AF ISR A Comprehensive Review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Life Science Services and Solutions
Advertisements

The Military Challenge of Cyber AOC Talk on Cyber, EW and IO Dr Gary Waters, 17 April 2012.
Bulk Petroleum Executive Agent Cynthia F. Smith PETRO May 30, 2012.
Joint Worldwide Training and Scheduling Conference Can Be A Mechanism For Joint Force Development.
UNCLASSIFIED 1 1 Joint Concept Development & Experimentation – Future Joint Operations Joint Concept Development & Experimentation – Future Joint Operations.
AF Aerial Layer Network Approach
Mission Brief Paul N. Turner AF ISR Agency UNCLASSIFIED.
© 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights Reserved. Evolutionary Strategies for the Development of a SOA-Enabled USMC Enterprise Mohamed Hussein, Ph.D.
Navy’s Operational Authority for Naval Networks, Information Operations, and FORCEnet 2004 Strike, Land Attack & Air Defense Annual Symposium Vice Admiral.
BENEFITS OF SUCCESSFUL IT MODERNIZATION
Defense Daily Open Architecture Summit EMS Panel
Joint Cryptologic Mission Simulation (JCMS) M&S Program
CYBERSPACE A Global War-fighting Domain Every minute of every day, Airmen in the United States Air Force are flying and fighting in cyberspace.
This Briefing is:UNCLASSIFIED Headquarters U.S. Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 3-Jan-071 Air Force Cyber Operations.
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited. 1 Electronic Warfare Information Operations 29 MAR 2011 Val O’Brien.
Improving Your Business Results Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec – All Rights Reserved June 26, 2002 BEYOND SIX SIGMA: A HOLISTIC.
Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Meeting Strategic Challenges: Balancing Capabilities With Priorities.
Global Integrated ISR in the Information Age
Connecting People With Information DoD Net-Centric Services Strategy Frank Petroski October 31, 2006.
© 2006 Carnegie Mellon University Establishing a Network Centric Capability: Implications for Acquisition and Engineering Dennis Smith Complex System Symposium.
IT Governance and Management
AFCEA State of Combat Comm Advancing Warfighter Capabilities in, through and from Cyberspace.
From the IT Assessment to the IT Roadmap ( )
Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 3-37; and Army
Deloitte Consulting SCOOPS Session September 2003.
Developing an IS/IT Strategy
9/11/ SUPPORT THE WARFIGHTER DoD CIO 1 Sample Template Community of Interest (COI) Steering Committee Kick-off Date: POC: V1.0.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
DASD (Plans) Directorate for Interagency Planning and Assessments UNCLASSIFIED.
ADP 2-0 and ADRP 2-0 U.S. Army Intelligence Center of Excellence 10 September 2012 This briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO POC: Mr. Craig Sieting Doctrine.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Lt Gen Bill Lord, SAF/CIO A6 Chief of Warfighting Integration and.
Air University: The Intellectual and Leadership Center of the Air Force Aim High…Fly - Fight - Win The AFIT of Today is the Air Force of Tomorrow. Distribution.
Air Force ISR Reach Back Distributed Common Ground Systems
Headquarters U. S. Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e © 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved From Throw Away.
Import of New Security Environment Keys to Transformation: Exploit Technology Exploit DOD ability to integrate processes Result: JV2010 Vision shall.
OVERALL CLASSIFICATION OF THIS BRIEFING IS UNCLASSIFIED United States Southern Command SOUTHCOM’s Role and Responsibilities in Foreign Humanitarian Assistance.
Air Force Strategy to Resources
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
Integrity  Service  Excellence Technology Challenges – Determining What to Invest In: Well-Considered Balance! Maj Gen Curt Bedke AFRL/CC 03 Sep 09 Air.
Catawba County Board of Commissioners Retreat June 11, 2007 It is a great time to be an innovator 2007 Technology Strategic Plan *
Mr. Tom Matthews OUSD(I) The overall classification of this brief is UNCLASSIFIED Discussion with the Intelligence Community Officer Course 10 April 2006.
Chapter 3 Strategic Information Systems Planning.
Last Updated 1/17/02 1 Business Drivers Guiding Portal Evolution Portals Integrate web-based systems to increase productivity and reduce.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force Warfighting Integration & XMSF Allen Murashige HQ USAF/XIW 6 Sep 2002.
Headquarters U.S. Air Force Fly – Fight – Win APEX Orientation Arthur J. Lichte Assistant Vice Chief of Staff.
A Net-Centric DoD NII/CIO 1 Sample Template Community of Interest (COI) Steering Committee Kick-off Date: POC:
Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 2 The Need TRANSFORMATION DEMANDS REFORM TRANSFORMATION DEMANDS REFORM.
MPE – Enabling ALL to securely SEE, DECIDE, ACT MPE - Highlights  Establish Core Implementation Working Group  Build Joining, Membership, and Exiting.
Mine Warfare - A Total Force Approach for the Future
1 Power to the Edge Agility Focus and Convergence Adapting C2 to the 21 st Century presented to the Focus, Agility and Convergence Team Inaugural Meeting.
Sustainment Solutions Envelope (SSE) Sustainment Solutions Envelope (SSE) Presented at the Defense Standardization Program Conference, 16 March 2004.
Latest Strategies for IT Security Margaret Myers Principal Director, Deputy CIO United States Department of Defense North American Day 2006.
US CYBER COMMAND The overall classification of this brief is: UNCLASSIFIED 1 Perspectives from the Command to APEX LtGen Robert E. Schmidle USMC Deputy.
This Briefing is Unclassified Space Situation Awareness (SSA) for the Warfighter 25 August 2005 HQ AFSPC/DRC Lt Col Troy Pannebecker.
JFCC Space and Global Strike Lt Col David Adler, USAF Special Assistant to the Commander 19 Oct 2005 UNCLASSIFIED This Briefing is UNCLASSIFIED Brief to.
CGSIC International Subcommittee Prague, Czech Republic March 14, 2005 Michael E. Shaw Director, Navigation and Spectrum Policy U.S. Department of Transportation.
Megacities: Rebuilding A Roadmap for Sustained Collaboration, Learning, and Training Kevin M. Felix COL(R), US Army.
“Existing world order is being redefined.” Henry Kissinger Jan 2015
DoD Cyberspace Workforce Definitions
Air Force Airborne SIGINT Architecture & Analysis
Fires Conceptual Framework Supporting Multi-Domain Battle
DoD Cyberspace Workforce Definitions
Air Force Cyber Operations Command Mission: Warfighting
Joint Staff J8, Deputy Director for C4
Deloitte Consulting LLP SCOOPS Session
Intelligence Support to Allied and Coalition Operations
DDR&E AC: Aligned to the National Defense Strategy
Presentation transcript:

