Challenges and opportunities for nafta Plus third Annual North American agrifood Market Integration workshop Eduardo Paláu Caades Sinaloa.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Frank Kern Senior Vice President Global Sales and Distribution Innovating for growth.
Advertisements

Effects of Agricultural Commodity Programs Kristin Mackie & Lane Mayberry.
Chapter 4 Global Analysis
Free Trade vs Fair Trade Winners and Losers. Why trade? Specialization and economies of scale in production lead to greater quantity of production in.
Controversies in Trade Policy
1 TRADE LOGISTICS CONFERENCE Company Overview Logistics Food Safety Costs of freight and customs Key Issues & Challenges.
GOOD INDICATORS ARE HARD TO FIND Susan Offutt Economic Research Service United States Department of Agriculture.
التكتلات السياسية والإقتصادية العالمية والإقليمية
Deindustrialitation and financing in Mexico Alicia Puyana Mutis.
Chapter 8 Economic Integration.
México Julieta Dorantes Maria Porto. Agenda. Mexico: General information about the country. Mexican Industry: quick review. Industrial Policy: what are.
 Example: The Green Revolution ◦ The process of technological development of agricultural techniques that began in the northern Mexican state.
Agricultural Systems and Their Determinants Dr. George Norton Agricultural and Applied Economics Virginia Tech Copyright 2009 AAEC 3204.
CHILE INITIAL CONDITIONS, Years Military Rule. 17 Years Military Rule. Over Heated Economy Over Heated Economy –Rate of Inflation 30% –Annualized.
The Natural Resources Paradox. The Natural Resources Paradox refers to the paradox that countries and regions with an abundance of natural resources,
“As the state’s second largest economic driver, it’s a sector ripe with opportunity for business expansion, job growth, and is a driving force in our.
IMPACTS OF NAFTA ON AGRI-FOOD TRADE FLOWS: A MEXICAN PERSPECTIVE ASERCA-SAGARPA August, 2001.
How to Tap Progress: The Role of Trade Openness Raymond Robertson Macalester College.
Chantal Line Carpentier, Ph.D Head, Environment, Economy and Trade NAFTA CEC Efforts to Examine the Mexican Experience.
Globalization: The Ups and Downs of Globalization or World economic integration Globalization: The Ups and Downs of Globalization or World economic integration.
GE’s Key Growth Initiative Globalization is not only striving to grow revenues by selling goods and services in global markets. It also means globalizing.
Glossary of Key Terms balance of payments. An account of the flow of goods, services, and money coming into and going out of the country. capital. Money.
NS3040 Winter Term 2015 Pre-NAFTA Assessment. NAFTA Cost/Benefits U.S. I Stephen Stamos, Reflections on the Proposed U.S.- Mexico Free Trade Agreement,
NAFTA By Brian Tedrow. What It Was About NAFTA means North American Free Trade Agreement. Implementation started on January 1 st, It removed most.
Economic Union$ Geography WG.9d O’Leary- Riverbend High School.
For more information and up to date statistics visit Changing Global Patterns of Student Mobility American Council on Education Annual Meeting,
Chapter 2: Environmental Constraints on Managers
Promoting innovative remittance markets and empowering migrant workers and their families International Fund for Agricultural Development Rome, 02 October.
The Economics and Politics of U.S. Agricultural Policy James Dunn Pennsylvania State University.
1 Chapter 8 Economic Integration. 2 Learning Objectives To review types of economic integration among countries To examine the costs and benefits of integrative.
1 THE MEXICAN POULTRY INDUSTRY AND THE NAFTA Cesar de Anda Cesar de Anda Cancún, México May 6 - 7, 2004 FIRST ANNUAL NORTH AMERICAN AGRIFOOD MARKET INTEGRATION.
Globalization, Women, Food. So far Shift in power balance – from whom to who? Who lost power? Who gained power? How? Through what mechanisms?
Program for the Integration of the Northeastern Region of Mexico and its integration with Texas Government of Nuevo León´s State Corporation of Strategic.
BUS 460. ECONOMIC INTEGRATION Introduction: Economic integration around the world has been one of the most significant trends since world war two. The.
NAFTA North American Free Trade Agreement. Canada, United States, and Mexico This agreement lifted tariffs between the three member countries.
 Background Information  Disadvantages of NAFTA  Advantages of NAFTA  Trouble in Juarez  Conclusion.
North American Free Trade Agreement
Collaborative Modeling Efforts Between the U.S. and Mexican Governments Pablo Sherwell, Mexican Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development,
Prosperity Through Trade North American Agri-Food Integration Session II - The European Perspective Discussant Liam McCreery, President Canadian Agri-Food.
CHAPTER 10 Regional Trading Arrangements. 2 Types of regional trading arrangements Free-Trade Area — all members of the group remove tariffs on each other’s.
Regional Economic Integration: The Theoretical Reason Countries agreeing to come together (collaborate) to form regional economic development agreements.
1 © ©1999 South-Western College Publishing PowerPoint Slides prepared by Ken Long Principles of Economics 2nd edition by Fred M Gottheil.
PRINCIPLES OF MACROECONOMICS LECTURE 11 ECONOMICS OF PROTECTIONISM.
Trade and Competitive Advantage. The Global Competitiveness Report World Economic Forum Global competitiveness.
Chapter 26- Comparing Economic Systems. Why Nations Trade Exported goods are sold to other countries; imported goods are purchased from abroad; the US.
Confidential and Proprietary/For internal use Food & Agribusiness Research I North American Trade Disputes: A Mexican Perspective.
International Marketing: Chapter 9 Key Concepts u What does the stage of economic growth impact? u Evolution of the market process u Stages of economic.
Ch 4.1 International Trade The Global Marketplace.
Defining North American Economic Integration Raymond Robertson Macalester College St. Paul, MN.
Lessons Learned from Other Blocs: The NAFTA Experience Rene F. Ochoa Dirección General de Estudios Agropecuarios y Pesqueros Subsecretaría de Fomento a.
Mexican Agriculture: 12 Years into NAFTA George Dyer September 14 de 2006 Seoul.
CORPORATE MANAGEMENT in ACTION Session 1. Impact of International Business Environment on Global Organizations CORPORATE MANAGEMENT IN ACTION - CMA 1.
NAFTA. What is NAFTA? North American Free Trade Agreement Participants include U.S., Mexico, and Canada Established in 1994 under the Clinton administration.
"Innovation-based Growth – the Development and the Future Challenges of the Finnish Innovation Environment” Timo Kekkonen Director, Confederation of Finnish.
MEXICO SECTION 5. POLITICAL CHALLENGES AND CHANGING AGENDAS  1970s: Mexico was a leader among Third- world countries in improving trade and bargain agreements.
Trouble in Juarez BY Chris Maleki Jason Swope.  NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, was signed by the United States, Canada, and Mexico.
Lead off 5/1 Should we buy things from other countries? Why or why not? Should the government do things to discourage/prohibit us from buying things from.
Chapter 26- Comparing Economic Systems
Long-term challenges of industrial development in Latin America and the Caribbean
Opportunities and Issues Chapter 1
International Trade LT: The benefits of international trade
Japan-NAFTA Relations
Chapter 4 Global Analysis
North American Free Trade Agreement
NS3040 Fall Term 2018 Pre-NAFTA Assessment
Chapter 8 Economic Integration.
STUDENT NOTES – 4 CH. 5 MEXICO
Economic Systems Chapter Two.
How did this happen so fast?
International Economics and Trade
Presentation transcript:

