Le Song Joint work with Mladen Kolar and Eric Xing KELLER: Estimating Time Evolving Interactions Between Genes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. D.4 The Drosophila life cycle Slide number 1 Drosophila life.
Advertisements

Unravelling the biochemical reaction kinetics from time-series data Santiago Schnell Indiana University School of Informatics and Biocomplexity Institute.
Yinyin Yuan and Chang-Tsun Li Computer Science Department
Complex Networks for Representation and Characterization of Images For CS790g Project Bingdong Li 9/23/2009.
1 Dynamics of Real-world Networks Jure Leskovec Machine Learning Department Carnegie Mellon University
FUNNEL: Automatic Mining of Spatially Coevolving Epidemics Yasuko Matsubara, Yasushi Sakurai (Kumamoto University) Willem G. van Panhuis (University of.
Modelling and Identification of dynamical gene interactions Ronald Westra, Ralf Peeters Systems Theory Group Department of Mathematics Maastricht University.
Inferring Quantitative Models of Regulatory Networks From Expression Data Iftach Nachman Hebrew University Aviv Regev Harvard Nir Friedman Hebrew University.
Systems Theoretical Modelling of Genetic Pathways Ronald L. Westra Systems Theory Group Department Mathematics Maastricht University.
Probabilistic modelling in computational biology Dirk Husmeier Biomathematics & Statistics Scotland.
Modelling Cell Signalling and Pattern Formation Nick Monk Department of Computer Science Collaboration: Erik Plahte & Siren Veflingstad Agricultural University.
Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBNs)
CSE Fall. Summary Goal: infer models of transcriptional regulation with annotated molecular interaction graphs The attributes in the model.
D ISCOVERING REGULATORY AND SIGNALLING CIRCUITS IN MOLECULAR INTERACTION NETWORK Ideker Bioinformatics 2002 Presented by: Omrit Zemach April Seminar.
Mechanistic models and machine learning methods for TIMET Dirk Husmeier.
A Probabilistic Dynamical Model for Quantitative Inference of the Regulatory Mechanism of Transcription Guido Sanguinetti, Magnus Rattray and Neil D. Lawrence.
Consistent probabilistic outputs for protein function prediction William Stafford Noble Department of Genome Sciences Department of Computer Science and.
SIGCOMM 2003 Making Intra-Domain Routing Robust to Changing and Uncertain Traffic Demands: Understanding Fundamental Tradeoffs David Applegate Edith Cohen.
Predicting Gene Expression using Logic Modeling and Optimization Abhimanyu Krishna New Challenges in the European Area: Young Scientist’s 1st International.
1 Learning Dynamic Models from Unsequenced Data Jeff Schneider School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University joint work with Tzu-Kuo Huang, Le.
GENIE – GEne Network Inference with Ensemble of trees Van Anh Huynh-Thu Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Systems and Modeling,
Estimation of Distribution Algorithms Ata Kaban School of Computer Science The University of Birmingham.
Regulatory Network (Part II) 11/05/07. Methods Linear –PCA (Raychaudhuri et al. 2000) –NIR (Gardner et al. 2003) Nonlinear –Bayesian network (Friedman.
1. Elements of the Genetic Algorithm  Genome: A finite dynamical system model as a set of d polynomials over  2 (finite field of 2 elements)  Fitness.
Improvements in the Spatial and Temporal representation of the Model Owen Woodberry Bachelor of Computer Science, Honours.
Simulation Models as a Research Method Professor Alexander Settles.
Data Mining Presentation Learning Patterns in the Dynamics of Biological Networks Chang hun You, Lawrence B. Holder, Diane J. Cook.
Fuzzy K means.
The UNIVERSITY of NORTH CAROLINA at CHAPEL HILL Graph Regularized Dual Lasso for Robust eQTL Mapping Wei Cheng 1 Xiang Zhang 2 Zhishan Guo 1 Yu Shi 3 Wei.
Systematic Analysis of Interactome: A New Trend in Bioinformatics KOCSEA Technical Symposium 2010 Young-Rae Cho, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of.
Gaussian Processes for Transcription Factor Protein Inference Neil D. Lawrence, Guido Sanguinetti and Magnus Rattray.
Bayesian integration of biological prior knowledge into the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks Dirk Husmeier Adriano V. Werhli.
“An Extension of Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis to Include Signed Interactions” Michael Mason Department of Statistics, UCLA.
Genetic Regulatory Network Inference Russell Schwartz Department of Biological Sciences Carnegie Mellon University.
Probabilistic Models that uncover the hidden Information Flow in Signalling Networks.
Reverse engineering gene regulatory networks Dirk Husmeier Adriano Werhli Marco Grzegorczyk.
ResponseNet revealing signaling and regulatory networks linking genetic and transcriptomic screening data CSE Fall.
Combined Central and Subspace Clustering for Computer Vision Applications Le Lu 1 René Vidal 2 1 Computer Science Department, Johns Hopkins University,
Reconstruction of Transcriptional Regulatory Networks
Inferring gene regulatory networks from transcriptomic profiles Dirk Husmeier Biomathematics & Statistics Scotland.
Analysis of the yeast transcriptional regulatory network.
Motifs BCH364C/391L Systems Biology / Bioinformatics – Spring 2015 Edward Marcotte, Univ of Texas at Austin Edward Marcotte/Univ. of Texas/BCH364C-391L/Spring.
Intel Confidential – Internal Only Co-clustering of biological networks and gene expression data Hanisch et al. This paper appears in: bioinformatics 2002.
Probabilistic modelling in computational biology Dirk Husmeier Biomathematics & Statistics Scotland.
Abstract ODE System Model of GRNs Summary Evolving Small GRNs with a Top-Down Approach Javier Garcia-Bernardo* and Margaret J. Eppstein Department of Computer.
Module networks Sushmita Roy BMI/CS 576 Nov 18 th & 20th, 2014.
Problem Limited number of experimental replications. Postgenomic data intrinsically noisy. Poor network reconstruction.
Inferring gene regulatory networks with non-stationary dynamic Bayesian networks Dirk Husmeier Frank Dondelinger Sophie Lebre Biomathematics & Statistics.
Regularization and Feature Selection in Least-Squares Temporal Difference Learning J. Zico Kolter and Andrew Y. Ng Computer Science Department Stanford.
Learning Bayesian networks from postgenomic data with an improved structure MCMC sampling scheme Dirk Husmeier Marco Grzegorczyk 1) Biomathematics & Statistics.
Analyzing wireless sensor network data under suppression and failure in transmission Alan E. Gelfand Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences Duke.
DM-MEETING Bijaya Adhikari OUTLINE From Micro to Macro: Uncovering and Predicting Information Cascading Process with Behavioral Dynamics 
Reverse engineering of regulatory networks Dirk Husmeier & Adriano Werhli.
Nonlinear differential equation model for quantification of transcriptional regulation applied to microarray data of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Vu, T. T.,
Bioinformatics 3 V8 – Gene Regulation Fri, Nov 9, 2012.
G LOBAL S IMILARITY B ETWEEN M ULTIPLE B IONETWORKS Yunkai Liu Computer Science Department University of South Dakota.
The Genomics: GTL Program Environmental Remediation Sciences Program Spring Workshop April 3, 2006.
Computational methods for inferring cellular networks II Stat 877 Apr 17 th, 2014 Sushmita Roy.
Yeast Cell-Cycle Regulation Network inference Wang Lin.
Privacy Vulnerability of Published Anonymous Mobility Traces Chris Y. T. Ma, David K. Y. Yau, Nung Kwan Yip (Purdue University) Nageswara S. V. Rao (Oak.
Identifying submodules of cellular regulatory networks Guido Sanguinetti Joint work with N.D. Lawrence and M. Rattray.
Inferring Regulatory Networks from Gene Expression Data BMI/CS 776 Mark Craven April 2002.
Multiplicative updates for L1-regularized regression
Time-Course Network Enrichment
Recovering Temporally Rewiring Networks: A Model-based Approach
1 Department of Engineering, 2 Department of Mathematics,
1 Department of Engineering, 2 Department of Mathematics,
Estimating Networks With Jumps
1 Department of Engineering, 2 Department of Mathematics,
Regulation Analysis using Restricted Boltzmann Machines
Presentation transcript:

