Plan B ® Actual Use and Behavior Studies NDA 21-045 NDAC & ACRHD Joint Meeting December 16, 2003 Jin Chen, MD, PhD Division of OTC Drug Products NDAC &

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numbers Treasure Hunt Following each question, click on the answer. If correct, the next page will load with a graphic first – these can be used to check.
Advertisements

WPA-WHO Global Survey of Psychiatrists' Attitudes Towards Mental Disorders Classification Results for the Spanish Society of Psychiatry.
Linoxsmart S DX Master Study
Fill in missing numbers or operations
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
1
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
Properties Use, share, or modify this drill on mathematic properties. There is too much material for a single class, so you’ll have to select for your.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
Disability status in Ethiopia in 1984, 1994 & 2007 population and housing sensus Ehete Bekele Seyoum ESA/STAT/AC.219/25.
The Application of Propensity Score Analysis to Non-randomized Medical Device Clinical Studies: A Regulatory Perspective Lilly Yue, Ph.D.* CDRH, FDA,
We need a common denominator to add these fractions.
EQUS Conference - Brussels, June 16, 2011 Ambros Uchtenhagen, Michael Schaub Minimum Quality Standards in the field of Drug Demand Reduction Parallel Session.
1 RA I Sub-Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Casablanca, Morocco, 20 – 22 December 2005 Status of observing programmes in RA I.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
Exit a Customer Chapter 8. Exit a Customer 8-2 Objectives Perform exit summary process consisting of the following steps: Review service records Close.
1 1  1 =.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt ShapesPatterns Counting Number.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
WARM UP What is the value of 4 5 x 4? Explain. WARM UP What is the value of 4 5 x 4 3 ? Explain.
Around the World AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision.
REVIEW: Arthropod ID. 1. Name the subphylum. 2. Name the subphylum. 3. Name the order.
The basics for simulations
Division- the bus stop method
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
Bright Futures Guidelines Priorities and Screening Tables
VOORBLAD.
Sexual Behaviors that Contribute to Unintended Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Infections, Including HIV Infection.
Sample Service Screenshots Enterprise Cloud Service 11.3.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
1 RA III - Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 – 27 October 2006 Status of observing programmes in RA.
Factor P 16 8(8-5ab) 4(d² + 4) 3rs(2r – s) 15cd(1 + 2cd) 8(4a² + 3b²)
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
1..
Emily Scales, Catherine Mackenzie, Victoria Little Nursing 300: Research Methods Donna MacDonald March 24, 2013.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Adding Up In Chunks.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
1 Impact Assessment. 2 Demographics 3 Sex and Age.
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
25 seconds left…...
Subtraction: Adding UP
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Essential Cell Biology
Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Alex Y. Chen, M.D. UCLA Children’s Hospital LA
PSSA Preparation.
Weekly Attendance by Class w/e 6 th September 2013.
Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health & Disease Sixth Edition
Presentation transcript:

Plan B ® Actual Use and Behavior Studies NDA NDAC & ACRHD Joint Meeting December 16, 2003 Jin Chen, MD, PhD Division of OTC Drug Products NDAC & ACRHD Joint Meeting December 16, 2003 Jin Chen, MD, PhD Division of OTC Drug Products Center for Drug Evaluation and Research

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, OutlineOutline Plan B Actual Use Study Behavior studies associated with emergency contraception Plan B Actual Use Study Behavior studies associated with emergency contraception

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Actual Use Study Principles Simulate OTC setting Assess –self-diagnosis –self-selection –self-medication –safety –efficacy (rarely) Multi-center, open-label, single-arm, uncontrolled trial Simulate OTC setting Assess –self-diagnosis –self-selection –self-medication –safety –efficacy (rarely) Multi-center, open-label, single-arm, uncontrolled trial

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Actual Use Study Principles (cont.) Study Population: anticipated OTC users Geographically diverse OTC-like settings Minimal exclusion criteria Subgroups (low literacy, age) Unlimited product access Minimal intervention from healthcare professionals Study Population: anticipated OTC users Geographically diverse OTC-like settings Minimal exclusion criteria Subgroups (low literacy, age) Unlimited product access Minimal intervention from healthcare professionals

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Plan B Actual Use Study Objectives Primary Objectives: –Self-selection –Timing of doses Secondary Objectives: –Adverse events –Multiple use –Pregnancy rate Additional Observation: –Contraceptive behaviors Primary Objectives: –Self-selection –Timing of doses Secondary Objectives: –Adverse events –Multiple use –Pregnancy rate Additional Observation: –Contraceptive behaviors

