DESE WORKSHOP MAY 29, 2013 LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FIELD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technology Use Plan Methacton School District Patty McGinnis ED TECH 501.
Advertisements

Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
The Principal’s Role in Leading College and Career Readiness September, 2013.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
DESE REGIONAL WORKSHOP MARCH 5, 2013 LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FIELD.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
DPS Educator Effectiveness: Stakeholder Engagement Lessons Learned February 6, 2013.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Presenter: Gary Bates.  “If a certificated employee receives a rating of ineffective or improvement necessary, the evaluator and the certificated employee.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Session Materials  Wiki
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
EDCO SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FIELD.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.
ADMN 6130 Class 4 “Cheap teaching is like cheap dentistry, cheap cotton, or cheap anything else.” - Annual Report of the Owensboro Public Schools
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Our Journey with Family Engagement An Overview of North Penn School District’s experiences with Family Friendly Schools As part of our strategy to Engage.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
 Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence National Institute April 12 and 13, 2012.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Presented by: Barbara A. Deane–Williams, Superintendent Christopher Marino, Teacher Leader Susan Streicher, Principal Strengthening Teacher & Leader Effectiveness.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
New Employee Induction Program
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
CAPS: COACHING TEACHERS Facilitator: Dr. Lynne Paradis BELIZE LITERACY PROGRAM June 2011.
 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o
Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.
Welcome!  Please complete the three “Do Now” posters.  There are nametags on the tables:  Please ensure that more than one district is represented at.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Identifying and Developing Future Principal Supervisors September 29, 2015 Ben Fenton Gina Ikemoto.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Overview of Network Team Plan.  Deliverable Metrics are being finalized  Assessment of Network Team Deliverables ◦ Principals ◦ Teachers ◦ District.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Implementing Race to the Top
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

DESE WORKSHOP MAY 29, 2013 LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE FIELD

PRESENTER John Doherty, Superintendent, Reading Public Schools Craig Martin, Principal, Coolidge Middle School Donna Martinson, ELA Teacher, Parker Middle School Wiki

LESSONS LEARNED Trust and Collaboration Building Capacity Making it SMART Training Opportunity vs. Compliance Modeling the Process

TRUST AND COLLABORATION DESE PRESENTATION

Trust and Collaboration are Critical for Success

VALVE HANDBOOK FOR NEW EMPLOYEES Risks (What if I screw up?) “Nobody has ever been fired at Valve for making a mistake. It wouldn’t even make sense for us to operate that way. Providing the freedom to fail is an important trait of the company-we couldn’t expect so much of individuals if we also penalized people for errors. Even expensive mistakes, or ones which result in a very public failure, are genuinely looked at as opportunities to learn. We can always repair the mistake or make up for it.”

READING PUBLIC SCHOOL TRANSLATION Risks (What if I make a mistake?) “Nobody has ever been fired in the Reading Public Schools for making an honest mistake that benefits students. It wouldn’t even make sense for us to operate that way. Providing the freedom to try new methods or ideas, and fail is an important trait of our organization- we couldn’t expect so much of individuals if we penalized our staff for taking risks and not succeeding. Even expensive mistakes, or ones which result in a very public failure, are genuinely looked at as opportunities to learn and grow. We can always repair the mistake or make up for it.”

“WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER” “IT WILL NOT BE PERFECT” “WE WILL BE MAKING MISTAKES ALONG THE WAY.” “WE NEED YOUR HELP TO MAKE THE PROCESS BETTER.”

TRUST Focus on Growth, not Gotcha Form Joint Committees Conversations between supervisor and educator is the most critical Communication is Key Joint Meetings/Union Leaders, Members and Administration Engage School Committee -Training opportunities - Enlist support for rewarding exceptional teaching and for supervision of mediocre/ineffective teaching

TAP COMMITTEE A KEY TO THE PROCESS-ESTABLISHED 2003 Committee of Teachers, Building Administrators, Central Office Administrators Representation from every school Compared current rubric with model rubric system Reviewed model contract language Involved in development of forms for September, 2012 implementation

BUILDING CAPACITY DESE PRESENTATION

A FRAMEWORK FOR ENGAGING EDUCATORS I KnowI Apply I Participate I Lead

STRATEGIES FOR BUILDING CAPACITY All stakeholders (SEA, LEA, Union, SC) are responsible Develop feedback loops for misconceptions Surveys, Focus Group Sessions Communicate, Communicate, Communicate Guidebooks/Handbooks/CBA District/School Improvement Documents FAQ Website Newsletter Information Sessions Podcasts/Webinars Train the Trainer Models

STRATEGIES FOR BUILDING CAPACITY Make resources and tools available for educators to use Model lesson plans aligned to standards Instructional coaching Mentoring Professional Development Interim Assessments Videos of high quality instruction Professional Libraries Opportunities to Observe Peers and Discuss Practice

STRATEGIES FOR BUILDING CAPACITY Follow up on Feedback Joint Union/Administration Communication Teams Breaks down barriers and eliminates misconceptions Identify teachers for additional roles and responsibilities Peer Observation Pilot Developing assessments for multiple measures Tools and guidance with student learning objectives

STRATEGIES FOR BUILDING CAPACITY Identify excellent practitioners and give them opportunities to lead Study groups which focus on particular evaluation standards or development of assessments Participate on school/district evaluation advisory committees Establish a culture that accommodates disagreement, but does not accept the status quo Process Important - Culture of Trust = Success Using DESE process only can be seductive “We Implemented the Regulations and are in compliance” Compliance only will not lead to change or better student outcomes

TRAINING DESE PRESENTATION

TRAINING FOR ADMINISTRATORS Provide training for All Stakeholders Administrators Department Chairs Team Chairs Coordinators Central Office School Committee Public Training Focus Providing meaningful feedback Supervision and observation Understanding the process

TRAINING FOR ADMINISTRATORS Administrative Collaborative Conversations Why are we doing this ? If… Then… How do our goals connect to maximize impact within the framework of our resources? How can we use the evaluation system in our strategy for classroom/school/district improvement? What are our beliefs and do we institutionalize them or are they pretty words? Do our actions reflect core values? What our our “Non-discussables”?

INTER-RATER RELIABILITY Teachers need to understand that expectations for observation and evaluation are consistent across a district- Calibrate observations across district Train administration/evaluators Video review of lessons and debrief as a team Discuss and establish instructional norms and values Assign administrators to walk through classrooms as teams Teams should observe across all levels Use essential questions to debrief Invite Union leaders to do “walk throughs”/debrief Invite School Committee to visit – opportunity to realize how budget is expended

Link this system to the common core and assessments implementation.

TRAINING FOR TEACHERS Focus on connections between initiatives Common Core State Standards Assessment Development District Determined Measures Other initiatives Focus on process, not compliance Give examples

OPPORTUNITY VERSUS COMPLIANCE DESE PRESENTATION

Look at this as an opportunity to improve teaching and learning and educator growth in your district

OPPORTUNITY VS. COMPLIANCE Connect Common Core and Assessment Development to the Educator Evaluation System Use the conversations as opportunities to grow Don’t treat this as “we have to do this.” Provide time for teachers to understand process and collaborate Identify ways to take things off of principal’s plate Assigning some evaluations to central office and team chairs Increasing evaluation cycle for non-teachers (i.e. paraeducators) Communicate their priorities

OPPORTUNITIES Engage School Committee/Interest Based Bargaining (IBB) Opportunity to collaborate to solve problems Involves all stakeholders Collaborative Conversations about Issues and Emerging Trends Time, Compensation, Schedules Explore how technology can assist teachers and administrators to collect/share data Baseline Edge May afford opportunity for feedback or to clarify data

OPPORTUNITIES Explore systemic strategies to collect/report data to public Community Engagement Standard Opportunity to establish a public dialogue and solicit feedback Schedule of survey and data collection/On going, systemic process Measures of student/parent engagement Measures of teacher/parent satisfaction Measures of how effectiveness in teaching 21 st C skills/Career Readiness Alumni data collection

MODELING THE PROCESS DESE PRESENTATION

MODELING THE PROCESS Communicate the Process Newsletters Blogs School Committee Meetings If not RTTT District, implement the following this year: Administrator Process Superintendent’s Process Educator Plan Superintendent should play a key role in communication

FINAL THOUGHTS

SOME THOUGHTS AS AN EARLY ADOPTER This combination of common core/educator evaluation/district determined measures may be the most important integrated initiative that you undertake in your district Look at this as your organizing initiative for all other initiatives Look at this as an opportunity to improve teaching and learning and educator growth in your district Plan your strategy and process Train staff on how to write and implement SMART goals Use the Train the Trainer Model Use Special Education Teachers as Experts Collaboration is critical to the success of this implementation Link this system to the common core and assessment development

SOME THOUGHTS AS AN EARLY ADOPTER Transparent and ongoing open honest communication is critical Train all supervisors in the process to create inter- rater reliability Use the DESE materials Adopt the model rubrics Develop a logic model on how you will implement this process Involve your staff, school committee, and community early and often in the communication process

Plan your strategy and process

The DESE has provided some excellent materials

Adopt the model rubric

Involve your school committee early and often in the communication process.

Focus on the reason why we are doing this

QUESTIONS DESE MAY 29, 2013