CSU-ITL GE Symposium: Assessing GE at the program level Each CSU campus shall define its GE student learning outcomes, to fit within the framework of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

Quality School Reform step1.html.
Re-engineering your approach to the beginning college experience should include an acknowledgement of what is working well and only needs to be maintained,
1 Closing the Loop: How to Do It and Why It Matters.
Gail G. Evans Dean, Undergraduate Studies San Francisco State University Assessment of General Education: Who/What/When/Why/How? CSU Summer Institute,
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
The Board’s Role in Accreditation Michael F. Middaugh Associate Provost for Institutional Effectiveness University of Delaware Celine R. Paquette Trustee,
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
Aaron J. Scott Research Associate October 13 th, 2009.
Program Review: The Foundation for Institutional Planning and Improvement.
SEM Planning Model.
Matriculation March 10, :45-5:00. WHAT IS MATRICULATION? Matriculation is a process that enhances student access to the California Community Colleges.
GE Temporary Moratorium on GE Class Approval.
Office of Academic Affairs June 1, 2007 Academic Priorities: Next Steps Spring Symposium 2007.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
KANSAS CITY KANSAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: THE MOST PROGRESSIVE, FORWARD THINKING, FORWARD LOOKING COMMUNITY COLLEGE IN THE STATE OF KANSAS Continue to be “A.
The Personal Development Plan (PDP)
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
Applying the Principles of Prior Learning Assessment Debra A. Dagavarian Diane Holtzman Dennis Fotia.
August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.
Module 3 Developing Improvements and Building Institutional Capacity.
Accreditation, SLOs and You – What are the patient outcomes? or Will the patient survive? Facilitators: Janet Fulks and Phillip Maynard.
2004 National Oral Health Conference Strategic Planning for Oral Health Programs B.J. Tatro, MSSW, PhD B.J. Tatro Consulting Scottsdale, Arizona.
Program Level GE Assessment: A Pilot Project Stephen Branz Associate Dean, Undergraduate Studies and Director of General Education San José State University.
IMPROVE STUDENT LEARNING for Institutional Effectiveness THE REASON: Improvement of Student Learning and Institutional Support Services THE OCCASION: Regional.
Assess the effectiveness of strategies Analyze that evidence/data Identify the most powerful teaching strategies Identify and gather evidence/data of student.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
California State University, Sacramento Higher Education Symposium January 22, 2003 Recommendations from Commissioned Report: “An Accountability Framework.
A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning Raúl Rodriguez, Ph.D., Chancellor 1.
Second session of the NEPBE I in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 22, 2013.
Three GE Projects at SJSU Compass Project Stephen Branz & Maureen Scharberg (Debra David) GE Program Assessment Stephen Branz & Scot Guenter Integrated.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
I. Establishment of College-wide Student Learning Outcomes II. Establishment of Program Level Student Learning Outcomes III. Establishment of Course Level.
Moving Forward: Taking Charge of SLO Assessment Marcy Alancraig English Professor and Learning Outcomes Coordinator Cabrillo College.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
Assessment of Student Learning in General Education AAHE/NCA 2003 Assessment Workshop Omaha, Nebraska ● June 2003.
Gathering Evidence to Achieve Results.  ALL CSD students and educators are part of ONE proactive educational system.  Evidence-based instruction and.
Learning Goals at St. John Fisher College Peter J. Gray, Ph.D. Director of Academic Assessment United States Naval Academy May 2004.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Development of the Egyptian Code of Practice for Student Assessment Lamis Ragab, MD, MHPE Hala Salah, MD.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
DEEP DIVING INTO THE REVISED MSCHE STANDARDS FOR RE-ACCREDITATION ​ Brigitte Valesey, Ph.D. Widener University ​ Drexel Assessment Conference ​ September.
Australian Council for Educational Research School Improvement Christian Schools National Policy Forum Canberra, 26 May 2014.
SLO P ROCESSES G UIDE This guide is a compilation of a series of SLO presentations over the last several years. This guide will serve as a review or for.
Facult Retreat January 2010 Graham Benton, WASC Coordinator, Accreditation Liaison Officer
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
As A Team Identify Current Conditions What does the instructor require? Is there a reward for early completion? Check the class outline for specific dates.
Integrated Planning Randy Lawson 411 Training April, 2016.
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Office of Educational Effectiveness
Thursday 2nd of February 2017 College Development Network
League for Innovation in the Community College March 29, 2010
Transitional Interim Pastor
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
February 21-22, 2018.
Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College
Assessing GE under EO 1065, Instruments, Tools and Strategies.
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

CSU-ITL GE Symposium: Assessing GE at the program level Each CSU campus shall define its GE student learning outcomes, to fit within the framework of the four “Essential Learning Outcomes” drawn from the Liberal Education and American Promise (LEAP) campaign, an initiative of the Association of American Colleges and Universities. Each campus shall provide for regular periodic reviews of general education program policies and practices in a manner comparable to those of major programs, including evaluation by an external reviewer. The review should include an assessment of general education student learning outcomes … From EO 1065.