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Plan B Actual Use Study Design/Procedure Conducted in 5 family planning clinics across US & 5 pharmacies in WA Female subjects of reproductive age Purchased 1 package of Plan B 4-week Follow-up (2 contacts) Data collection by phone and diary card Conducted in 5 family planning clinics across US & 5 pharmacies in WA Female subjects of reproductive age Purchased 1 package of Plan B 4-week Follow-up (2 contacts) Data collection by phone and diary card

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Subject Enrollment 665 Screened subjects 80 (12%) Not Enrolled 585 (88%) Enrolled 94% from clinics 6% from pharmacies

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Demographics of Enrolled Subjects (n=585) Age: yrs (22±5) Education: –87% ≥ HS education –13% had 9 th -11 th grade education Prior EC experience: 40% Age: yrs (22±5) Education: –87% ≥ HS education –13% had 9 th -11 th grade education Prior EC experience: 40%

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Subject Follow-Up (n=585) 93% (n=543) at least one follow-up contact –86% (n=501):2 follow-up contacts –2% (n=12):≥ 3 follow-up –5% (n=30):only 1 follow-up 7% (n=42) lost to follow-up 92% (n=540) used Plan B 93% (n=543) at least one follow-up contact –86% (n=501):2 follow-up contacts –2% (n=12):≥ 3 follow-up –5% (n=30):only 1 follow-up 7% (n=42) lost to follow-up 92% (n=540) used Plan B

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, ResultsResults Self-Selection Timing of Dosing Adverse Events Contraceptive Behavior Pregnancy Rate Self-Selection Timing of Dosing Adverse Events Contraceptive Behavior Pregnancy Rate

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, ResultsResults Self-Selection Timing of Dosing Adverse Events Contraceptive Behavior Pregnancy Rate Self-Selection Timing of Dosing Adverse Events Contraceptive Behavior Pregnancy Rate

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Self-Selection (n=540) 95% of users (n=514) correctly self-selected: Unprotected intercourse (40%) Condom broke or slipped (45%) Missed taking OC pills (7%) Withdrawal method (4%) 95% of users (n=514) correctly self-selected: Unprotected intercourse (40%) Condom broke or slipped (45%) Missed taking OC pills (7%) Withdrawal method (4%)

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Self-Selection (cont.) (n=540) 5% of users (n=26) incorrectly self-selected: 1.3% (n=7) had label contraindication: –6 unexplained vaginal bleeding –1 pregnancy 0.4% (n=2) took Plan B before unprotected intercourse 3% (n=17) provided non-specific reasons 5% of users (n=26) incorrectly self-selected: 1.3% (n=7) had label contraindication: –6 unexplained vaginal bleeding –1 pregnancy 0.4% (n=2) took Plan B before unprotected intercourse 3% (n=17) provided non-specific reasons

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, ResultsResults Self-Selection Timing of Doses Adverse Events Contraceptive Behavior Pregnancy Rate Self-Selection Timing of Doses Adverse Events Contraceptive Behavior Pregnancy Rate

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Timing of Dose per Label (n=540) 92% (n=499) – 1 st pill < 72 hours 72% (n=387) – 2 nd pill at 12 hours after 1 st pill 68% (n=366) – both pills according to the label dosing regimen 92% (n=499) – 1 st pill < 72 hours 72% (n=387) – 2 nd pill at 12 hours after 1 st pill 68% (n=366) – both pills according to the label dosing regimen

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Timing of Dose (Alternate 2 nd Dosing Analysis) 92% (n=499) – 1 st pill < 72 hours 93% (n=500) – 2 nd pill between 6-18 hours after 1 st pill 87% (n=469) – both pills according to the alternate 2 nd dosing interval 92% (n=499) – 1 st pill < 72 hours 93% (n=500) – 2 nd pill between 6-18 hours after 1 st pill 87% (n=469) – both pills according to the alternate 2 nd dosing interval

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, ResultsResults Self-Selection Timing of Dosing/use Adverse Events Contraceptive Behavior Pregnancy Rate Self-Selection Timing of Dosing/use Adverse Events Contraceptive Behavior Pregnancy Rate

