PDAS Update Training “The goal of PDAS is to improve student performance through the professional development of teachers.” Review the Slide: Have participants.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
Advertisements

Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
Training for Teachers and Specialists
On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
The Teacher Work Sample
Evaluation Orientation Meeting Teacher Evaluation System
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Professional Development and Appraisal System Teacher Orientation.
Professional Development and Appraisal System. Rules To Know From Commissioner’s Rules Chapter 150.AA Subchapter  Each teacher must be appraised.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.
History and Overview of the PDAS Jay Dawson Cassie Fredendall Molly Schroepfer October 20, 2005.
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Special Education and Teacher Evaluations Janelle Smith Dr. Peter Verona O Director of Special Services O Byron CUSD #226 O O Byron.
Teacher Evaluation Model
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Professional Development and Appraisal System
M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.
Principles of Assessment
PDAS Overview La Porte ISD
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT APPRAISAL SYSTEM TEACHER ORIENTATION UPDATE POWER POINT PRESENTATION Developed by Carlene Lenox Division of Administration Region.
John Drugan School July 19,  PDAS remains in place as the State of Texas’s approved instrument for appraising its teachers and identifying areas.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Teacher Orientation August, 2011 Brazosport Independent School District Professional Development and Appraisal System
The Jordan Performance Appraisal System (JPAS) is designed to help educators in their continuing efforts to provide high quality instruction to all students.
Committee on the Assessment of K-12 Science Proficiency Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education National Academy of Sciences.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
Factoring Growth Models Into Administrator and Teacher Performance Evaluations -- a presentation for -- Henderson, Mercer, and Warren Counties Regional.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.
Teacher Evaluation Process Update March 13, 2015 SCASPA Roundtable.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Teacher Orientation August, 2012 Brazosport Independent School District Professional Development and Appraisal System.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM. A school district shall ensure that all teachers are provided with an orientation of the Professional Development.
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Evaluation Information
HOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS
Presentation transcript:

PDAS Update Training “The goal of PDAS is to improve student performance through the professional development of teachers.” Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Timelines Local Decision TSR TINA Performance Level Decisions Agenda Timelines Local Decision TSR TINA Performance Level Decisions Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

APPRAISAL PERIOD TIME LINE SCHOOL CALENDAR YEAR First 12 weeks Second 12 weeks Third 12 weeks Last 15 Days of INSTR. Teacher Orientation Within 1st 3 weeks Observations no earlier than 3 weeks after Teacher Self-Report-I No later than three weeks after orientation. TEACHER SELF-REPORT II & III At least two weeks prior to summative conference Formal Observations Minimum of 45 minutes or shorter segments Written summary within 10 working days Advanced notice may be given/NOT REQUIRED Follow district APPRAISAL CALENDAR May have pre or post conference at request of Teacher or Appraiser WALK-THROUGH VISITS To be used at the discretion of the appraiser Documentation shared with teacher within 10 days Review the Slide: ADDITIONAL TIME LINE ISSUES Teacher Response Within 10 working days (Appraiser may extend to 15) May rebut or request 2nd appraisal within 10 working days after receiving any documentation SUMMATIVE ANNUAL REPORT 5 working days before conference No later than 15 working days before last day of instruction Observation Summary Walk-through documentation Third party/Teacher documentation TSR I, II, III SUMMATIVE CONFERENCE No later than 15 working days before last day of instruction May be waived in writing by Teacher, NOT APPRAISER. If Appraiser is not administrator on campus, principal/asst. principal or designated supervisory staff will participate.

Timelines Orientation Your expectations Campus/district focus Duties All teachers on campus should receive orientation. It has to be done within the 1st 3 weeks; it can be before students arrive. Topics to cover: Your expectations Campus/district focus Duties Classroom performance Teacher Self-Report (Parts I, II, and III) Conferences: pre/post and summative It should be a Standardized/uniform/consistent message to all of your teachers. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Timelines Teacher Self-Report Walkthroughs Formal observations Part I is due within 3 weeks of the orientation. Parts II and III are due at least 2 weeks before the summative conference. Walkthroughs Should begin the first day of instruction and continue through the final day of instruction. Formal observations Earlier is better. Completing observations and conferences in the fall can direct professional development for rest of year. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Timelines Locally Adopted Calendar Documentation Know your local calendar; it should be covered in staff orientation. Follow your local calendar. Documentation Teachers must be notified within 10 days of you receiving information that will affect their appraisal. When documenting it is best to document the date received and the date of teacher notification. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Timelines Summative Conference Give yourself a buffer; complete all summatives well before the deadline. Earlier is better, especially in cases where a 2nd appraisal is requested. There should not be any surprises in the summative conference. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Timelines What if you fail to follow any part of the timeline? The PDAS system has two main goals: professional development and appraisal. Teachers and appraisers are encouraged to complete the appraisal process, even when timelines are broken, because the system can still contribute to professional development, especially through completion of the Teacher Self-Report (TSR) and the annual summative appraisal. However, when timelines are not adhered to, the appraisal cannot be used for employment decisions. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Local Decisions Local Policy Board must approve Appraisal policy Local calendar 2nd appraisal process Grievance policy All appraisers in district Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Local Decisions Who should be appraised using PDAS? PDAS was designed to evaluate classroom teachers. Other education professionals must be evaluated annually; however, they do not have to be evaluated with PDAS. A district may develop an appraisal system for these educators or modify other systems so long as the job requirements of that group are addressed. If the educator is the teacher of record for at least one class they must be appraised using PDAS or a locally developed teacher appraisal. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Local Decisions What is a teacher’s recourse if he/she does not agree with his/her appraisal? Within 10 working days after receiving an Observations Summary or a Summative Annual Appraisal a teacher has two options if he/she does not agree with the report. A written response or rebuttal may be submitted which becomes a part of the teacher’s appraisal; or A 2nd observation can be requested in writing. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Local Decisions 2nd appraisals How are 2nd appraisals initiated and weighted with the initial appraisal in your district? This will be in your district’s local appraisal policy. The following will be included in the 2nd appraisal: a 45 minute observation (or equivalent amount of time in shorter segments), scoring of all domains, cumulative documentation collected by the first appraiser, particularly in Domains VI, VII, and VIII, and any walk-through documentation that are used to score any or all domains. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Teacher Self-Report Gives the teacher an opportunity to have input into his/her appraisal process. Serves as a platform to align instruction. Is a reflective tool. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Teacher Self-Report TSR I The Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) objectives listed in Section I of the TSR are skills embedded in all learning. All grades and subjects teach or reinforce some of all of these skills within the context of the respective curriculum and at the appropriate level for the assigned students. It can be revised during the school year as needed. This must be done at least 2 weeks prior to the Summative Annual Conference. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Teacher Self-Report Parts II and III of the TSR give the teacher an opportunity to give his/her appraiser additional information about his/her efforts to improve the students’ performance. TSR Parts II and III should connect to the Campus Improvement Plan and this should be communicated to the teachers during orientation. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Teacher Self-Report The appraiser should use the TSR as one piece of the data in completing the Summative Annual Appraisal. The TSR should also help to drive all of the appraisal conferences, especially the summative conference. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Teacher In Need of Assistance When do you use a TINA? Commissioner’s Rules 150.1004 (a) (1) a teacher who is evaluated as unsatisfactory in one or more domains; or (2) a teacher who is evaluated as below expectations in two or more domains. TINA’s can also be developed for a teacher at the discretion of the appraiser when the appraiser has evidence that would potentially produce an evaluation rating of below expectations or unsatisfactory. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Teacher In Need of Assistance Documentation needs to include the following: Date: Date of occurrence, date of notification of the teacher Facts (who, what, when, where) Explicit (as it relates to language used in the PDAS framework) Behavior observed Valid source (must be verified when data is coming form a 3rd party) Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Teacher In Need of Assistance Development of the TINA must include: A partnership between the teacher and appraiser. Focus on the Domain(s) that designate the teacher as a Teacher In Need of Assistance. Professional Development activities and dates for completion. Evidence that will be used to determine that professional development activities have been completed. Directives for changes in teacher behavior and timelines. Evidence that will be used to determine if teacher behavior has changed. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Teacher In Need of Assistance When a teacher needs to be placed on a TINA, earlier is better. Get it started as early as possible to give opportunity for growth. At the first sign that there might be a problem, get involved. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Teacher In Need of Assistance When developing the intervention plan it shall: include options for professional development activities designed to enhance teacher proficiency. At least one option shall not place significant financial burden on either the teacher or the school district. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Performance Level Decisions Communicating Expectations Needs to happen when teachers report through their final work day. Constant, clear, concise. Two-way, get teachers’ input. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Performance Level Decisions Pre and Post conferences Pre- should be two way and used to communicate expectations of the appraiser and teacher. Post- should be used for feedback, growth, and planning. Every teacher should be given both pre and post conferences, the more communication the better. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Performance Level Decisions Proficient Standard is defined under PDAS as: The four performance levels under PDAS (Exceeds Expectations, Proficient, Below Expectations, and Unsatisfactory) are defined in terms of the impact on student learning. In other words, what is the impact on student learning and how often and with how many students does the positive impact on learning occur? Since the goal of PDAS is to enhance the learning of all students, the “proficient” level is a high standard of performance. Teaching behaviors that result in considerable impact on student learning and which are demonstrated a high percentage of the time and with a high percentage of students (80-89%) is ‘proficient.’ Words associated with ‘proficient’ teaching behaviors or the rating of ‘proficient’ are: skillful, experienced, masterful, well-advanced, and knowledgeable. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Performance Level Decisions Using inference is acceptable in the following cases: It can be applied to Domains I, II, III, IV, V, VII, and VIII (except Criteria 10). You can infer proficient in only one criteria out of a domain if 80% of the other criteria in the domain are proficient or better. All of Domain VII can be inferred if there is no evidence otherwise. None of Domain VI can be inferred. Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Performance Level Decisions Decisions should be based on: Critical Attributes Quality Quantity Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Performance Level Decisions Quality Scoring Standards S trength I mpact V ariety A lignment Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Performance Level Decisions Strength Thinking at high cognitive levels Depth & Complexity Significant Content Connecting within/across disciplines & work/life applications Effective, clear & substantive Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Performance Level Decisions Impact Promotes student success Effective use of assessments Data-driven decision making Responsibility Reflection Challenging Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Performance Level Decisions Variety Varied student characteristics Differentiated instruction Support strategies & services Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Performance Level Decisions Alignment Curriculum, instruction and assessment aligned with TEKS & district objectives Targeted instruction Congruent Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Performance Level Decisions Quantity Can you see it? Did it happen? How often? How many students? Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.

Closure Review the Slide: Have participants complete an introduction activity.