Z1 Z2 Z3 Fz (% body weight) X7 X9 Y10 A B C Figure 1. gait cycle (%) gait cycle (%) gait cycle (%) Fx (% body weight) Fy (% body weight)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recovery in horizontal gait after hip resurfacing vs. total hip arthroplasty at 6-month follow-up – a RCT study Purpose To test the hypothesis that (i)
Advertisements

3-Dimensional Gait Measurement Really expensive and fancy measurement system with lots of cameras and computers Produces graphs of kinematics (joint.
Prepared by: MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM KHAN BS.PT(Pak), MS.PT(Pak), NCC(AKUH)
Biomechanical Examination Parameters
Renee Kitto Port Macquarie Base Hospital
Pathological Gait. Excessive Plantarflexion Causes Triceps surae contracture Triceps surae spasticity Pre-tibial weakness Voluntary/compensatory 2 0 weak.
Biomechanics of Locomotion D. Gordon E. Robertson, PhD, FCSB Biomechanics, Laboratory, School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada D.
Ambulation and Ambulation Aids
Phases of the Gait Cycle And Determinants of Gait
Walking Analysis … the process A gait cycle consists of “the activities that occur from the point of initial contact of one lower extremity to the point.
Stair Gait Lecture Notes.
Kinesiology Laboratory 8
Gait.
Biomechanics- Gait.
Progression: The basic objective of the locomotor system is to move the body forward from the current site to a new location so the hands and head can.
Analysis of a continuous skill – walking and running (gait)
Determinants of Gait Determinants of Gait.
Gender Influences on Gait when Walking Normally versus Carrying Weight Andrea L. Homan, 1 Chelsea L. Smith, 2 Emily E. Heffernen, 2 Elena E. Leon, 3 David.
1 Gait Analysis – Objectives To learn and understand: –The general descriptive and temporal elements of the normal walking movement –The important features.
Gait Analysis – Objectives
Gait Analysis – Objectives
Normal and Pathological Gait in the Elderly Peggy R. Trueblood, PhD, PT California State University, Fresno.
LINEAR KINEMATICS DESCRIBING OBJECTS IN MOTION Chapter 2.
Analysis of gait Analysis of gait.
Gait development in children. The prerequisite for Gait development Adequate motor control. C.N.S. maturation. Adequate R.O.M. Muscle strength. Appropriate.
Ki Hyuk Sung, MD Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Long term outcome of SEMLS including DHL in spastic diplegia.
The Gait Cycle:.
Chapter 9 Evaluation of Gait. Introduction Gait Analysis – functional evaluation of a person’s walking or running style Systematic method of identifying.
Ki Hyuk Sung, MD Relationship between isometric muscle strength, gait parameters, and gross motor function Seoul National University Bundang Hospital.
Predicting outcomes of rectus femoris transfer surgery.
Biomechanics of Walking
Gait Analysis – Objectives
 Support Events  Foot (Heel) Strike  Foot Flat  Midstance  Heel Off  Foot (Toe) Off  Swing Events  Pre swing  Midswing  Terminal swing.
Treatment Rationale: Terminology
 Flexion  Extension  Rotation  Lateral Flexion.
연구 계획 이경호 Predicting outcome of surgery Ideal approach.. ? Training Data Predicting outcome surgery.
Gait (3) Sagittal Plane Analysis Lecture Notes. Example To Make Things Clear  If during gait knee flexion is necessary, & a flexion moment is acting.
ANKLE DORSI-FLEXION.
Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Experimental Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis Using Proportional Myoelectric Control.
1 Gait Analysis – Objectives To learn and understand: –The general descriptive and temporal elements of the normal walking movement –The important features.
Figure Figure Figure Figure
 Understand the 3 types of levers that are used in everyday life and how they affect different sports.
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (July 2011)
Clinical Biomechanics
Running Gait.
Measures of Dispersion
Date of download: 10/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Bare weight Provide a means for locomotion Maintain equilibrium
Figure 1 Step length during uncued gait, cued gait, and retention phases. From: Effects of Long-Term Gait Training Using Visual Cues in an Individual With.
Range of Motion and Walking Distances in Subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease Sarah Bakera, Iraklis Pipinosb,c, Jason Johanningb,c, and Sara Myersa,b.
Preliminary Evaluation of an Automatically Stance-Phase Controlled Pediatric Prosthetic Knee Joint Using Quantitative Gait Analysis  Jan Andrysek, MASc,
Date of download: 12/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Contralateral hip and knee gait biomechanics are unchanged by total hip replacement for unilateral hip osteoarthritis  Kharma C. Foucher, Markus A. Wimmer 
Human Gait.
Descriptive Statistics
S3 vary load.
Keith E. Gordon, PhD, Daniel P. Ferris, PhD, Arthur D. Kuo, PhD 
Transtibial Amputee Human Motion Analysis
Measures of Dispersion
Cory L. Christiansen, PT, PhD 
Immediate Effects of a New Microprocessor-Controlled Prosthetic Knee Joint: A Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation  Malte Bellmann, Dipl-Ing, Thomas Schmalz,
System setup and results of a representative participant in a single training session. System setup and results of a representative participant in a single.
Quantitative Gait Analysis in Parkinson’s Disease: Comparison With a Healthy Control Group  Olumide Sofuwa, PT, MSc, Alice Nieuwboer, PT, PhD, Kaat Desloovere,
Energy expenditure and gait characteristics of a bilateral amputee walking with C-leg prostheses compared with stubby and conventional articulating prostheses 
Is There a Relationship Between Fatigue Questionnaires and Gait Mechanics in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis?  Jessie M. Huisinga, PhD, Mary L. Filipi,
Measures of Dispersion
Intrathecal baclofen in subjects with spastic hemiplegia: assessment of the antispastic effect during gait1  Olivier Rémy-Néris, MD, PhD, Vincent Tiffreau,
Presentation transcript:

