European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Presentation to ICAO Workshop Kiev 28 July – 1 July 2010 EUR Regional Implementation of Flight Plan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
B-RNAV OPERATIONS IN EUROPEAN AIRSPACE
Advertisements

The Changes Kim Breivik Chairman EUR 2012 Task Force
ICAO FPL 2012 Implementation Workshop Lisbon 16 th February 2012 Kim Breivik Chairman EUR 2012 Task Force Operational Requirements, Network Management.
ICAO FPL 2012 Implementation Workshop Lisbon 16 th February 2012 Kim Breivik Chairman EUR 2012 Task Force Operational Requirements, Network Management.
ICAO FPL 2012 Implementation Workshop Lisbon 16 th February 2012 Transition & Roll-Over Period Kim Breivik Chairman EUR 2012 Task Force Operational Requirements,
APPLICABLE TO KC-30A OPS ICAO FLIGHTPLANNING AMENDMENT NAIPS INTERNET SERVICE (NIS)
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office OVERVIEW OF THE AMENDMENT - ICAO EUR FPL2012 Workshop Kiev, Ukraine 29 June.
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Presentation to ICAO Workshop Kiev 28 July – 1 July 2010 EUR Regional Implementation of Flight Plan.
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation 2012 FPL Task Force Revised Specifications for 2012 FPL in EUR Region Andrew Hill, Eurocontrol.
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation WXXM, December 2012 Dennis Hart Senior Aviation Meteorology Expert EUROCONTROL
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-40/PIA-4 Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application.
Module R2 CS450. Next Week R1 is due next Friday ▫Bring manuals in a binder - make sure to have a cover page with group number, module, and date. You.
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Presentation to ICAO Workshop Kiev 28 July – 1 July 2010 EUR Regional Implementation of Flight Plan.
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Flight Planning Present and Future Day 3 Description of the FPL from 15 Nov (the 2012 FPL)
FLIGHT PLAN 2012 PREPARED BY:DYLAN KEMLO TRANSITION – 15 NOVEMBER 2012 Note – This presentation does not incorporate the additional changes related to.
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office Outcome of the ICAO EUR FPL2012 Workshop Kiev, Ukraine 29 June – 1 July 2010.
Service Definer Roles NHS e-Referral Service
APAC PBN Seminar F.LECAT (ICAO)
ICAO SARPS and Guidance Material
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Gulf of Mexico 50 NM Lateral Separation – RNAV Routes Project Project Overview ATO Oceanic & Offshore.
International Civil Aviation Organization European and North Atlantic Office CLARIFICATIONS FROM ICAO - ICAO EUR FPL2012 Workshop Kiev, Ukraine 29 June.
ATS Route and Waypoint Implementation:
APOLLO GX50/55 GPS Basic Operations. Introduction  This presentation is designed to introduce the basics of the GX50/55 GPS  Focus will be placed on.
System Analysis and Design
Why Flight Plan and ATFCM adherence?
© FREQUENTIS 2010 Datum: Rev.1 Autor: ODOSeite: 1 FPL 2012 Kym Shenton Senior Technical Engineer/Safety Engineer Frequentis California, Inc.
ICAO Flight Plan 2012 Workshop ARE YOU READY? Durban 24 August 2012.
Data entry: Validation
ICAO Changes to the Present Flight Plan Form Amendment 1 to the PANS-ATM Fifteenth Edition (PANS-ATM, Doc 4444) Tom Brady ICAO HQ.
NORTH ATLANTIC ADS WAYPOINT REPORTING TRIALS. John Coulson NATS Infrastructure Services.
FPL2012 TF#7Brussels 10 October 2012 Kim Breivik Operational Requirements Network Management EUROCONTROL Deployment.
Customizing ArcReader to support GPS Kelly Johnston Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Vendors Conference Prestwick 2011 Customer Picture Implementation of Changes to ICAO FPL 2012 Christoph Kunze Lufthansa Systems 7th December 2011.
Air Traffic Management Chapter 5 – Flight Plan By Captain Ab Manan Mansor.
EUR Flight Planning Guidance
Doc.: IEEE /0041r1 AP Location Capability January 2007 Donghee Shim et alSlide 1 AP Location Capability Notice: This document has been prepared.
E | W | E | W | NHS e-Referral Service Referring Roles Issued: 27 th.
FILES AND EXCEPTIONS Topics Introduction to File Input and Output Using Loops to Process Files Processing Records Exceptions.
APAC PBN Seminar F.LECAT (ICAO)
General Rules When completing a flight plan the following rules apply:
Presentation to ICAO Workshop Kiev 28 July – 1 July 2010 EUR Regional Implementation of Flight Plan Amendment 1 for 2012 Issues with Certain Fields.
FIXM briefing for the AIXM CCB Hubert LEPORI EUROCONTROL, ATM/STR/SWM
Aerodrome Operations under Limited Visibility Conditions
OVERVIEW OF THE AMENDMENT - ICAO EUR FPL2012 Workshop
FPL 2012 Kym Shenton Senior Technical Engineer/Safety Engineer
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Допълнение 7 на PANS-ATM (ICAO Doc 4444)
CLARIFICATIONS FROM ICAO - ICAO EUR FPL2012 Workshop
Description of the FPL from 15 Nov. 2012
FILING OF VFR FLIGHT PLANS
FAA Implementation of Amendment 1
FPL 2012 FPL Vendor Conference Mona Annaddaf Scotland, 7-8/12/2011
OVERVIEW OF THE AMENDMENT - ICAO EUR FPL2012 Workshop
Building Configurable Forms
Transmitted by the expert
Example showing New / Modified Elements
ICAO 2012 Network Operations Update
Publication specialties and how to flight plan
Training & Documentation
ICAO 2012 FPL Anthony Coult 8 Dec 2011.
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
RAD Evolution Workshop Network Approach to the RAD - DP/4
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
ETS – Air Data submission Training
Select Requisition to Amend
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
Presentation to ICAO Workshop Kiev 28 July – 1 July 2010 EUR Regional Implementation of Flight Plan Amendment 1 for 2012 OLDI Issues
Creating Additional Input Items
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
Presentation transcript:

