1 What Counts: Measuring the Benefits of Early Intervention in Hawai’i Beppie Shapiro Teresa Vast Center for Disability Studies University of Hawai`i With.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Performance Measurement. Learning Objectives By the end of the module, you will be able to: Describe what performance measurement is, and.
Advertisements

Aviation Security Training Module 4 Design and Conduct Exercise II 1.
Preschool Learning Foundations and Curriculum Framework, Volume 2
Copyright © 2012 California Department of Education, Child Development Division with WestEd Center for Child & Family Studies, Desired Results T&TA Project.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
School Improvement Technical Assistance Meeting September 17, 2009 Jane Massi, Title I Consultant 1.
Program Goals, Objectives and Performance Indicators A guide for grant and program development 3/2/2014 | Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.
1 The Massachusetts Early Learning Guidelines for Infants and Toddlers.
Board of Early Education and Care Retreat June 30,
1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
QA & QI And Accreditation.  A continuous process to review, critique, and implement measurable positive change in public health policies, programs or.
Using outcomes data for program improvement Kathy Hebbeler and Cornelia Taylor Early Childhood Outcome Center, SRI International.
Virginia - March 2014 (Content adapted from 2014 MSRRC Forum) Preparing for the State Systemic Improvement Plan.
1 Implementing Internet Web Sites in Counseling and Career Development James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State University Copyright 2003 by James P. Sampson,
Special Education Survey Barnstable Public Schools September 17 – October 2, 2012.
1 Title I Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session May 23, 2011.
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
2 |SharePoint Saturday New York City
VOORBLAD.
Transition IEP Using Your IEP to Plan for Your Life After High School
Factor P 16 8(8-5ab) 4(d² + 4) 3rs(2r – s) 15cd(1 + 2cd) 8(4a² + 3b²)
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
District Advisory Council (DAC) 1 October 22, 2012 Westlawn Elementary School.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
Appraising and Managing Performance (c) 2007 by Prentice Hall7-1 Chapter 7.
Functional Areas & Positions
25 seconds left…...
H to shape fully developed personality to shape fully developed personality for successful application in life for successful.
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
WEB IEP FOLLOW-UP ECO GATHERED FOR BIRTH TO 5 INCLUDING INFANT, TODDLER, PK 1.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference, September 2014 Digging into “Data Use” Using the DaSy Framework.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
PSSA Preparation.
Target Setting for Child Outcomes Conference Call October 30,
Educator Evaluation: A Protocol for Developing S.M.A.R.T. Goal Statements.
Terrific Transitions:
Data, Now What? Skills for Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Building a national system to measure child and family outcomes from early intervention Early Childhood Outcomes Center International Society on Early.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP)
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Presented at: Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA - November 3, 2011 Performance Management in Action: A National System.
Presented at Division for Early Childhood National Harbor, Maryland November, Child Outcomes: What We Are Learning from National, State, and Local.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
What Counts: Measuring Benefits of Early Intervention in Hawai`i Beppie Shapiro, University of Hawai`i.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation to Measuring Child and Family Outcomes for New People Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG/UNC.
Embedding Child and Family Outcomes into Practice – Part 2 Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International Early Childhood Outcomes Center Webinar for the Massachusetts.
Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Parent and National TA Perspectives on EC Outcomes Connie Hawkins, Region 2 PTAC Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn ECO at FPG and NECTAC.
Making Progress on Measuring Progress Barbara Jackson, NE Beppie Shapiro, HI Lynne Kahn and Kathy Hebbeler, ECO.
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010 Cornelia Taylor, ECO Christina Kasprzak, ECO/NECTAC Lisa Backer, MN DOE 1.
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Why Collect Outcome Data?
Early Childhood and Family Outcomes
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Presentation transcript:

1 What Counts: Measuring the Benefits of Early Intervention in Hawai’i Beppie Shapiro Teresa Vast Center for Disability Studies University of Hawai`i With assistance from the Early Childhood Outcomes Center

2 Orientation Objectives  Understand What Counts and the national context.  What can measuring success do for you, for early intervention programs in Hawai`i, and for children and families?  Get your reaction to this initiative and to the process Early Intervention in Hawaii is using to collect this information from programs.

