Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NIH Public Access Compliance Cleveland Health Sciences Library Case Western Reserve University Kathleen C. Blazar.
Advertisements

MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
CREATING AN INTERNSHIP CONSORTIUM Linda K. Knauss, Ph.D., ABPP NCSPP 2007.
Project Option Ass Prof Peter Hill School of Population Health.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Christina Hansen, Assistant Vice Chancellor Bob Johnson, Research Librarian for Nursing & Allied Health May 2008 NIH Public Access Policy UCI Libraries.
NOAA Data Sharing Policy for Grants and Cooperative Agreements Ingrid Guch NOAA Environmental Data Management Committee.
Complying with the NIH Public Access Policy Lisa Oberg, M. Libr. Associate Director for Public and Research Services.
RESPONSIBLE AUTHORSHIP Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University Adapted from Scientific Integrity: An Internet-based course in.
Responsible Conduct of Research & Research Compliance Adam J. Rubenstein, Ph.D. Director of Research Compliance Old Dominion University Office of Research.
Institutional Compliance with the NIH Public Access Policy: Ensuring Deposit Rights, March 7, 2008 Sponsored by The Association of Research Libraries (ARL)
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities Peer Review Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities.
Columbia University IRB IRB 101 September 21, 2005 George Gasparis, Executive Director, CU IRB Asst. V.P. and Sr. Asst. Dean for Research Ethics.
2.2 Data Group Membership: Reeves (chair), Lloyd, Morse. Reports to SSC. This group will be responsible for preparation of the AMMA-UK Data Protocol, which.
IRB Basics Helen Panageas New York University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board Portion of slides courtesy of Suzanne M. Smith, University.
1 Dissertation & Comprehensive Exam Process Dissertation Process Comprehensive Exam.
1 NIH PUBLIC ACCESS POLICY Overview Office of Research & Sponsored Programs Compliance Subgroup 1, 2 & 3 Meeting April 1, 2008.
NIH Proposed Use of a Central IRB (C-IRB) for NIH-funded multi-site studies Committee on Clinical Research January 26,
Communicating With Your Program Director : Understanding the Who, Why & How Elisa Woodhouse Division of Cancer Biology New Grantee Workshop March 18, 2015.
1 Dissertation Process 4 process overview 4 specifics –dates, policies, etc.
NIH Public Access Policy What it means to OHSU Researchers Presented by: Andrew Hamilton Date: 3/18/2007.
1 NIH Public Access Policy Policy on Enhancing Public Access to Archived Publications Resulting From NIH-Funded Research (Public Access Policy)
Best Practices for Graduate Supervision December 10, 2014 Your Role in Graduate Studies.
1 Module 4: Post-Award Administration of Sponsored Projects (Part 1) Office of Research and Sponsored Programs The University of Mississippi 100 Barr Hall.
ERA Commons and Progress Reports How PIs and the NIH Communicate Elisa Woodhouse Division of Cancer Biology New Grantee Workshop March 12, 2014.
Complying with the NIH Public Access Policy: Depositing manuscripts in PubMed Central Julie Speer, Lori Critz, Michelle Powell Office of Organizational.
Libra: Thesis and Dissertation Submission. What is Libra? UVA’s institutional repository, providing online archiving and access for the scholarly output.
Title of presentation umanitoba.ca Research Ethics at the U of M Academic Integrity at the University of Manitoba Human Ethics Animal Ethics.
The US CLIVAR SSC is undertaking an examination of progress made and priority science questions and research needs remaining to be addressed to: – improve.
What Expectations Does the University have of Supervisors? Professor Rod Devenish, Academic Director, MIGR.
ACCESS for VALIDITY ACCESS for INNOVATION. Starting January 2011 for NEW proposals Not voluntary – “integral part” of proposal and FastLane Required for.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
SAON Data Management Workshop Report June 7-8, 2010, Norway Recommendations (Extracted by Jan René Larsen, 25 September 2012),
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
T-PARC Operations Plan Outline Chapter 1. T-PARC Overview Chapter 2 Scientific Mission Planning Organization and Intensive Observing Period Definition.
Common PSMFC “data use agreement or policy” Overview of current data sharing in PTAGIS, RMIS, StreamNet.
ESEA - Non-public Equitable Services Annual Consultation Meeting for Participating Schools Office of Consolidated Planning & MonitoringOffice of Consolidated.
The Process of Accreditation
Data Management during GEOTRACES Data Management sub-committee: Reiner Schlitzer, Jing Zhang, Bill Jenkins, Chris Measures Scientific.
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.
DRAFT EDMC Procedural Directives NOAA Environmental Data Management Committee 12/3/2015 1
Regulations and Procedures Please ensure you are familiar with the regulations surrounding examination as laid out in the Research Degree Regulatory Framework.
Proposition 1 Workshop: the Grant Application Process July 2015.
The United States Department of Transportation. The United States Department of Transportation Public Access Plan is still under development and is subject.
DOE Data Management Plan Requirements
Thesis Defense and Submission 1 Spring  Register for Spring semester  Deadline to submit thesis to GPS: Friday, April 22 nd at NOON  Deadline.
West Virginia University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Transforming Graduate Education and Research.
Implementing NIH Deposit Policies: Institutional Strategies at the University of Minnesota CNI Spring Task Force Meeting April 7-8, 2008 Minneapolis, MN.
VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION SLIDE 0 New Requirements for VA ORD Investigators: Implementation of Data Management and Access Plans.
1 The NIH Public Access Requirement [short presentation] June 2013.
Data Management Practices for Early Career Scientists: Closing Robert Cook Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN.
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM t Selection and Employment of Consultants Negotiations with Consultants; Monitoring Performance of Consultants; Resolving Disputes.
A research proposal is a document written for the purpose of obtaining funding for a research project.
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
2017 Convening & Collaborating (C2) Awards
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
Open Access, Research Funders, Research Data, and the REF
Implementation Strategy July 2002
GIRO usage and GSICS Lunar Observation Dataset Policy S. Wagner
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
SCD Grants & Contracts Policy & Procedure 670.
Open Access and Compliance with NIH Public Access Policy
Equitable Services Sections 1117 and 8501 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA),
Roles and Responsibilities
GDPR PERSONDATAFORORDNINGEN I PRAKSIS
Fort Valley State University
Protocol Approval Criteria
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and Discover Data

