With support from: NSF DUE-0903270 in partnership with: George McLeod Prepared by: Geospatial Technician Education Through Virginia’s Community Colleges.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ann Johnson Associate Director
Advertisements

Fire Detection & Assessment Practical work E. Chuvieco (Univ. of Alcalá, Spain)
Page 1 of 50 Optimization of Artificial Neural Networks in Remote Sensing Data Analysis Tiegeng Ren Dept. of Natural Resource Science in URI (401)
Major Operations of Digital Image Processing (DIP) Image Quality Assessment Radiometric Correction Geometric Correction Image Classification Introduction.
PRESENTATION ON “ Processing Of Satellite Image Using Dip ” by B a n d a s r e e n i v a s Assistant Professor Department of Electronics & Communication.
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
Change analysis of Northborough, Massachusetts, Kristopher Kuzera and Silvia Petrova 1987 LANDSAT TM – 30m resolution False Color Composite Bands.
Chapter 2: Pattern Recognition
An Overview of RS Image Clustering and Classification by Miles Logsdon with thanks to Robin Weeks Frank Westerlund.
Image Classification.
Use of Remote Sensing in Forestry Applications Murat Tunç Murat Tunç
Basics: Notation: Sum:. PARAMETERS MEAN: Sample Variance: Standard Deviation: * the statistical average * the central tendency * the spread of the values.
Lecture 14: Classification Thursday 18 February 2010 Reading: Ch – 7.19 Last lecture: Spectral Mixture Analysis.
Image Classification To automatically categorize all pixels in an image into land cover classes or themes.
Pattern Recognition. Introduction. Definitions.. Recognition process. Recognition process relates input signal to the stored concepts about the object.
Classification of Remotely Sensed Data General Classification Concepts Unsupervised Classifications.
Lecture 14: Classification Thursday 19 February Reading: “Estimating Sub-pixel Surface Roughness Using Remotely Sensed Stereoscopic Data” pdf preprint.
An Overview of Remote Sensing and Image Processing by Miles Logsdon with thanks to Robin Weeks and Frank Westerlund.
Image Classification: Supervised Methods
Image Classification: Redux
Image Classification
Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.
Classification Advantages of Visual Interpretation: 1. Human brain is the best data processor for information extraction, thus can do much more complex.
Image Classification R.A.ALAGU RAJA Remote Sensing & GIS Lab Department of ECE Thiagarajar College of Engineering Madurai.
Image Classification and its Applications
Rsensing6_khairul 1 Image Classification Image Classification uses the spectral information represented by the digital numbers in one or more spectral.
1 Lectures 11 Analysis and Classification of Digital MSS Data 21 October 2008 Today’s Lecture will be given by Dr. Tatiana Loboda, a Research Scientist.
Environmental Remote Sensing Lecture 5: Image Classification " Purpose: – categorising data – data abstraction / simplification – data interpretation –
Classification & Vegetation Indices
Exercise #5: Supervised Classification. Step 1. Delineating Training Sites and Generating Signatures An individual training site is delineated as an “area.
OBJECT RECOGNITION. The next step in Robot Vision is the Object Recognition. This problem is accomplished using the extracted feature information. The.
Land Cover Classification Defining the pieces that make up the puzzle.
Image Classification Digital Image Processing Techniques Image Restoration Image Enhancement Image Classification Image Classification.
1 Remote Sensing and Image Processing: 6 Dr. Mathias (Mat) Disney UCL Geography Office: 301, 3rd Floor, Chandler House Tel:
Summer Session 09 August Tips for the Final Exam Make sure your answers clear, without convoluted language. Read questions carefully – are you answering.
Image Classification 영상분류
Remote Sensing Supervised Image Classification. Supervised Image Classification ► An image classification procedure that requires interaction with the.
Map of the Great Divide Basin, Wyoming, created using a neural network and used to find likely fossil beds See:
MACHINE LEARNING 8. Clustering. Motivation Based on E ALPAYDIN 2004 Introduction to Machine Learning © The MIT Press (V1.1) 2  Classification problem:
Digital Image Processing
BOT / GEOG / GEOL 4111 / Field data collection Visiting and characterizing representative sites Used for classification (training data), information.
Supervised Classification in Imagine D. Meyer E. Wood
Remote Sensing Unsupervised Image Classification.
Remote Sensing Theory & Background III GEOG370 Instructor: Yang Shao.
Chapter 7 Maximum likelihood classification of remotely sensed imagery 遥感影像分类的最大似然法 Chapter 7 Maximum likelihood classification of remotely sensed imagery.
CHANGE DETECTION ANALYSIS USING REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES Change in Urban area from 1992 to 2001 in COIMBATORE, INDIA. FNRM 5262 FINAL PROJECT PRESENTATION.
Unsupervised Classification
High resolution product by SVM. L’Aquila experience and prospects for the validation site R. Anniballe DIET- Sapienza University of Rome.
Quantifying Analyst Bias in Mapping Flooded Areas from Landsat Images
Supervised Training and Classification
Classification of Remotely Sensed Data
ASTER image – one of the fastest changing places in the U.S. Where??
Class 10 Unsupervised Classification
Chapter 12 Object Recognition
Map of the Great Divide Basin, Wyoming, created using a neural network and used to find likely fossil beds See:
Incorporating Ancillary Data for Classification
Spatial Analysis: Raster
University College London (UCL), UK
REMOTE SENSING Multispectral Image Classification
REMOTE SENSING Multispectral Image Classification
Supervised Classification
Unsupervised Classification
Image Information Extraction
The Pagami Creek Wildfire
Spatial Analysis: Raster
University College London (UCL), UK
Statistical Classification on a Multispectral Image
Remote Sensing Landscape Changes Before and After King Fire 2014
Class 10 Unsupervised Classification
Change in Land Cover in Elk Grove
Presentation transcript:

