Paolo Donzelli ESTEC HR Division Den Haag 27 November 2008

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From CESSDA to European Research Infrastructure Developments in cross-European data sharing.
Advertisements

Key Area Meeting, Prague 3-7 th Sept 2014 AA workshop What are Academic Activities?
Info Day - Promoting FP7 – Theme 1 HealthFeb. 14th, 2007, Bucharest Building on the success of SMEs go Life Sciences SMEs go Health.
Erasmus Thematic Network Sanne Hirs, Project coordinator Faculty of Law, Utrecht University.
Student Programmes and Career Opportunities at ESA Kiruna, 15 th May 2007 Merlijne Berntsen Human Exploration Promotion Division Directorate of Human Spaceflight,
EASAC science-policy dialogue project: phase 2 – 2011 Report of phone interviews with Academies Gill Petrokofsky October 2012.
UNICA RECTORS’SEMINAR Brussels 5th of June 2007 Poul Petersen Tel
1 “European R&D Benchmarking (2002) “European R&D Benchmarking (2002)” Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Student Presentations Students: Miguel.
Delegations ICM Cluj-Napoca, 20th April The European Law Students’ Association Albania ˙ Austria ˙ Azerbaijan ˙ Belgium ˙ Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Delegations III KAM, Bratislava 4th to 8th September 2013.
Study Visits ICM Croatia, Opatija, 27th October to 3th November 2013.
ISARE : Health indicators in the regions of Europe André Ochoa for Isare team ISARE : Health indicators in the regions of Europe André Ochoa for Isare.
Connection of Piracy and Export and import control International preview Experience of Armenia.
Knowledge Management and Transition ICM Cluj-Napoca, 24th April 2015.
Delegations IV KAM Prague 3rd to 7th September 2014.
1 Volker Liebig (H/ESRIN, D-EOP) Gunther Kohlhammer Head of Earth Observation Ground Segment & Mission Operations Department 06 November 2012 Introduction.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use POLAND AND THE EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY Dr. Christina Giannopapa Coordination with Member States Office, Director General’s.
European Life Sciences Infrastructure for Biological Information ELIXIR
Ratela Asllani, December NATO, Enlargement, Chances & Challenges Presented by: Ratela Asllani, M.A PhD Candidate PhD Candidate.
Improving School Leadership 1 st Workshop of Participating Countries Beatriz Pont Education and Training Policy Division Workshop of National Coordinators.
European Federation of Engineering Consultancy Associations.
The importance of being ERIC Developments in cross-European data sharing.
OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Organisation and Content Overview.
Institutional autonomy, regulatory frameworks and incentives Enora Bennetot Pruvot Programme Manager Governance, Autonomy & Funding “Governance and Diversification.
ICM Bodrum th Oct 2014 AA workshop Introduction to Academic Activities.
C ross-European data sharing made easy EDAF Luxembourg.
→ May 2013 THE EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY. 2 “To provide for and promote, for exclusively peaceful purposes, cooperation among European states in space research.
REALISING POTENTIAL Social services and active inclusion John Halloran Director European Social Network Social Services In Europe
INTERNATIONALA CONFERENCE Security and Defence R&D Management: Policy, Concepts and Models R&D HUMAN CAPITAL POLICY ASSISTANT PROFESSOR KONSTANTIN POUDIN.
EOP Standard Presentation