AF ISR A Comprehensive Review UNCLASSIIFIED AF ISR A Comprehensive Review Good afternoon, it’s a real pleasure and a privilege to be here with you today to share some thoughts on how Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance is aligned to meet today’s 21st century operations… Lt Gen Larry James Deputy Chief of Staff, ISR Overall Briefing Classification: UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIIFIED

Holistic Review from a Capability Perspective UNCLASSIIFIED Purpose Baseline review the AF ISR Enterprise to include all capabilities that contribute to ISR missions, regardless of the programming portfolio - Information architecture - Processing, Exploitation, and Dissemination (PED) - Sensors - Platforms - Personnel Holistic Review from a Capability Perspective UNCLASSIIFIED

SECAF Task Direction Context for Review: absence of objectively determined joint requirements for ISR; unconstrained requests for additional MQ-1/9 CAPs that are unsustainable; and independently sponsored ISR R&D projects driven by JUON and availability of OCO funding Within this context: AF must balance currently growing capabilities with the reality of significant resource limitations ahead Demonstrate: How and where ISR capabilities have grown over time; Current and programmed level of effort in growing the ISR enterprise, including personnel, training, communications, and infrastructure; Commitment to sustaining capabilities to meet future needs; Balance between the MQ-1/9 force and other assets, including more advanced capabilities, in a future security environment that is more non-permissive and resource constrained; Rationale and recommendations for prioritizing multiple ISR and demo programs now underway

A View of the Future: The 2030 AF ISR Enterprise Seamless, open-architecture, all-domain, sensor-agnostic, “go-to” information source integrated with AF C2 architectures Able to characterize any target set (Air, space, cyber, or terrestrial) as a “network” to enable effects-based targeting and assessment Capability to persistently access target sets by necessary means Ability to collaboratively plan all-domain ISR ops as a single entity Demands trained/equipped analysts with critical thinking skills Needs secure, reliable, sufficient information pathways Fully integrated operations in a networked world Operators and Intel professionals working as a fused team in all domains Must improve the way we think, train, and operate Success in war depends on superior information…ISR underpins every mission the DoD executes

