Kinship Care and Behavioral Outcomes for Children in the Child Welfare System David Rubin, MD MSCE Director or Research & Policy Safe Place: The Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Advertisements

1 Does Disadvantage Start at Home? Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Early Childhood Home Routines, Safety, and Educational Practices/Resources Glenn Flores,
Figure 1. There Are 13.3 Million Uninsured Young Adults Ages 19–29, 30 Percent of the Nonelderly Uninsured, 2005 Source: Analysis of the March 2006 Current.
Child Protective Services Enhanced Perinatal Surveillance May 30, 2007.
15 Community Supported Relief Nurseries Across Oregon.
Roderick Best 6th World Congress on Family Law and Children’s Rights 17 – 30 March 2013 Sydney Convention and Exhibition Centre Child heritage vs child.
Influenza Vaccination Coverage among Pregnant Women: Results from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), Rhode Island, Hanna.
1 Definitions and Examples of Practices vs. Services in Child Welfare The Service Array Process The National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational.
Preventable Injury Deaths: A Population-Based Proxy of Child Maltreatment Risk Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD Center for Social Services Research University.
US Berkeley 2/12/2013 linking population-based data to child welfare records: a public health approach to surveillance Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD University.
Foster Care Reentry after Reunification – Reentry in One or Two years – what’s the difference? Terry V. Shaw, MSW Daniel Webster, PhD University of California,
Impact of foster care on sexual activity of maltreated youth Monica Faulkner, PhD, LMSW Center for Social Work Research The University of Texas at Austin.
California Department of Social Services Children’s Services Operations and Evaluation PRESENTED TO THE CHILD WELFARE COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 12, 2012 REVISED.
How do Macon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Macon/Piatt Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement14833%
1. Kinship Breakdowns: Causes and Prevention ACWA Conference 2-5 August 2010, Sydney Lynne McCrae Wendy Frayne 2.
How do Coles County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Clark...Shelby Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement7136%
How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%
How do Morgan & Scott County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Morgan and Scott Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
Who lives in Rock Island County? Rock Island County Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White113, % Black or African.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
How do Logan County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Logan, Mason and Menard Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
Foster Care Reentry Going Beyond 12 Months of Follow-up Terry V. Shaw, MSW, PhD Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley School of Social.
Substance Abuse and Child Welfare Services: Research Update and Needs Presented at the National Center on Substance Abuse and Child Welfare Researcher’s.
Increasing Child Welfare Permanency Options: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley.
The California Child Welfare System: Data Snapshot Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Emily Putnam Hornstein, MSW Joseph Magruder, MSW Center for Social Services.
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare.
AN EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT GROUP PROGRAM FOR FOSTER PARENTS DESIGNED TO PREVENT PLACEMENT DISRUPTION: A GRANT PROPOSAL Miriam Vitela California State University,
Colorado Educational Stability Grant April David T. Menefee, Ph.D. Associate Director for Quality and Performance Improvement Division of Child.
Rogers, A.N. (2010), Human Behavior in Social Environment, 2 nd Ed., New York, Routledge/Taylor and Francis,.
©2008 National Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved. 1 CHILD PROTECTION IN THE UNITED STATES Norma Threadgill-Goldson, Ph.D., MSW Eastern.
©2008 National Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved. 1 Child Protection and Family Care Cora Hardy, LCSW Clinical Director Better Life Children.
1 Data Revolution: National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW) John Landsverk, Ph.D. Child & Adolescent Services Research Center Children’s.
Creating Racial Equity in Child Welfare: What Do We Know? Judith Meltzer, CSSP Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative Fall Convening November 16, 2010.
The Link Between Thriving Children and Economic Security: Creating Equity in Early Childhood for Our Common Good.
Demographics. National Statistics  “America’s Children: Key National Indicators of Well- Being, 2009” Report:  In 2008, 73.9 million children 0-17 y/o.
A National Assessment of Youth Involved with Child Welfare: Prevalence of Emotional and Behavioral Problems, Access to Treatment, and the Role of Court.
The Health of Children in Foster Care: Where Policy meets Practice David Rubin, MD MSCE Director of Research & Policy Safe Place: Center for Child Protection.
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
NC Child Welfare Data State Fiscal Year 2012 (7/1/11-6/30/12) 132,031 unique children were assessed for reports of child abuse, neglect & dependency Approximately.
A New Approach to Servicing Families.  Introduction to the practice of kinship care specific to A Second Chance Inc.  An Overview of how kinship care.
Demographics. Why focus on children & adolescents?  Unique population – especially this generation.  The first to understand terrorism as a domestic.
Michigan’s Child Welfare System Why is Overrepresentation a Critical Issue?
Foster Care Re-entry Study A Hennepin County Project conducted in collaboration with the Minnesota Department of Human Services and the University of Minnesota.
Presented at the UCI Undergraduate Research Symposium by Rebecca Christensen May 15, 2004 Social Support and Foster-Care Children’s Adjustment: A Comparison.
C hildren and F amily Research Center University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign School of Social Work TM Return to Care: What are the Factors Involved.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
The Health of Children in Foster Care: Where Policy meets Practice David Rubin, MD MSCE Director of Research & Policy Safe Place: Center for Child Protection.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
NCADS Child Maltreatment 2000 Data about child abuse and neglect known to child protective Services (CPS) agencies in the United States in 2000.
Early Intervention Program & Early Family Support Services: Analyzing Program Outcomes with the Omaha System of Documentation Presented to: Minnesota Omaha.
The Prevalence of Children with Disabilities in the Child Welfare System: An Analysis of State Administrative Data Elizabeth Lightfoot, PhD Katharine Hill,
Permanency Outcomes for Children in Erie County Department of Social Services Brett Loschiavo, Public Administration · Project Advisor – Dr. Suparna Soni.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Longitudinal Dynamics of Youth in Foster Care Joseph Magruder Emily Putnam-Hornstein.
RELATIVE GUARDIANSHIPS: INCREASED OPTIONS FOR SUSTAINED PERMANENCY Joseph Magruder, PhD University of California, Berkeley Daniel Webster, PhD University.
Direct Practice with Children and Families – Parenting Grandchildren Funded by Master’s Advanced Curriculum Project Grant University of Texas at Arlington.
Diversity of Children in Foster Care Lisa Martinez Patrick Long Juanita Arellano Linda Smith-Dishmon.
 1) To examine the prevalence of animal abuse among youth placed in foster care because of maltreatment.  2) To determine which types of maltreatment.
Teen Pregnancy. Class Survey - Why? Statistics o Graph Analysis Impact on parent and child o Developmentally o Educationally o Socially.
International & Transracial Adoption
Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment: A Summary of a Systematic Review Erin Geary.
Elizabeth J. Greeno, PhD, LCSW-C; Richard P. Barth, PhD, MSW; Mathew C
Congregate Care in Ohio
Ken Larimore, Ph.D., LISW-S
Birth to Six Initiative
A New Approach to Servicing Families
Demographics.
Presentation transcript:

Kinship Care and Behavioral Outcomes for Children in the Child Welfare System David Rubin, MD MSCE Director or Research & Policy Safe Place: The Center for Child Protection & Health

Background: Child welfare workers often choose between available kin vs. non-relative foster parents when faced with the decision to remove children from their homes.Child welfare workers often choose between available kin vs. non-relative foster parents when faced with the decision to remove children from their homes. Exits to kinship care in recent years have been largely responsible for a nearly 10% drop in the out- of-home population.Exits to kinship care in recent years have been largely responsible for a nearly 10% drop in the out- of-home population. Children in supervised kinship care represent less than 10% of the 2.5 million children being raised in kinship settingsChildren in supervised kinship care represent less than 10% of the 2.5 million children being raised in kinship settings

Background: Competing theories on kinship care:Competing theories on kinship care: “Blood is thicker than water” Stronger attachment between caregiver and childStronger attachment between caregiver and child Less disruptiveLess disruptive “The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree” Kin may share the same risk factors as the birth parentsKin may share the same risk factors as the birth parents Unrestricted and unregulated contact with birth parentsUnrestricted and unregulated contact with birth parents

Methods Data Source:Data Source: –National Survey of Child & Adolescent Well- Being (NSCAW) Study Population:Study Population: –Children who entered kinship care or non- relative foster care following report

Gender:Gender: 54% female 46% male Age:Age: 28% < 2 years 50% 2-10 years 22% > 10 years Race & Ethnicity:Race & Ethnicity: 50% White 38% African-American 13% Hispanic Abuse type:Abuse type: 57% neglect/abandonment 19% physical abuse 9% sexual abuse Results: Total study population (N = 1,309)

Initial Placement SettingInitial Placement Setting –50% kinship care –50% non-relative foster care 36-month CBCL Scores36-month CBCL Scores –38% had scores indicating behavioral problems Results:

Were children who were placed into kinship care different from those who were placed into non-relative foster care?

Differences in Baseline Characteristics by Initial Placement Setting

χ 2 : p =.007 Child’s Baseline Risk for Placement Instability

Did children in kinship care have more stability than children in non-relative foster care?

Actual Placement Stability (36 Months) χ 2 : p <.001

Controlling for the lower baseline risk and increased placement stability among children in kinship care, were behavioral outcomes different between children in kinship and non-relative foster care?

Predicted Probability of Behavior Problems at 36 Months Based on Placement Stability and Setting* 31% 30% 25% *Marginal standardization, adjusting for baseline risk and reunification status

Some words of caution Although children in kinship had fewer behavioral problems than children in non-relative foster care, their rates of behavioral problems were greater than other children in general.Although children in kinship had fewer behavioral problems than children in non-relative foster care, their rates of behavioral problems were greater than other children in general. Kinship care is not a realistic option for all children who enter out-of-home care.Kinship care is not a realistic option for all children who enter out-of-home care. Reporting bias among the kinship care population might have explained some of the difference.Reporting bias among the kinship care population might have explained some of the difference.

From Policy to Impact Non-Relative Kin Care CPS Report Child removed Guardianship vs. Adoption Reunification Adoption Risk Informal Kinship Care

From Policy to Impact Non-Relative Kin Care Guardianship vs. Adoption Reunification Adoption Notification CPS Report Child removed Risk Informal Kinship Care

From Policy to Impact Non-Relative Kin Care Guardianship vs. Adoption Reunification Adoption Licensing CPS Report Child removed Risk Informal Kinship Care

From Policy to Impact Non-Relative Kin Care Guardianship vs. Adoption Reunification Adoption Guardianship Benefits CPS Report Child removed Risk Informal Kinship Care

From Policy to Impact Non-Relative Kin Care Guardianship vs. Adoption Reunification Adoption CPS Report Child removed Risk Informal Kinship Care Navigators Navigators Navigators

Conclusions Children raised in kinship settings had more stability than children in non- relative foster careChildren raised in kinship settings had more stability than children in non- relative foster care Kinship care conferred benefits to children beyond the increased stability that was achievedKinship care conferred benefits to children beyond the increased stability that was achieved

Implications: Provides empirical data to support efforts to improve the early placement of children with kin when appropriateProvides empirical data to support efforts to improve the early placement of children with kin when appropriate Also reinforces the need to provide better services (via accessible navigator programs) among kinship families, which can only support efforts to achieve stability and maintain permanencyAlso reinforces the need to provide better services (via accessible navigator programs) among kinship families, which can only support efforts to achieve stability and maintain permanency

Acknowledgements: Funding:Funding: –Dr. Rubin’s work was supported through a K23 mentored career development award from NICHD (1 K23 HD A1) and a supplemental grant from the Office of Research & Planning of the Adminstration of Children & Families Special thanks to:Special thanks to: –Kevin Downes –Amanda O’Reilly MPH –Xianqun Luan MS –A. Russell Localio JD PhD –Robin Mekonnen MSW

Thank you.