Legislative Services Agency

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numbers Treasure Hunt Following each question, click on the answer. If correct, the next page will load with a graphic first – these can be used to check.
Advertisements

Jack Jedwab Association for Canadian Studies September 27 th, 2008 Canadian Post Olympic Survey.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Property Tax Relief and Reform: Plan Overview Joint Select Committee on Property Tax Relief and Reform June 11, 2007.
AP STUDY SESSION 2.
1
Worksheets.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley
Addition and Subtraction Equations
Properties Use, share, or modify this drill on mathematic properties. There is too much material for a single class, so you’ll have to select for your.
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
Process a Customer Chapter 2. Process a Customer 2-2 Objectives Understand what defines a Customer Learn how to check for an existing Customer Learn how.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
Tennessee Higher Education Commission Higher Education Recommendations & Finance Overview November 15, 2012.
CALENDAR.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt BlendsDigraphsShort.
Fiscal Condition of the States Presentation to the Rhode Island House of Representatives Economic Forum December 1, 2009 Arturo Pérez Fiscal Affairs Program.
1 Finance Overview: AEAs/LEAs Barb Harms Business Manager Grant Wood Area Education Agency Management Team Meeting – 11/3/06.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
1 Click here to End Presentation Software: Installation and Updates Internet Download CD release NACIS Updates.
The 5S numbers game..
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
Table 12.1: Cash Flows to a Cash and Carry Trading Strategy.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
MM4A6c: Apply the law of sines and the law of cosines.
MCQ Chapter 07.
Exarte Bezoek aan de Mediacampus Bachelor in de grafische en digitale media April 2014.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
1 RA III - Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 – 27 October 2006 Status of observing programmes in RA.
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
1..
Adding Up In Chunks.
FAFSA on the Web Preview Presentation December 2013.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Synthetic.
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
School Funding Formulas: A National Perspective Presentation to the Task Force on School Funding John Myers & Mark Fermanich, APA Consulting Salem, Oregon.
Subtraction: Adding UP
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
1 hi at no doifpi me be go we of at be do go hi if me no of pi we Inorder Traversal Inorder traversal. n Visit the left subtree. n Visit the node. n Visit.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 A Monetary Intertemporal Model: Money, Prices, and Monetary Policy.
Speak Up for Safety Dr. Susan Strauss Harassment & Bullying Consultant November 9, 2012.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Essential Cell Biology
Converting a Fraction to %
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Clock will move after 1 minute
Solanco School District Preliminary Budget April 28, 2014.
PSSA Preparation.
Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health & Disease Sixth Edition
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Energy Generation in Mitochondria and Chlorplasts
1 Fundamental Stock Analysis The Market is NOT Efficient Fundamental analysis can uncover individual companies selling in the public market at significant.
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Copyright Tim Morris/St Stephen's School
1 School Finance in Iowa Iowa Association of School Boards.
Where’s the Innovation in the School Foundation Formula? Marsha Tangen, Davenport Chief Financial Officer Shawn Synder, LSA Division Administrator Jackie.
Iowa Department of Education1 Special Education Finance Overview SEAP Friday, April 5, 2013.
Bondurant-Farrar COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT FY2010 BUDGET PROPOSAL March 23, :00 P.M. MEDIA CENTER.
School Aid: 1 Legislative Services Agency 2006 Session Click to continue Press escape to exit Iowa School Foundation Aid Formula Overview Shawn Snyder.
College Community School District 4 Budget Calculations for General Fund Budget Year.
Presentation transcript:

Legislative Services Agency Overview of School Finance in Iowa LSA contacts: Shawn Snyder 515-281-7799 Dwayne Ferguson 515-281-6561

Brief History of School Finance in Iowa In 1950 - 4,652 school Districts Reorganization Plan adopted in 1950’s 1965 – 1,098 school districts 1975 – 450 school districts 1985 – 437 school districts 1995 – 384 school districts 2005 – 367 school districts Currently - 362 school districts

Brief History of School Finance in Iowa Until the mid 1960’s – school district funding was all property tax. In 1971, a school foundation program adopted (enrollment based) – substantial increase in State aid to school districts. In 1989 – enactment of Chapter 257, Code of Iowa. Implementation beginning in FY 1992.

Brief History of School Finance in Iowa In 1992, allowable growth adopted. In 1995, modified so that the allowable growth set 2 years in advance. In 1996, increased Regular Program Foundation Level from 83.0% to 87.5% beginning in FY 1997 (increased the proportion of State aid and provided property tax relief). In 1999, Special Education Foundation Level increased from 79.0% to 87.5% beginning in FY 2000.

Brief History of School Finance in Iowa In 2001, eliminated the 100.0% budget guarantee and replaced it with phase-out or alternate budget adjustment to begin in FY 2004. Made permanent on-time funding provision. In 2006, created additional property tax adjustment aid to “buy down” additional levy rates for qualifying school districts that have the highest tax rates.