BLUF AF ISR well-postured to operate in permissive environments UNCLASSIIFIED BLUF AF ISR well-postured to operate in permissive environments Sufficient airborne ISR capability in the near term Growing to 65 CAPs on schedule We will consolidate recent gains and continue to improve Continuously evaluating airborne fleet (RJ, U-2, Global Hawk, etc.) Evaluating ability to operate across the spectrum of ops to include A2AD Need persistent access to characterize areas of interest Need ability to move information securely and reliably Must be able to PED the information on required timelines Must continue to improve analyst tools Need enhanced open-architecture, machine-to-machine processes Better integrate non-traditional ISR sources into existing construct Capability, Planning and Analysis feeds all Core Function Master Plans Need improved acquisition to field capabilities on required pace UNCLASSIIFIED

UNCLASSIIFIED Strategic Guidance UNCLASSIIFIED

AF Role for the Nation “The Nation’s principle air and space force…” UNCLASSIIFIED AF Role for the Nation “The Nation’s principle air and space force…” “Conduct offensive and defensive ops…to gain and maintain air superiority, air supremacy, as required…to enable conduct of U.S. and allied land, sea, air, space, and special operations” “Conduct global precision attack, to include strategic attack…prompt global strike…global personnel recovery” “Provide rapid global mobility…agile combat support…integrated C2” “Provide timely, global integrated ISR…to support worldwide ops” DODD 5100.01, Functions of the Department of Defense and Its Major Components, SECDEF, Dec 21, 2010 “The Joint Force will be able to counter highly capable adversaries. The Navy and Air Force will provide the primary level of effort during such a contingency Defense Planning Guidance, 29 Aug 11 UNCLASSIIFIED

UNCLASSIIFIED Findings UNCLASSIIFIED

UNCLASSIIFIED Findings AF well postured to conduct permissive environment ISR operations AF will continuously improve the current ISR capabilities to consolidate gains Growth to 65 MQ-1/9 CAPs on track AF ISR expected to operate across the spectrum of ops, humanitarian assistance/disaster relief through major conflict Robust, reliable, secure information architectures and communications enable all operations Ability to process, exploit, and disseminate information on ever-shorter timelines requires focused effort Analyst training and improved tool suites will always be a requirement Will continue to analyze sensor/platform/PED mix required to balance full-spectrum capabilities, especially all-domain A2AD operations C2 of ISR must be integrated with other C2 architectures to provide maximum return on investment Demand for AF ISR is increasing around the world—requires prioritization UNCLASSIIFIED

UNCLASSIIFIED Key Insights UNCLASSIIFIED

Key Insights Information Architecture PED Platforms/sensors mix C2 UNCLASSIIFIED Key Insights Information Architecture PED Platforms/sensors mix C2 UNCLASSIIFIED

Information Architecture Insights UNCLASSIIFIED Information Architecture Insights AF needs to determine sufficiency of current global information architecture Large data rates, high-definition sensors, increased users and rising expectations are combining to tax information pathways Future threats may further exacerbate limitations AF needs to partner with many users to maximize agility and flexibility Separate domain capabilities need review to understand a way ahead to integrate capabilities UNCLASSIIFIED

UNCLASSIIFIED PED Insights AF is the only service providing “Joint” PED and there is some external expectation that the AF contribution will increase AF needs to develop future PED capability holistically to account for all-domain requirements and leverage all-domain capabilities Need to refine global demand from COCOMs Must recognize and account for space/cyber requirements and contributions Non-traditional ISR will provide more information than ever but we must improve information transfer mechanisms Information architectures need to account for and integrate PED requirements UNCLASSIIFIED

Platform/Sensor Mix Insights UNCLASSIIFIED Platform/Sensor Mix Insights AF needs to characterize the full spectrum of potential targets, in all domains Air Mix of manned and unmanned platforms still required Non-traditional ISR has significant potential Airborne capability needs to be considered as just one part of “all- domain” solutions A2AD capability needs to be a key part of AF focus Space Space Situational Awareness is more than Missile Warning and object collision avoidance PED architecture needs to integrate with existing capability Multi-domain tipping and cueing is a game changer UNCLASSIIFIED

Platform/Sensor Mix Insights Cyberspace UNCLASSIIFIED Platform/Sensor Mix Insights Cyberspace Like Space, PED architecture needs to integrate with existing other domain capability Policy development, with respect to multi-level security to enable coordination and collaboration, needs focus Cyberspace offers significant opportunity to enable military operations, if considered in context Persistent ISR is as applicable to cyberspace as it is to other domains UNCLASSIIFIED

