MONTGOMERY COUNTY TRANSIT PROJECT BRIEFING 8/22/13 Prepared by Charles Lattuca Montgomery County Department of Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emphasizing TDM in Transportation Planning Asher Mercer TDM Summit November 18, 2009.
Advertisements

DART Orange Line Project Update and Development Opportunities
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HIGHLIGHTS for the Dulles Area Transportation Association June 19, 2013 Helen Cuervo VDOT District Administrator, Northern Virginia.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Board Four Year Transportation Plan 2012 to 2015 Board Transportation Committee November 29, 2011.
Reston Metrorail Access Group (RMAG) Status Report Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee September 20, 2011.
I-95 Transit & TDM Plan I-95 Transit and TDM Plan Summary of Recommendations Slide 1.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Board Four Year Transportation Plan 2013 to 2016 Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Columbus, OH May 2013 Estimating Bus and Rail Travel Times For Transit Corridor Studies Presented.
Chicago Bus Rapid Transit. Improving Transportation in Chicago is Making the Most of Every Option Pedestrians – Countdown Signals, Safety Improvements.
Los Angeles Bus Rapid Transit Tour Lessons Learned.
400 North Orange Avenue Orlando, FL
ATN Applications: Montgomery County, Maryland Transit Opportunities Advanced Transit Association Annual Technical Meeting January 11, 2014 College Park,
Bus Rapid Transit Study Rockefeller Foundation August 3, 2011.
Transit Signal Prioritization (TSP) Considerations within RTS Corridors Rapid Transit System Steering Committee Technical Memorandum 2 Existing Conditions.
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Tampa Bay Regional Transportation Summit October 10, 2013.
MAC -- Update on CTfastrak October 16, What is CTfastrak? Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) –Fast, frequent, reliable service throughout.
Gateway Corridor Alternatives Analysis Findings Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee November 26, 2012.
Visual Highway Data Select a highway below... NORTH SOUTH Salisbury Southern Maryland Eastern Shore.
EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS IN MINNESOTA A JOINT PRESENTATION TO THE Transportation Funding Advisory Committee September 14, 2012.
1 presented to Policy Steering Committee presented by AC Transit May 15, 2009 East Bay Bus Rapid Transit.
CITY OF MIAMI CITY OF MIAMI. Health District Traffic Study July 21, 2008 Miami Partnership.
Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee April 2, 2014 OVERVIEW | SOURCE OF PROJECTS PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT.
1 June 13, 2013YMPO RTP Technical Advisory Committee Meeting.
D2 Roadway Discussion Sound Transit Board September 22, 2011.
9/7/2012 MBS UU.
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority THE HEATHLINE EUCLID CORRIDOR BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT Michael J. Schipper, P.E DGM- Engineering & Project.
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
An Integral Perspective on the S.E. 17 Corridor October 29, 2013 Calgary.
1 Think Big – Build Small Presented to White Flint Sector Plan Advisory Committee Nov, 2007 Presented by Natalie Goldberg.
Montgomery County Rapid Transit System (RTS) Service Planning and System Integration Study Steering Committee Meeting Presented to Montgomery County Department.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
Rapid Transit System Steering Committee Meeting December 4, 2012.
COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN Coalition for Smarter Growth Presentation on Staff Recommendations for Bus Rapid Transit Silver Spring.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
1 Draft Regional Priority Projects List Steve Yaffe, Arlington County November 20, 2008 TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee Presented to the TPB Access For All.
1 Item 11: Review of Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
1 John B. Catoe, General Manager June 24, 2009 Metrobus’ Priority Corridor Network: An Opportunity for Priority Bus Transit in the Washington Region:
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Metrobus 30s Line Study Improving Your Customer’s Transit Experience Virginia Transit Association May 20,
Montgomery County Rapid Transit System (RTS) Service Planning and System Integration Study Service Planning and Integration Study Work Group Report 7/30/13.
1 Development of a Regional BRT System Proposal Presented to the TPB Access for All Committee April 23, 2009 Michael Eichler and Monica Bansal Transportation.
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
Montgomery County Rapid Transit System (RTS) Service Planning and System Integration Study Steering Committee Meeting Presented to Montgomery County Department.
1 Item 12: Report on Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
The Purple Line Transit Connecting Bethesda, New Carrolton, and the Washington Metro Presented by- Nick Flanders Rose Ryan Anupam Srivastava.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Central Corridor LRT Review of Washington and Northern Alignments Jan Lysen and John Siqveland December 10, 2009 Image: MPR News Q.
Department of Public Works Approval of a Journal Voucher Amending Projects in the FY 2011 Capital Improvement Program Budget and Appropriate $125,000 in.
Metropolitan Council 1 Twin Cities Region Transportation Policy Plan Nacho Diaz Metropolitan Council Evaluating Economic and Community Impacts of Transit.
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
1 Bus Rapid Transit Strategic Plan May BRT Strategic Plan Evaluate feasibility and effectiveness of six BRT corridors Establish framework for.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
A presentation by Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Broward Boulevard Presentation to the Broward MPO TCC and CIR March 2012 Agenda Item NA-1, Attachment.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Geary Bus Rapid Transit Project Presentation to the San Francisco.
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board October 26, 2016.
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ACEC Presentation May 25, 2017
ITS VA Conference Amy Inman Planning & Mobility Programs Administrator
D Line and Station Plan overview
Bus Rapid Transit Study
North-South Corridor Bus Rapid Transit Project
WELCOMES YOU TO THE COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE OCTOBER 2018.
MD 355 FLASH Phase 2 Study Results
Presentation transcript:

MONTGOMERY COUNTY TRANSIT PROJECT BRIEFING 8/22/13 Prepared by Charles Lattuca Montgomery County Department of Transportation

Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in Montgomery County Not a New Idea ActivityDate Georgia Avenue Busway Study1999 I-270/US 15 Multi-Modal Corridor Study Draft Environmental Impact Statement 2002 Veirs Mill Road BRT Study Final Report2003 Phase 1 Veirs Mill Road Bus Rapid Transit Facility Planning Report2005 Countywide BRT Study2011 MDOT preliminary engineering for BRT projects on Veirs Mill Road and Georgia Avenue 2012 County Executive Transit Task Force Report2012 Countywide Transit Corridors Functional Master Plan2013

Elements of a BRT System Dedicated Lanes or Busways Off Board Fare Collection Specialized Vehicles Greater Distance Between Stops Integration With Other Public Transport Platform Boarding Transit Signal Priority Real Time Traveler Information Systems Branding and Marketing Bicycle Sharing Integration

Countywide Transit Corridors Functional Master Plan for Bus Rapid Transit Recommends changes and additions to the transportation network. Supports economic development and mobility goals. Identifies 10 BRT corridors throughout the County. The BRT network is 80.6 miles in size and includes a variety of BRT treatments. Does not change current planned land use or zoning.

Determining BRT Treatments Plan Thresholds for BRT Lanes Treatment Level Person Per Peak Hour in the Peak Direction Buses Per Hour 100 passengers per bus (60’ Bus 57 Seated/63 Standing) Headway (Minutes) Dedicated Lane *1, Draft Plan 1, Median Busway *2, Draft Plan 1, *Transportation Research Board, Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition

Lane Repurposing Lane Repurposing Test -- Lane Repurposing Test – When forecast BRT ridership on a roadway is greater than the capacity of a general traffic lane. Example: MD 355 South Corridor MD 355 from I-495 to Friendship Heights Metro has a lane capacity of cars per hour. The 2040 BRT forecast states that taking lanes BRT treatments will provide a person throughput capacity of 1, persons per hour.

Other Recommendations in the Planning Board Draft The transit network may evolve over time to meet future transit needs. Success must be measured by person throughput not vehicle throughput. The Service Planning and Integration Study will determine station locations, size and links to other transit services. Improvement of existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities near all BRT stations. Enhanced MARC commuter train services.

Recommended Corridors CorridorCorridor Size (directional miles) # of Stations Georgia Ave North9.513 Georgia Ave. South3.78 MD 355 North MD 355 South9.314 New Hampshire Avenue8.512 North Bethesda Transitway 2.77 Randolph Road University Boulevard5.59 US Veirs Mill Road6.211 Total

Recommended Transit Corridor Map & Transit Treatments

Treatments by Category TreatmentDirectional Miles% of BRT Network Two Lane Median Two Lane Side Running Busway Reversible One Lane Median Bidirectional One Lane Median Curb Lanes Managed Lanes Mixed Traffic Total

Planning Board Draft Versus TTF Report Slide I CorridorPB Draft (miles) TTF Phase 1 (miles) TTF Phase 2 (miles) TTF Phase 3 (miles) Georgia Ave. North Georgia Ave. South MD 355 North MD 355 South New Hampshire Ave North Bethesda Transitway Randolph Road University Boulevard US Veirs Mill Road Total Directional Miles

Planning Board Draft Versus TTF Report Slide 2 CorridorTransit Task Force Start & End Points Planning Board Draft Start & End Points Difference (miles) Georgia Ave. NorthOlney Sandy Hill Rd to Veirs Mills RoadPrince Phillip Dr. (Medstar) to Veirs Mill Rd -0.3 Georgia Ave. SouthVeirs Mill Rd to Silver Spring Transit Center Veirs Mill Rd to DC Line/Montgomery College -0.2 MD 355 NorthMontgomery Village Ave, Clarksburg to Montgomery College, Germantown Redgrave Place, Clarksburg to Rockville Metro -0.8 MD 355 SouthMontgomery Village Ave, Gaithersburg to Bethesda Metro Station Rockville Metro to Friendship Heights Metro -2.8 New Hampshire Ave. Intercounty Connector, Colesville to Fort Totten, D.C. Colesville Park & Ride to D.C. Line-1.6 North Bethesda Transitway Grosvenor Metro to Montgomery MallWhite Flint Metro to Montgomery Mall-2.4 Randolph RoadWhite Flint Metro to FDA Blvd.White Flint Metro to US University Boulevard Wheaton Metro to New Hampshire Ave.Wheaton Metro to Takoma /Langley Park Transit Center -0.9 (identical route) US 29Burtonsville/MD 198 to Silver Spring Metro Burtonsville Park & Ride to Silver Spring Transit Center +0.3 (identical route) Veirs Mill RoadRockville County Office Bldg./Metro to Wheaton Metro Rockville Metro to Wheaton Metro-0.5 (identical route)