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Adverse Events (AEs) (n=540) No serious AEs No new safety signals Most common AEs (transient): –Abdominal pain (14%) –Nausea (12%) –Headache (11%) –Fatigue/tiredness (8%) No serious AEs No new safety signals Most common AEs (transient): –Abdominal pain (14%) –Nausea (12%) –Headache (11%) –Fatigue/tiredness (8%)

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, ResultsResults Self-Selection Timing of Dosing/use Adverse Events Contraceptive Behaviors Pregnancy Rate Self-Selection Timing of Dosing/use Adverse Events Contraceptive Behaviors Pregnancy Rate

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Contraceptive Behaviors (n=543) Behavior 1 month before study 1 month during study ≥ 1 sex act w/o contraception 60%20% Withdrawal method 28%10% Condom use79%90%

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Contraceptive Behaviors (cont.) Subjects tended to use more effective contraception methods 1.7% of enrolled subjects (n=10) requested Plan B more than once during 3-month enrollment period Subjects tended to use more effective contraception methods 1.7% of enrolled subjects (n=10) requested Plan B more than once during 3-month enrollment period

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, ResultsResults Self-Selection Timing of Dosing/use Adverse Events Contraceptive Behavior Pregnancy Rate Self-Selection Timing of Dosing/use Adverse Events Contraceptive Behavior Pregnancy Rate

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Pregnancy Rate (n=540) Confirmed pregnancy (n=10):1.9% Unknown pregnancy status:2.6% (n=14, at the end of the study) Confirmed pregnancy (n=10):1.9% Unknown pregnancy status:2.6% (n=14, at the end of the study)

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, SummarySummary 95% of users correctly self-selected Plan B 68% of users took 1 st pill within 72 hours and 2 nd pill at 12 hours after the 1 st pill 87% of users took 1 st pill within 72 hours and 2 nd pill between 6-18 hours 95% of users correctly self-selected Plan B 68% of users took 1 st pill within 72 hours and 2 nd pill at 12 hours after the 1 st pill 87% of users took 1 st pill within 72 hours and 2 nd pill between 6-18 hours

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Summary (cont.) No serious AEs and no new safety signals Subjects tended to use more effective contraception No significant differences among demographic subgroups: –Self-selection –Timing of dose/use –AEs –Adverse contraceptive behaviors No serious AEs and no new safety signals Subjects tended to use more effective contraception No significant differences among demographic subgroups: –Self-selection –Timing of dose/use –AEs –Adverse contraceptive behaviors

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Limitations of Plan B Actual Use Study Short follow-up period Purchased only 1 package of Plan B No literacy testing 94% of subjects from clinics Short follow-up period Purchased only 1 package of Plan B No literacy testing 94% of subjects from clinics

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Contraceptive Behavior Studies in Literature 8 behavior studies on advance provision of emergency contraception 5 published, 2 unpublished and 1 abstract 5 studies conducted in US 1 study each from UK, India, and Ghana 8 behavior studies on advance provision of emergency contraception 5 published, 2 unpublished and 1 abstract 5 studies conducted in US 1 study each from UK, India, and Ghana

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Contraceptive Behavior Studies Study Design Study Populations: Family planning clinics/hospital-based clinics Ages years Sample size from 160 to 1083 subjects Study Populations: Family planning clinics/hospital-based clinics Ages years Sample size from 160 to 1083 subjects

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Contraceptive Behavior Studies Study Design (cont.) Randomized controlled design –Treatment group: advance provision of 1 or 3 courses of EC pills –Control group: Rx EC access EC education for all subjects Follow-up period from 2-12 months Randomized controlled design –Treatment group: advance provision of 1 or 3 courses of EC pills –Control group: Rx EC access EC education for all subjects Follow-up period from 2-12 months

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Contraceptive Behavior Studies Results Subjects with advanced EC provision were more likely to use EC did not have more unprotected sex did not decrease condom use did not switch to less effective contraception Subjects with advanced EC provision were more likely to use EC did not have more unprotected sex did not decrease condom use did not switch to less effective contraception

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Contraceptive Behavior Studies Complement the AU Study: Longer follow-up period Relative large sample size Advance EC provision Complement the AU Study: Longer follow-up period Relative large sample size Advance EC provision

NDAC & ACRHD December 16, Limitations of Contraceptive Behavior Studies Conducted in clinics EC education (verbal and written) 3 foreign studies 6 studies provided 1 course of EC Conducted in clinics EC education (verbal and written) 3 foreign studies 6 studies provided 1 course of EC