2

3

4

Definition of an NACP Core Project Projects funded as extramural awards and designated as part of the NACP at the time of selection and award. These projects address the goals and objectives of the NACP and contribute relevant research products within the timeframe of the program. Selection or award letters explain expected NACP participation. Projects funded as extramural awards and designated as part of the NACP subsequent to the award being made. Agency program leads and the project PI determine that an effort is relevant to the NACP and that the project will contribute relevant research products within the timeframe of the program. Program managers and project investigators reach a mutual understanding regarding whether a project should participate in NACP, and program managers document that participation by correspondence with the PI or investigator team. 5

Projects funded through intramural mechanisms to conduct NACP research or to provide specific measurements, datasets, or other products for NACP. PIs or primary contacts will be identified for each major project or task, and titles and abstracts will be developed, allowing these tasks to be tracked in a manner similar to projects funded through extramural mechanisms. In consultation with task leaders and their managers, agency program leads will document commitments to NACP through appropriate correspondence. Standing agency activities, including those that may have another primary mission, that agency program leads commit to participate in NACP or to provide specific measurements, data sets, or other products. PIs or primary contacts will be identified for each major project or task, and titles and abstracts will be developed, allowing these tasks to be tracked in a manner similar to projects funded through extramural mechanisms. In consultation with the project or task leaders and their managers, agency program leads will document commitments to NACP through appropriate correspondence. 6

