The argument from design: God

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How do we know what exists?
Advertisements

© Michael Lacewing Religious point of view as seeing-as Michael Lacewing
The Ontological Argument
Rationalism and empiricism
© Michael Lacewing Plato on knowledge and experience Michael Lacewing
Michael Lacewing The Idea of God Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
The Nature of God God is Mystery That which is beyond our comprehension Then how can we speak of God? By meditating on His effects we can: Know.
Plato, knowledge and virtue
Free will and God’s omniscience
Recent versions of the Design Argument So far we have considered the classical arguments of Aquinas and Paley. However, the design argument has attracted.
© Michael Lacewing A priori knowledge Michael Lacewing
Gettier and the analysis of knowledge Michael Lacewing
Omniscience and immutability Michael Lacewing
Is Religion Reasonable? Are religious beliefs (about the universe’s relation to the supernatural) reasonable? Faith seeking understanding: ontological,
Chapter 12: Is There a God?.
Explaining the universe Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Philosophy and the proof of God's existence
Explaining the universe
Plantinga’s ontological argument
Two puzzles about omnipotence
Michael Lacewing Is the mind the brain? Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
The ontological argument
The logical problem of evil
a) AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding Explain in detail Use technical terms (and explain them) Include quotations Link back to the question Make sure your.
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ cosmological argument
Understand the anthropic principle. Have knowledge of the replies.
© Michael Lacewing Hume’s scepticism Michael Lacewing
Swinburne’s argument from design
© Michael Lacewing The Argument from Design Michael Lacewing
The Argument from Design. The Argument Famously presented by William Paley, who imagined stumbling across a watch in a wilderness Famously presented by.
The argument from design: Paley v. Hume Michael Lacewing
Michael Lacewing Idealism: objections Michael Lacewing
The Rationality of Religious Belief  What reasons are there to believe that God or some supernatural force exists? The existence and order of the universe.
Substance dualism: do Descartes’ arguments work? Michael Lacewing
Is Religion Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding The ontological argument The cosmological argument The teleological argument (from design)
The Teleological Argument: Argument from Design/Purpose u The order and intricacy of things in the universe make sense only if an ordering and purposive.
Cosmological arguments from contingency Michael Lacewing
Divine attributes Michael Lacewing
The Teleological Argument The idea that there is evidence of design in the universe which suggests a designer.
L ECTURE 17: T HE T ELEOLOGICAL A RGUMENT AND C AUSALITY.
A Questions AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding – one side. Explain in lots of detail 20 mins Approx 2 sides Link back to the question Make links between.
The Teleological Argument October 7 th The Teleological Argument Learning Objective: To analyse the argument from Design, considering its strengths.
The Teleological Argument also known as “ the argument from design ”
Recent versions of the Design Argument. Describe the teleological argument for the existence of God. 4KU An argument for the existence of God or a creator.
Divine Attributes Miscellaneous Proofs of the existence of God
It is reasonable to infer the existence of God from the fact that the world is as it is; just like the cosmological argument. We are going to consider.
Teleological Argument Also Known As The Argument From Design.
Epistemology Revision Another criticism of indirect realism:  Problems arising from the view that mind-dependent objects represent mind-independent objects.
1.The argument makes it likely that there are lots of worldmakers. Strength: Man made things often require many creators. For example a house needs many.
The Teleological Argument  Aquinas, Paley ( )  The Argument: Two Ways To View It:  First Way: Argument By Analogy  1. Aspects Of Natural World.
Chapter 4 The God Who Reveals Religion
Pages 420 to 433 IDEAS ON THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. PHILOSOPHIC REASONING ABOUT GOD There is value in discussing God’s existence Three basic positions: Teleological.
Argument from Design. Review: Leibniz and PSR Something “created” is something contingent on its creator—i.e. the created thing depends on a creator for.
What a Wonderful World. Question Tennis In pairs you will take it in turns to ask as many questions as you can about this image. You have 30 seconds...
Inductive Argument Premise = The world appears to have order and purpose. The world is complex, which is evidence that it has been designed. If the world.
L/O: To explore Hume’s criticisms of the Design Argument.
Cosmological arguments from contingency
The Argument from Design
Religious language: cognitive or non-cognitive?
Descartes’ Ontological Argument
Descartes’ ontological argument
Paley’s design argument
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Is Religion Reasonable?
The Argument from Design
What is the difference between a cabbage and a machine?
Is the concept of substance innate?
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
The Teleological Argument
Presentation transcript:

The argument from design: God Michael Lacewing enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk

The argument from design The argument from design argues from the order and regularity that we see in the universe to the existence of a God that designed the universe. Paley, Hume and Swinburne all agree that even if we could infer the existence of a designer of the universe, it is an extra step to argue that the designer is God.

Hume’s argument from analogy In the organization of parts for a purpose (the fitting of means to ends), nature resembles the products of human design. Similar effects have similar causes. The cause of the products of human design is an intelligent mind that intended the design. Therefore, the cause of nature is an intelligent mind that intended the design. So the designer should be like human beings!

Objections to God The scale and quality of the design reflect the power and ability of the designer. The universe isn’t infinite or perfect. So we can’t infer that the designer is infinite or perfect. Designers are not always creators. So we can’t infer that the designer of the universe also created the universe. The design may have resulted from many small improvements made by many people. So we cannot infer that ‘the designer’ is just one person. We find mind always connected to body. So we can’t infer the designer is only a mind. Designers can die even as their creations continue. So we can’t infer that the designer still exists.

Replies Paley: the designer has the power and knowledge necessary to create this universe Such power and knowledge is ‘beyond comparison and there is no reason… to assign limits to it’ ‘Infinite’ power is a superlative, expressing our conception of such power in the strongest terms we have. Paley: the design of nature gives rise to more benefits than are strictly necessary. So the designer is good But see the problem of evil.

Replies Ockham’s razor supports the claim that there is just one designer who also created the universe The uniformity of the laws of nature also suggest just one mind at work. The designer can’t have a body If God’s effects are the laws of nature, and these hold throughout the universe, then God can act everywhere in space simultaneously.

Two types of order Spatial order: the organisation of parts to serve a purpose (discussed by Paley and Hume) E.g. the eye. Temporal order: the orderliness in the way one thing follows another These temporal regularities are the laws of nature.

Replies Designers of spatial order can die while the effects of their design continue. But temporal order requires the existence of the person at that time So God must exist whenever the laws of nature hold.