The Sustainability and Energy Performance Analysis of Bernard Weatherill House (BWH) Kyle Gerlach Tyler Howard Ben List Juan Parra
The Taberner House Rationale of Project 1: Introduction The Bernard Weatherill House
2: Background The Project Worcester Polytechnic Institute Interactive Qualifying Project –14 weeks –Report
3: Methodology Methodology Findings 4: Findings 3.1 Building Design Review 3.1 Building Design Review 3.3 Predicted vs. In-Use Energy Consumption 3.3 Predicted vs. In-Use Energy Consumption 3.4 Assess Occupant Opinions 3.4 Assess Occupant Opinions 3.5 Energy Management Software and Bureau provider Portfolio 3.5 Energy Management Software and Bureau provider Portfolio 3.7 Submit Deliverables (Portfolio, Visuals, Presentation) 3.7 Submit Deliverables (Portfolio, Visuals, Presentation) 3.2 Building Energy Management Analysis 3.2 Building Energy Management Analysis Time EvaluationRecommendation 4.1 Building Design Review 4.1 Building Design Review 4.3 Predicted vs. In-Use Energy Consumption 4.3 Predicted vs. In-Use Energy Consumption 4.4 Assess Occupant Opinions 4.4 Assess Occupant Opinions 4.5 Energy Management Software and Bureau provider Portfolio 4.5 Energy Management Software and Bureau provider Portfolio 4.6 Create Visual Tools for Public Communication 4.6 Create Visual Tools for Public Communication 4.2 Building Energy Management Analysis 4.2 Building Energy Management Analysis 4.6 Create Visual Tools for Public Communication 4.6 Create Visual Tools for Public Communication
The BREEAM Design can be Improved Finding #1 Energy Strategy and BREEAM Assessment Difficult to Understand BWH Design Plan Recommendation: Locate or obtain a post-construction BREEAM Accreditation
Trend Sensors are Improperly Calibrated Finding #2 Building Energy Analytics Trend Control Points are Unintuitively Named Data TypeAccuracy Lighting76.1% Small Power67.5% Pumps & Cooling 81.4% “Town Hall 16A” “Chiller Shunt 05A” Recommendations: Rename Trend sensors and aggregate them appropriately Recalibrate Trend sensors
Finding #3 Energy Building Performance Electricity Use is 42.3 % Higher than Predicted Recommendations: Regulate Small Power Devices at BWH Restrict After-Hours Work to One Floor Small Power is 29% Higher than Predicted Lighting Usage is 4.2 % Less than PredictedPV Panels are withing 15% of Predicted Values
Finding #4 Energy Management Companies 8 Companies Available for Energy Management Options: Scenario 1: Keep TEAM Sigma Scenario 2: TEAM Bureau Services Scenario 3: Switch Providers Entirely 8 Boroughs Use Similar Energy Management
34% Know of BWH BREEAM Accreditation Finding #5 Occupant Satisfaction/Awareness 79% Believe BWH is a Better Environment Recommendations: Increase recycling participation in BWH Increase occupant awareness of BWH features with visual tools
Finding #6 Visual Tools Energy Management Offers Energy DashboardsSankey Diagrams are Effective Visual Tools Data for Complete Sankey Data is not Available Recommendations: Online dashboards of utility information should be published Continuous production of Sankey Diagrams Display visuals in elevator floor lobbies
Thank You! Questions? Questions