1 Bevorzugter Zitierstil für diesen Vortrag Axhausen, K.W. (2012) Large-Scale Travel Data Sets and Route Choice Modeling: European Experience, presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Onderzoeksinstituut Workshop Valorisation of transport models for a sustainable transport Namur 19 December 2005 Travel behaviour survey in Flanders :
Advertisements

Measuring PA. What aspects of PA do we measure? Timeframe – day, week, month etc. Sport and exercise vs PA Domains – Leisure time- household / gardening.
1 Preferred citation style for this presentation Axhausen K.W. (2012) Swiss Mikrozensus and its lessons, presentation at the “National Travel Surveys in.
GPS and Multi-Week Data Collection of Activity-Travel Patterns Harry Timmermans Eindhoven University of Technology 4/19/2015.
Three Times a Week: Mapping the Transportation of Dialysis Patients Dayton, Ohio Ambreen Hasan Research Analyst Lakeland Community College 2013 Ohio GIS.
Michael Löchl Institute for Transport Planning and Systems (IVT) July 2005 Modelling businesses and employment: UrbanSim and its application in Zurich.
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
Enhanced analytical decision support tools The Scheme level Final workshop of the DISTILLATE programme Great Minster House, London Tuesday 22 nd January.
Neighborhood Walkability and Bikeability Andrew Rundle, Dr.P.H. Associate Professor of Epidemiology Mailman School of Public Health Columbia University.
Transportation mode detection using mobile phones and GIS information Leon Stenneth, Ouri Wolfson, Philip Yu, Bo Xu 1University of Illinois, Chicago.
Agenda Overview Why TransCAD Challenges/tips Initiatives Applications.
Opportunities & Challenges Using Passively Collected Data In Travel Demand Modeling 15 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic.
InMoSion: Science Shop for Innovative Mobility Solutions for Mobility Challenged Europeans 3rd INTERNATIONAL MEETING ANKARA, TURKEY Partnering: Civil Engineering.
Trip Reconstruction Tool for GPS- Based Personal Travel Surveys Eui-Hwan Chung.
Conversion of Volunteer-Collected GPS Diary Data into Travel Time Performance Measures Research Project Conducted for PC : Terry Keener PD : Michael.
GIS Techniques and Algorithms to Automate the Processing of GPS- Derived Travel Survey Data Praprut Songchitruksa, Ph.D., P.E. Mark Ojah Texas A&M Transportation.
Mobility plan for Geneva Airport employees. Constraints and needs for the mobility of Geneva airport staff Airport staff: all employees working in the.
GPS Trajectories Analysis in MOPSI Project Minjie Chen SIPU group Univ. of Eastern Finland.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Validate - A Nationwide Dynamic Travel Demand Model for Germany Peter Vortisch, Volker Waßmuth, PTV AG, Germany.
1 WORLD TOURISM ORGANIZATION (UNWTO) MEASURING TOURISM EXPENDITURE: A UNWTO PROPOSAL SESRIC-UNWTO WORKSHOP ON TOURISM STATISTICS AND THE ELABORATION OF.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
Workshop B4. The Collection and Processing of Survey Data Using Mobile Technologies.
SMART-WAY A FP7 GNSS Success Story in LBS Let your Smartphone guide you through the transport jungle WORKSHOP: European GNSS Applications in H2020 FP7.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
BEST Survey 2010 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
National Household Travel Survey Statewide Applications Heather Contrino Travel Surveys Team Lead Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy.
Evaluating GPS Technology Used for Household Surveys Kathy Yu, Arash Mirzaei, Behruz Paschai North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) 15 th.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Data Collection With Surveys Unit 2: Describing Transit Systems with Data.
MPO/RPC Directors Meeting Asadur Rahman Lead Worker-Traffic Forecasting Section, BPED, July 28, 2015.
BEST Survey 2011 City report: Stockholm Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
2001 National Household Travel Survey Kentucky Add-on Ben Pierce Presentation By.
USING SENSECAM TO PURSUE “GROUND TRUTH” FOR GPS TRAVEL SURVEY Ohio, May th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Li Shen and Peter.
TRB 88th Annual Meeting, Washington DC January, 2009 Huan Li and Robert L. Bertini Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting Washington, DC January.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2010 Survey.
Using an Odometer and a GPS Panel to Evaluate Travel Behaviour Changes Peter Stopher and Natalie Swann Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies The.
NHTS Update and Data Analysis Plans presented to Florida Model Task Force presented by Krishnan Viswanathan November 10, 2009.
ILUTE Toronto Activity Panel Survey: Demonstrating the Benefits of a Multiple Instrument Panel Survey Matthew J. Roorda UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO.
AADAPT Workshop South Asia Goa, December 17-21, 2009 Maria Isabel Beltran 1.
Deducing Mode and Purpose from GPS Data Peter Stopher, Jun Zhang and Eoin Clifford Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies The University of Sydney.
Marie-Odile GASCON, CertuSHANGHAI, Forum THNS, 11 – 14 Novembre /11/ Household travel surveys how to carry them out ? Method and a few results.
Best Practices in Transit Rider Survey Data Collection Chris Tatham Sr. Vice President, CEO, ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Circle Olathe, KS
FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.
David Connolly MVA Transport, Travel and SHS Data SHS Topic Report: Modal Shift.
Design and Assessment of the Toronto Area Computerized Household Activity Scheduling Survey Sean T. Doherty, Erika Nemeth, Matthew Roorda, Eric J. Miller.
SHRPII C04: TEG Meeting, Washington, DC - January 14, 2010 Results today based primarily on three data sources… Seattle 2006 household travel survey (RP)
An Enhanced Framework for Link and Mode Identifications for GPS-Based Personal Travel Surveys Amy Tsui and Amer Shalaby University of Toronto June 13,
Regional and urban Policy Developing harmonised indicators on urban public transport in Europe Hugo Poelman European Commission DG Regional and Urban Policy.
Travel Data and the Smartphone: Building an International Travel Dataset One Android User at a Time GIL TAL MICHAEL NICHOLAS MATTHEW FAVETTI.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Findings on Weekday Travel Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
The Dutch travel survey Mixed-mode experiences from the Netherlands Ilona Bouhuijs Netherlands Statistics June 17th 2013 Disclaimer: the views expressed.
ILUTE A Tour-Based Mode Choice Model Incorporating Inter-Personal Interactions Within the Household Matthew J. Roorda Eric J. Miller UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO.
1 Preferred citation style Axhausen, K.W. (2009) Travel and social capital: Some empirical evidence, 2 nd CCSS Workshop, Zürich, June 2009.
Workshop on Passenger Mobility Conclusions. EU data requirements – DG MOVE  Environmental, economic and social considerations require close monitoring.
An automated framework to derive model variables from open transport data using R, PostgreSQL and OpenTripPlanner. Marcus Young
ParkNet: Drive-by Sensing of Road-Side Parking Statistics Irfan Ullah Department of Information and Communication Engineering Myongji university, Yongin,
Network Analyst. Network A network is a system of linear features that has the appropriate attributes for the flow of objects. A network is typically.
Introduction Most samples in Household Travel Surveys (HTS) complete via web Geocoding is an important element in HTS collection Online geocoding services.
Use Survey to Improve the DFX Transit Model
2007 Household Travel Survey
1st November, 2016 Transport Modelling – Developing a better understanding of Short Lived Events Marcel Pooke – Operational Modelling & Visualisation Manager.
Mathematical Modelling of Pedestrian Route Choices in Urban Areas Using Revealed Preference GPS Data Eka Hintaran ATKINS European Transport Conference.
Karen Tsang Bureau of Transport Statistics Department of Transport
Transport mode detection in the city of Lyon using mobile phone sensors Jorge Chong Internship for MLDM M1 Jean Monnet University
Final Project – Anomalies Detection
MEASURING INDIVIDUALS’ TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR BY USE OF A GPS-BASED SMARTPHONE APPLICATION IN DAR ES SALAAM CITY 37th Annual Southern African Transport Conference.
Transportation Research Institute (IMOB)-Universtiet Hasselt
DATELINE PMWG Meeting, Luxembourg, 24/25 April 2003
Geospatial data for cities and FUAs: state of play and opportunities
Presentation transcript:

1 Bevorzugter Zitierstil für diesen Vortrag Axhausen, K.W. (2012) Large-Scale Travel Data Sets and Route Choice Modeling: European Experience, presentation at Workshop 189 „Route choice modeling and availability of data sets“, 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, January 2013.

Large-Scale Travel Data Sets and Route Choice Modeling: European Experience KW Axhausen IVT ETH Zürich January 2013

3 GPS surveys and analysis: Nadine Rieser – Schüssler Lara Montini Mikrozensus 2010 (Swiss national travel diaries survey) Matthias Kowald, ARE (Federal Office for Spatial Development), Bern Kathrin Rebmann, BfS (Federal Office for Statistics), Neuchatel Acknowledgements

4 What do we need ?

5 Stages – trips – tours - activities At home

6 Stages – trips – tours - activities Breakfast

7 Stages – trips – tours - activities Walk Bus Tram

8 Stages – trips – tours - activities Work Trip 1

9 Stages – trips – tours - activities Tour 1

10 Elements of the generalised costs of the chosen / not-chosen movement: Duration of the stages Routes of the stages Circumstances of the stages (congested; parking search) Monetary (decision relevant) costs of the stages (Joint) activities during the stages Joint travel with whom Time pressure of the stages What should we capture?

11 Elements of the generalised costs of the chosen/non-chosen activity: Price levels Price worthiness (value for money) Social milieu Purpose of the activity Joint activity: with whom and expenditure sharing, if any Planning horizon of the activity What should we capture?