Definition of NACP Affiliated Projects Agency program leads may request that research investigations, research projects, or operational programs or projects with core missions and goals different from those of the NACP cooperate in some way with the NACP. Such cooperation might involve provision of specialized data sets or performance of specific services (e.g., satellite data acquisition/processing; computer time and support; access to research aircraft; etc.). The agency program lead will document a mutual agreement with the project lead and funding sponsor(s) as to the nature and scope of the cooperation. The cooperating project will be expected to follow applicable NACP policies and practices for the activities within the scope of the agreement and consistent with their own operating policies. Individual researchers conducting relevant research may request to affiliate with the NACP for a variety of reasons. To be eligible, investigators must demonstrate the relevance of their research to NACP, agree to follow applicable NACP policies and practices, and secure their funding sponsor’s agreement to the affiliation.. 7

Responsibilities of NACP Participants PIs, co-investigators, and project managers of NACP core projects are expected to participate fully in the program, including attendance at program meetings, service on working groups, coordination with other NACP projects, sharing data and results in accordance with NACP policies, and collaboration on synthesis and integration research. They are expected to acknowledge program participation in relevant presentations, on posters, and in publications. Participants in NACP affiliated projects are expected to interact with the NACP and participate commensurate with the scope of their agreed- upon involvement. At a minimum, attendance at some meetings and compliance with data policies applicable to their agreed-upon involvement may be expected. It is anticipated that most affiliated project investigators will participate as fully as possible, consistent with the resources they are able to use for NACP involvement. 8

NACP Data Policy For the purposes of this Policy, the term "NACP data" shall mean the primary observations, monitoring data, site characterization information, model output, remotely sensed products, and ancillary data specifically supported by U.S. agencies to meet the goals outlined in the NACP Science Implementation Strategic Plan. Data Archiving NACP metadata and data products, including value-added products and model input and output generated by the program, need to be archived when the data sets are finalized or at the completion of NACP. …A data archive plan developed early in NACP will ensure survival, integrity, long-term stewardship, and access to NACP data and metadata. Long-term data archives must include easily accessible information about the data holdings, including quality assessments, version of the data or model input and output, supporting ancillary information, and guidance and aids for locating and obtaining the data. 9

Sharing Data Full, open, and timely sharing of the full suite of North American data sets for all NACP researchers is a fundamental objective. All data and associated metadata are to be made available to every NACP investigator as soon as feasible but no later than 12 months after acquisition. For those programs in which selected Pis have a period of exclusive data use longer than 12 months, data must be made openly available as soon after that period as possible. In each case, the agency sponsoring the data collection will explicitly define the duration of any exclusive use period. Data will be analyzed cooperatively by all scientists involved in obtaining them. In addition, NACP data will be made available in preliminary form to NACP investigators to enable preliminary analysis and intercomparison with other data sets. Corrections and refinements to data products will be made as the analysis proceeds. Revisions will be noted, and investigators and the NACP data system will maintain version control. 10

Credit to Data Collectors When data are used by others in publications or in modeling or integrating studies during the course of NACP, the scientist collecting the data will be credited appropriately, either by co-authorship, citation, or acknowledgement. For data that have not been published, the data originators must be informed of analysis and publication plans well in advance of submission of a paper, given an opportunity to read the manuscript, and, if appropriate, be offered co-authorship. In cases where unpublished data from other investigators are a minor contribution to a paper, the data are to be referenced by a citation or acknowledgement. Users of the data must state the primary source of the data as well as the version number. 11

Protecting the rights of students Universities require that key data collected by graduate students should not be published prior to submitting a thesis or dissertation because to do so can jeopardize the student’s academic interests. As a result, data collected specifically for a student’s thesis or dissertation are not subject to the data sharing obligations of this policy until after the student has completed their degree. This special consideration will be limited to 2 years after data collection for a masters student and 3 years after collection for a doctoral candidate. Acknowledging NACP NACP investigators will include an acknowledgement in each publication or presentation arising from participation in NACP. The wording shall be similar to the following: “This study was part of the North American Carbon Program.” Data providers and funding agencies may request additional acknowledgements. Upon publication of results, investigators should send the NACP Office an electronic copy of the publication. 12

13

14

15

16

17