THE EUROPEAN UNION. HISTORY 28 European states after the second world war in 1951 head office: Brussels 24 different languages Austria joined 1995.
Assistant Professor Nicoleta SIRGHI Assistant Professor Ioana VADASAN 1.
KAM Prague 3 rd -7 th September AA Workshop Studies Abroad Projects Embrace cultural diversity!
Schools for Health in Europe SHE Goof Buijs NIGZ 8 June 2008 Vancouver, partnership track.
COST Workshop on Developing Knowledge- Sharing Partnerships in Europe and Central Asia Orsolya Tóth National Innovation Office Gödöllő, 4 December, 2013.
Bureau for International Research and Technology Cooperation Herlitschka 1 SMEs in FP6 New Activities Supporting Successful SME Participation in Life.
The European Union 1 THE EUROPEAN UNION Lesson 2 Where in the world is the European Union?
CERN as a World Laboratory: From a European Organization to a global facility CERN openlab Board of Sponsors July 2, 2010 Rüdiger Voss CERN Physics Department.
ELSA Summer Law Schools IV KAM Prague, 3rd to 7th September 2014.
© Enterprise Europe Network South West 2009 The Eurostars Programme Kenny Legg R&D Funding for the Environmental Sector – 29 June 2010 European Commission.
Which role is yours? ADV and Promotion of ELSA projects/events LXIV International Council Meeting Opatija, Croatia October 28 th - November 3 rd 2013.
EUROCONTROL.
KAM Prague 3 rd -7 th September AA Workhsop Law Review.
Bureau for International Research and Technology Cooperation Herlitschka 1 Warsaw FP6 Launch Conference - 26 Nov Small and Medium Enterprises -
Delegations LXV International Council Meeting Qawra, Malta 16 th - 23 rd of March 2014.
E u r o g u i d a n c e A Network of National Resource and Information Centres for Guidance Established in 1992.
E u r o g u i d a n c e A Network of National Resource and Information Centres for Guidance Established in 1992.
The European Law Students’ Association Albania ˙ Austria ˙ Azerbaijan ˙ Belgium ˙ Bosnia and Herzegovina ˙ Bulgaria ˙ Croatia ˙ Cyprus ˙ Czech Republic.
Your first EURES job Making it easier to move and work to recruit young people in Europe.
The Mission of CERN  Push back  Push back the frontiers of knowledge E.g. the secrets of the Big Bang …what was the matter like within the first moments.
CIÊNCIA July 2010 Lisboa © ESA. CIÊNCIA July 2010 Lisboa © ESA Slide # 2 1. The European Space Agency 2. Impact in Portugal 3. Future 0.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS Unit 2 Business Development GCSE Business Studies.
Best Sustainable Development Practices for Food Security UV-B radiation: A Specific Regulator of Plant Growth and Food Quality in a Changing Climate The.
→ Inflight call Event with ESA astronaut Tim Peake Hans Tuinenburg, ESA Education National STEM Learning Centre York, 14 April 2016.
EUROPEAN UNION – MAKING OFF European Economic Community
European Union Duy Trinh.
THE EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY
THE EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY
The European Union “United in Diversity”
PRAG PRACTICAL GUIDE TO CONTRACT PROCEDURES FOR EXTERNAL ACTIONS
A LIFE-CHANGING EXPERIENCE…
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The European Parliament – voice of the people
EU: First- & Second-Generation Immigrants
Enterprise and Industry Directorate General
European Union Membership
Perspective of an International Research Center
Where in the world is the European Union?
Prodcom Statistics in Focus
Presentation transcript:

Paolo Donzelli ESTEC HR Division Den Haag 27 November 2008 EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY Alternative Career Paths for Technical Specialists Paolo Donzelli ESTEC HR Division Den Haag 27 November 2008

PURPOSE OF ESA “To provide for and promote, for exclusively peaceful purposes, cooperation among European states in space research and technology and their space applications.” Article 2 of ESA Convention

18 MEMBER STATES Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Canada takes part in some projects under a cooperation agreement. Hungary, Romania and Poland are European Cooperating States. Estonia and Slovenia have recently signed cooperation agreements with ESA.

ACTIVITIES Space science Human spaceflight Exploration Earth observation Launchers Navigation Telecommunications Technology Operations ESA is one of the few space agencies in the world to combine responsibility in all areas of space activity.

ESA’S LOCATIONS EAC (Cologne) ESTEC (Noordwijk) Establishments & Centres Brussels ESOC (Darmstadt) ESA HQ (Paris) Offices Toulouse ESRIN (Frascati) ESAC (Villafranca) Moscow Washington Kourou Houston

ESA FACTS AND FIGURES Over 30 years of experience 18 Member States Four establishments, 2043 staff 3 000 million Euros budget (2008) Over 60 satellites designed and tested 14 scientific satellites in operation Five types of launcher developed More than 180 launches made

ESA STAFF FIGURES 2000+ Grade Structure from Coordinated Organisations (like NATO) 20% Administrative (B1 to B6) 10% Management (A5, A6 and Hors Class) 70 % Professionals (A2 to A4): 15% Business Support (HR, Finance, Legal, Procurement, IT,...) 10% Scientists 45% Engineers Contract Policy: 4Y + 6Y + Indefinite

New Career Paths for Technical Specialists: THE A5 AD PERSONAM PROGRAM

TECHNICAL CAREER AT ESA (THE PAST) JUNIOR (ENTRY LEVEL) ASSOCIATED SENIOR MANAGERIAL HEAD OF SECTION HEAD OF DIVISION OF DEPART. FROM A2 TO A4: PROGRESSION BY PROMOTION FROM A4 TO A5, A5 TO A6: PROGRESSION BY VACANCY NOTICE

PROBLEMS ESA success is based on its technical competences but it could not reward and promote its best technical staff Good scientists and engineers were left without career perspectives for their last 10/15 years at ESA Good technical staff are not, by default, good managers (especially when they become managers but they want to keep technical and operational roles)

SOLUTION: A new schema for A5 ad personam TECHNICAL CAREER JUNIOR (ENTRY LEVEL) ASSOCIATED SENIOR ADVISOR (RETAIN CURRENT JOB) MANAGERIAL HEAD OF SECTION HEAD OF DIVISION OF DEPART. FROM A2 TO A4: PROGRESSION BY PROMOTION FROM A4 TO A5: BY APPLYING FOR AN A5 AD PERSONAM FROM A4 TO A5, A5 TO A6: PROGRESSION BY VACANCY NOTICE

OBJECTIVES Extend the career opportunities for high qualified professionals in the ESA core businesses: space science and space engineering Rewards continuous outstanding results Reinforce the technical and scientific culture of ESA Set up a network of experts, visible and recognized through the organization, able to disseminate knowledge and passion for Space

PRINCIPLES The promotion from A4 to the grade A5 ad personam is based on the PERSONAL competences and skills of the staff. When promoted the staff member maintains the current functions. The grade is linked to the staff member. The promotion from A4 to A5 by applying to an open Vacancy Notice is based on the responsibilities of the new job. The grade is linked to the post.

PROCESS Scheme approved in 2001 by ESA Governing Bodies: Max of 30 A5 AP positions for all ESA In 2001 and 2002 selection by the top (directors). It did not work: heterogeneous and wrong profiles selected and no consistency in the selection. Targeting only Technical and Scientific Staff at A4 grade Selection Campaign usually every other year (subject to 30 post cap, replacement of A5 AP retiring) As from 2006 new bottom-up scheme: All A4 staff may apply providing CV, list of publications and references HR and a board of four (kept anonymous) senior reviewers, selected for integrity and competence, evaluate the applicants by objective criteria and rank them The first 15 ranked applicants are short-listed for the final interview with a selection board composed of ESA directors and HR 10 are finally selected and appointed by the ESA Director General Appointed staff retain their present functions but are required to contribute to the exchange of knowledge inside/outside ESA through lectures and courses in their domains of competence

SELECTION CRITERIA Internal recognition Participation to Technical Reviews and Boards External recognition Publication in internationally recognized Technical and Scientific Journals Membership of Professional Associations Past contribution to ESA activities and projects Patents Demonstrated contribution to the solutions to complex technical issues Potential future contribution to ESA activities and projects

DETAILED DATA

LESSONS LEARNED Keep the bottom-up approach: all senior professionals staff may apply and have a chance through open and fair competition Strength the internal recognition criteria over the external ones (scientists publish papers on Nature, engineers write technical notes nobody reads...) Rotate the reviewers in charge of ranking the candidates to maintain variation in the selection process Keep top management away until the final decision has been made (to avoid influence) Don’t be afraid of diversity: experts are good for the organization as they are all different Be fair and transparent through the whole process and debrief applicants at anytime

Questions?