International Flight Inspection Symposium

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numbers Treasure Hunt Following each question, click on the answer. If correct, the next page will load with a graphic first – these can be used to check.
Advertisements

EcoTherm Plus WGB-K 20 E 4,5 – 20 kW.
1 A B C
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AP STUDY SESSION 2.
1
Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-01. Feichter_DPG-SYKL03_Bild-02.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Sequential Logic Design
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 38.
Addition and Subtraction Equations
Chapter 1 Image Slides Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
ALGEBRA Number Walls
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
Local Customization Chapter 2. Local Customization 2-2 Objectives Customization Considerations Types of Data Elements Location for Locally Defined Data.
Create an Application Title 1Y - Youth Chapter 5.
Process a Customer Chapter 2. Process a Customer 2-2 Objectives Understand what defines a Customer Learn how to check for an existing Customer Learn how.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt BlendsDigraphsShort.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
Around the World AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision.
The 5S numbers game..
Photo Slideshow Instructions (delete before presenting or this page will show when slideshow loops) 1.Set PowerPoint to work in Outline. View/Normal click.
Inspections on an iPad, iPhone, iPod Touch, Android Tablet or Android Phone.
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
Media-Monitoring Final Report April - May 2010 News.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
This module: Telling the time
The basics for simulations
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
Bellwork Do the following problem on a ½ sheet of paper and turn in.
1 Prediction of electrical energy by photovoltaic devices in urban situations By. R.C. Ott July 2011.
Exarte Bezoek aan de Mediacampus Bachelor in de grafische en digitale media April 2014.
15. Oktober Oktober Oktober 2012.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
1..
Adding Up In Chunks.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Synthetic.
1 Termination and shape-shifting heaps Byron Cook Microsoft Research, Cambridge Joint work with Josh Berdine, Dino Distefano, and.
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
Before Between After.
25 seconds left…...
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
1 hi at no doifpi me be go we of at be do go hi if me no of pi we Inorder Traversal Inorder traversal. n Visit the left subtree. n Visit the node. n Visit.
1 Titre de la diapositive SDMO Industries – Training Département MICS KERYS 09- MICS KERYS – WEBSITE.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Converting a Fraction to %
Clock will move after 1 minute
famous photographer Ara Guler famous photographer ARA GULER.
PSSA Preparation.
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Murach’s OS/390 and z/OS JCLChapter 16, Slide 1 © 2002, Mike Murach & Associates, Inc.
Copyright Tim Morris/St Stephen's School
1.step PMIT start + initial project data input Concept Concept.
1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Least Squares Curves, Rational Representations, Splines and Continuity.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Presentation transcript:

International Flight Inspection Symposium Oklahoma City, OK USA June 2008 Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches David Quinet Aaron Wilson Avionics Engineering Center Ohio University

ILS Signal Requirements Localizer Signal: Aligned with runway centerline Meet Category I course roughness tolerances Glide Slope Signal 5.5 to 8.65 degree path angle Meet Category I path roughness down to an altitude of 344 feet Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Location Previous Facility: Blythe removed when cooling tower built under approach Aircraft decoupling due to updraft TMB: 09L Known site performance National FAA ILS test facility Equipment and infrastructure [power, foundations, buildings] already exists Established working relations with ATC Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Summary of Aircraft Using Facility Aircraft Type Avionics Path Angles Flown (Degrees) Engineering Flight Dates E-175 Honeywell 5.5 5/08-6/1/08 Cessna Mustang Garmin 2/20-2/21/07 Gulfstream G-550 1/09/07 Gulfstream G -150 Cessna Encore+ Rockwell Collins 3/14/07 Cessna Excel 3/31-4/01/08 Falcon 900 5.5, 6.65, 8.65 8/10-8/12/08;10/24-26/07 Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

