digestion Facility Post Construction DIGGING INTO BIOGAS DETAILS WORKSHOP April 5,
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Regulations that Protect Clean Water Jocelyn Mullen, P.E. PART 2 OF PRESENTATION Presented at The Water Course January 27, 2010 Mesa County Water Association.
WATERSHED PERMITTING IN NORTH CAROLINA NPDES PERMIT NCC BECAME EFFECTIVE JAN 1, 2003 NEUSE RIVER COMPLIANCE ASSOCIATION MORRIS V. BROOKHART, P.E.
Changes in Phosphorus Concentrations and Loads in the Assabet River Following Mandated Reductions in Wastewater Treatment Plant Discharges U.S. Geological.
Implementation Procedures (IPs) Brittany Lee Standards Implementation Team
Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.
Orange County Board of County Commissioners Update on USEPA Rulemaking for Numeric Nutrient Criteria Utilities Department January 26, 2010 Utilities Department.
Designing De Minimis Indiana Antidegradation Workshop April 29, 2008 Brad Klein -- Environmental Law & Policy Center.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
Lake Jesup BMAP Adoption Environmental Protection Division February 23, 2010.
James A. Klang, PE Senior Project Engineer Kieser & Associates, LLC 536 E. Michigan Ave., Suite 300 Kalamazoo, MI America’s Ag Water Management Summit.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
Kentucky Growth Readiness for Water Quality Does your water quality matter?
Our Case Study. Rationale for study The TMDL model assumes that there is no decrease in seepage during low flow conditions, basing its calculations on.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Surface Water Monitoring Pam Anderson, MPCA May 20 th, 2015.
Antidegradation and Alternatives Analysis Mary E. Gardner Regulatory Programs Administrator Littleton/Englewood WWTP Colorado.
ANTIDEGRADATION and THE BENEFITS OF PUMP LOGS FOR BATCH DISCHARGES Given by: Dan Murray, Terrell Hendren and Josh Frazier.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
BMW Association 2006 Barr Lake and Milton Reservoir Watershed Management Plan ~ Brief History of the Reservoirs ~ Overview of the BMW Association ~ Outline.
PUBLIC HEARING September 15, Draft NPDES Permits for ArcelorMittal Facilities Indiana Harbor West, Central Wastewater Treatment Plant, Indiana.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Material Contribution to the Condition SB325 Rulemaking Stakeholder Meeting February 23, 2016.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
Integrated Watershed Management
Arkansas Dept. of Environmental Quality Regulation No
NH MS4 Stormwater Permit -- Guidance for NHDES related provisions
Unresolved Reg 2 Issues and Triennial Review Preview Raymond E
Debra S. Baker and Donald G. Huggins
Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework
Spencer Bohaboy Policy Development Specialist Water Quality Policy
Mercury TMDL Review & Permitting Strategy Update
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Implementation of Water Quality Standards and the WQ Based Approach
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Presentation transcript:

Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality

10/14/20142 Receiving Stream Protect the near-field and far-field waterbody – River/stream/lake – Based on a water quality standard (narrative), total maximum daily load (TMDL), observed impacts, response variables, accelerated monitoring – Total nitrogen for streams – Total phosphorus for lakes and reservoirs

10/14/20143 Developing Loads and Concentrations Technology Based Effluent Limitation (TBEL) Water Quality Based Effluent Limitation (WQBEL) Certain types of facilities will have established TBELs Other types, such as Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs), may have WQBELs More stringent WQBELs could be applied to facilities with TBELs

10/14/20144 Developing Loads and Concentrations Need to consider magnitude, duration and frequency of the discharge and loading Review background and support documentation, as well as response variables – Existing TMDL – 2000 Ecoregional Nutrient Criteria – 1986 Gold Book – Chloraphyll a

10/14/20145 Developing Loads and Concentrations Can use the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Technical Support Document to conduct a reasonable potential analysis to determine loads and concentrations Selection of critical stream and effluent flow will need to be established Selection of critical stream and effluent concentrations will need to be established

10/14/20146 Translation to a Permit Individual and general permits – Standard individual and general permits for facilities in a watershed may have different permit cycles Watershed permits – One permit for all facilities in a watershed – The effluent limitations for each facility in the watershed are established at the same time

10/14/20147 Translation to a Permit Nutrient trading – Probably want to avoid – Have to set up a nutrient trading program – Contracts between facilities – Facilities with TBELs cannot trade above the TBEL

10/14/20148 Translation to a Permit Variances – Probably try to avoid variances for small lagoon system – Small lagoons may be a small contributor – May require seasonal discharges instead

10/14/20149 Translation to a Permit Seasonal limitations – Different limitations may be established based on the season (summer vs. winter) Compliance schedules may be established to meet limitations Antidegradation procedures will need to be followed if a facility cannot meet nutrient limitations

10/14/ Conclusion The North Dakota Department of Health will need to establish protocols for including nutrient criteria within permits – Background information that will be considered – Critical flows and concentrations – Permitting approach (individual, general and watershed permits) – Nutrient trading – Variances – Type of limitations – Compliance schedules – Antidegradation

10/14/ Discussion