BESAC Grand Challenge Subcommittee Update and Status John Sarrao Los Alamos National Laboratory 12/03/14

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Report of the Committee of Visitors Energy Frontier Research Centers and Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis Energy Innovation Hub Office of Basic.
Supporting an Essential Platform for the Knowledge Base David Harman.
The Role of Environmental Monitoring in the Green Economy Strategy K Nathan Hill March 2010.
The Changing Face of Higher Ed and the Role of IT as a Strategic Enabler Dave Wallace Chief Information Officer University of Waterloo December 4, 2012.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Dr. Daniel A. Hitchcock October 21, 2003
Quanta to the Continuum: Opportunities for Mesoscale Science 1 meso2012.com John Sarrao George Crabtree BESAC, July 2012 As always, thanks for a valuable.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Advanced Scientific Computing Research Program NERSC Users Group Meeting Department of Energy Update June 12,
Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) Presentation to: SBE Advisory Committee By: Dr. Kaye Husbands Fealing National Science Foundation November.
How do Remarkable Properties of Matter Emerge from Complex Correlations of the Atomic or Electronic Constituents and How Can We Control These Properties?
Sept. 18, 2008SLUO 2008 Annual Meeting Vision for SLAC Science Persis S. Drell Director SLAC.
BERAC Charge A recognized strength of the Office of Science, and BER is no exception, is the development of tools and technologies that enable science.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Dr. Raymond L. Orbach Under Secretary for Science U.S. Department.
From the IT Assessment to the IT Roadmap ( )
The NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
1 BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present, Shaping the Future Dr. Harriet Kung Director, Office of Basic Energy Sciences Office of Science U.S. Department.
SKA-cba-ase NSF and Science of Design Avogadro Scale Engineering Center for Bits & Atoms November 18-19, 2003 Kamal Abdali Computing & Communication.
BESAC 29 July 2014 Patricia M. Dehmer Acting Director, Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy.
Transformational Opportunity Summary John Sarrao 12/04/14.
Reorganization at NCAR Presentation to the UCAR Board of Trustees February 25, 2004.
Opportunities for Discovery: Theory and Computation in Basic Energy Sciences Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Response to BESAC Subcommittee.
NIH Roadmap for Medical Research and Common Fund Update on Recent Changes Dinah Singer, Ph.D. Director, Division of Cancer Biology June 18, 2008.
Finding a Home at the NSF for Your Chemical Biology Proposal George L. Kenyon April 30, 2009 Scripps Research Institute.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
Basic Energy Sciences The Charge The Objective The Context The Message The Vehicle The Recommendations New Science for a Secure and Sustainable Energy.
Strategic Research Areas “If I have seen a little further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants”
John Vetrano Materials Sciences and Engineering Division Office of Basic Energy Sciences Welcome.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Advanced Scientific Computing Research Program NERSC Users Group Meeting Department of Energy Update September.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
Billy Gellepis Administrative Services Associate NCURA Region VI Meeting Waikoloa, HI – April 2012 Developing an OPEN HOUSE Collaboration Between Principal.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure 10/31/06 Craig.
Network-related problems in M2ACS Mihai Anitescu.
BESAC Dec Findings and Recommendations Subcommittee on Theory and Computation of the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee U.S. Department.
Quantum to the continuum is the key theme Mesoscale is a frontier for control science Emphasize what is new/why now Lead by specific examples through the.
BESAC Dec Outline of the Report I. A Confluence of Scientific Opportunities: Why Invest Now in Theory and Computation in the Basic Energy Sciences?
Introduction of the Curriculum for Prospective NHTI Faculty NHTI Coordinating Committee Association of College & University Housing Officers – International.
David Mogk Dept. of Earth Sciences Montana State University April 8, 2015 Webinar SAGE/GAGE FACILITIES SUPPORTING BROADER EDUCATIONAL IMPACTS: SOME CONTEXTS.
U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Meeting FY 2009 Budget.
Basic Energy Sciences Next Generation Photon Sources for Grand Challenges in Science and Energy George Crabtree Marc Kastner Co-Chairs, New Era Subcommittee.
BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present, Shaping the Future Dr. Patricia M. Dehmer Director, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES) Office of Science.
Materials Innovation Platforms (MIP): A New NSF Mid-scale Instrumentation and User Program to Accelerate The Discovery of New Materials MRSEC Director’s.
P. 1 basic research needs workshop for Carbon Capture: Beyond 2020 Plenary Closing Session March 5, Liquid Absorbents: panel members * Panel co-lead.
1 DOE Office of Science October 2003 SciDAC Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing Alan J. Laub.
Digital Design of Materials: Some Thoughts for a Closing Group Discussion Andrei Ruckenstein Boston University.
BESAC Workshop on Opportunities for Catalysis/Nanoscience May 14-16, 2002 William S. Millman Basic Energy Sciences May 14, 2002 Catalysis and Nanoscience.
Marv Adams Chief Information Officer November 29, 2001.
BESAC Subcommittee on Theory and Computation Co-Chairs Bruce Harmon – Ames Lab and Iowa State University Kate Kirby – ITAMP, Harvard Smithsonian Center.
Science Department Draft of Goals, Objectives and Concerns 2010.
BESAC August Part III IV. Connecting Theory with Experiment V. The Essential Resources for Success Co-Chairs Bruce Harmon – Ames Lab and Iowa.
How Do We Control Material Processes at the Level of Electrons? Progress on Grand Challenge New Horizons for Grand Challenge Remaining ChallengeRefreshed.
Submitted by Bill Tumas Affiliation NREL Harnessing Metastability for Adaptive Synthesis, Self-repair and novel functionality Opportunity (WHY?) Impact.
How Do We Control Material Processes at the Level of Electrons? Progress on Grand Challenge New Horizons for Grand Challenge Remaining ChallengeRefreshed.
Statistics in WR: Lecture 1 Key Themes – Knowledge discovery in hydrology – Introduction to probability and statistics – Definition of random variables.
How Do We Characterize and Control Matter Away - Especially Very Far Away - from Equilibrium? Progress on Grand Challenge New Horizons for Grand Challenge.
Collaboration between University- National Lab-Industry It is in the national interest to foster and support a vibrant and dynamic research infrastructure.
Management February 20, Annual Review of the Muon Accelerator Program (MAP) Subcommittee members: Ron Prwivo, Ron Lutha, and Jim Kerby.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
Getting to the Root of the Problem Learn to Serve 501 Commons November 6, 2013 Bill Broesamle.
Provost’s Report Global Penn State: Our Ongoing Efforts to Be a Truly Global University Dr. Nicholas P. Jones Meeting of the Board of Trustees Friday,
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
Office of Scienc e 1 Solving Grand Challenges in Energy Sciences Basic Research Needs for Innovation and Discovery of Transformative Experimental Tools.
How Do We Control Material Processes at the Level of Electrons? Progress on Grand Challenge New Horizons for Grand Challenge Remaining ChallengeRefreshed.
CPM 2012, Fermilab D. MacFarlane & N. Holtkamp The Snowmass process and SLAC plans for HEP.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Presentation to the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC) Dr. Raymond L. Orbach, Director November.
Impact of EU structural funds in research and innovation: the experience of the Lithuanian 'Valleys’ April, 2016.
Computational Science Crosscut
The Curry School of Education October 3, 2018
Emerging Information Technologies I
Presentation transcript:

BESAC Grand Challenge Subcommittee Update and Status John Sarrao Los Alamos National Laboratory 12/03/14

Agenda Thurs., Dec 4 8:30Update/status 9:00Mark Johnson, Yale 9:30Craig Taatjes, Sandia 10:00John Spence, ASU 10:30Break 11:00 Discussion of write-ups with lots of discussion NoonWorking lunch 1:00Continuation of discussion 2:00Organized breakouts Grand Challenges Highlights Transformational Opportunities Tools and Implementation 3:30Break 4:00Return to breakouts to generate outbrief presentations 4:45Outbriefs from Breakout groups 5:45Definition of Overnight Homework Fri., Dec 5 8:00AM Executive Committee version of the report available for distribution 8:05Discussion of Funding Modalities—Hemminger 9:00Presentation of Executive Committee version of the report 10:30Break 11:00Assign working group tasks for Next Steps NoonSubcommittee departs Thanks to Cynthia & Jennifer for hosting

3 BESAC New Charge on Strategic Planning for BES Research From: Dr. Pat Dehmer (Acting Director of Office of Science) The new BESAC study should evaluate the breakthrough potential of current and prospective energy science frontiers based on how well the research advances the five grand science challenges. Your report will advise BES in its future development of focused, effective research strategies for sustained U.S. leadership in science innovation and energy research. I ask BESAC to consider the following questions in formulating the study plan:  What progress has been achieved in our understanding of the five BESAC Grand Science Challenges?  What impact has advancement in the five Grand Science Challenges had on addressing DOE’s energy missions? With evolving energy technology and U.S. energy landscape, what fundamental new knowledge areas are needed to further advance the energy sciences? Please consider examples where filling the knowledge gaps will have direct impacts on energy sciences.  What should the balance of funding modalities (e.g., core research, EFRCs, Hubs) be for BES to fully capitalize on the emerging opportunities?  Identify research areas that may not be sufficiently supported or represented in the US community to fully address the DOE’s missions.

