PROCEDURES TO USE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES TO REPLACE COMMON CORE'S STANDARDS 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Texas Workforce Education Course Manual (WECM) 1995 – 2012
Advertisements

Successful strategies for improving outcomes through quality assessment and evaluation of programs Leadership Conference Winston Salem, NC June
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
NC Department of Public Instruction: Future-Ready Core NC Department of Public Instruction Academic Services and Instructional Support K-12 Curriculum.
NCLB, Highly Qualified and IDEA 2004 How it all fits together and What it means for you. RIDE Spring Leadership Conference May 11, 2006 Grossi/Olsen 2006.
Transforming Secondary Education in New Jersey Lucille E. Davy, Commissioner Willa Spicer, Deputy Commissioner Jay Doolan, Assistant Commissioner New Jersey.
1 Common Core State Standards What they are! & How they came to be! Implications for New Jersey New Jersey State Board of Education May 4, 2011 Dorothy.
West Virginia Department of Education
OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Common Core State Standards Initiative Information Shared by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.
SBA to GLE: The Road Les Morse, Director Assessment & Accountability Alaska Department of Education & Early Development No Child Left Behind Winter Conference.
1 Massachusetts Draft of Prekindergarten Standards in Mathematics and English Language Arts Susan Wheltle, Donna Traynham, and Barbara Libby Massachusetts.
Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment
Curriculum Reform Bryan MacGregor Cathy Macaslan.
1 THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. 2 WHAT IS A SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL, AND WHO ARE MEMBERS? The School Site Council (SSC) is an elected or selected group representative.
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
Grade-level and Competency Portfolios for 2014 MCAS-Alt
Bologna Process at the University of Helsinki University of Helsinki June 2005
Promotion and Tenure Workshop 1. Evaluation Procedure There is only one evaluation procedure leading to recommendations regarding promotion, tenure and.
New Directions: Online Courses & the University of Californias A-G Subject Area Requirements Monica H. Lin, Ph.D. Associate Director of Undergraduate Admissions.
The CSU Center for the Advancement of Reading (CAR)
Mississippi Special Education Advisory Panel Annual Report to the State Board of Education July 2009.
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
Common Core at CPS Scope and Sequence Implementation Plan
PARTICIPATION AND ADOPTION OF THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS INITIATIVE 1 Transforming Education in Kentucky Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner Michael.
1 Common Core State Standards: A Statewide Dialogue What is the Common Core State Standards Initiative and how is New York State involved? NYS ED.gov.
1 Orientation to SAFE-T. 2 ADEPT A Assisting, D Developing, and E Evaluating P Professional T Teaching.
Addition 1’s to 20.
2013 College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All.
College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All of.
Module 1: CIP Basics Contents of Module: Purposes of the CIP
Deana Holinka, MA, CRC, Administrative Coordinator,
EDUCATIONAL PROFICIENCY PLAN
Proposal for the Process of Faculty Selection to Committees in the School of Undergraduate Studies History As the School of Undergraduate Studies (UGS)
Florida’s 2+2 System of Articulation Matthew BouckHigher Education Coordinating Council Interim Director, Office of ArticulationJanuary 28, 2011 Matthew.
WRITING PROCESS FOR MATHEMATICS AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Oklahoma Academic Standards.
Preparing for NCATE October 22-26, 2005 Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
COMMON CORE GEORGIA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Mike Royal Vice Chair, State Board of Education January 9, 2015.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC/CDE Joint Meeting May 16, 2013 Update on Key Smarter.
DMUSD TRANSITION TO COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS. COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS  Common Core State Standards Initiative is a state-led effort coordinated.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Early Childhood Education (ZA) Endorsement Program Review December 12, 2008 Dr. Bonnie Rockafellow Education Consultant Office of Professional Preparation.
Promoting Literacy from Early Development Through College Proficiency Hallie Yopp Slowik and Nancy Brynelson CSU Center for the Advancement of Reading.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Michigan Merit Curriculum (MMC) and Personal Curriculum (PC) Update FEBRUARY 6, 2015.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
NC Department of Public Instruction: Future-Ready Core NC Department of Public Instruction Academic Services and Instructional Support Curriculum, Instruction,
Session 1 Achievement Testing Pre-Test Training
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
1 TERMS OF REFERENCE Assoc.Prof.Dr. Osman YILMAZ April 20, 2004 University Curriculum Committee.
ALTERNATIVE TEACHER LICENSE PROGRAM ALTERNATIVE TEACHER LICENSE PROGRAM Presented by Joy Yudnich, Mountain BOCES.
An Introduction to Virginia’s Standards of Learning, Assessments, and Related Resources Provided by the Virginia Department of Education Dr. Linda Wallinger.
Common Core Standards Overview. The Common Core Standards (CCS) were developed by the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governor’s.
Curriculum Directors Meeting February 24, 2016.
CAA Review Joint CAA Review Steering Committee Charge Reason for Review Focus Revision of Policy Goals Strategies Milestones.
Their role within Schools and Colleges
Special Education Teachers and Highly Qualified Requirements
Susan Wheltle, Donna Traynham, and Barbara Libby
Common Core State Standards: A Statewide Dialogue
Superintendent Goals Update MAY 7, 2013
Common Core State Standards: A Statewide Dialogue
Their role within Schools and Colleges
Minnesota’s Academic Standards
Their role within Schools and Colleges
UND’s Promotion & Tenure Process: Electronic Submission and Next Steps
Program Modification “Academic Year 2019” Assumption University
ECH/416 METHODS OF TEACHING IN EARLY CHILDHOOD: MATHEMATICS The Latest Version// uopcourse.com
ECH 416 ECH416 ech 416 ech416 Entire Course // uopstudy.com
Presentation transcript:

PROCEDURES TO USE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES TO REPLACE COMMON CORE'S STANDARDS 1

STEERING COMMITTEE Possible Membership –Chancellor of State System of Higher Education –State Legislators (? Members) –State Commissioner of Education –State Board of Education (? Members) PLUS (When Chosen) –ELA Standards Development Chair –Mathematics Standards Development Chair 2

STEERING COMMITTEE Responsibilities –Oversees the entire project –Final approval of all committee membership –Supported by Attorney General’s office 3

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (PAID) Selected by and reports to Steering Committee Oversees entire standards process Assures complete and accurate communications are provided to the Legislature, the Governor, and the public at large Works directly with ELA and Math Chairs, and directs work of the ELA and Math Scribes 4

DOCUMENT SCRIBES (PAID) ELA Scribe Math Scribe Qualifications –Expertise in subject matter –Adept at digital technology –Report to ELA or Math Chair on Steering Committee 5 Selected by Steering Committee

DOCUMENT SCRIBES (PAID) Responsibilities –Organization Prepares database of all nominees Processes nominations to various committees Schedules and secures sites for all in-person and virtual meetings Arranges for the services of meeting facilitators where needed –Communication Takes and transcribes detailed notes of all meetings Creates minutes from Steering Committee meetings Provides ongoing updates of standards-writing process to all committees and the public 6 Selected by Steering Committee

DOCUMENT SCRIBES (PAID) Responsibilities –Communication (continued) Posts appropriate information on webpage Maintains all drafts and revisions throughout the writing process Compiles public comments Coordinates responses to public comment 7 Selected by Steering Committee

MATH & ELA CHAIRS Qualifications –Undergraduate teaching faculty in the arts and sciences at an accredited university or college that maintains graduate-level programs –Math Chair must be a faculty member in a science, mathematics or engineering department –ELA Chair must be a faculty member in an English literature/language department –Nominated by the president of the university or college employing faculty member –At least 2 candidates for each committee will be nominated to the Steering Committee for final selection 8 (2 MEMBERS)

MATH & ELA CHAIRS Responsibilities –Maintains schedules and timelines –Leads and coordinates the work of the Standards Development Committees –Assures that standards are written with an emphasis on disciplinary content and accuracy –Works with Executive Director 9 (2 MEMBERS)

STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES District superintendents may nominate up to a total of 6 teachers for the subgroups in ELA and Math (i.e., no more than 1 per subgroup) 10 (15 MEMBERS EACH)

STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES Membership of ELA Standards Development Committee –ELA Chair –ELA Vice Chair - Teaching faculty member in an undergraduate English Literature department at a four-year university and selected by the ELA Chair –4 Pre-K to Fifth Grade school teachers –4 Middle school teachers (6 th -8 th Grade) –4 High school teachers at each grade level (9 th -12 th Grade) –1 Librarian (nominated by State's Library Association) 11 (15 MEMBERS EACH)

STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES Qualifications for teachers (district superintendents are to use one-page nomination forms): –Minimum 7 years experience at the educational level of the subgroup for which they are applying: Current teaching assignment at one of the grade levels in that subgroup –At least a minor in English and/or list courses completed in literature, composition, or rhetoric for those in middle or high school subgroup –Reading methods coursework for those in PreK-Grade 8 –Steering Committee in conjunction with the ELA Chair and Vice Chair make the final selection of those to serve on the subgroups 12 (15 MEMBERS EACH)

STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES Membership of Math Standards Development Committee –Math Chair –Math Vice Chair — teaching faculty member in an undergraduate mathematics department at a four-year university and selected by the Math Chair –4 Pre-K to Grade 5 teachers –4 Middle school teachers (6 th -8 th Grade) –4 High school teachers (9 th -12 th Grade) to include: Algebra I teacher Geometry teacher Algebra II teacher Precalculus or Trigonometry teacher –1 Engineer (nominated by a state engineering professional organization or university faculty) 13 (15 MEMBERS EACH)

STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES Qualifications for teachers (district superintendents are to use one-page nomination forms): –Minimum 7 years experience at the educational level of the subgroup for which they are applying: Current teaching assignment at one of the grade levels in the subgroup –At least a minor in mathematics, science, or engineering for those in middle or high school subgroup –Considered effective math teacher in PreK-5 –Steering Committee in conjunction with Math Chair and Vice Chair make the final selection of those to serve on the subgroups 14 (15 MEMBERS EACH)

STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES Responsibilities –Each Standards Development Committee as a whole uses a highly- rated pre-2009 set of state standards as the foundational blueprint ELA: California, Indiana 2006, Massachusetts 2001 or Stotsky 2013 Math: California, Indiana 2006, Massachusetts 2000, or Minnesota –Each subgroup addresses each relevant grade-level set of standards by adoption, modification, or rewrite. –Standards Development Committee as a whole examines entire set of standards and revises when necessary –Submits the documents to the Steering Committee for approval for further review 15 (15 MEMBERS EACH)

FIRST-DRAFT REVIEW COMMITTEE Membership –Remaining nominees not selected to be on Standards Development Committee Responsibilities –Teachers review all standards at their own educational level for appropriateness and wording –High school teachers review all documents –Comments are recorded by the Scribes and sent to the Standards Development Committee for review and possible action –First draft presented to the Steering Committee for approval and public comment 16

SECOND DRAFT REVIEW State Chamber of Commerce State business and industry professional organizations State engineering organizations Early childhood advocacy organizations Special education advocacy organizations English Language Learners advocacy organizations School counselor professional organizations Speech pathology professional organizations Undergraduate teaching faculty in science, engineering, mathematics and English literature/language 17 (BY HIGHER EDUCATION AND SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS)

SECOND DRAFT REVIEW Responsibilities –Review standards and advise on: a)Classroom application b)Vertical alignment –All responses must be signed and submitted electronically –Recommended changes to the Second Draft are recorded by the Scribes and sent to the Standards Development Committee for review and possible action –Second draft presented to the Steering Committee for review. Steering Committee reviews recommendations and provides direction to the ELA and Math Chairs and the Standards Writing Teams on edits for the second draft. 18 (BY HIGHER EDUCATION AND SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS)

EXTERNAL EVALUATION The presidents, provost, and faculty of the 4 year colleges nominate two well-known or well published experts in each subject area. –Selection is by the Steering Committee –Individuals do not teach at a state college or university –Qualifications determined by Steering Committee Responsibilities –External Reviewer will report on the quality of the standards –External Reviewer will report to the Steering Committee and the State Legislature 19

FINAL DRAFT After the second draft review, the Standards Development Committees will review, revise and submit a final draft to the Steering Committee. Final draft will be submitted for a 45-day public comment period and public hearing at the State Capitol. Public comment will be incorporated as deemed appropriate by the Standards Development Committee. Final Draft submitted to the State Legislature for Legislative Hearings and final approval. Assessment Committees formed to ensure that test items are based on approved standards and of high academic quality. 20