Georgia Ave North & South Corridor 1: Georgia Avenue North, Prince Phillip Dr. (Medstar) to Veirs Mill Rd Length: 9.5 Miles One Lane Median Busway & 0.9 Mixed Traffic Stations: 13 Stations -- avg. every 0.73 miles Corridor 2: Georgia Avenue South, Veirs Mill Rd to DC Line/Montgomery College Length: 3.7 Miles – 2.0 Mixed Traffic & 1.7 Dedicated Curb Lanes Stations: 8 Stations – avg. every 0.46 miles

MD 355 North and South *Corridor 3: MD 355 North, Redgrave Place, Clarksburg to Rockville Metro Length: 14.1 miles – 12.5 Two Lane Median Busway & 1.6 Mixed Traffic Stations: 20 Stations -- avg. every 0.7 miles *Corridor 4: MD 355 South, Rockville Metro to Friendship Heights Metro Length:9.3 Miles – 8.2 Two Lane Median Busway & 1.2 Dedicated Curb Lanes Stations: 14 – avg. every 0.66 miles *Assuming Rockville & Gaithersburg agree to endorse the Planning Board Draft.

New Hampshire Avenue & North Bethesda Transitway Corridor 5: New Hampshire Avenue, Colesville Park & Ride to D.C. Line Length: 8.5 Miles – 3.8 One Lane Reversible Median, 2.8 Mixed Traffic & 1.8 Two Lane Median Stations: 12 – avg. every 0.71 miles Corridor 6: North Bethesda Transitway, White Flint Metro to Montgomery Mall Length: 2.7 miles – 1.5 Two Lane Median, 0.9 Two-Lane Side Running & 0.3 Mixed Traffic Stations: 7 – avg. every 0.38 miles

Randolph Road & University Boulevard Corridor 7: Randolph Road, White Flint Metro to US 29 Length: 10.1 miles Mixed Traffic Stations: 10 – avg. every 1.0 miles Corridor 8: University Boulevard, Wheaton Metro to Takoma /Langley Park Transit Center Length: 5.5 miles – 2.8 Mixed Traffic & 2.7 One Lane Median Stations: 9 Stations – avg. every 0.6 miles

US 29 & Veirs Mill Road Corridor 9: US 29 Corridor, Burtonsville Park & Ride to Silver Spring Transit Center Length: 11 miles – 5.6 Two Lane Median, 3.4 Mixed Traffic, 1.1 Curb Lanes & 0.9 Managed Lanes Stations: 11 – avg. every 1.0 miles Corridor 10: Veirs Mill Road, MD 355 to Wheaton Metro Length: 6.2 miles One Lane Median Stations: 11 – avg. every 0.56 miles Bi-Directional

Transit, Traffic & Environmental Impacts by 2040

MARC Brunswick Line Expansion The Brunswick Line serves 7,000 daily passengers at 11 stations in Montgomery County. Calls for a 3 rd track be constructed between Frederick County line and the Metropolitan Grove station (12 miles). Consistent with MTA’s 2007 Growth & Investment Plan. The additional capacity, coupled with expanded service, would accommodate a tripling of ridership.

MARC Brunswick Line Expansion

Bikeways The Plan recognizes good bike/pedestrian access is needed to all BRT stations. All master plan bikeways within the recommended ROW are accommodated. Recommends designating new Bicycle- Pedestrian Priority Areas in the State’s Bicycle- Pedestrian Master Plan around major transit and BRT stations.

RTS Funding Update To date, MCDOT has dedicated $11 million for BRT corridor studies on Veirs Mill & Georgia Ave. MDOT is expected to offer another $10M to advance BRT corridor planning. MCDOT would program the State’s $10M for concept planning related to the MD 355 South, US 29 and Randolph Road Corridors

Process ActionTiming Planning Board Draft Sent to Council7/25 Fiscal Impact AnalysisMid September Departmental Comments to DGS9/6 Draft to County ExecutiveMid September Council Public Hearings9/24 & 26 Council T&E Committee Work SessionsOctober Council Resolution Approving the Planning Board Draft as Amended Winter 2014 Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Adoption Spring 2014

How Do We Compare to Other BRT Initiatives in the US Bus Rapid Transit Around the Country SystemStart DateLength (miles) Avg. Daily Ridership StationsCost millions Los Angles County Metro Orange line , Los Angles County Metro Silver Line , Everett, WA Swift BRT , Eugene, OR Emerald Express Green Line , Hartford, CT Fastrack , Salt Lake City MAX , Cleveland, Healthline BRT , Corridor Cities Transitway Phase I , Countywide Transit Corridors FMP TBD ,250115TBD

Plan Versus Project BRT corridors identified in the Planning Board Draft do not automatically become County projects. A functional master plan addresses systems or policies but does not make land use or zoning recommendations. BRT projects that are developed may vary from those outlined in the Plan.