Brief History of School Finance in Iowa 2008 Legislative Session: State Sales/Use Tax for school infrastructure – excess funds after school infrastructure allocations will be used for property tax relief through school aid formula. State Categoricals – Additional categorical program funding rolled-into the school aid formula beginning in FY 2010.

School District Finance Overview Revenue Sources Formula (State Aid and Property Tax) State Categorical Funding Miscellaneous Sources Budgets/Expenditures General Fund Physical Plant and Equipment Fund Management Fund Other Funds

School District Finance Components Combined District Cost (formula) Regular, Guarantee, Supplementary Weighting, Special Education, AEAs Instructional Support Management Levy Physical Plant & Equipment Levy Public Education and Recreation Levy Debt Service Levy State Sales/Use Tax for School Infrastructure State/Federal Categoricals

School District Finance Components (FY 2009) Combined District Cost: $3,385.9 million Instructional Support: $181.3 million Management Levy: $105.6 million PPEL: $125.9 million PERL: $1.9 million Debt Service Levy: $112.2 million Sales/Use Tax (SILO): $375.0 million Categoricals: $333.7 million

School Finance Formula Goals Equalize educational opportunity Promote high achievement Provide property tax relief Equalize taxation Establish maximum spending control Predictable Simple Pupil Driven Provide for local discretion Provide adequate funding

Combined District Cost Regular Program Cost + Budget Guarantee (Budget Adjustment) + Weighted Enrollment Funding + AEA Program Funding + State Categoricals (New in FY 2010) + Modified Allowable Growth Funding . Combined District Cost

Regular Program District Cost District Cost Per Pupil X Number of Pupils Regular Program District Cost (Basic “pool” of money for the district)

District Cost Per Pupil – FY 2009 $5,721 – Highest (8 Districts) $5,546 – Lowest (176 Districts) $175 – Range District Cost Per Pupil Increases Each Year by a Per Pupil Amount (Per Pupil Allowable Growth) Minimum District Cost Per Pupil = State Cost Per Pupil

Allowable Growth Rate Recommended by the Governor Established by the Legislature within 30 days of the Governor’s budget recommendation. Set 18 months in advance – 2009 Legislature will set the allowable growth rate for FY 2011.

Allowable Growth Amount Allowable Growth Rate x State Cost Per Pupil = Growth Per Pupil For example: 2008-2009 4% Allowable Growth Rate X FY 2008 State Cost Per Pupil ($5,333) = $213 Per Pupil

State Cost Per Pupil (SCPP) FY 2009: $5,333 + $213 = $5,546 FY 2009 SCPP = $5,546 Used to Determine Allowable Growth Per Pupil for the Next Year Used to Determine Minimum District Cost

Allowable Growth - History

Basic Funding Pupil Driven System (Pupils x Cost Per Pupil = Regular Program Budget) Pupil Count Pupils Weighted Special Education English Language Learners Sharing At-Risk Formula Reorganization Incentives Administration Functions Sharing Budget Adjustment

Weighted Enrollment Funding Pupil Driven System Weightings Provide Funding to Cover Additional Cost Special Education English Language Learners Shared Teachers/Students/Regional Academies At-Risk Students Provide Incentives Iowa Communications Network (ICN) Sharing Whole Grade Sharing/Reorganization Shared Administration Functions (new for FY 2009)

Weighted Enrollment Funding Special Education Weighting FY 2009 Level 1 weighting = 0.72 (28,230) Level 2 weighting = 1.21 (16,047) Level 3 weighting = 2.74 (23,957) Generates $380.0 Million

Weighted Enrollment Funding Supplementary Weighting English Language Learners (ELL) At-Risk Students Sharing Teachers/Students/Community Coll. Whole Grade Sharing ICN Operational Sharing Reorganization Incentives Total Weighting = 8,903.57 Funding = $49.6 million

Budget Adjustment (Previously Called Budget Guarantee) Regular Program Budget = Pupils x District Cost Provides an adjustment in the Regular Program Budget for districts with no or low growth in enrollments Phase-out began in FY 2005 Scale Down Version 101% Adjustment

Budget Adjustment FY 2009 Total B.A. $12.1 Million (155 districts) Scale Down (50% Based on FY 2004) $4.8 million (64 districts) 101% Adjustment (101% Based on Previous Year) $7.3 million (91 districts)

Area Education Agency (AEA) Program Funding Funding through the Combined District Cost AEA Funding - $173.4 million Pupil Driven Flows Through Local District Special Education Support Services - $123.9 million Media Services - $23.4 million Educational Services - $25.9 million AEA Sharing (New in FY 2009) - $220,000 State Categoricals (New in FY 2010)

School Budget Review Committee Funding Five Member Committee Authority to Grant Budget Increases Modified Allowable Growth (Property Taxes) Unique and Unusual Circumstances “Manage” Formula Special Education Weights Cash Reserve Negative Unspent Balances Grants Budget Authority

School District Revenues Where do the revenues come from? General Fund Formula Required Discretionary Miscellaneous Income State categoricals Federal categoricals Non General Fund/Other