Challenges and opportunities for nafta Plus third Annual North American agrifood Market Integration workshop Eduardo Paláu Caades Sinaloa

Primer Lugar Nacional en Exportación de Hortalizas Fuente: Cierre de Ciclo CNPH

Valor De La Exportación A U.S.A. Basados En Precios FOB Nogales Az. M. D. D : 78.26% Tasa de Crecimiento Anual: 4.48% Fuente: Cierre de Ciclo CIDH

TMAC= 19.7%

TMCA= 8.4%

Producción trigo sonora

Uso de las Tierras de Riego en Sinaloa TOTAL = 800,000 HECTAREAS

Challenges and opportunities of nafta plus The Mexican Growers perspective Eduardo Paláu

The Search for NAFTA Plus and Strategic bargain in the North American agrifood sector

What is Nafta: but, More important to México Control of inflation ( 1987 : 159%) Institutionalize the modernization of Mexico: Economic reform ( started in 82)¿ Second generation reform? Dismantling of institutions ( including corruption and vices) ¿creation of new ones? ¿political Reform? Nafta: a transition period for competitiveness.. TRQ for Corn and beans: useless, until 2001, when congress put limits to over the quota)

dumping Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy Montana

Dumping margins us agricultural products Us dumping margin in 5 main products Producto/ AñoTrigoSoyaMaízAlgodónArroz %4%10%32%20% %8%16%23%17% %3%7%42%11% %12%26%49%18% %-9%4%25%2% %8%11%19%21% %-12%-26%16%6% %-23%12%24%3% %1%21%40%13% %27%30%50%20% %24%33%50%19% %28%18%63%20% %16%11%65%34% %10% 47%26%

Mexico China Mexican vegetable producer tipycal size: 270 has. 666 acres. Green houses 1,200 has. 40% “malla sombra” 60 % state of the art Typical size: hectares and expanding by jumps of 10 has.

¿Comparative Advantage or Competitive Advantage? A changing score Matured green tomatoes in the 80´s Long Shelf life tomatoes “ The vine tomatoes” de los 90’s de Sinaloa. The tomato war through time. vegetable production < 10% of 800,000 has. The rest corn, sorghum, beans, garbanzo.

¿Competitive Advantage? Strategic Competitiveness is not granted forever.. In function of response capacity to changes in the environment Enterpreneurship capacity and Innovation capacity

Input costs CountryseedNitrogen USA 1.05 dlrs./1000 seeds dlrs./ha México1.87 dlrs./1000 seeds dlrs./ha

Labor: In USA most of it is not paid, highly productive with capital intensive technology

The middle cost producers are 38% higher thab US cost; The lowest cost producers in Culiacan are 57% higher than US efficient low cost producers.

Kevin Muslow: toward a nafta policy

conclusion The process of globalization is irreversible. Reading several papers, the NAFTA plus and others from previous workshops (no all them) It appears there is a great deal of consensus about this matter. Free trade bring greater economic efficiency. I believe so, but I don´t see how. A Distinction is made about economics and politics. But when it comes to pure economics in market access is applied and made part of the political wisdom. When it comes to migration, Is is politics that is imposed into economics. When it comes to a matter of market access, yes it brings economic efficiency. But when it is a matter of labor migration, no, the political reality does not accept it.