Professional Development Standards William E. Dugger, Jr., DTE Shelli Meade Lisa Delany.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consider the past and you shall know the future!
Advertisements

Marylands Technology Education Voluntary State Curriculum 2007 Bob Gray Center for the Teaching of Technology & Science (ITEA-CATTS) and the University.
Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
When Students Can’t Read…
The Teacher Preparation World Cafe September 26, 2008 Statewide Meeting Results and Recommendations New York Higher Education Support Center Task Force.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
Ia Teachers lead in their classrooms. Teachers demonstrate leadership by taking responsibility for the progress of all students to ensure that they graduate.
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
1 New Hampshire’s preK-16 Literacy Action Plan for the 21 st Century Deb Wiswell & Linda Stimson NH Literacy Task Force July 23, 2007.
Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.
Student Assessment Standards
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Chapter Twelve - 12 Preparing for Tomorrow’s Challenges Instructional Technology and Media for Learning Presented By: Ms. Yohana Lopez.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program (SRCL) SRCL is a comprehensive literacy development education program to advance literacy skills for students.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Developing Professionals: Preparing Technology Teachers Developing Professionals: Preparing Technology Teachers ITEA Standards Specialist and CATTS Meeting.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Information Literacy Standards: Boosting Student Achievement.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
History and Impact of Standards for Technological Literacy Revising Standards for Technological Literacy – Content for the Study of Technology: Issues.
Program Standards William E. Dugger, Jr., DTE Shelli Meade Lisa Delany.
William E. Dugger, Jr., DTE Shelli Meade Lisa Delany The Complete Picture STL and AETL.
1 Historical Perspective... Historical Perspective... Science Education Reform Efforts Leading to Standards-based Science Education.
Standards-Based Curricula Dr. Dennis S. Kubasko, Jr. NC Teach Summer 2009.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
What is a 21st Century Learner?
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
What is Technology? Broadly speaking, technology is how people modify the natural world to suit their own purposes. From the Greek word techne, meaning.
Learning4Life or Lifelong learning? Warren Goetzel, PhD GaETC – CTO Clinic Atlanta, GA 2013.
The Comprehensive Literacy Plan Pennsylvania KeystonestoOpportunity Tom Corbett Governor Ron Tomalis Secretary.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Office of Service Quality
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Presenter: Mazinza Ndala Tel:
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Measuring Progress and Planning Learning William E. Dugger, Jr. Shelli D. Meade.
Realizing Excellence: Structuring Technology Programs Realizing Excellence: Structuring Technology Programs ITEA Standards Specialist and CATTS Meeting.
Policy Planning & Research Development & Dissemination Diffusion & Establishing Roots Monitoring & Evaluation ICT in Education Master Plan (I, II,
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Interpretation Workshop Notes
Partnership for Practice
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
PPMES-UPRM Methodology & Practice Working Retreat
Reflecting National Education Goals in Teacher’s Competency Standards
Objectives: To comprehend and know the different strands and specific performance indicators from domain 2 and 3. To appreciate the significance of learning.
TEACHING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FRAMEWORK
Personal Growth and Professional Development
Constructing High Performing Schoolwide Programs
William E. Dugger, Jr. Shelli D. Meade
Presentation transcript:

Professional Development Standards William E. Dugger, Jr., DTE Shelli Meade Lisa Delany

Features of Nationally-Developed Standards Emphasize a comprehensive, focused, and coherent approach to education. Emphasize content more than curriculum. –Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology (STL) Recognize the need to define more than what students should know and be able to do. –Advancing Excellence in Technological Literacy: Student Assessment, Professional Development, and Program Standards (AETL) Summarized from Rodger Bybee, BSCS

International Technology Education Association’s Technology for All Americans Project Funded by: National Science Foundation (NSF) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)

Overview of AETL Along with STL, AETL describes the attributes of the effective study of technology that lead to technological literacy. AETL provides the means for implementing Standards for Technological Literacy (STL) in K–12 laboratory-classrooms. AETL contains three separate but interrelated sets of standards –Student Assessment –Professional Development –Program

Professional Development A continuous process of lifelong learning and growth that begins early in life, continues through the undergraduate, pre-service experience, and extends through the in-service years.

Professional Development Standards Criteria for use in ensuring the effective and continuous in- service and pre-service education of teachers. Primary audience (users of standards): Professional Development Providers –Teacher Educators –Supervisors –Administrators

Organizational Topics 1.Consistency with STL 2.Students as Learners 3.Curricula and Programs 4.Instructional Strategies 5.Learning Environments 6.Continued Professional Growth 7.Pre-Service and In-Service

Standards and Guidelines Standards are written statements about what is valued that can be used for making a judgment of quality. Guidelines are specific requirements or enablers that identify what needs to be done in order to meet a standard. The goal is to meet all of the standards in each chapter through the guidelines.

Guidelines for meeting Standard PD-1 require that professional development providers consistently prepare teachers to: A. Understand the nature of technology. B. Recognize the relationship between technology and society. Standard PD-1: Professional development will provide teachers with knowledge, abilities, and understanding consistent with Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology (STL).

Guidelines for meeting Standard PD-1 require that professional development providers consistently prepare teachers to: C. Know the attributes of design. D. Develop abilities for a technological world. E. Develop proficiency in the designed world. Standard PD-1 Continued

Guidelines for meeting Standard PD-2 require that professional development providers consistently prepare teachers to A.Incorporate student commonality and diversity to enrich learning. B.Provide cognitive, psychomotor, and affective learning opportunities. Standard PD-2: Professional development will provide teachers with educational perspectives on students as learners of technology.

Standard PD-2 Continued Guidelines for meeting Standard PD-2 require that professional development providers consistently prepare teachers to: C. Assist students in becoming effective learners. D.Conduct and use research on how students learn technology.

Guidelines for meeting Standard PD-3 require that professional development providers consistently prepare teachers to: A. Design and evaluate curricula and programs that enable all students to attain technological literacy. B. Design and evaluate curricula and programs across disciplines. Standard PD-3: Professional development will prepare teachers to design and evaluate technology curricula and programs.

Standard PD-3 Continued Guidelines for meeting Standard PD-3 require that professional development providers consistently prepare teachers to: C. Design and evaluate curricula and programs across grade levels. D.Design and evaluate curricula and programs using multiple sources of information.

Guidelines for meeting Standard PD-4 require that professional development providers consistently prepare teachers to A. Coordinate instructional strategies with curricula. B. Incorporate education (instructional) technology. C. Utilize student assessment. Standard PD-4: Professional development will prepare teachers to use instructional strategies that enhance technology teaching, student learning, and student assessment.

Guidelines for meeting Standard PD-5 require that professional development providers consistently prepare teachers to: A. Design and manage learning environments that operate with sufficient resources. B. Design and manage learning environments that encourage, motivate, and support student learning of technology. C. Design and manage learning environments that accommodate student commonality and diversity. Standard PD-5: Professional development will prepare teachers to design and manage learning environments that promote technological literacy.

Standard PD-5 Continued Guidelines for meeting Standard PD-5 require that professional development providers consistently prepare teachers to D. Design and manage learning environments that reinforce student learning and teacher instruction. E. Design and manage learning environments that are safe, appropriately designed, and well maintained. F. Design and manage learning environments that are adaptable.

Guidelines for meeting Standard PD-6 require that professional development providers consistently prepare teachers to: A. Assume commitment to self assessment and responsibility for continuous professional growth. B. Establish a personal commitment to ethical behavior within the educational environment as well as in private life. Standard PD-6: Professional development will prepare teachers to be responsible for their own continued professional growth.

Standard PD-6 Continued Guidelines for meeting Standard PD-6 require that professional development providers consistently prepare teachers to C. Facilitate collaboration with others. D. Participate in professional organizations. E. Serve as advisors for technology student organizations. F. Provide leadership in education.

Guidelines for meeting Standard PD-7 require that professional development providers consistently A. Plan pre-service and in-service education for teachers. B. Model teaching practices that teachers will be expected to use in their laboratory- classrooms. C. Evaluate professional development to assure that the needs of teachers are being met. Standard PD-7: Professional development providers will plan, implement, and evaluate the pre-service and in-service education of teachers.

Standard PD-7 Continued Guidelines for meeting Standard PD-7 require that professional development providers consistently D. Support technology teacher preparation programs that are consistent with state/provincial/regional and national/federal accrediting guidelines. E. Provide teacher preparation programs, leading to licensure, that are consistent with AETL and STL. F. Provide in-service activities to enhance teacher understanding of technological content, instruction, and assessment.

Standard PD-7 Continued Guidelines for meeting Standard PD-7 require that professional development providers consistently G. Obtain regular funding for in-service professional development opportunities. H. Create and implement mentoring activities at both in-service and pre-service levels.

Professional Development Standards The professional development standards are based on Standards for Technological Literacy. They are intended to be implemented in conjunction with STL as well as with the student assessment and program standards included in Advancing Excellence in Technological Literacy.

Program Permeability  The vision behind the professional development standards calls on teachers, administrators, and policymakers to perpetuate interchange between elements of the program, including content, professional development, curricula, instruction, student assessment, and the learning environment, in all areas of learning.

Technology Program Components

Significant Elements of AETL Standards Guidelines Notations Vignettes

Notations consist of definitions, tables, quotations, and correlations. Correlations identify a relationship within or between the standards in AETL and STL.

Vignettes provide detailed examples of how standards can be put into practice.

Vision of STL and AETL The vision of STL and AETL is that all students can and should become technologically literate.

“A focused professional development experience led by qualified teachers, mentors, and colleagues is the indispensable foundation for competence and high-quality teaching.” (The National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21 st Century, 2000, p. 18)

“High-quality teaching not only encourages students to learn, it insists they learn.” (The National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21 st Century, 2000, p. 18)

ITEA Standards Specialists ITEA Standards Specialists are a cadre of professional educators available to conduct workshops and presentations on interpreting and implementing STL and AETL on a cost-recovery basis.

URL:

Thank You!