3 What will measuring success do for us?  Program improvement  Federal interest: OMB/OSEP  Justification for funding  Families want to know what benefits they can expect  Research

4

5 What Counts? Measuring the success of early intervention programs  What does success mean?  Develop goal statements  How can we visualize success across diverse programs?  Develop indicators  How can we collect & summarize data?  Develop measurement strategies

6 Involving Stakeholders  Design Team  STEPS teams  Family groups  Advisors

7 Let’s look at the big picture:

8 Background: The Need for Data on Goals Achieved Assumptions:  Many programs serving infants and toddlers and their families are doing a good job but even programs doing a good job can usually improve in some way  One way to help good programs become better programs is to look at how participating children and families benefit from services

9 Background (continued) For many years, information collected to show how programs were doing looked at:  “Process”  How many children served  How many professionals working in the program  What degrees they held, etc.  Family satisfaction Problem: There are limits to improving programs with this kind of information

10 Background (continued)  Because the most important question is: What difference does this make for children and families?  To answer this question… Hawai`i needs information about children and families

11 Current answers to the question  We have lots of stories about how a child or family was changed because of their early intervention experience, but…  It’s not systematic  How typical are these families?  Does a story apply to all families and children in a program? If not, which ones?  In all programs? If not, which ones?

12 Background (continued)  State and federal policy-makers who fund programs are asking the same question: What difference do these programs make for children and families?  They want to know because they make decisions about what programs to fund and not fund and how much money a program should get  They want taxpayers’ money supporting programs that are valuable, effective, good programs

13 Background (continued)  All federal programs (housing, roads, job training, education, etc.) now need to develop ways to measure goals achieved  In the future, programs that can demonstrate they have achieved their goals are going to be in a better position to continue to receive funds or even receive an increase  Programs that don’t have this information…

14 Background (continued)  Federal government is requiring states to submit data on children and families in early intervention  Initial round of data on Child Goals is being collected from “initial implementation” communities between April and September 2006  Initial data on Family Goals will be collected summer of 2006 – a survey is planned  Data from every EI program will be collected by October 2006

15 Questions?

16 Challenge  How to get answers to the question What difference does this make for children and families? is not easy or obvious, but…  Hawai’i has been making some progress

17 EI Goals for Families 1.Families understand their child's abilities and special needs. 2.Families know their rights and effectively communicate their child’s needs. 3.Families help their child develop and learn. 4.Families have adequate social support. 5.Families can access desired services, programs, and activities in their community.

18 EI Goals for Children 1.Children have social and emotional skills (including positive social relationships). 2.Children learn and use knowledge and skills. 3.Children take action to meet their needs.

19 Checking in with you… Do the goal statements reflect what your program is trying to achieve for children and families?

20 Indicators for Child Goals  Percentage of children making progress on each goal

A way to think about how children are doing with regard to each goal Age-expected skills and behavior Movement away from age-expected Movement toward age-expected

22 Challenges for Child Goals  Find a way to assign a score to each child on each goal which can show progress over time  Which represents the same ‘thing’ for all children at all programs…  So scores from different children can be summarized at program level for program improvement and  Scores from different programs can be summarized at State level and  Reported to OSEP

23 Measurement Strategy for Child Goals: EI Programs  Who: IFSP team  When: Initial & Review meetings  How: Rating on each goal based on  Parent & provider input  IFSP Present Levels of Development Section  Assessments

24 We need a new form: the Child Goals Summary Tool What we hope the tool can do:  Be used with all children participating in early intervention programs (and perhaps other programs)  Describe how a child is doing across a variety of settings and situations

25 Why we need a new form  We need to report how each child is doing compared to a typically developing child on each of the three Child Goals.  No current assessment measures the 3 Child Goals  The 3 Child Goals reflect broad areas of child functioning, not domains we have been measuring with assessments.

26 Introducing…. THE CHILD GOALS SUMMARY FORM

27 Questions for you  Could an IFSP team answer each of the 3 goal questions for each child, based on information that is usually domain based?  Will this work at the IFSP team meeting? Is there a better time/way?  How will this work for families on the Team?  How can we prepare families for this process?  Other comments?

28 Next Steps for What Counts Step 1: Jan-Feb 2006  Pilot-test the What Counts measurement strategy at 3 programs on O`ahu :  Kailua Easter Seals  Leeward PHNs  Wai’anae Healthy Start

29 Next Steps ( continued) Step 2  Revise procedures as indicated by pilot data & feedback  Develop way to send data “up the chain”  Develop data analysis & reporting routines

30 Next Steps ( continued) Step 3: April-Sept 2006  Initial implementation in 3 communities began in April  Data will become “baseline” for OSEP  EIS program, Healthy Start & PHN in each community participate: 1.West Hawaii 2.Windward Oahu 3.East Honolulu

31 Next Steps ( continued) Step 4  Roll-out of statewide training & implementation begins June 2006  EIS programs, Healthy Start & PHNs in every area will be trained  Each month, June to September, more communities will implement the measurement system

32 Finally… By October 1, 2006:  ALL programs will be measuring child benefits at each IFSP  Data sent to EIS for OSEP reporting  QA and TA planned to  Support staff implementing the What Counts system  Maximize usefulness of results to programs

33 Continue the discussion…  Help keep us on the right track as we move forward: Provide feedback to national & state teams.  comments to:  For more information…  What Counts:  ECO Center: