A Systematic Review of the Literature

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comprehensive family assessment as a prerequisite of individualized planning, monitoring and evaluation of family-visitation program in Croatia Professor.
Advertisements

Joint Investigation Protocols Convening Presented by: Theresa Costello, MA Emily Hutchinson, MSSW The National Resource Center for Child Protective Services.
Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
Center for Elimination of Disproportionality and Disparities
Suzanne Franco, Ed.D and Nimisha Patel, Ph.D CREATE Conference: October, 2010.
By The Numbers: The Public Costs of Teen Childbearing
DR. JOHN WINTERDYK, DIRECTOR Centre for Criminology and Justice Research Mount Royal University, Calgary, AB. DR. JOHN WINTERDYK, DIRECTOR.
Maps, tables, flow charts and diagrams in Qualitative Data Analysis
The Impact of Diabetes Mellitus in the United States
Claudia Perez MSW, may 2013 Cal state university long beach
Healthy North Carolina 2020 Objective: Maternal and Infant Health
Barriers to Health Service Utilization by Immigrant Families Raising a Child with a Disability Unmet Needs and the Role of Discrimination.
Opportunities for Prevention & Intervention in Child Maltreatment Investigations Involving Infants in Ontario Barbara Fallon, PhD Assistant Professor Jennifer.
Asthma in Minnesota Slide Set Asthma Program Minnesota Department of Health January 2013.
Values Driven Systems of Care: the BC SCORES Experience Children’s Mental Health Research and Policy Conference March 22, 2011 Holly Wald, PhD, Cynthia.
Parent Connectors: An Evidence-based Peer-to-Peer Support Program Albert J. Duchnowski, Ph.D. Krista Kutash, Ph.D. University of South Florida Federation.
Cross-jurisdictional Policing Perspectives Jon White, ANZPAA CEO 13 November 2012.
ISSUES, RESEARCH, PRACTICE Josie Phillips, Research Associate.
“CLEAN/Good Government”
Unintended Implications of Child Welfare Reform for Texas Foster Children’s Mental Health Kelly J. Gober, L.M.S.W. Mental Health Services Research and.
Healthy People 2010: Mental Health Objectives Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration January 20, 2000.
Parents Under Correctional Supervision: Past Estimates, New Measures Presented by: Christopher J. Mumola Policy Analyst, Bureau of Justice Statistics U.S.
Beyond the Bars II Who Are the Children of Incarcerated Parents? Charlene Wear Simmons, Ph.D. Acting Interim Director September 23, 2008 C A L I F O R.
Asset-building and the Ontario Looking After Children (OnLAC) Project: Promoting resilient outcomes in young people in care Cynthia Vincent, Shaye Moffat,
Improving The Lives of Maryland’s Dually Involved Girls June 11, 2014 A project generously funded by the Abell Foundation & the Jewish Women’s Giving.
Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Bureau of Justice Assistance JUSTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIONS Presentation.
IMPLEMENTING THE ACA: HOW MUCH WILL IT HELP VULNERABLE ADOLESCENTS AND YOUNG ADULTS? Abigail English, JD Center for Adolescent Health & the Law
Mentoring Prisoner's Children: A Prevention & Intervention Strategy That Works Kristy A. Stender-Bratcher, M.Ed Mentoring.
Race Matters: Synthesis of Research Findings Robert B. Hill, Ph. D. Disproportionality Teleconference May 24, 2005.
" The Impact of Criminal Justice Policies and Practices on Minorities" 2009.
Analysis of Prison Nursery Benefits and Program Strategies: Alaska Department of Corrections Opportunity for Reduction in Recidivism and Improved Bonding.
AT-RISK YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES AND TREATMENT BY L.Nicole Cervantes, MSW (Spring 2013) A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE.
Disproportionality in Human Services
Vermilion County Action Team Laurie Krolikowski & Susan Werner.
1 Transitions to Adulthood: Comparing TANF and Foster care Youth Pamela C. Ovwigho, PhD Valerie Head, MPP Catherine E. Born, PhD Paper presented at the.
