1.3. Scientific institutions and organizations, scientific conferences B130P16: Praktické základy vědecké práce Katedra experimentální biologie rostlin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENERGY ENGINEERING MASTERS DEGREE. Why a Consortium? Great problems are solved with high performance equipment. We celebrate that eight leader companies.
Advertisements

PURPOSE OF GRADUATE SCHOOL Ghana Technology University College.
European Commission - Marie Curie Actions. Intra-European Fellowships for Career Development Call identifier FP7-PEOPLE-2009-IIF Closing Date: 18 August.
DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY COPYRIGHT CASTeL Oct-09 Slide 1 ST. PATRICK’S COLLEGE Dr. Eilish McLoughlin S-TEAM mid-project conference, Glasgow, October.
Jean-Pierre BOURGUIGNON
CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Internal Evaluation Procedures at CUT Quality Assurance Seminar Organised by the Ministry of Education and Culture and.
Science, Technology and Culture Strategy document October 2006.
Research and Doing a Phd
Aajeevika Skills Visioning Workshop 24 th Feb 2014 Visioning Exercise Briefing.
1. Review- What is a scientific theory Compare and Contrast- How does use of the word theory differ in science and in daily life 2. Review- What is peer.
Vice-rector of research department A.S. Karakushikova Director of Research and Education activities of Academic and Research Institution of Fundamental.
Reviewing Papers: What Reviewers Look For Session 19 C507 Scientific Writing.
Education in the United States
The Department of Computer Science offers three levels of studies - Two three-years undergraduate programs Laurea in Informatica Laurea in Informatica.
Revised principles of Master thesis at Department of Mathematics and Informatics, University of Novi Sad B. Šešelja, Z. Budimac.
Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities Peer Review Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities.
Research Mentoring Sadiq M. Sait 07 February 2005.
On Being a Successful Graduate Student
University of Jyväskylä Research Evaluation 2000–2004 General Results – Recommendations Dr. Antoaneta Folea Research Evaluation Coordinator Research and.
On Being a Successful Graduate Student Researcher Much of this material is adapted extensively (and shamelessly) from a presentation given annually at.
Research Methods for Computer Science CSCI 6620 Spring 2014 Dr. Pettey CSCI 6620 Spring 2014 Dr. Pettey.
National Science Centre An Important Component of Research Funding in Poland RECFA visit to Poland, Krakow 2012 Andrzej Jajszczyk.
The evaluation of research units at HCERES
5. Presentation of experimental results 5.5. Original contribution (paper) - the main outcome of scientific activities - together with patents, they can.
Excellence in scientific research Prof
Pavol Jozef Šafárik University Košice, Slovakia EUA Doctoral Programme Project SWOT analysis on Quality Structures (Cultures, Processes) Eva Čellárová.
WRITING A REVIEW ARTICLE STRUCTURE AND STYLE OF A REVIEW ARTICLE Saleem Saaed Qader MBChB, MD, MSc, MPH, PhD, SBGS Consultant General Surgeon, Lecturer.
Course Timeline October 7 th : Project description October 14 th : Paperwork and Budget October 21 st : Successful Grant Writers (Project description due)
Research Ethics November 2nd 2005 Kirsten Ribu.
Quality Assurance System in Croatia – National Council for Higher Education Aleksa Bjeliš Zagreb, 29 May 2004.
Questionnaires on Gap Analysis and Benchmark Report.
Teaching psychology in the Czech Republic Context Psychology education is offered by many universities in the Czech Republic. All education degrees (bachelor,
Types of scientific reports and periodics (reminder from ch. 3.1.) 5. Presentation of experimental results - original contribution (the article) - universal.
On Preparing Proposals: Comments from Both Inside and Outside NSF Xiaodong Zhang The Ohio State University.
1 Chapter 1 Research Methods When sociologists do quantitative research, they generally use either surveys or precollected data.quantitative research Qualitative.
Research and Graduate School. MS degree –can give you a nice boost in salary, more opportunities (e.g. project leader) –usually 2 years –2-3 courses per.
Software Engineering Experimentation Rules for Reviewing Papers Jeff Offutt See my editorials 17(3) and 17(4) in STVR
B130P16: Praktické základy vědecké práce Katedra fyziologie rostlin, PřF UK RNDr. Jan Petrášek, Ph.D. iHOPiHOP - information.
Good Research Practice Other Roles of the Researcher Fang Mao, Department of Chemistry-Ångström Mi Wang, Department of EBC Getachew Kebede, Department.
-Honesty-Cooperation-Responsibility-Respect  Established in 2003 by the Ministry of Economy.  Non – profit public institution.  Managing and administrating.
How to develop an independent research plan – review literature with an eye for problem, approach, solution, new ideas – review objectives of funding programs.
Practical basics of scientific work (B130P16E) Guaranteed by: Dept. Plant Physiology State: taught Winter term: 0/2 C (hours/week) Credits: 2 Valid.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?. SCIENTIFIC WORLD VIEW 1.The Universe Is Understandable. 2.The Universe Is a Vast Single System In Which the Basic Rules.
5.5. Original contribution (paper) - the main outcome of scientific activities - together with patents, they can not be combined together at one time -
Writing Describe a problem in education. What is the significance of this issue? What would you like to know about this problem? Who else is interested.
The Scientific Method. Objectives Explain how science is different from other forms of human endeavor. Identify the steps that make up scientific methods.
1 CHBE 551 Lect 03 Planning A Research Career. 2 Outline Objective: Overview of how you build a research career What are key skills that need to be developed.
5.2. Diploma thesis B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department of Plant Physiology FS CU RNDr. Jan Petrášek,
Practical basics of scientific work (B130P16E) Guaranteed by: Department of Plant Experimental Biology State: taught Winter term: 0/2 C (hours/week)
Bologna Process in Croatia Melita Kovačević University of Zagreb Consortia Meeting of the Tempus Project UM-JEP Moving Ahead with the Bologna Process.
MANAGEMENT and MARKETING DEPARTMENT PERM NATIONAL RESEARCH POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY.
Practical basics of scientific work (B130P16E) Guaranteed by: Department of Plant Experimental Biology State: taught Winter term: 0/2 C (hours/week)
Research Funding Opportunity & Scientific Capacity Building in Developing Countries By Dina R. Andersson 1.
Research assessment for at the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Eva Zažímalová The Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
Lesson Overview Lesson Overview Science in Context Lesson Overview 1.2 Science in Context Scientific methodology is the heart of science. But that vital.
The American system of university education is very different from ours. It was created in the country with the culture and traditions different from.
Writing for funding Faculty of Humanities Postgraduate Research Training John Canning
1. Basics of research work
Career presentation - My career….. To be a Botanist …
The Role of Students in Program and Course Evaluation
Research Methods for Computer Science
Practical basics of scientific work (B130P16E)
On Being a Successful Graduate Student
Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki, Finland
Practical basics of scientific work (B130P16E)
1. Basics of research work
Practical basics of scientific work (B130P16E)
5. Presenting a scientific work
5. Presenting a scientific work
Practical basics of scientific work (B130P16E)
Presentation transcript:

1.3. Scientific institutions and organizations, scientific conferences B130P16: Praktické základy vědecké práce Katedra experimentální biologie rostlin PřF UK What is the character of the experimental scientific work? Isolated researchers are very rare, however they bring new ideas Classical team work 1. Basics of research work

What institutions are involved in the scientific research? 1) Universities 1.3. Scientific institutions and organizations, scientific conferences B130P16: Praktické základy vědecké práce Katedra experimentální biologie rostlin PřF UK 1. Basics of research work The symbiosis of pedagogical and scientific activities. Positive correlation between the quality of research and teaching. With respect to the quality of the scientific research the best universities are located in the USA and UK The evaluation of the quality of the particular university might be rather dependent on its original purpose.

World University Rankings according to the quality of their research and teaching activities Harvard, Yale, Cambridge and Oxford are usually among the top 5 B130P16: Praktické základy vědecké práce Katedra experimentální biologie rostlin PřF UK Scientific institutions and organizations, scientific conferences 1. Basics of research work

Scientific research is usually inherent part of the mission of good university B130P16: Praktické základy vědecké práce Katedra experimentální biologie rostlin PřF UK Scientific institutions and organizations, scientific conferences 1. Basics of research work

- Max Planck Society, Germany - RIKEN, Japan 2) Specialized research institutions - In contrast to universities the emphasis is on the scientific research - They are often involved in Ph.D. programs and collaborate closely with universities - Some examples of well known research institutions: - AS CR, Czech Republic - Governmental or privat research centres B130P16: Praktické základy vědecké práce Katedra experimentální biologie rostlin PřF UK Scientific institutions and organizations, scientific conferences 1. Basics of research work

B130P16: Praktické základy vědecké práce Katedra experimentální biologie rostlin PřF UK The spectrum of particular research teams: - is the result of the existence of scientific authorities in the field - is the result of certain strategy (modern topics, applicability, etc.) 1.3. Scientific institutions and organizations, scientific conferences 1. Basics of research work Scientific team - basic building unit of every scientific institution, usually international The interconnection between individual teams within the institution is the crucial for the efficiency of the whole institution.

1.3. Scientific institutions and organizations, scientific conferences What is the structure of „healthy” research team? - Group leader - he/she is responsible for the scientific quality of the research, co-ordinates the work, usually the holder of some more important academical degree (Professor, Associated professor) - Research assistants, postdocs - represent the main „power” of the team, they are usually in their best age (untill 35 or 40), the most frequently asked temporary positions around the world - Specialists - experts in certain methods, they do not have their own scientific ambitions - Ph.D. students - they work on their thesis under the supervision of the leader or some of the postdocs, the thesis must fit into the profile of the team. - Diploma students - they work on their diploma thesis, topic might be broader - Younger students (bachelors) - temporary help with the laboratory work, very good for the orientation in the field - Laboratory technicians - essential for the keeping the lab in good shape. Sometimes the success of crucial experiments depends purely on their skills. B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department Experimental Plant Biology FSCU 1. Basics of research work

1. Základní pravidla vědecké práce

1.3. Scientific institutions and organizations, scientific conferences What is the structure of „healthy” research team? The structure is not rigid, it is gradually changed depending on the improvement of the students and quality of the group leader The relationship between teacher and pupil (master/apprentice) is crucial for the transfer of knowledge B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department Experimental Plant Biology FSCU 1. Basics of research work

1.3. Scientific institutions and organizations, scientific conferences What is wrong in the team profile? - Too many scientific topics or their inconsistency - The absence of students or too many students - The inability of group leader to properly lead and discuss all individual research projects in the group, it could lead to the fatal consequences (scientific frauds, overlooking mistakes, etc.) B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department Experimental Plant Biology FSCU 1. Basics of research work

B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department Experimental Plant Biology FSCU

1.3. Scientific institutions and organizations, scientific conferences Scientific organizations/societies - join researchers according to their research field - their significance is often more important for the reasearch team than the interaction with other teams in the same building - ironically, the membership is often payed from the private money of the researcher Examples of the main scientific societies in the field of plant experimental biology: - FESPB - Federation of European Societies of Plant BiologistFESPB - ASPB – American Society of Plant BiologistsASPB - support of collegiality needed for the evaluation of research grants and papers, organization of conferences, etc. B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department Experimental Plant Biology FSCU 1. Basics of research work

Scientific meetings - Ideal platform for the effective and fast exchange of information and experience - congresses, symposia, seminars, courses (workshops), etc. - Congresses in the field of plant experimental biology: FESPB, ASPB FESPBASPB 1.3. Scientific institutions and organizations, scientific conferences B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department Experimental Plant Biology FSCU 1. Basics of research work - Conferences/symposia: Gordon Research Conferences Gordon Research Conferences - around 250/year Keystone Symposia Keystone Symposia - around 50/year Cold Spring Harbor Conferences

1.4. Ethical rules of scientific work Private reasons of the existence of scientific work - Creative activity, uncovering yet unexplored facts and rules, there is no manual for the solution - Research might be understood as a kind of craft - Private hobby for which one might be payed for - Making „carrier“ is usually not the reason How is the particular topic selected and determined? - Following the teacher or professor, respected authority in the field - Private interest - Public acceptance and scientific relevance - phenomenon of the „scientific fashion“ - By the provider of the money B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department Experimental Plant Biology FSCU 1. Basics of research work

When doing research one should: - start from the existing knowledge, groundbreaking discovery might be done through the falsification of accepted theory - avoid the repetitive discovery of already discovered facts - not formulate hypothesis without a good knowledge of the literature - bring the public good, reduce the private interest and regularly publish results (according to what you promise during matriculation) Although there is no well-established ethical codex for the research work there are several rules that should be respected: - respecting the priority of scientific discovery - respecting ideas and results of others - avoiding excesive editing and hiding of results - consistent acknowledgement of the work of all colleagues 1.4. Ethical rules of scientific work B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department Experimental Plant Biology FSCU 1. Basics of research work

1.4. Ethical rules of scientific work The most frequent mistakes: - intentional ignoration of already known facts - hiding the intelectual source - „suitable“ adjusting of results - e.g. hiding of unclear results - premature publishing or repeated publishing of the same results - pretending the practical applicability - plagiarism - both in case of original contributions and projects B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department Experimental Plant Biology FSCU 1. Basics of research work

Spin off companies 1.5. Financing of the scientific research B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department Experimental Plant Biology FSCU 1. Basics of research work

B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department Experimental Plant Biology FSCU 1. Basics of research work Spin off companies 1.5. Financing of the scientific research

Grant projects: Student, doctoral, starting or junior research projects - for one to three years, young student or freshly graduated scientists - Standard research propjects - the most frequent form, three to five years. - Specialized projects - travel or publication expenses - Integration projects - interconnection of several research groups, at least five years. Overlap with the classical reseach projects Financing of the scientific research B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department Experimental Plant Biology FSCU 1. Basics of research work

1.5. Financing of the scientific research Grant agencies: - Local (internal) Grant Agency - serves as a money-distributing organization in the frame of certain institution - The grant agency of the Charles University (GAUK; in Czech, in English students and employees are eligible for proposals here Grant agency belonging to certain ministry (governmental) - support of research and development in certain research area (education, medicine, agriculture, culture, etc.) - Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports in Czech, in English Supports mainly huge, collaborative projects B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department Experimental Plant Biology FSCU 1. Basics of research work

1.5. Financing of the scientific research Grant agencies: - National Grant Agencies - independent agency supported directly from the budget (separate chapter), all research areas are covered - The Czech Science Foundation - supports research projects submitted by individuals or organizations in all research areas - National Science Foundation (NSF; the biggest and the best organized grant agency in the USAThe Czech Science Foundationhttp:// - International Grant Agency - founded in the frame EU convergence in the area of scientific research - CORDIS (Community research and development Information Service; - European research council (ERC) recently founded agency supporting individual scientists all around EUhttp://cordis.europa.eu/ B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department Experimental Plant Biology FSCU 1. Basics of research work

1.6. Writing scientific projects and grant proposals, basic rules Consider which type of the project will be the most suitable at the moment, choose the grant agency Strictly keep formal requisites - project proposals are often eliminated before scientific evaluation, just because formal defects Constitute a functional team - project feasibility is guaranteed by the research institution - proposal text is similar to scientific paper, it contains expected results, the judgment of possible practical applications and financial demands Example of the scientific proposal herehere Evaluation of the proposal - committee of specialist selects opponents according to the topic of the proposal. Opponents are always anonymous. B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department Experimental Plant Biology FSCU 1. Basics of research work

Successful proposals are granted, financially supported, applicants turn to be solvers and their research institutions holders of the particular project. Reports about the progress of the project is needed every year. The outcomes of the particular project are scientific papers or patents - grant agencies strictly control how the solver publish his/her results - in case of bad outcome (no papers, no patents) the scientist has problems with all subsequent proposals - Scientific projects are all registered in the CR at the pages of Research and Development Council ( Writing scientific projects and grant proposals, basic rules B130P16E: Practical basics of scientific work Department Experimental Plant Biology FSCU 1. Basics of research work

Průvodce vědeckým žargonem (ke snímku 14) : "je již dlouho známo" = nezjistil jsem si původní pramen "projevuje se tu určitý trend" = tyto údaje jsou v podstatě bezcenné "ačkoliv nebylo možné přinést na tyto otázky jednoznačnou odpověď" = pokus se nezdařil. ale i tak doufám, že jej budu moci publikovat "k podrobnému studiu byly vybrány tři vzorky" = ostatní výsledky nedávaly smysl "representative results are shown iin the plot" = I really made this plot nicely "tyto výsledky budou obsahem příští studie" = jednou se snad do ní pustím, jestli mě k tomu někdo dokope / poskytne finanční prostředky "from our own experience" = once "in several cases" = twice "in many cases" = three times "panuje názor" = já si myslím "panuje všeobecný názor" = pár kolegů si to myslí taky "platný v řádu daných veličin" = neplatný "podle statistického průzkumu" = říká se "statisticky vyjádřený odhad významu těchto zjištění" = pustý dohad "pečlivá analýza dosažitelných údajů" = tři stránky poznámek se mi rozpily, když sem si na ně zvrhl pivo "je jasné že bude třeba vykonat ještě mnoho další práce, než budeme schopni porozumět tomuto jevu v jeho úplnosti" = já mu nerozumím "po následné práci mých kolegů" = ani oni mu nerozumějí "Děkuji Joe Blotzovi za asistenci při pokusu a André Schafferové za přínosné konzultace" = Blotz udělal práci a Schafferová mi vysvětlila, o co jde "nesmírně významná oblast výzkumné práce" = naprosto zbytečný úkol, který mi zadala komise "doufám že tato studie podnítí další výzkum v dané oblasti" = já s tím končím