Making CMP’s From chapter 16 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Advertisements

Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Seismic Reflection Processing Illustrations The Stacking Chart and Normal Moveout Creating a seismic reflection section or profile requires merging the.
Velocity Analysis Introduction to Seismic ImagingERTH 4470/5470 Yilmaz, ch
Accommodation space, Coluvial wedge. Even in this image, throw is hard to interpret however, there is still geologic insight to be gained. Surface expression.
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Processing and Binning Overview From chapter 14 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
Introduction to GeoProbe
Processing: zero-offset gathers
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Yue Du Mark Willis, Robert Stewart AGL Research Day
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
Seismic Reflection: Processing and Interpretation Katie Wooddell UW Madison.
Seismic reflection Seismic reflection profiling basically same principle as echo sounding But lower frequency used for greater subbottom penetration Trade.
SOES6004 Data acquisition and geometry
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
MULTIPLE PREDICTION & ATTENUATION Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb Feb
Loading of the data/conversion Demultiplexing Editing Geometry Amplitude correction Frequency filter Deconvolution Velocity analysis NMO/DMO-Correction.
Filters  Temporal Fourier (t f) transformation  Spatial Fourier (x k x ) transformation applications  f-k x transformation  Radon (-p x ) transformation.
Experiment 3 part 1 – Feedback and recap of Experiment 2 – Lab 3: Terminal Velocity Goals for this lab: o How accurately can you measure the terminal velocity.
GG 450 April 16, 2008 Seismic Reflection 1.
Seismic reflection Ali K. Abdel-Fattah Geology Dept.,
The ray parameter and the travel-time curves P flat and P radial are the slopes of the travel time curves T-versus-X and T-versus- , respectively. While.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Seismic Reflection Data Processing and Interpretation A Workshop in Cairo 28 Oct. – 9 Nov Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Sherif Mohamed Hanafy Lecturer.
Time vs Depth Migration Insensitive to v(z) model Sensitive to v(z) model Time migration uses best fit hyperbola Depth migration uses best guess moveout.
Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell D.S. Macpherson.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
Refraction Statics Bryce Hutchinson Sumit Verma. 3D Statics display 1. Click this button on the right side of the statics window to open a 3D statics.
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS. EARTH MODEL NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER.
The Experimental Comparison of Conventional and Differential Semblance on several data sets Jintan Li Rice University.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Moveout Correction and Migration of Surface-related Resonant Multiples Bowen Guo*,1, Yunsong Huang 2 and Gerard Schuster 1 1 King Abdullah University of.
Introduction to Seismology
Radon Transforms in Tau-P space and Multiple Removal
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
T 2 = T X 2 /V 2. It is a hyperbola with apex at X = 0 and T 0 = 2H/V. – –V and H are the layer velocity and thickness. T 2 -X 2 plot is a straight.
Reflection seismograms
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 8 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Wed 10 Feb: Burger (§ ) Last Time: Seismic Reflection Travel-Time Cont’d.
Introduction to Seismic Reflection Imaging References: J.M. Reynolds, An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics, John Wiley & Sons,
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
Coincident Source receiver Concepts
Processing Seismic Reflection Data of La Bajada Fault Ryan Lester.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics Last time: The Refraction Method Cont’d Multiple Horizontal Layers: Using Snell’s law, generalizes simply to: Dipping.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 10 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Seismic Reflection Travel-Time Cont’d Dix Equations for multiple layers:
Multiplication Timed Tests.
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology Field measurements and mapping Terminology on folds and folds Stereographic projections From maps to cross-sections.
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
Reflection velocity analysis
Processing of KAUST Golf Data
SEISMIC DATA GATHERING.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II
Marine Reflection Seismology - Geometry
High Resolution AVO NMO
INTRODUCTION STRF: 50m reflection line with dx=1.0m
Multiple attenuation in the image space
Coincident Source receiver Concepts
Making CMP’s From chapter 16 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
Common MidPoint (CMP) Records and Stacking
3D Seismic Processing Eric Verschuur AES 1530.
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Processing and Binning Overview
Dipping layer reflection events and the common midpoint gather
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
Discussion of problems & Common midpoint gathers
Packing of uniform spheres
Presentation transcript:

Making CMP’s From chapter 16 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner

Outline Normal Moveout Stacking

Normal Moveout x T Hyperbola:

Normal Moveout x T “Overcorrected” Normal Moveout is too large Chosen velocity for NMO is too (a) large (b) small

Normal Moveout x T “Overcorrected” Normal Moveout is too large Chosen velocity for NMO is too small (a) large (b) small

Normal Moveout x T “Under corrected” Normal Moveout is too small Chosen velocity for NMO is (a) too large (b) too small

Normal Moveout x T “Under corrected” Normal Moveout is too small Chosen velocity for NMO is too large (a) too large (b) too small

Vinterval from Vrms Dix, 1955

Vrms V1 V2 V3 Vrms < Vinterval

Vinterval from Vrms

Primary seismic events x T

x T

x T

x T

Multiples and Primaries x T M1 M2

Conventional NMO before stacking x T NMO correction V=V(depth) e.g., V=mz + B M1 M2 “Properly corrected” Normal Moveout is just right Chosen velocity for NMO is correct

Over-correction (e.g. 80% Vnmo) x T NMO correction V=V(depth) e.g., V=0.8(mz + B) M1 M2 x T M1 M2

f-k filtering before stacking (Ryu) x T NMO correction V=V(depth) e.g., V=0.8(mz + B) M1 M2 x T

Correct back to 100% NMO x T NMO correction V=V(depth) e.g., V=(mz + B) M1 M2 x T M1 M2

Outline Convolution and Deconvolution Normal Moveout Stacking

NMO stretching V1 V2 T0T0 “NMO Stretching”

NMO stretching V1V1 V2V2 T0T0 “NMO Stretching” V 1 <V 2

NMO stretching V1V1 V2V2 V 1 <V 2 NMO “stretch” = “linear strain” Linear strain (%) = final length-original length original length X 100 (%)

NMO stretching V1V1 V2V2 V 1 <V 2 X 100 (%) original length = final length = NMO “stretch” = X 100 (%)

stretching for T=2s,V1=V2=1500 m/s Green line assumes V1=V2 Blue line is for general case, where V1, V2 can be different and delT0=0.1s (this case: V1=V2) Matlab code

Stacking + + =

+ + = Stacking improves S/N ratio

+ = Semblance Analysis “Semblance” + X Twtt (s)

+ = Semblance Analysis + X Twtt (s) V3V3 V1V1 V2V2 V Peak energy