12 But how? One week of a Zurich participant

13 But how? DimensionDiaryGSMGPS TripsDirectlyImpossiblePost- processing CompletenessRespondent dependent NoYes, but data loss possible DurationRounded to the next 5, 15 min NoExactly Destinations(Exactly)Cell towerExactly (?) PurposeYesNoImputation CompanyPartiallyNo RoutesExpensively(Impossible)Exactly RecruitmentF(response burden) (Easy)F(response burden) Response period1 (-42) days(Unlimited)(1-) 7-14 (- ) days

Diaries 14

15 Format: Swiss Mikrozensus (MZ) 2010 Geocoded CATI interview (LINK) Person- and household socio-demographics Stage-based travel diary Routes of car/motorcycle-stages were identified with two way- points (interviewer had map interface) Add-on modules for sub-samples (LINK) One-day excursions Long-distance travel Attitudes to transport policy Integrated, but independent SC questionnaire (IVT) SC mode choice SC route and departure time choice

16 Protocol: MZ 2010 CATI with multiple calls (no incentives) (72% response rate) Households (59’971) Persons (62’868) Recruitment for the SC: 50% willingness Customized SCs for 85% of the recruited within 12 days 70% response rate for the SC experiments

17 Route capture: Which ? Slow modes (Walking, cycling) Motorised travel (car, motorcycle) Public transport (train, bus, stret car…) Stages RoundtripsAll Distance≥ 3 km ≥ 0 km Detail Capture of one way-point Capture of two way- points Capture of all transfers (end of stages)

18 Route capture: Motorised travel Selection between fastest (blue) and shortest path Two way points possible (a la Google maps)

19 Route capture: Public transport Valid stops as start and end Selection based on the national transit schedule Distance calculation based on the rail network or shortest road path between the stops of the selected service for busses

GPS self-tracing 20

Some current examples 21

COST and Peacox 7 th framework project: GPS based diary at IVT GPS unit: Interval: 1Hz 3D position Date and time HPOD and other measures of accuracy Accelerometer Interval 10 Hz 3D acceleration Battery Multiple days GSM: Savings every 4 hours on SQL database server 22

GPS-based prompted recall survey 300 participant for 7 days Web-survey Socio-demographics Attitudes to risk, environment, variety seeking Checking and correction of the automated processing 23

Data processing 24 Stages Stops Mode detection map-matching Identify stages and stops Filtering and smoothing Purpose imputation Analysis and application

Filtering and smoothing Filtering VDOP > 5 Unrealistic elevations Jumps with v > 50m/s Smoothing Gauss Kernel smoother over the time axis Speed as first derivate of the positions Raw data are kept 25

Detection of stages and stops Clusters of high density Longer breaks without points Accelerometer data GPS points No movement V ≈ 0 km/h No accelerations Mode change Walk stage as signal 26 Stops Stages

27 Number of trips/day in comparison with MZ 2005 Source: Schüssler, 2010 (without acceleration data)

28 Trip durations and length in comparison with MZ 2005 Länge [km]Dauer [min] Source: Schüssler, 2010 (without acceleration data)

29 Comparison with MZ 2005 ZHWIGEMZ 2005 Number of persons Days per persons Trips per day Trip lengths [km] Daily trip lengths [km] Trip duration [min] Stages per day Source: Schüssler, 2010 (without acceleration data)

Mode detection 30

Trip length by mode in comparison with MZ WalkCar Public Transit - City Bycicle Train Source: Schüssler, 2010 (without acceleration data)

Map matching Car and bike stages Selection from a set of possible routes At nodes all possible on-going links become new candidate routes (branches) If the tree has enough branches, it is pruned based on their total errors Each candidate branch is assessed by Squared error between GPS and path Deviation between GPS speed and posted speeds Transit-stages Route identified as for cars Line identified by time table 32

Map-Matching: Number of branches against computing times 33 Source: Schüssler, 2010 (without acceleration data)

34 Research needs: GPS post processing Test dataset with true values Further integration between map-matching and mode detection Better imputation of the movement during signal loss More and better purpose imputation (POI – data base; land use data; frequency over multiple days)

35 What now ? Cost of GPS/Smartphone studies as a function Rate of usable addresses Recruitment rate Response rate Rate of usable returns Correlation between household members Correlation between days Correlation between tours of a day Correlation between trips of tour Number of waves with the GPS loggers Rate of loss of the GPS loggers

36 What now ? DiariesGPS-self tracing AdvantagesAll variables Social contacts All movements (but data loss) Exact times, routes, locations Longer observation periods Dis- advantages ≈15% under reporting of trips Rounded times Approximate routes only Decreasing response rates / expensive response Post-processing and imputation (Effort of the post-processing) Unknown response rates (Costs of the units and their distribution/collection)

Questions?

Map-Matching: First branches 38 Source: Schüssler, 2010 (without acceleration data)