Measuring Performance within School Climate Transformation Grants

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
North Carolina Positive Behavior Intervention & Support State Recognition Exemplar School Application PowerPoint Presentation.
Advertisements

School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior.
PBIS Implementation in CA: An Early Look at State-wide Implementation Dr. Josh Harrower California State University, Monterey Bay.
Using the PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) E-12
Computer Applications for Monitoring Student Outcomes: Behavior Rob Horner University of Oregon
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Current Status and Emerging Directions for PBIS
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Aligning Educational Initiatives
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
Designing Evaluation Plans and Reports for School Climate Transformation Grants Webinar February 26, 2015 Rob Horner, Steve Goodman, Jessica Swain-Bradway.
Planning for Success: Using Implementation Data to Action Plan for Full and Sustained Implementation Barbara Sims Caryn Ward National SISEP Center National.
Rob Horner and Steve Goodman. Goals Logic for investing in Trainer development For state leadership teams developing action plan For individuals identified.
PBIS Applications NWPBIS Washington Conference November 5, 2012.
Coming June 30,  Purpose of PBIS Assessment  Implications of the move from PBIS Surveys  Overview of available Tools and Surveys  Criteria for.
Northern California PBIS Symposium November 18, 2013.
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013 Nadia K. Sampson & Dr. Kelsey R. Morris University of Oregon.
Pat Mueller David Merves October 6, 2008 NH RESPONDS Evaluation Component.
MU Center for SW-PBS College of Education University of Missouri Missouri SW-PBS Annual Reporting pbismissouri.org.
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
V 2.1 Evaluation Tools, On-Line Systems and Action Planning.
Youth Forum Cities Implementation of School-wide PBIS Rob Horner, University of Oregon Rebecca Mendiola, Santa Clara County Office of Education.
PBIS Tier 1 Coaches Training
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
Brockton PBIS: Tier 2 Coaches Meeting March 2014 Adam Feinberg
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Update Cambrian School District March 8, 2012.
Developing a Comprehensive State-wide Evaluation for PBS Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Donald K. Kincaid, Ed.D.
Monitoring Advanced Tiers Tool (MATT) University of Oregon October, 2012.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Data Systems Northwest AEA September 7, 2010.
V 2.1 TFI Wordle. V 2.1 Objectives of Session: 1.Not bore you to sleep 2.Types of PBIS Data 3.pbisapps.org 4.PBIS Evaluation Tools 5.Action Planning.
E VALUATION FOR S CHOOL - WIDE PBIS Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina: Charlotte Rob Horner University of Oregon December 9, 2011.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Bob Algozzine Rob Horner National PBIS Leadership Forum Chicago Hyatt Regency O’Hare October 8, /
Establishing Multi-tiered Behavior Support Frameworks to Achieve Positive School-wide Climate George Sugai Tim Lewis Rob Horner University of Connecticut,
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR SWPBS Rob Horner and Bob Algozzine.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Data-Based Decision Making: Using Data to Improve Implementation Fidelity & Outcomes.
Evaluation Planning & Reporting for School Climate Transformation Grant (SCTG) Sites Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte Steve GoodmanMichigan's.
Designing Evaluation Plans and Reports for School Climate Transformation Grants Valerie Velez, Hemet Unified School District Steve Goodman, Michigan Integrated.
Systems, Data, & Practices to Move PBIS Forward in Ravenswood City School District Sheldon Loman, Ph.D.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports: New Team Training Evaluation Day 2.
Supporting District Structures & Teams through a State-Level Plan Susan Barrett, Implementer Partner Center on PBIS Brenda Melcher Central Region Coordinator.
State and District-level Role in Implementation, Scaling and Sustaining PBIS Session A-3 Washington Leadership Discussion Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
Aligning PBIS to Achieve Educational Excellence Rob Horner University of Oregon Acknowledge: George Sugai, Lucille Eber, Susan Barrett, Justyn Poulos,
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network PAPBS Network Coaches Day January 28, Fidelity Measures Lisa Brunschwyler- School Age- School.
Module 2 : Using Data to Problem-Solve Implementation Issues Session 3 Phase I Team Training Presented by the MBI Consultants.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.
School Climate Transformation Grant. SSAISD Learner Profile ▪Reflects to set personal goals ▪Is an accomplished reader ▪Employs digital skills ▪Is an.
SCTG COACHES WEBINAR November 3, 2015 December 1, 2015 January 5, 2016 February 2, 2016 March 1, 2016 April 5, 2016 May 3, 2016.
PBIS DATA. Critical Features of PBIS SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Culturally Knowledgeable Staff Behavior Supporting Culturally Relevant Evidence-based.
“Are We at Fidelity?”: Annual Evaluation and Action Planning.
School Climate Transformation Grants SEA Session October
Integrating AWARE, SCT and PBIS at the District and State Levels
Compilation of Slides for Data Measures
Current Issues Related to MTSS for Academic and Behavior Difficulties: Building Capacity to Implement PBIS District Wide at All Three Tiers OSEP conference.
Steve Goodman, MiBLSi, Michigan Rob Horner, University of Oregon
2018 SEA Title IV Part A Coordinator’s Meeting
NC DPI Exemplar Recognition Criteria
TFI Wordle This presentation is intended to introduce the PBISApps site and the types of data teams will be working with. The teams will take their first.
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
Aligning Educational Initiatives
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)
Presentation transcript:

Measuring Performance within School Climate Transformation Grants Rob Horner OSEP TA-Center on PBIS www.pbis.org

Goal Define resources for measuring performance within SCTG grants that may improve efficiency, consistency and effectiveness of evaluation efforts. Provide a brief summary of schools using PBIS in the U.S.

Why a Framework for Multi-tiered Behavior Support? The fundamental purpose of a Multi-tiered Behavior Framework is to make schools more effective and equitable learning environments. Predictable Positive Consistent Safe

All the parts Logic Model Intervention Strategies/Programs Why the strategies work Logic Model Multi-tiered Intervention Strategies/Programs Build Capacity to Scale and Sustain Implementation Process Are we doing the strategy/program Fidelity of Implementation Student/ Family Outcomes Valued outcomes/ Academic, Behavior, Social Emotional

Four ways the OSEP TA-Center may be helpful Aligning multiple initiatives begins by defining common fidelity and outcome measures Coordination and Communication Webinars and information dissemination Intervention Content Tier I Tier II Tier III Measuring Fidelity of Multi-tiered Behavior Support Measuring Student Outcomes

Resources Grantees are held accountable for what they submitted. But some consistency across projects may help all evaluation efforts Resources that may be helpful: Evaluation Blueprint (www.pbis.org) Evaluation Annual Reports (www.pbis.org) State and District Capacity Assessments www.sisep.org Multi-tiered Fidelity Assessment (Tier I, Tier II, Tier III) www.pbisapps.org Multi-tiered student discipline data systems SWIS, CICO-SWIS, ISIS-SWIS www.swis.org, www.pbisapps.org

Performance Indicators: SEA The number of training and technical assistance events provided by the SEA School Climate Transformation Grant Program to assist LEAs in implementing a multi-tiered behavioral framework. The number and percentage of LEAs provided training or technical assistance by the SEA School Climate Transformation Grant Program that report an improvement in knowledge and understanding of the implementation of a multi-tiered behavioral framework. The number and percentage of schools in LEAs provided training or technical assistance by the SEA School Climate Transformation Grant Program that implement a multi-tiered behavioral framework.

Performance Indicators: LEA Number and percentage of schools that report an annual decrease in office disciplinary referrals. Number and percentage of schools that report an annual improvement in the attendance rate. Number and percentage of schools that report an annual decrease in suspensions and expulsions, including those related to possession or use of drugs or alcohol. Number and percentage of schools annually that are implementing the multi-tiered behavioral framework with fidelity.

Performance Measure Considerations Use a Formal Evaluation Model Measure Fidelity at All Three Tiers Consider Measuring Improved State/ District Capacity Measure student outcomes within a formal “decision system”

Multi-Tiered Behavior Support Evaluation Model: Evaluation Blueprint/ www.pbis.org Multi-Tiered Behavior Support

Context Who is participating How selected Initial Assessment Process for support plan development

Input Type and amount of technical assistance Training Coaching Systems for Performance Feedback Development of evaluation capacity Development of Leadership Team Capacity

Fidelity Are schools using Tier I practices and systems of behavior support? Are schools using Tier II practices and systems of behavior support? Are schools using Tier III practices and systems of behavior support?