UNCLASSIIFIED C2 Insights C2 needs to be developed holistically and should be consistent across domains C2 must consider an entire capability and not be tied to individual platforms Improves consistency Non-traditional ISR needs to be “normalized” C2 of airborne PED resources needs to be based on information and product development requirements vice tied to platform apportionment C2 of PED for Space and Cyberspace information needs to be considered as part of the overall “PED solution” UNCLASSIIFIED

UNCLASSIIFIED Recommendations UNCLASSIIFIED

Information Architecture Recommendations UNCLASSIIFIED Information Architecture Recommendations We need to review and understand long-term information requirements All domains All operating environments Invest to improve global operations capability Need to better understand key information we “must move” from sensors/platforms vice what we “want to move” On-board processing will expand decision space by providing more options Must consider integrated, multi-domain solutions, to include ground infrastructure Need to improve availability, security, capacity UNCLASSIIFIED

UNCLASSIIFIED C2 Recommendations Develop solutions considering all-domain PED requirements Mandate enforceable standards for information pathways and PED analytic tools during sensor/platform development and acquisition Improve PED apportionment by designing a model based on consumer information requirements UNCLASSIIFIED

PED Recommendations Improve automated tools UNCLASSIIFIED PED Recommendations Improve automated tools Rapid database search, fusion, dissemination Enable fusion of multi-domain source information Machine-to-machine interfaces Improve multi-level security integration Continue DCGS migration to Service Oriented Architecture (DI2E) Tie to appropriate C2 nodes and databases Demonstrate future architectures through QRC’s and spiral upgrades UNCLASSIIFIED

Platform/Sensor Mix Recommendations UNCLASSIIFIED Platform/Sensor Mix Recommendations Develop persistent, survivable platforms/sensors for all domains Ensure integrated and synchronized development of information pathways and PED capability with platform/sensor development Air Normalize non-traditional ISR Consider survivable platforms for A2AD Develop capability to reliably pass information in high threat environments Need sensors to characterize, find, fix and track targets in all operating areas then assess effects Space/Cyber Recognize space/cyberspace as contested and develop capability to ensure continued operations during crises/conflict Integrate solutions with air, cyber, and terrestrial architectures UNCLASSIIFIED

SECAF Directed Tasks UNCLASSIIFIED Pri Task Description OPR OCR 1 Conduct Information Architecture Analysis to frame AF discussions on information architecture of the future AFSPC MAJCOMs, AF A2, A3/5, A4/7, A6, A8, A9 2 Develop/acquire framework tools to enable capability-based planning and analysis (CP&A) of AF ISR Enterprise platform/sensor/PED requirements to feed Core Function Master Plans AF/A2 ACC, AFSOC, AFMC, AFSPC AF A5, A6, 3 Develop roadmap for ISR automated tools and analyst visualization tools ACC, AFSOC, AFMC, AFSPC 4 Develop DCGS roadmap with specific measures required to implement Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) and ability to synergize PED for all air, space, and cyber platforms/sensors ACC, AFMC, AFSPC, AFSOC, AF A5, A6 5 Develop AF Targeting Roadmap to outline requirements to satisfy target folder development support to warfighters, including space and cyberspace target sets ACC AFMC, AFSPC, USAFE, PACAF, AFSOC 6 Develop NTISR roadmap to include platform/sensor mix, communication pathways requirements, CONOPs development, & personnel training requirements AFMC, AFSPC, AFSOC, AF A2, A5, A6, A8, A9 7 Develop PED apportionment model and associated roadmap that models manpower based on air, space, and cyberspace fused information requirements, not apportioned platforms ACC, AFMC, AFSPC, AFSOC UNCLASSIIFIED

Prioritized Investment UNCLASSIIFIED Prioritized Investment Global Architecture for ISR Operations Robust, survivable, secure pathways for manned, unmanned, air, space, and cyberspace capabilities Sufficient to meet global mission demand Robust tools to improve PED capacity, capability and C2 Linked across all domains and C2 architectures Capability to access A2AD environments with persistence Continue to improve, refine and leverage investment in legacy ISR capabilities, e.g. MQ-1/9 Improve current sensors for new operating environments UNCLASSIIFIED

UNCLASSIIFIED Questions UNCLASSIIFIED

AF ISR A Comprehensive Review UNCLASSIIFIED AF ISR A Comprehensive Review Good afternoon, it’s a real pleasure and a privilege to be here with you today to share some thoughts on how Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance is aligned to meet today’s 21st century operations… Lt Gen Larry James Deputy Chief of Staff, ISR Overall Briefing Classification: UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIIFIED