Federal Aviation Administration Airport 20 to 1 Approach Surface Georgia Airports Association (GAA) Annual Workshop Cindy M Hintz Eastern Flight Procedures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emergency COA Process Presented to: UAS All Users TELCON
Advertisements

Obstruction Surveys and Airport Airspace Analysis
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
FAASTeam CFI Workshop 8 Pilot Deviations Including Runway Incursions
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
Document #07-12G 1 RXQ Customer Enrollment Using a Registration Agent Process Flow Diagram (Switch) Customer Supplier Customer authorizes Enrollment.
Document #07-2I RXQ Customer Enrollment Using a Registration Agent (RA) Process Flow Diagram (Move-In) (mod 7/25 & clean-up 8/20) Customer Supplier.
Aviation Security Training Module 4 Design and Conduct Exercise II 1.
Normal Operations Data: Air Traffic Facility Evaluations and NOSS
1 ATS Evaluation Programs The Federal Aviation Administration Presented By: Gary Romero.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
606 CMR 14.00: Background Record Checks What you need to know!
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
ZMQS ZMQS
Grants 3.0 Departmental Administrator Review January 22, 2014.
1 FLL Construction Playbook RWY 10R / 28L April 17, May 6, 2013 Phase 1 Only ~ RWY 9R Closes.
Presented by Sandra Healy, CGFM Principal Auditor Idaho Transportation Department 1.
Page 1 of 30 To the Create Assignment Request Online Training Course An assignment request is created by an assignor to initiate the electronic assignment.
ABC Technology Project
Behind the Fence and Contract Change Stakeholder Update September 18, 2012.
Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) Free Clinics Program Technical Assistance Call Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration.
High School Data Review Grades 9-12 KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 8/20/
Presenter Todd G. Johnson, Airport Solutions Specialist September 14, 2012.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Approval Process Overview Cranes or Other Objects United Parcel Service Mike Manis, Support Specialist,
FAA Office of Airports Airport Fuel Storage and Handling
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Safety Management System (SMS) at Airports : Principles APEC TPT-WG AEG-SAF Jim White, Deputy Director.
Airport Obstruction Issues GAA Workshop March 14 th, 2014 Presented by: Alan Hood, Georgia Department of Transportation Airport Safety Data Program Manager.
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration By: Ken Jacobs FAA Airport Planning and Environmental Division APP-400 Date: March 2, 2011.
2 |SharePoint Saturday New York City
ATO-NATIONAL FLIGHT PROCEDURES GROUP NEW YORK FLIGHT PROCEDURES GROUP FEB 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 1 February 2006 NY FPO OFFICE LATERAL PRECISION.
© S Haughton more than 3?
29 th Annual Airports Conference Hershey, PA Kenneth Jacobs FAA Airport Engineering Division March 1, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration Runway Safety.
Federal Aviation Administration Environmental Prescreening Training Module 3 Noise Review.
Twenty Questions Subject: Twenty Questions
1 Vince Galotti Chief/ATMICAO 27 March 2007 REGULATING THROUGH SAFETY PERFORMANCE TARGETS.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Functional Areas & Positions
Clinical Trial Agreements
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Visual 3.1 Delegation of Authority & Management by Objectives Unit 3: Delegation of Authority & Management by Objectives.
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
PSSA Preparation.
Airport Obstruction Issues And ASM GAA Workshop February 25, 2015 Presented by: Alan Hood, Georgia Department of Transportation Airport Safety Data Program.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration What’s New at the Flight Procedures Office Pennsylvania Airports Conference Jerry Lebar March 2,
Hershey Conference March 2008 Federal Aviation Administration 0 Hershey Conference March 2008 Federal Aviation Administration 0 Conducting Studies For.
WHAT AIRPORT MANAGERS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TERPS Association of California Airports Lake Tahoe, California September 10, 2014 QED Airport & Aviation Consultants.
Federal Aviation Administration Airport 20 to 1 Approach Surface Oklahoma Airport Operators Association, (OAOA)/ American Association of Airport Engineers,
Federal Aviation Administration Airport 20 to 1 Approach Surface & Restoring Night Minimums Georgia Airports Association (GAA) 2015 Annual Workshop Cindy.
Federal Aviation Administration What’s New In Instrument Flight Procedures Jerry Lebar, Eastern Flight Procedures Office March 3, 2010 Hershey Airports.
Federal Aviation Administration Obstructions 101 Protecting Your Approach Minimums Presented to: GAA Conference 2015 By: Cindy M. Hintz Date: October 14,
2015 GDOT PowerPoint Title Page Sub Titles Body Text Obstruction Evaluation “What are all these surfaces?” GAA Spring Conference February 19, 2016 Presented.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Teterboro Runway 19 Quiet Visual Approach Teterboro Users Group (TUG) Gerald Lynch, Eastern Service.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Obstacles in the Visual Segment 20:1 Background, Policies and Action Gerard G Lebar Eastern Flight.
2017 Annual Conference, South Lake Tahoe Rayvon Williams,
Presentation transcript:

Federal Aviation Administration Airport 20 to 1 Approach Surface Georgia Airports Association (GAA) Annual Workshop Cindy M Hintz Eastern Flight Procedures Team March 14, 2014

Federal Aviation Administration 2 20:1 Approach Penetrations Criteria developed by Flight Standards in the late 1990s Requires clear 20:1 approach surface for night minimums Visual aids (VGSI) such as VASI or PAPI were designated as a possible mitigation All terminal procedures are currently reviewed every two years, as required by AFS policy. During that periodic review, or other amendments, the TERPS Specialist in AeroNav Products may identify obstacles that penetrate the 20:1 visual surface.

Federal Aviation Administration 3 20:1 Penetrations (continued) Background: During Oct 2012, Flight Standards Division AFS-400 required immediate NOTAM action resulting in “Not Authorized (NA) at night when 20:1 identified. Current Policy: Effective Jan 6, 2014, refined policy considered “Risk” factor of the identified penetrations and allowing a validation period (30 days). Validation: To verify if the obstacle exists or has been removed, and/or if the obstacle is lighted.

Federal Aviation Administration 4 20 to 1 Approach Surface (TERPS)

Federal Aviation Administration 5

Federal Aviation Administration 6 20 to 1 Penetrations Identified/reported by various offices: EFPT, ANP, GDOT, FC and soon, Geographic Information System (GIS) tool - Mandatory biennial reviews / OKC ANP - During instrument procedure amdts Result in loss of night time capability Daytime visibility restricted to 1 SM

Federal Aviation Administration 7 Identification of 20 to 1 Penetrations Typical scenario: During biennial review of airport’s procedure(s) OKC development branch identifies non-validated penetrations. - - Specialist’s findings are forwarded to EFPT, assigning each penetration with risk assessment of high, medium or low. - - EFPT adds GoogleEarth overlay to the file (.kml)

Federal Aviation Administration 8 20 to 1 penetrations (cont) - - Within 3-business days, file is forwarded to airport requiring sponsor to validate each penetration ASAP, but no more than 30-days / ADO copied Airport owner/sponsor must provide a written report and copy ADO No response received within prescribed timeframe will result in IAP visibility minima and night capability as required.

Federal Aviation Administration 9 Airport Owner / Sponsor Response If 20 to 1 penetrations determined invalid - - EFPT will notify applicable offices to update airport’s data file(s); no action required to restrict or modify subject IAP. If 20 to 1 penetrations determined valid: - - Submit written compliance plan - - Remove, light or lower - - Actions taken per risk Assessment criteria

Federal Aviation Administration 10

Federal Aviation Administration 11

Federal Aviation Administration 12 Possible Mitigation Actions Visual Glideslope Indicator (VGSI) - Apt Mgr submits Form seeking AFS approval Apply ILS / LOC / LPV / LP Full-Scale Deflection - Calculation, conducted by ANP when trying to mitigate 20:1 penetration vs restricting night mins Restrict only CAT C/D approach category minimums vs restricting CAT A/B/C/D -If penetrations are outside CAT A/B area

Federal Aviation Administration 13 Mitigate by Aircraft Category Most common GA 20 to 1 issue - - Runway type often, e.g., BII - - Charted minima CAT C/D - - CAT A/B begins at +/- 200 FT - - CAT C/D begins at +/- 400 FT Airport cannot clear larger surface area - - Other mitigation N/A (VGSI/Deflection) - - Restrict CAT C/D minima only

Federal Aviation Administration 14 Jim Hamilton L.B. Owens (KCUB), SC RWY to 1 penetrations - Clearing project lasting several years - Received official notification - Provided compliance plan, VGSI checklist and initiated flight check within 30 day window - EFPT forwarded to OKC requesting temporary VGSI mitigation and requested OKC ANP perform check of full-scale deflection and evaluate CAT A/B vs CAT C/D penetration(s)

Federal Aviation Administration 15 VDP or DA

Federal Aviation Administration 16

Federal Aviation Administration 17

Federal Aviation Administration 18

Federal Aviation Administration 19

Federal Aviation Administration 20 Thank you Questions?

Federal Aviation Administration 21 Contact Info Cindy M Hintz Eastern Flight