Impact State: Capacity of State Has the state established the capacity to (a) improve district capacity, (b) implement evidence-based, multi-tiered behavior support in schools, (c) monitor the fidelity of school-level implementation and (d) benefits for children and families? District/Region: Capacity of LEA or Region Has the district/region established the capacity to (a) implement evidence-based, multi-tiered behavior support in schools, and (b) monitor the fidelity of implementation in schools and (c) benefits for children and families? Schools: Fidelity of Imp and Impact on Students Is multi-tiered behavior support being implemented with fidelity in target schools? Is there an effect of multi-tiered behavior support on student behavior as measured by office discipline referral (ODR) patterns? Is there an effect of multi-tiered behavior support on student attendance? Is there an effect of multi-tiered behavior support on student suspension and expulsion? Is there an effect of multi-tiered behavior support on student bullying and violence? Is there an effect of multi-tiered behavior support on juvenile arrests? Is there an effect of multi-tiered behavior support on student academic performance?

Are Schools Implementing Multi-tiered Systems of Behavior Support?

Possible Measures of Multi-Tiered Behavior Support Fidelity Measures (www.pbis.org) Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) Tier III Individual Student System Evaluation Tool (ISSET) Benchmark of Advanced Tiers (BAT) Measure of Advanced Tiers Tool ( MATT) Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) Tier II Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) Tier I School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) Team Implementation Checklist (TIC) Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ) Regardless of the Intervention approach used, TA-Center Fidelity measures are available and appropriate

TFI- Technical Adequacy (McIntosh, Massar et al. 2014) Available from OSEP TA-Center www.pbis.org No Cost Assessors Training PowerPoint available Assessors Training Video in development TFI- Technical Adequacy (McIntosh, Massar et al. 2014) Content Validity (.95; .93; .91) Usability (12 of 14 > 80%) (15 min per Tier) Inter-rater Agreement (.95; .96; .89) Test-retest reliability (.98; .99; .99) Factor Analysis (in process)

TFI Data Tier I: 2014

Tier II Tier III

Action Planning

State/Region Capacity Does a state have the capacity to implement multi-tiered systems of behavior support? Is Technical Assistance improving the capacity of a state/region to implement multi-tiered systems of behavior support?

Possible Measures of SEA/LEA Capacity www.sisep.org State Capacity Assessment (SCA) Assessment of extent to which state department has capacity to implement evidence-based practices at scales of social significance? No Cost, from OSEP’s SISEP TA-Center www.sisep.org; www.scalingup.org Scores: Total, Sub-scale, Item Used for initial assessment, action planning, progress monitoring District Capacity Assessment (DCA) Assessment of extent to which a school district (or region) has capacity to implement evidence-based practices as scales of social significance? No Cost, from OSEP’s SISEP TA-Center Implementers Training Video

SCA/ DCA Format (Team with Coach/ Assessor) Item Data Sources Scoring Criteria Score 0 1 2

Minnesota State

Minnesota State

Minnesota State

State SCA Item Analysis: Action Planning

District Capacity Is Technical Assistance improving the capacity of a district to implement multi-tiered systems of support?

District Capacity

District Capacity Assessment

District Capacity Assessment Data from Duda and Horner data system www.scalingup.org District Capacity Assessment: Duda, et al. 2012 (c) Dean Fixsen and Karen Blase, 2013

District Capacity Assessment Data from Duda and Horner data system www.scalingup.org District Capacity Assessment: Duda, et al. 2012 (c) Dean Fixsen and Karen Blase, 2013

District Capacity Assessment

District Capacity Assessment

Measures of Student Benefit Office Discipline Referrals Tier I = SWIS Tier II = CICO-SWIS Tier III = ISIS-SWIS School Climate Under development School Safety Survey Risk Factor/ Protective Factor

Performance Monitoring Summary Consider including measures of MTBSF fidelity at all three tiers. Many Tier I options Several Tier II options One new measure that does all three (Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) Consider assessing SEA/ LEA “Capacity to implement evidence-based interventions” State Capacity Assessment District Capacity Assessment Outcome measures Office discipline referrals (SWIS, CICO-SWIS, ISIS-SWIS)… later School Climate School Safety Survey Excellent Examples of State and District Reports at www.pbis.org