TMB Layout Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Summary of Ground Equipment Parameter Equipment Localizer Glide Slope Frequency (MHz) 109.7 333.2 Antenna Type Log Periodic Dipole FAA 8971 Array Type 8-Element Single-Frequency Null Reference Transmitter Mark 20 Mark 1F CSB Power (W) 15.0 4.0 Standby Power Batteries (6 hours minimum) Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Glide Slope Mast All-Angles Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Flight Results Summary Parameter Flight Measurement Results Flight Inspection Tolerance Path Angle 5.5 Degrees 5/12/06 - 8/27/07 Width (degrees) 1.36[1.41] 1.22 -1.42 Symmetry (%) 47[47] 33 - 67 Structure Angle (degrees) 3.50[3.41] 1.65 (minimum) Path Angle (degrees) 5.49[5.46] 5.4 - 5.6 Path Angle 6.65 Degrees 8/27/07 1.61 1.5-1.7 46 4.3 2.0 (minimum) 6.61 6.6 - 6.7 Path Angle 8.65 Degrees 3.0 3.0-3.2 47 4.8 2.6 (minimum) 8.51 8.5- 8.8 Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Proportional Guidance Sector 5.5 Degrees Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Proportional Guidance Sector 6.65 Degrees Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Proportional Guidance Sector 8.65 Degrees Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Structure Roughness (μA / % Tolerance / nmi) Path Quality Summary Category Structure Roughness (μA / % Tolerance / nmi) ILS Zone 2 ILS Zone 3 Path Angle 5.5 Degrees 5/12/07 18.2/66.5/2.96 4.5/14.8/0.23 III 16.8/82.5 11.1/59.4/0.20 8/27/07 I 23.3 / 77.5 / 4.0 5.8 / 15.9 / 0.18 19.7 / 96.6 / 0.72 4.8 / 23.9 / 0.18 Path Angle 6.65 Degrees 9.9 / 33 / 073 3.8 / 12.7 / 0.09 9.9 / 48.5 / 0.73 3.8 / 19.1 / 0.09 Path Angle 8.65 degrees 9.0 / 30.1 / 1.78 8.4 / 27.8 / 0.13 8.5 / 42.4 / 0.59 8.4 / 41.7 / 0.13 Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Structure Roughness 5.5 Degrees Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Structure Roughness 6.65 Degrees Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Structure Roughness 8.65 Degrees Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Summary Localizer Performance Parameter Flight Measurement Results Flight Inspection Tolerance Width (degrees) 4.97 4.5 - 5.5 Symmetry (%) 48 45 - 55 Minimum Clearance 90 Hz (μA) 155 150 (minimum) Minimum Clearance 150 Hz (μA) 165 Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Horizontal Sector Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Localizer Performance ILS Zone Structure Roughness (μA / % / nmi) Category I Category III 2 2.6 / 13.6 / 1.46 1.9 / 36.3 / 0.62 3 2.1 / 13.8 / 0.76 3.9 / 52.3 / 0.02 4 N/A 5.4 / 108.3 / 0.42 5 2.9 / 36.9 / 0.59 Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Course Quality Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Equipment Consideration Path Angle Change CEGS/M-Array: Antenna heights UA- amplitude/phase change LA-amplitude/phase change Snow accumulation SBR: UA-amplitude change LA-amplitude change EFGS: Pedestal displacement Phase change [F-R] Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Null Reference Path Angle Change Upper Antenna Height [0.01° per 1”] Verified height with tape measure Snow Accumulation Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Path Roughness Aircraft on Taxiways Terrain Modification No taxiways near mast Terrain Modification Visual inspection SBO CSB Power Ratio Test equipment Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

8-Element Array Course Alignment Change Structure Roughness Phase change in antenna cable or DU Verified with ground checks Modulation Balance [0.001 DDM=> 2.3’ at threshold] Verified using calibrated external equipment Structure Roughness Constant No change to environment [buildings/parked aircraft] in front of array Visual inspection No change in CSB/SBO power ratio Verified using thru-line elements Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Signal Verification Based on ground measurements Transmitter output power & modulation In-line phase GS antenna heights Localizer ground checks (CL, width points) Taken pre & post mission Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Path Angle Stability Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Structure Roughness Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC

Conclusions Localizer & Glide Slope remained within tolerances during all certification flights. Based on reference readings (antenna height); angle remained within 0.00015-degrees. Glide Slope Considerations to Provide Support for Aircraft Certification for Steep Angle Approaches IFIS 2008, OKC