Understanding Major & Annual Review September 2014 Donna Crighton, Cheryl Strong & Nikki Sowerby Research Section, QMD, Academic Registry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Academic Services Division Registry Academic Services Division Chris Bexton, Postgraduate Registry Manager.
Advertisements

Progress Files and reflection… …for postgraduate research students…
Institute of Psychiatry Research Degree Induction - Day 1 – Tuesday October 4 th 2011 Institute of Psychiatry, Supervisors Training Course September 2010.
WBS PLAGIARISM PROCEDURE
Standards for Training Packages. Outline Outline of the development of the Standards Framework Transition timelines Overview of the Standards Framework.
Departmental/Divisional Administrator Briefing
External Examiners’ Conference Context Professor Mary Watkins.
External Examining at Keele University
External Examiners’ Conference Context Professor Pauline Kneale Pro-Vice Chancellor, Teaching and Learning.
EXTERNAL EXAMINERS’ INDUCTION 20 NOVEMBER 2013.
The International Postgraduate Student Experience – QAA perspective Dr Laura Bellingham Research, Development and Partnerships Group UKCGE workshop Thursday.
Sharing Good Practice in Quality
External Examiners’ Briefing  Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
UoB monitoring expected contact and reporting to the UKBA PBS monitoring stakeholder group meeting 16 th March 2010.
External Examiners Preview Demonstrations Academic Services & Student Systems Presented by Daniel Chandler, Project Officer, Academic Services & Matthew.
Research Degree Examining and Chair of Viva: Professor Stephen Lacey Friday 30 November 2012 A104.
Introduction to PhD Code of Practice Jo FerrieInterim Director Graduate Training September 2013.
Mitigation and Extenuating Circumstances
Postgraduate Development Record (PDR) system. What is the PDR? The Postgraduate Development Record (PDR) is a University-wide, web-based system to record.
Annual Monitoring and Review & Mutual Review Quality Assurance Services.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
Student Attendance Monitoring Martina Daly 23 rd September, 2010.
Registration and Assessment There are 3 periodic assessments throughout the PhD: Assessment 1: the Research Plan (by 8 weeks) All students must complete.
1Induction for Subject External Examiners Nicola Clarke Academic Standards and Quality Assurance Manager.
Organisation of PGR Provision Dr Martina Daly Chair School Graduate Research Committee.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
Monitoring and Evaluation Harvey Hurree David /londonmetuni londonmet.ac.uk.
1 GRADUATE SCHOOL A Guide to the Academic Regulations What you need to know! Michael Frain, Graduate School Level Two, Foundation Building 15 November.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
Rhona Sharpe, Head of OCSLD Liz Turner, Head of APQO 11 th April 2013 CHAIRING VALIDATION PANELS.
Research Supervisor Training Programme Regulations & Processes.
Information for External Examiners involved in Academic Collaborative Provision - 12 Nov 2014.
Learning and Teaching Forum Higher Education Review - Update 31 May, 2016Gwendolen Bradshaw1.
Update - ATSM Recent changes. Regulations for the Advanced Training Skills Modules Generic: The applicant must be working in the UK for the duration of.
Cheating, Plagiarism Unfair Practiceaterials Quality Assurance Services Collaborations and Partnerships Group.
Annual Review Submission Dates Annual Review October intake = 30 th September February intake = 31 st January Exceptional June intake = 31 st May Guidance.
Introduction to eProg, Progression Requirements and Regulations.
QAA Review Incorporating the GOsC Recognised Qualification (RQ) Renewal.
PhD Registration and Assessment procedures There are 3 stages of internal assessment during the PhD: Research Plan 8 weeks after registration date Early.
Academic Approval and Periodic Review Staff Development for Chairs and Secretaries of Approval and Periodic Review Events.
Approaching your final years of research Kate Marsh Faculty Director of Postgraduate Research, Humanities & Social Sciences.
The ARCP An Overview. A Trained ARCP Panel? Purpose of the ARCP Normally at least annually A review and record of the trainee’s progress Allows judgement.
Supervisor Awareness Training Session One Faculty of Humanities May 2009.
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education ‘Tutoring for the 21 st Century’ 28 January 2015 Harriet Barnes Natalja Sokorevica Standards, Quality.
Introduction to the Doctoral Training Centre (DTC) for Transart Institute doctoral students.
Forum for New External Examiners. Enid Ashdown, Principal Administrator, Academic Quality Alan Gregg, Academic Coordinator, Academic Quality Vashti Hutton,
Research Student Supervision – Update 2012 Dr Ann Hartley.
Doctorate Extension Scheme Johanna Pursey Student Administration Officer (Tier 4) November 2013.
PGR administrative milestones and academic decisions First contact/decision: Student may contact you before application Interested? Discuss proposal further?
A Guide to the Academic Regulations
Progression Monitoring
Quality and Standards An introduction.
External Examiners Briefing Session Wednesday 12th April 2017
Registration and Assessment
Postgraduate Research Administration
Responsibilities and engagement of an external examiner
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
Annual Assessment of Progress 2017/18 Briefing for Research Students Research Student Registry Mar/Apr 2018.
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
External Examiner Briefing Session
External Examiner Reports
Compliance, Policy and Regulations
Progression and Advancement
Assessment and completion
PhD Registration and Assessment procedures
Research Degree Independent Chair Workshop 4 April 2019
Validation Programme Developers
Preparation for the Doctoral Examination 11 March 2019
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Understanding Major & Annual Review September 2014 Donna Crighton, Cheryl Strong & Nikki Sowerby Research Section, QMD, Academic Registry

Session Objectives By the end of this session, you will: Have an overview of the Major/Annual Review processes Know what sources of guidance are available for the Major/Annual Review processes and where to find them

Useful Contacts Faculty/Department – Departmental Research Degree Coordinators (DRDC’s) – Chair, Faculty Research Degree Committee (FRDC) Central – Research Section, Academic Registry Donna Crighton, Faculty Advisor (Research) Ext Cheryl Strong, Faculty Advisor (Research) Ext

Academic Regulations Research Students are governed by the Regulations for Higher Degrees by Research, Regulations for Professional Doctorates or Regulations for the Integrated Doctorate Programme Available at:

Postgraduate Research Handbooks Initial point of reference for all Research Students and Supervisors (updated annually) Guidance on the key processes and other circumstances that may arise Available at:

Reviewing Process UK Quality Code for Higher Education (Part B – Assuring and Enhancing Academic Quality) – Chapter B11: Research Degrees (The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA), June 2012) Indicator 13 – “Higher education providers put in place clearly defined mechanisms for monitoring and supporting research student progress, including formal and explicit reviews of progress at different stages. Research students, supervisors and other relevant staff are made aware of progress monitoring mechanisms, including the importance of keeping appropriate records of the outcomes of meetings and related activities. ”

Major Review Process “The purpose of the assessment procedure is to assess whether the student has the capability to complete satisfactorily, within the prescribed time limits, a PhD or MD thesis.” (Regulations for Higher Degrees by Research, 2013, Major Review, Section 6, 1.2.1)

Major Review Full-Time PhD/MD – End of Year 1 Part-Time PhD/MD & Integrated Doc – End of Year 2 MPhil students may submit to upgrade (within these timescales)

Major Review Submission Dates Major Review October intake = 30 th September February intake = 31 st January Exceptional June intake = 31 st May Further information on the Major Review process is available in the University Postgraduate Research Student Handbook

Flowchart of the Major Review Process Academic Registry send reminder to PGR Student and First Supervisor for Major Review to be submitted by ~DATE~ PGR Student completes Major Review document First Supervisor completes UPR10 & s to Chair, FRD Committee for Faculty Assessor to be appointed

Flowchart of the Major Review Process (cont’d 2) Report & UPR10 sent to Assessment Panel (FS & Two Assessors) by Academic Registry PGR Student submits document to Academic Registry UPR10 sent to Academic Registry by Chair, FRD Committee

Flowchart of the Major Review Process (cont’d 3) First Supervisor arranges Major Review Meeting All Panel Members and PGR Student in attendance at the Major Review Meeting

Flowchart of the Major Review Process (cont’d 4) Decisions at Major Review meeting Confirm Registration (PhD or MD) – upgrade to PhD if MPhil Student Application Insufficient: Final Review meeting required (see cont’d 5) Assessment Panel’s recommendation sent to Academic Registry who confirm decision in writing

Flowchart of the Major Review Process (cont’d 5) Work required and submission date notified to PGR Student by Academic Registry Application Insufficient: Final Review meeting required After submission documents are sent to the panel, First Supervisor organises Final Review meeting date, time & venue

Flowchart of the Major Review Process (cont’d 6) Final Review meeting decisions (confirmed in writing) Confirm Registration (PhD or MD) Upgrade MPhil to PhD Further Supporting Evidence is necessary Change PhD to MPhil Continue with MPhil registration Discontinue registration

Annual Review Process “ The purpose of the assessment procedure is to assess whether the student is actively engaged in the research programme and making satisfactory progress.” (Regulations for Higher Degrees by Research, 2013, Annual Review, Section 7, 1.2.1)

Annual Review All PGRS for each year of registration Unless, a Major Review is due Unless, the PGRS has interrupted their studies Unless, the PGRS has submitted for examination

Annual Review Submission Dates Annual Review October intake = 30 th September February intake = 31 st January Exceptional June intake = 31 st May Further information on the Annual Review process is available in the University Postgraduate Research Student Handbook

Flowchart of the Annual Review Process Academic Registry send reminder to PGR Student and First Supervisor for Annual Review to be submitted by ~DATE~ FRDC’s supply list of Reviewers prior to deadline First Supervisor completes UPR8B PGR Student completes UPR8A and gathers additional evidence as required Academic Registry request list of Reviewers from FRDC’s

Flowchart of the Annual Review Process UPR8A, UPR8B & required evidence sent to Review Panel by Academic Registry PGR Student submits documents to Academic Registry UPR8B sent to Academic Registry by First Supervisor

Flowchart of the Annual Review Process Annual Review Meeting arranged All Panel Members and PGRS in attendance at the Annual Review Meeting

Flowchart of the Annual Review Process Decisions at Annual Review meeting Confirm Registration Application Insufficient: Final Review meeting required Review Panel’s recommendation sent to Academic Registry who confirm decision in writing Confirm Registration, with recommendations

Flowchart of the Annual Review Process Work required and submission date notified to PGR Student by Academic Registry Application Insufficient: Final Review meeting required After submission documents are sent to the panel, First Supervisor organises Final Review meeting date, time & venue

Flowchart of the Annual Review Process Final Review meeting decisions (confirmed in writing) Confirm Registration Further Supporting Evidence is necessary Change PhD to MPhil Discontinue registration

Thank you for listening Any questions?