 Department of Family and Children Services, Santa Clara County  San Jose State University School of Social Work  Santa Clara County Children’s Issue.
MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR PARENTS EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS: A GRANT PROPOSAL Lindsay Willman California State University, Long Beach May 2013.
Pre- and Post- Placement Intervention Approach with Kinship Families: Role for Child Protection Workers Priscilla Gibson, Ph.D., Katie Haas Shweta Singh.
Parenting and Poverty: Making the Connection Laura Frame Children’s Hospital and Research Center at Oakland Jill Duerr Berrick School of Social welfare,
A Case Study of the Intersection Between the Child Welfare and Criminal Justice Systems Charlene Wear Simmons, Ph.D. Parental Incarceration, Termination.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
Child Protection and Educational Neglect: A Preliminary Study Curriculum Module Center for Advanced Studies in Child Welfare Funded in part by the Minnesota.
Claire Brindis, Dr. P.H. University of California, San Francisco American Public Health Association- Annual Meeting November 10, 2004 Adolescent Health:
Peter Gamache, Ph.D. candidate MBA/MPH Reducing Disparities among Youth in Transition to Adulthood Georgetown Technical Assistance Center.
GUIDE A SCHOLAR PROGRAM- EXTENDING SERVICES TO FOSTER YOUTH: A GRANT WRITING PROJECT By: Daisy Cruz School of Social Worker California State University.
California State University, Long Beach
Impact of Culture on Stress and Coping: The Experiences of Latina Dementia Caregivers Mayra Calatayud California State University, Long Beach May 2012.
Maria R. Zuniga California State University Long Beach May, 2012.
Introduction The United States has one of the largest criminal justice populations in the world with over 6.94 million people under the supervision of.
Incarcerated Mothers: Their Histories of Victimization and the Consequences for Their Children Toni Johnson, Associate Professor
Ursula Hill February 2012 Notre Dame-AmeriCorps Mid-Year Conference.
April Anderson-Vizcaya California State University Long Beach May 2012.
COMMUNITY-BASED MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH TO PROMOTE SOCIAL JUSTICE & CHILDREN’S HEALTH November 20, 2008 Jessica Goodkind, PhD University of New Mexico Department.
Key Leaders Orientation 2- Key Leader Orientation 2-1.
Midwest Evaluation of the Adult Functioning of Former Foster Youth: Outcomes at Age 19 Chapin Hall Center for Children University of Chicago.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
Program Evaluation - Reunification of Foster Children with their Families: NYS Office of Children and Family Services, Division of Child Care Evelyn Jones,
Permanency Outcomes for Children in Erie County Department of Social Services Brett Loschiavo, Public Administration · Project Advisor – Dr. Suparna Soni.
Child Welfare FCSFC 485 Lecture 7 & 8 1. Overview Child Welfare Services Child maltreatment ▫Statistics ▫Risk and Resilience Child Abuse Prevention and.
Pamela D. Ennis. Video recording of this presentation can be found at: dx0&feature=youtu.be.
The Effects of Parental Incarceration on Children and Families Carole Thompson Senior Associate The Annie E. Casey Foundation Friday, November 16, 2007.
Child protection in rural areas – home based measurements NFBO 2014 Nuuk 26. august.
Prison and Parenthood Lesson Seven. According to Sesame Street:
Brief Overview Of PLC & Culturally Responsive Teaching Strategies.
Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment: A Summary of a Systematic Review Erin Geary.
Adding an evidence-based family strengthening program
The association between a biological parent spending time in jail/prison and the child ending up in jail/prison later in life. Kathleen Johnson *Department.
Juvenile Diversion Programs: Background and Impact
Effects of Children with incarcerated parents
How Current Policy Issues Can Benefit from the Family Impact Lens
Presentation transcript:

A Systematic Review of the Literature CHILDREN, INCARCERATED MOTHERS AND THE CHILD WELFARE SYSTEM CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LONG BEACH SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK ANGELIQUE FLORES, MAY 2013

Introduction The total number of incarcerated mothers increased 122% since 1991 (Glaze & Maruschak, 2010). Despite the increasing incidence, little is still known about the particular risks facing children between the ages of 0 – 18 with incarcerated mothers also involved with the child welfare system. Most incarcerated women are single (62%), White (48%), and between the ages of 25 to 34. Parenthood is also a reality, with 55% of women having minor children under the age of 18 (Glaze & Maruschak, 2010). Research Questions: 1. What are the risk factors for children in the child welfare system with incarcerated mothers? 2. What types of programs and social support services are available for children of incarcerated mothers? 3. What is the effectiveness of the existing types of programs in the United States working with child welfare agencies towards the reunification of mothers with their children? Further research is needed in this area in addition to support and assistance in the development of programs and social support services for children of incarcerated mothers.

Social Work Relevance Examining children of incarcerated mothers also involved in the child welfare system is important to social work practice, social policy development, and as a basis for further research. This study can contribute to the body of knowledge for social workers and provide assistance towards the development of programs and social support services for children of incarcerated mothers. Social work practitioners should create additional social service support for these children through partnerships between the child welfare systems, correctional systems and prisoner advocacy groups. Policy makers might further consider and study the impact of current sentencing guidelines for incarcerated mothers and visitation practices at correctional facilities. Finally, the profound increase in the percentage of incarcerated women merits further investigation.

Cultural Relevance Consideration of race and ethnicity are critical issues when examining incarcerated mothers and their children. Racial and ethnic minorities are disproportionately represented in the criminal justice system in comparison to their representation in the general population (Glaze & Maruschak, 2010). Continued awareness and development of appropriate services are needed for people of diverse backgrounds. Evidence-based interventions that employ race, ethnic, and gender specific modalities need further development (Miller, 2006). African American children (6.7%) were seven and a half times more inclined than white children (0.9%) to have an imprisoned parent; and Hispanic children (2.4%) were more than two and a half times more inclined than white children to have a parent in prison.

Methods Research Design: Qualitative, comparative analysis method (Miles & Huberman, 1994; Bradley, Curry, & Devers, 2007). Data Collection Method: Reference library professional as well as comprehensive search of academic databases. Sample: 20 – 25 articles during the past 15 years. Analysis Plan: “PICO” method (Gambrill, 2006). The following databases will be utilized: Academic Search Complete, PsycINFO, ABI/INFORM, Social Services Abstracts, SocINDEX, The Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews, Criminal Justice Abstracts and Social Work Abstracts. Exclusion criteria will include studies done in languages other than English, narrative reviews, commentaries and other opinion based studies, weaker studies and multiple reports on the same set of data. Inclusion criteria will include studies during the past 15 years plus U.S. and international articles.

Results Many incarcerated mothers are imprisoned as a result of activities related to substance abuse problems (Mumola, 2000). This review of the literature presented research indicating a lack of programs and services focusing on drug rehabilitation for women offenders with children (Beckerman, 1998; Craig, 2009). Imprisoned mothers face many obstacles to avoid having their parental rights terminated (Beckerman, 1998; Halperin & Harris, 2004; Hayward & DePanfilis, 2007).

Results Cont. Child welfare agencies need to work collaboratively with correctional institutions and implement nationwide programs to meet the needs of incarcerated mothers and their children more effectively. Also unaddressed are the problems facing children from the trauma of maternal incarceration. This literature review found no current information or reliable data indicating any significant improvements regarding special programs targeted towards children with incarcerated mothers.

Implications for Social Work Policy & Practice Research indicates that children of incarcerated mothers in the child welfare system are at risk for higher rates of antisocial and delinquent behavior than children whose mothers are neither incarcerated nor involved in the child welfare system (Cho, 2010; Foster & Hagan, 2007; Dallaire, 2007; Murray & Farrington, 2008; Murray, Seokol, & Olsen, 2009). Social work practitioners should create additional social service support for these children through partnerships among child welfare systems, correctional systems and prisoner advocacy groups.

Implications for Social Work Research More research is needed to better understand the impact of maternal incarceration on children. While children of incarcerated mothers are at risk of experiencing many adverse outcomes, the exact cause of these outcomes and how to improve them is not clear (Hairston, 2007; Shlafer & Poehlmann, 2010). Another gap in the literature involves the reunification of a formerly incarcerated mother with children who have been in the child welfare system (Gleeson, 2007; Hairston, 2009; Laughlin, Arrigo, Blevins, & Coston, 2008). Regarding those instances particularly involving kinship foster care, the research is minimal.

References Beckerman, A. (1998). Charting a course: Meeting the challenge of permanency planning for children with incarcerated mothers. Child Welfare League of America, 77, 513-529. Bradley, E., Curry, L., & Devers, K. (2007). Qualitative data analysis for health services research: Developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Research and Educational Trust, 60, 1758-1772. Cho, R. M. (2010). Maternal incarceration and children’s adolescent outcomes: Timing versus dosage. Social Service Review, 84, 257-282. Craig, S. C. (2009). A historical review of mother and child programs for incarcerated women. The Prison Journal, 89(1), 35-53. Dallaire, D. H. (2007). Incarcerated mothers and fathers: A comparison of risks for children and families. Family Relations, 56, 440-453. Foster, H., & Hagan, J. (2007). Incarceration and intergenerational social exclusion. Social Problems, 54, 399-433. Gambrill, E. (2006). Social work practice: A critical thinker’s guide (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Glaze, L., & Maruschak, L. M. (2010). Parents in prison and their minor children. Retrieved from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/pptmc.pdf Gleeson, J. (2007). Kinship care research and literature: Lessons learned and directions for future research. The Kinship Reporter, Child Welfare League of America, 1(2), 1-12. Retrieved from http://www.cwla.org/programs/kinship/kinship summer2007.pdf Hairston, C. F. (2007). Focus on children with incarcerated parents: An overview of the research literature. Retrieved from http://www.aecf.org/~/media/Pubs/Topics/ Child%20Welfare%20Permanence/Foster%20Care/KinshipCareWhenParentsAreIncarceratedWhatWeKn/10147801_Kinship_Paper06a%203.pdf Hairston, C. F. (2009). Kinship care when parents are incarcerated: What we know, what we can do. Retrieved from http://www.aecf.org Halperin, R., & Harris, J. L. (2004). Parental rights of incarcerated mothers with children in foster care: A policy vacuum. Feminist Studies, 30(2), 339-352. Hayward, R. A., & DePanfilis, D. (2007). Foster children with an incarcerated parent: Predictors of reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 1320-1334. Laughlin, J. S., Arrigo, B. A., Blevins, K. R., & Coston, C. T. (2008). Incarcerated mothers and child visitation: A law, social science, and policy perspective. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 215-238. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Miller, K. M. (2006). The impact of parental incarceration on children: An emerging need for effective interventions. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 23(4), 472-486. Mumola, C. J. (2000). Bureau of Justice Statistics special report: Incarcerated parents and their children. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2008). The effects of parental imprisonment on children. Crime and Justice, 37(1), 133-206. Murray, J., Farrington, D. P., Seokol, I., & Olsen, R. F. (2009). Effects of parental imprisonment on child antisocial behavior and mental health: A systematic review. Retrieved from http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/lib/ Shlafer, R. J., & Poehlmann, J. (2010). Attachment and caregiving relationships in families affected by parental incarceration. Attachment and Human Development, 12(4), 395-415.