Revenue - Foundation Formula Where do the revenues come from? Required Local Levy - Uniform Levy State Aid Additional Levy Property Tax Equity Relief (PTER) Fund (New in FY 2011)

State Aid Increase Funding for Districts “Fair” Method to Distribute State Aid Provide Property Tax Relief Equalize Effort

Foundation Formula Foundation Level FY 2009: Additional Levy Foundation Level FY 2009: 87.5% of State Cost ($5,546) = $4,853 Per Pupil State Aid Uniform Levy $5.40 Per $1000 Valuation

Foundation Formula Property Rich District Property Poor District Foundation Level Foundation Level Additional Levy Additional Levy State Aid State Aid Uniform Levy $5.40 Uniform Levy $5.40

Foundation Formula Special Education AEA Special Regular Program Instruction Education Support Additional Levy Additional Levy Additional Levy 87.50% Foundation 79% Level Foundation State Aid Level State Aid State Aid Uniform Levy

Foundation Formula (FY 2009) AEA Special Regular Program Special Education Instruction Education Support Additional Levy Additional Levy Additional Levy $350.9 million $47.3 million $27.1 million State Aid State Aid State Aid $1,757.3 million $331.1 million $105.6 million* Uniform Levy $617.7 million *Does not include the state aid reduction of $10.0 million

Revenue - Foundation Formula FY 2009 Uniform Levy = $617.7 million State Aid = $2,224.4 million Additional Levy (Second Effort) = $561.0 million

Additional Levy – Property Tax Adjustment Aid FY 2009 - $18.0 million appropriated to buy down rates FY 2010 - $24.0 million appropriated FY 2011 and beyond - $24.0 million plus PTER funds

Property Tax Adjustment Aid Appropriation of FY 2009 $18.0 million for FY 2009 “buys” 65 districts down to a rate of $4.14/$1,000 of valuation.

Sidebar – PTER Fund Starting in FY 2009: Statewide 1% sales/use tax used to fund SILO with remaining going to PTER. Funds generated in FY 2009 for PTER will be used for FY 2011 school aid property tax relief for property tax adjustment aid. Any remaining PTER funds will be used to increase the foundation level.

Unadjusted Prop. Tax Rate Prop. Tax Rate w/$24M Approp. Prop. Tax Rate w/PTER Funds Foundation Level Increase w/PTER

Discretionary- General Fund Instructional Support Program Up to 10.0% of the Regular Program Budget Board Approved for Five Years Voter Approved for Ten Years FY 2009: 339 Districts $181.3 million State Aid - ($14.4 million [Frozen]) Property Tax - ($90.7 million) Income Surtax - ($76.2 million) $46.2 million Additional State Aid to “Fully” Fund

State Categorical Funding for FY 2009 Educational Excellence (Phase I, II) - $55.5 million Student Achievement/Teacher Quality - $248.9 million Teacher Compensation - $210.0 million Professional Development - $28.5 million Other Programs - $10.4 million Early Intervention/Class Size Reduction - $29.3 million

State Categorical Roll-in (FY 2010) Beginning in FY 2010 following categorical items will be funded on a per pupil basis with an allowable growth rate established annually beginning in FY 2011: Educational Excellence and SATQ Teacher Comp = Teacher Salary Supplement ($250.9 million) SATQ Professional Development = Professional Development Supplement ($28.5 million) Early Intervention/Class Size Reduction Supplement ($29.3 million)

Federal Categorical - Examples FY 2008: Title I - $63.3 million Title II - $20.6 million Individuals with Disablilities Education ACT (IDEA) - $26.4 million

Non General Fund Revenue Sources: Management Levy: $105.0 Mill. (357 districts) PPEL: $125.8 Mill. (336 districts) Public Education and Recreational Levy (PERL): $2.0 Mill. (18 districts) Debt Levy: $112.1 Mill. (207 districts) State Sales/Use Tax for School Infrastructure: $375 Mill. (All districts)

Sales/Use Tax for School Infrastructure Statewide Sales/Use Tax for School Infrastructure enacted in 2008. Funding is based on a per pupil distribution and is linked to the School Infrastructure Local Option (SILO) sales tax distribution formula. By FY 2014, all districts will receive the same per pupil amount. Any excess will be used for Property tax relief through the school aid formula.

Cash Reserve Property Taxes Levied for: $153.6 million 320 Districts Cash Flow State Aid, Property Tax Shortfall Provides “cash” behind spending authority $153.6 million 320 Districts

State Public School Funding State General Fund Appropriations for Public Schools: FY 2007 – $2.302 billion (42.7% of State General Fund expenditures) Estimated FY 2008 - $2.487 billion (42.4%) Estimated FY 2009 - $2.643 billion (43.1%)

Recent Issues Recent Issues Subject of Legislation: Equalization of Per Pupil Spending Enrollment Changes (Declines/Increases) Transportation Costs Property Tax Relief/Property Tax Equalization Technology School Infrastructure Teacher Compensation Curriculum School District Fees

Questions?