With support from: NSF DUE in partnership with: George McLeod Prepared by: Geospatial Technician Education Through Virginia’s Community Colleges (GTEVCC)

 Satellite images capture light by sampling over predetermined wavelength ranges which are referred to as “bands” or “channels”  To extract additional information from digital images use image processing techniques such as: False Color Composites, Image Ratios, and Classification (Supervised and Unsupervised)

 Supervised  Unsupervised Image source: Dr. Ryan Jenson

 Requires minimal amount of input from user  Based solely on numerical information in the data  Matched by the analyst to information classes  Pixels with similar digital numbers are grouped together into spectral classes using statistical procedures such as cluster analysis ISODATA  Iterative Self-Organizing Data Analysis Technique - Automated spectral clustering  User then identifies which class membership for each cluster

 User selects area in image that represent each unique class (“Training” sites)  Pixel values for each band are recorded for class sample set  Computer matches rest of pixels to user defined classes based on closest distance in multi- dimensional image space  This outputs a classified image

Image source: Dr. Ryan Jenson

 Used in supervised classification  Homogeneous areas of land cover  Information derived from:  field studies,  thematic maps,  other areas of knowledge

 Each site should have at least 10 times ‘n’ number of pixels, where n is equal to the number of bands used in the classification.  Map digitizing  On-screen digitizing

 Minimum Distance to the Means  Maximum Likelihood

The data points for DNs from two bands are dots; the mean for each clustered data set are the squares. For point 1, an unknown, the shortest straight-line distance to the several means is to the class "heather". Point 1, then, is assigned to this category. Point 2 is slightly closer to the "soil" category but lies within the edge of the "urban" spread. Here, the classification seems ambiguous. By the minimum distance rule, it would go to "soil" but this may be erroneous ("urban" would have been a greater likelihood). Point 3 is not near any of the class DN clusters, but is about equidistance between "urban", "water", "forest", and "heather". If one plays the odds, "urban" is just a tad closer to 3; but this situation indicates how misclassification might occur.

Not shown is the fact that inside each ellipse are contours that indicate the degree of probability. Associated with each ellipse is a separate plot that expresses a statistical surface (bell-shaped in three dimensions) called probability density functions. Using these functions, which relate to the contours, a likelihood that any unknown point U is most probably associated with some one ellipse is determined. A Bayesian Classifier is a special case in which the likely occurrence of each class (common to rare) is assessed and integrated into the decision making.

 Growth or shrinkage of urban areas  Deforestation of tropic areas  Fire and burn damage  Damage done by hurricanes,  earthquakes, and tornados

Phragmites Autralis Phragmites Autralis

 USGS data viewer  er/ USGS New Earth Explorer er/  Global Landcover facility at the University of Marylandhttp://  Terraserver  jsp NOAA NexRad Radar Data jsp