European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Presentation to ICAO Workshop Kiev 28 July – 1 July 2010 EUR Regional Implementation of Flight Plan Amendment 1 for 2012 Issues with Certain Fields Version d4

2 Field 10a – NAV/COM Equipment and Capability Syntax: ["N"] | [ 1 { "A" | "B" | "C" | "D" | "E1" | "E2" | "E3" | "F" | "G" | "H" | "I" | "J1" | "J2"| "J3" | "J4" | "J5" | "J6" | "J7" | "K" | "L" | "M1" | "M2"| "M3" | "O" | "P1" | "P2" | "P3" | "P4" | "P5" | "P6" | "P7" | "P8" | "P9" | "R" | "S" | "T" | "U" | "V" | "W" | "X" | "Y" | "Z" } ]  Description:The descriptor "N" or one or more of the listed descriptors without repetition, therefore a theoretical limit of 64 characters  No longer accepted: E, P, M, J, Q.  New: Letter&Digit combinations Semantics: If ‘R’ present  PBN/ expected in F18. If ‘Z’ present  at least one of COM/, DAT/, NAV expected in F18

3 Field 10b – SUR Equipment and Capability Syntax: ["N"] | (1{ ("I" | "P" | "X") | "A" | "C"}3 | 1{ "A" | "C" | "E" | "H" | "L" | "S"}6) [1{"B1"| "B2" | "D1" | "G1" | "U1" | "U2" | "V1" | "V2"}8 ]  Description: The descriptor 'N' or, either one or more of the descriptors ‘I’, ‘P’, ‘X’, ‘A’, ‘C’ with ‘I’, ‘P’, ‘X’ being mutually exclusive i.e. only one may be present, or one or more of the descriptors ‘A’, ‘C’, ‘E’, ‘H’, ‘L’, ‘S’. Plus optionally one or more of the descriptors ‘B1’, ‘B2’, ‘D1’, ‘G1’, ‘U1’, ‘U2’, ‘V1’, ‘V2’ without repetition. A total limit of 20 characters shall be applied  No longer accepted: D  New: Letter&Digit combinations Semantics: None

4 F18 & Flexibility - Background  Amendment 1 indicates for Field 18: Note.— Use of indicators not included under this item may result in data being rejected, processed incorrectly or lost INSERT 0 (zero) if no other information, OR, any other necessary information in the preferred sequence shown hereunder, in the form of the appropriate indicator selected from those defined hereunder followed by an oblique stroke and the information to be recorded

5 F18 & Flexibility - Background  A specified list of indicators in Field 18 Some ‘missing’ in use in Europe today. (RVR/, RFP/, IFP/, STAYINFOn, AWR/, SRC/)  A specified list of indicators in STS/ Some ‘missing’ (EXM833, PROTECTED, NONRNAV, CPDLCX)  Possibility to add new indications (without 4444 amendment) ?? Only RMK/, a free text field, seems to offer any flexibility

6 F18 & Flexibility – Use of Doc.7030  Doc to provide EUR requirements Retention of RVR/ and RFP/ as currently specified Introduction of EUR/ to provide specific EUR status and exemption indications (EXM833, PROTECTED, CPDLCX)  Proposed amendment to Doc presented to APDSG on May, COG Nov?, EANPG Dec

7 F18 & Flexibility – Technical Implementation Recommended: Globally, ATC end-user systems should accept an un-recognised indicator in Field 18 Alternatively, they must remain current with all planned 7030 updates involving new data items within the FPL If ATC systems only accept the published list of Field 18 indicators, then how can we evolve without the need for global synchronisation for every new data item requirement?