Z1 Z2 Z3 Fz (% body weight) X7 X9 Y10 A B C Figure 1. gait cycle (%) gait cycle (%) gait cycle (%) Fx (% body weight) Fy (% body weight)

Step length (cm) Stride width (cm) Stride length (cm) Cadence (steps/minute) Velocity (m/minute) Stance phase (% of gait cycle) Single stance phase (% of gait cycle) Z1 (% of body weight) Z2 (% of body weight) Z3 (% of body weight) X7 (% of body weight) X9 (% of body weight) Y10 (% of body weight) Hip motion b (degree) Knee motion b (degree) Ankle motion b (degree) Gait parameters1st day2nd day3rd dayAverage in 3 days p a Means and standard deviations ( SD) of gait parameters measured in the three days Table 1. b Differences of range of motion between peak extension (plantarflexion) and peak flexion (dorsiflexion) angle during gait cycle. a Resulted in one-way analysis of variance with repeated measures in the three days. * P < (4.38) (4.76) (5.95) (4.88) * (1.74) (1.75) (1.65) (1.63) (7.82) (8.98) (9.25) (8.47) * (10.0) (11.2) (10.7) (10.5) (1.09) (1.23) (1.03) (1.01) (8.48) (9.12) (11.5) (9.48) * (3.61) (3.12) (3.92) (3.19) * 6.62 (1.15) 6.90 (1.38) 6.99 (1.29) 6.83 (1.21) * (2.67) (2.55) (3.07) (2.58) * (3.26) (3.21) (3.26) (3.06) * (5.16) (5.40) (6.57) (5.55) * (1.11) (1.17) (1.08) (0.99) (5.36) (5.07) (6.47) (5.19) * (5.80) (5.56) (6.89) (5.78) * (4.98) (4.67) (5.48) (4.56) (6.27) (5.76) (6.82) (5.63) mean (SD)

Step length Stride width Stride length Cadence Velocity Stance phase Single stance phase Z1 Z2 Z3 X7 X9 Y10 Hip motion Knee motion Ankle motion Gait parameters ICC ( 1 , 1 ) a CV b Intraclass correlation coefficient ( 1 , 1 ) and coefficient of variation before compensation procedures. Table 2. a Intracalss correlation coefficient in the three days. b Coefficient of variation in the three days ( ) (0.92 – 13.0) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) mean (range)

Step length Stride width Stride length Cadence Velocity Stance phase Single stance phase Z1 Z2 Z3 X7 X9 Y10 Hip motion Knee motion Ankle motion Gait parameters Peason's correlation coefficient a Correlation among stride length, cadence, velocity and other gait parameters Table 3. Stride length CadenceVelocity 0.67 * * (1.00) * (1.00) 0.78 * 0.96 * * * 0.58 * * * 0.65 * * *-0.56 * * * 0.69 * 0.72 * 0.78 * (1.00) a Calculated for the three recording sessions. * P<

Step length Stride width Stride length Cadence Stance phase Single stance phase Z1 Z2 Z3 X7 X9 Y10 Hip motion Knee motion Ankle motion Gait parametersRegression equation a vel P b ICC (1, 1)CV Intraclass correlation coefficient (1, 1) and coefficient of variation of each parameters when compensated by the velocity Table 4. a Calculated for the three recording sessions by least squares method. b Resulted in one way analysis of variance with repeated measures after compensation. ICCs (1, 1), intraclass correlation coefficient; CV, coefficient of variation; vel, velocity value (m/minute) mean (range) ( ) vel (0.83 – 17.3) vel (0.22 – 1.80) vel (0.34 – 2.15) vel (0.06 – 1.67) vel (0.19 – 4.10) vel (0.14 – 4.44) vel (0.40 – 7.24) vel (0.38 – 2.58) vel (0.16 – 9.54) vel (0.27 – 10.5) vel (1.68 – 11.2) vel (1.62 – 7.89) vel (0.46 – 8.23) vel (0.07 – 22.0)