“Transformational Opportunities for Energy Science” Perspective: The original grand challenges, as explicated in the 2007 report, have proven to be a superb prod for the scientific community in the U.S. and beyond. The 46 EFRCs, created by the DOE after acceptance of the grand challenge report, as well as the advances of the broader BES research community, have very effectively pursued the high bar that the five original grand challenges set. From the published results of research that was generated by the original grand challenges, we suggest new opportunities to advance our understanding and mastering of nature. These themes suggest transformational opportunities for energy science of the next decade and beyond. Alternate Titles: Frontiers of Matter and Energy: Transformative Opportunities for Humankind Issues at the Frontiers of Matter & Energy: Transformative Opportunities for Humankind Matter in Transition: Understanding the Transport & Transformation of Matter & Energy

The 2007 Grand Challenges are still compelling AND the landscape has changed as a result of our progress How Do We Control Material Processes at the Level of Electrons? How do we design and perfect atom- and energy-efficient synthesis of revolutionary new forms of matter with tailored properties? How do remarkable properties of matter emerge from complex correlations of the atomic or electronic constituents and how can we control these properties? How can we master energy and information on the nanoscale to create new technologies with capabilities rivaling those of living things? How do we characterize and control matter away - especially very far away - from equilibrium? Breakout #1 - Ratner

New Opportunities have emerged that have their foundations in the Grand Challenges Spatially and Temporally Dependent Chemistry and Materials Synthetic mastery of materials Intersection of hard and soft matter Bio-inspired matter Beyond Ideal Systems: Interface behavior and heterogeneity Understanding real matter under realistic conditions Spatio-temporal Evolution and dynamics Quantum/Classical Systems: Mesoscale Complexity Science of Heterogeneity/Defects that Limit Lifetime Performance Harnessing coherence in light and matter Coherent control over the entire electromagnetic spectrum from THz to x-ray Manipulating Matter to Elucidate New States Of Matter Coherent Phonon/Light Interactions Ultra efficient communication and quantum computing Breakout #2 - Crabtree

Efficient Synthesis for Tailored Properties Control at the Level of Electrons Correlated Systems Energy and Information On the Nanoscale Systems Away From Equilibrium Bio Inspired Matter Intersection of Hard and Soft Matter Interface behavior and Heterogeneity Harnessing Coherence in Light and Matter Spatially and Temporally Dependent Chemistry and Materials: Graham’s circle

Revolutionary and cross-cutting capability advances are transformative Ushering in a New Era in Control Science: Revolutionary Advances in Models, Mathematics, Algorithms, Data, and Computing simulation, algorithms, information extraction and data analytics Data Science Numerical Modeling, Simulation Intuitive computation Thermodynamics, Information Entropy transport and processing of information Mathematical models to solve inverse problems (Inverting the Design Arrow) Theory->Experiment/Data and Data->Theory Visualization Probing and Mapping Matter Across Multiple Scales: Making and Exploiting transformative advances in imaging capabilities Electron orbital changing in a reaction (attosecond imagining) “seeing” Better x-ray and electron sources Integration of Multi-modal Imaging of Functional Systems Imaging Science From Atomic and Electronic to Meso, Space & Time Scales Breakout #3 - Sarrao

Enabling success: The people and physical resources required Early career awards are important for fostering creativity in rising stars New generation of scientists that understand both theory/computation and experiment are necessary and are emerging PI networks for lectures, training, focused schools, integrating both students and established researchers enable synergy In times of fiscal constraint, maintaining appropriate balance between single PI and center modalities is important for maximum impact Centers could mean three different activities: team science, central infrastructure, seed funding of ideas; goals and objectives when creating centers should be understood Foundations are doing interesting things in funding modalities that provide test cases Retaining instrumentation expertise at facilities especially when not building new instruments/facilities is a challenge Facilities should support staff focused on algorithm development and analytics to foster effective data utilization Recapitalization/upgrades of facilities and mid-scale instrumentation is essential for maintaining scientific leadership and refreshing staff Breakout #3 – Sarrao; Hemminger discussion

Report Outline Executive Summary Introduction The Success Story that is the Aftermath of the Grand Challenge Report Transformational Opportunities for Energy Science: Standing on the shoulders of giants Building on our success: urgent implementation needs Conclusion Friday AM (& help from Lynn Yarris)

11 The Community has not yet fully spoken Kudos to Talia and the ANL webfolks

Breakout Assignments NameBreakout George Crabtree2, lead John Hemmingern/a Mark Ratner1, lead John Sarrao3, lead Nora Berrah1 Gordon Brown2 Don DePaolo1 Roger French2 Cynthia Friend1 Bruce Kay3 Jennifer Lewis2 Margaret Murnane2 Tijana Rajh3 Tony Rollett3 Jamie Sethian3 Bill Tumas2 Natalia Melcer1 Lynn Yarris1 Mark Johnson1 Craig Taatjes2 John Spence3

Next Steps Work hard today, tonight, and tomorrow DC Meeting – January 14 & 15, 2015 BEASC Meeting – February 26 & 27, 2015 Write, write, write…