Le Song Joint work with Mladen Kolar and Eric Xing KELLER: Estimating Time Evolving Interactions Between Genes

2 Transient Biological Processes

3 3 PPI Network

4 Time-Varying Interactions

5 The Big-Picture Questions What are the interactions? active What pathways are active at a particular time point and location? How will biological networks respond to stimuli (eg. heat shot)?

6 Regulation of cell response to stimuli is paramount, but we can usually only measure (or compute) steady-state interactions

7 … t=1 23T Current Practice Static Networks Microarray Time Series Dynamic Bayesian Networks

8 Our Goal Reverse engineer temporal/spatial-specific “rewiring” gene networks Time t*t* n=1 --- what are the difficulties?

9 Two Scenarios Smoothly evolving networks Abruptly changing networks

10 Scenario I (This paper) Kernel reweighted L1-regularized logistic regression (KELLER) Key Idea I: reweighting observations Key Idea II: regularized neighborhood estimation

11 Key Idea Weight temporally adjacent observations more than distal observations

12 Key Idea Estimate the neighborhood of each gene separately via L1-regularized logistic regression Kernel Reweighting Log-likelihood L1-regularization

13 Consistency Theorem 1: Under certain verifiable conditions (omitted here for simplicity), KELLER recovers the true topology of the networks:

14 Synthetic data DBN and static networks do not benefit from more observations Number of Samples

15 Key idea: Temporally Smoothing Tesla (Amr and Xing, PNAS 2009) TESLA: … Senario II

16 Drosophila Life Cycle Larva Embryo Pupa Adult 66 microarrays across full life cycle 588 genes related to development

17 molecular function biological process cellular component

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40 Network Size vs. Clustering Coefficient mid-embryonic mid-pupal

41 Network Size vs. Clustering Coefficient mid-embryonic stage tight local clusters mid-pupal stage loose local clusters

42 Interactivity of Gene Sets 27 genes based on ontology

43 Interactivity of Gene Sets 25 genes based on ontology

44 Transient Gene Interactions Time Gene Pairs Active Inactive msn  dock sno  Dl

45 Transcriptional Factor Cascade Summary networks 36 transcription factors Node size its total activity

46 TF Cascade – mid-embryonic stage

47 TF Cascade – mid-larva stage

48 TF Cascade – mid-pupal stage

49 TF Cascade – mid-adult stage

50 Transient Group Interactions

51 Conclusion KELLER for reverse engineering “rewiring” networks Key advantages: Computationally efficient (scalable to 10 4 genes) Computationally efficient (scalable to 10 4 genes) Global optimal solution is attainable Global optimal solution is attainable Theoretical guarantee Theoretical guarantee Glimpse to temporal evolution of gene networks Many interactions are rewiring and transient Availability:

52 The End Thanks Travel fellowship: Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy, Grant No. DE-FG02-06ED64270 Funding: Lane Fellowship, Questions?

53 Interactivity of Gene Sets 30 genes based on ontology

54 Timing of Regulatory Program Galactose

55 Challenges Very small sample size Experimental data are scarce and costly Noisy measurement More genes than microarrays Complexity regularization needed to avoid over- fitting Observations no longer iid since the networks are changing!