Highlights from the 2013-14 Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A State Activities Funds August 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Transitioning California to a Future Assessment System California.
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
April 15, Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to.
Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.
March 6-7, 2012 Waterfront Hotel - Morgantown, WV Federal Programs Spring Directors Conference Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
10 Components of School Improvement LEA School Support Team Technical Assistance Workshop Supplemental Information August 2010.
Title II, Part A Allowable Expenses Middle Tennessee Federal Directors Conference September 24, 2009.
INTENT OF FUNDS. INTENT OF TITLE I A Title I Director salary and benefits Title I Administrative Assistant/Secretary salary and benefits Teachers Educational.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: July 2011.
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
AYP Regional Meetings In Need of Improvement Schools and Districts MDE School Improvement Division and Regional Service Cooperatives August/September 2010.
SY PIMS/Educator Effectiveness/PVAAS Teacher Specific Reporting Mini PPT for LEA Admin Use Provided by: PVAAS Statewide Team.
Katonah-Lewisboro School District Annual Professional Performance Review Update 5/23/
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents
Highlights From the Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A
1 Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting San Diego Unified School District Attachment 4.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Policy Decisions to make on Teacher Compensation Prepared for the Washington Learns K-12 Advisory Committee April 18, 2006 Lawrence O. Picus and Associates.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Adult Education Leader Proposed Adaptations.
ABC Board of Education Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Valencia Mayfield, Assistant Superintendent Academic Services Mike McCoy, Director of Child.
TITLE II, PART A Technical Support Webinar Wendy Modzelewski, Ed.D. May 2013.
The 10 Components of a Schoolwide Title I Program Presented by: Dr. Denise Ellis Director State and Federal Programs Dr. Ken Wagner Principal Rancho Mirage.
TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Uses and Budgeting of Title I, II, III and VI Funds January 13, 2010 Bambi Perrigin and Edmund Moore.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: RENEWAL PROCESS November 20, 2014.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Title II-A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality ESEA Application Workshop April 21-22, 2015.
The 2013 Legislative Session and You – Statute Changes Affecting Schools Iowa Department of Education.
BO MERRITT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Federal Grants Planning Titles I, II, & III.
Elementary and Secondary Education (ESEA) Law NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
All certified staff need to write professional development learning goals. A minimum of three learning goals are required. Individual Professional Development.
Developing Talent Enhancing Careers Improving Student Learning REIL “Update” Rewarding Excellence in Instruction and Leadership Education Service Agency.
What Does Supplement, Not Supplant Mean?. 2 Fiscal Requirements Supplement, not Supplant –
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Title II A: Teacher and Principal Training and Recruiting The primary goal of the program is to provide professional development to increase student achievement.
Charter School Leadership Institute October 7, 2015 Title IIA Improving Teacher Quality.
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
Educator Effectiveness Evaluation MERA Fall 2013 Conference November 25-26, 2013 Frankenmuth, Michigan.
Edit the text with your own short phrases. To change the sample image, select the picture and delete it. Now click the Pictures icon in the placeholder.
Title I Planning Meeting II for Legacy Charter School.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Spending/ Fiscal Allowable Expenses Equitable Services Needs Assessment Potluck
Title I Planning Meeting One November 18, How are Title I funds being used? The majority of the funding was spent on personnel personnel. Title.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
ESEA on Teacher Quality Pros Requires licensure, BA/BS, subject area knowledge Provides funding to states for PD Requires annual, measurable objectives.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
Larry Fazzari Program Supervisor k12.wa.us 1 TITLE I, PART A PROGRAMS SCHOOLWIDE VS. TARGETED
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Compliance Monitoring, Interventions, and Sanctions (CMIS)
Grant Activities, Needs Assessments And other SPDG application Issues to Consider.
Title III Fiscal Requirements and ESSA changes
Comprehensive Planning
Federal Programs and Advisory Planning Update
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
Constructing High Performing Schoolwide Programs
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Title II Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Ismail Ardahanli.
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
Presentation transcript:

Highlights from the Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A State Activities Funds August 2014

Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A About the Survey Designed to gather information on how State education agencies (SEAs) use their Title II, Part A State activities funds – Data are used to develop national estimates on how Title II, Part A State activities funds are used Administered to SEAs in the 50 States, the District of Columbia (DC), and Puerto Rico (PR) – In , 48 States, DC and PR completed the survey – Delaware and Vermont did not respond to the survey Data reflect usage of funds at the time of response

Figure 1 Most common activities funded by States

Figure 2 Percentage of total State activities funds allocated to most common activities

Figure 3 Number of States funding selected activities

Figure 4 Percentage of total State activities funds allocated to selected activities

Figure 5 Percentage of Title II, Part A State activities funds allocated by activity

Figure 6 State usage of Title II, Part A State activities funds, by number of activities funded

Figure 7 Number of States using Title II, Part A State activities funds to support activities in specific areas

Figure 8 Average percentage of funds allocated for selected activities, by support of college- and career-ready standards Note: Activity 10 is developing or assisting LEAs in the development of proven, innovative strategies to deliver intensive professional development activities that are both cost-effective and easily accessible. Activity 16 is supporting activities to ensure that teachers are able to use State academic content achievement standards and State assessments to improve instructional practices and student academic achievement.

Figure 9 Average percentage of funds allocated for selected activities, by support of educator evaluation systems Note: Activity 2 is providing support for teachers and principals through activities such as mentoring, team teaching and intensive professional development. Activity 8 is fulfilling the SEA’s responsibilities for proper and efficient administration of Title II, Part A.

Figure 10 Average percentage of funds allocated for selected activities, by support of equitable distribution of effective or HQTs Note: Activity 2 is providing support for teachers and principals through activities such as mentoring, team teaching and intensive professional development. Activity 8 is fulfilling the SEA’s responsibilities for proper and efficient administration of Title II, Part A. Activity 16 is supporting activities to ensure that teachers are able to use State academic content standards and State assessments to improve instructional practices and student academic achievement.

Figure 11 Average percentage of funds allocated for selected activities, by support of equitable distribution of effective or HQTs Note: Activity 4 is developing and implementing effective mechanisms for helping LEAs and schools to recruit and retain highly qualified teachers, principals, and pupil services personnel. Activity 12 is developing, or assisting LEAs in developing, merit-based performance systems and strategies that provide differential and bonus pay for teachers in high-need academic subjects and for teachers in high-poverty areas. Activity 14 is developing, or assisting LEAs in developing, teacher advancement initiatives that promote professional growth and that emphasize multiple career paths and pay differentiation. Activity 18 is establishing and operating a center that serves as a statewide clearinghouse for the recruitment and placement of K-12 teachers and establishes and carries out programs to improve teacher recruitment.

Figure 10 Number of States using Title II, Part A State activities or administrative funds to fully- or partially-fund staff salaries Total individuals funded: 816 Total FTEs funded: 271.3