8 Field 18 – IFPS will Accept Syntax: [ "0" ] | [ 1{"STS/" | "PBN/"| “EUR/” | "NAV/" | "COM/" | "DAT/" | "SUR/" | "DEP/" | "DEST/" | "DOF/" | "REG/" | "EET/" | "SEL/" | "TYP/" | "CODE/" | "RVR/" | "DLE/" | "OPR/" | "ORGN/" | "PER/" | "ALTN/" | "RALT/" | "TALT/" | "RIF/" | "RMK/" | "STAYINFOn/" | "RFP/" } ]  Description: Either the descriptor "0" (zero) or one or more of the listed elements without repetition.  Order of fields not important to IFPS.  New: PBN/, DLE/, ORGN/, TALT/, EUR/ Semantics: If PBN/  ’R’ in F10a

9 Field 18 – Transmitted by IFPS Syntax: 1{ [ "0" ] | ["STS/" | "PBN/" | “EUR/” | "NAV/" | "COM/" | "DAT/" | "SUR/" | "DEP/" | "DEST/" | "DOF/" | "REG/" | "EET/" | "SEL/" | "TYP/" | "CODE/" | "RVR/" | "IFP/" | "DLE/" | "OPR/" | "ORGN/" | "PER/" | "ALTN/" | "RALT/" | "TALT/" | "SRC/" | "RIF/" | "RMK/" | "STAYINFOn/" | "RFP/" | "AWR/" ] }  Description: Either the descriptor "0" (zero) or one or more of the listed elements in the order shown above.  The indicators "SRC/", "AWR/" and "IFP/" shall not be output by IFPS to unknown ‘AD’ line addressees

10 Field 18 – STS/ Syntax: 1{ "ALTRV" | "ATFMX" | "FFR" | "FLTCK" | " HAZMAT" | "HEAD" | "HOSP" | "HUM" | "MARSA" | "MEDEVAC" | "NONRVSM" | "SAR" | "STATE" }  Description: one or more of the listed descriptors without repetition.  No longer accepted: ATFMEXEMPTAPPROVED, EXM833, PROTECTED, NONRNAV, RNAVINOP, Other free text reasons to be provided in RMK/  New: ATFMX, FFR, FLTCK, HAZMAT, MARSA, MEDEVAC

11 Field 18 – DEPT, DEST, ALTN Syntax: [adname [(brng distnc) | (lattd longtd)]] | [ptid | lattd longtd] adname = 1{LIM_CHAR}50  Description: The name of the departure aerodrome (up to 50 characters) plus optionally (for aerodromes not listed in the relevant AIP) the location of the aerodrome given either as bearing and distance from a significant point or as a latitude and longitude. Or, if the aircraft did not depart from an aerodrome, the first point on the route (given by a Nav. Aid, Waypoint or Marker Beacon designator) or by latitude & longitude. e.g. DEP/ MALAHIDE DUB11015 DEP/ MALAHIDE 5327N00608W DEP/BAGSO DEP/5327N00608W

12 Field 18 – DLE Syntax: 1{ALPHANUM}11 4{DIGIT}4  Description: a significant point followed by an indication of a time period in hours and minutes e.g. DUB0040 ; DUB  A DLE/ indication will be retained by IFPS and provided to ATC Units as received regardless of the location of the DLE point (inside/outside IFPZ)  The CFMU profile shall reflect the additional flight time as appropriate  The STAY indication will be retained for use for flights which remain entirely within the IFPZ, as today.

13 Modifying Field 18 cont. (CHG-ABC123-EBBR2230-EDDF-DOF/ /REG/OOSAX)  F18= PBN/B3 DOF/ REG/OOSAX i.e. PBN & DOF have been removed ! FPL:F18= PBN/B3 DOF/ REG/OOSAB Note : When modifying a Field 18 element complete Field 18 must be provided, not just the modified element. Elements not repeated will be deleted.

14 Use of DOF/ FPL:F18= STS/HOSP DOF/ PBN/B3 F13b= 2230 Flight is delayed until 0200 i.e. a delay over midnight. (DLA-ABC123-EBBR0200-EDDF-DOF/100304) OR (CHG-ABC123-EBBR2230-EDDF-DOF/ /EBBR /STS/HOSP DOF/ PBN/B3) Note 1: The DOF (or Off Block Date) as provided in Field 18 shall always refer to the last notified Off Block Date & Time (EOBD/EOBT). Note 2: A modification to F18, via Field 22, must contain the complete F18 information, otherwise the ‘missing’ data will be removed from the FPL.

15 Field 18 In Other Messages  Field 18 required in CNL, DLA, CHG, DEP, RQS, RQP  IFPS will raise an error if not present (but it can just be ‘0’)  IFPS will ensure Field 18 containing only DOF/ is always included in CNL, DLA, CHG, DEP messages sent to ATC Units.

16 Field 18 - Other Message – Input Examples 1.(CHG-EIN105-EIDW1200-KORD-DOF/ /E346/H) 2.(CNL-EIN105-EIDW1200-KORD-DOF/100304) 4.(CNL-EIN105-EIDW1200-KORD-STS/ATFMX MARSA FLTCK PBN/A1C3L1 NAV/GBAS SBAS DAT/NO SPECIFIC DESIGNATORS SUR/ADDITIONAL INFO DEP/MALAHIDE 5327N00609W DOF/100305) 3.(CNL-EIN105-EIDW1200-KORD-0) Examples of valid message compositions:

17 Questions?