What do these images all have in common?

Legend General Edward LoganGeneral Joseph PershingGeneral Lloyd Newton General Lee Major General Baden Powell General Ann Dunwoody General Michelle Compton General Phil Sheridan General Walter Gaskin (USMC)

Your Task- Develop an action plan whose elements: – Lead to implementation of GE assessment under the provisions of EO 1065 or improve your current assessment plan Address specific weaknesses in the current GE assessment plan Can be implemented in the immediate future Will provide evidence that leads to continuous improvement of GE outcomes achievement

Campus Assessment of GE Outcomes

Personally, I would rate my campus's response in the assessment of GE outcomes so far as 1. Early: we know we need to do this, but haven’t really started 2. Emerging: we have a model for program assessment of GE, but it is fully developed or implemented yet 3. Maturing: we have begun program assessment of GE, but need to make some change to the model. 4. Fully developed: we measure the GE learning outcomes of our students in ways that help continuously improve curriculum and pedagogy.

Faculty Awareness of GE Outcomes in their GE course

Personally, I believe that, in general, faculty teaching GE courses on my campus are: 1. Unaware of which GE outcomes their course addresses 2. Somewhat aware of which outcomes their GE course addresses 3. Aware of which outcomes their GE course addresses 4. Design their course to focus on the GE outcomes it addresses

GE Assessment Measures To assess general education learning outcomes, my campus uses: (check all that apply)

Faculty Development Needs Personally, I believe that, in general, faculty teaching GE courses on my campus would benefit from faculty development in: (check all that apply)

Regular Review of GE Courses for Outcomes Achievement? How would you respond to the following statement? "The University academic governance body responsible for General Education regularly reviews courses in the GE program for student achievement of their GE outcomes."

"The University academic governance body responsible for General Education regularly reviews courses in the GE program for student achievement of their GE outcomes." 1. Strongly disagree2. Disagree3. Agree4. Strongly agree

What’s in an assessment plan? What is the assessment plan going to accomplish? – Statement of these goals Responsibilities for the different goals – Who does what Clear objectives – What is to be assessed and how Timeline – When does each step get accomplished

Gather Data (evidence) Interpret the data Make decisions based on evidence to improve outcomes resource allocation or reallocation if needed to improve outcome delivery Implement methods to deliver outcomes and methods to gather data Mission/Purpos es Goals Outcomes

Questions an assessment plan should answer. 1) What are the salient SLOs we want information about? 2) What is a valid yet easy way to evaluate student achievement of the targeted learning outcomes? The measure should allow for sufficient variability and be directly tied to the SLO. 3) How will we collect and enter this data? – Are we sampling or collecting the information on the entire population? – Who will be responsible for making sure this happens? 4) Who will prepare an initial analysis of the data? (Aggregate the data and report it a meaningful and easy to read manner.) 5) When will faculty meet to interpret the data and make a plan based on the findings?

Your Task- Develop an action plan whose elements: – Lead to implementation of GE assessment under the provisions of EO 1065 or improve your current assessment plan Address specific weaknesses in the current GE assessment plan Can be implemented in the immediate future Will provide evidence that leads to continuous improvement of student achievement

Symposium Outcomes. Campus teams will: develop a common understanding of the current state of their GE assessment develop common and realistic goals and outcomes for their action plan use information and team time at the CSU and WASC meetings to develop an action plan to implement program level GE assessment work at their home campuses to implement the action plan apply to the summer institute on GE assessment to disseminate their progress and pitfalls.

Answer some questions and earn consensus on your replies… What is the current state of assessment of GE as a program? What are areas of strength? What areas need improvement? What is the path to implementation? – What governance bodies will be involved in the approval and implementation of a new GE implementation plan? – What areas outside of faculty governance need to be brought into executing the plan?

Breakout time! Rooms- 20 each – California Foyer (here) – Santa Barbara, room (3 rd floor) – Sacramento Room (2 nd floor) – La Jolla Room (3 rd floor)