Allowing Events To Be Used As Audits When RTEG Is Not Activated Robert B. BurkeNew Asset Auditing Discussions Principal AnalystSeptember 27, 2012 Market.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T&D Losses Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012.
Advertisements

Requirements for IBCS OS and IBCS Providers Robert B. Burke ISO New England, Inc. May 5, 2004.
Results and Implications of the First Forward Capacity Market Auction National Town Meeting on Demand Response June 3, 2008 Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand.
ISO New England Demand Resource Measurement & Verification Standards Manual Overview April 11, 2007 NAESB Development of DSM/EE Business Practices Washington,
NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
Pump Load as Spinning Reserve David Lemmons Senior Manager, Market Operations August 21, 2012.
DR Under FCM – Update Metering Configurations – Summary Registration Timeline and Examples FCM DR Asset Data Conversion Update Lemuel Gonzalez, Manager.
Demand Resource Operable Capacity Analysis – Assumptions for FCA 5.
Summary of Proposed Market Rules For Transition Period Price-Responsive Demand and Active Demand Resources in the Forward Capacity Market Henry Yoshimura,
FEBRUARY 14, 2013 RELIABILITY COMMITTEE MEETING Steve Weaver SYSTEM OPERATIONS In-Day Reserves & Supplemental Procurement.
National Town Meeting on Demand Response Session A – Estimate It, Measure It, Verify It Demand Response Coordinating Committee (DRCC) Renaissance Washington.
New England Developments in Demand Response and Smart Grid 2010 National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart Grid Henry Yoshimura, Director, Demand.
Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
Ramping and CMSC (Congestion Management Settlement Credit) payments.
IAS 8 - Accounting changes and errors. Academic Resource Center Accounting changes and errors Page 2 Executive summary ► Both IFRS and US GAAP have similar.
BPA Guidelines for Measurement & Verification of Energy Efficiency Measures Presented at Brown Bag Session November 29, 2006.
1 Demand Response Measurement & Verification Standards Development Project April 21, 2008 Paul Wattles, ERCOT Eric Winkler, Ph.D., ISO New England.
Q3 A-car starts accelerating with +5m/s^2 from still (i. e. v=0) when B-car moving with 10m/s is 10m behind. Is the B-car able to catch A- car ? a)yes;
Electricity Markets Overview Lo-Cal seminar, 09/21/2010.
NERC LTRA Update / CDR Capacity Counting Issues
Utility Analysis. Baseline Electricity Analysis  Understanding and documenting current energy use is called developing a baseline. Developing a baseline:
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Restructuring BUSINESS PROCESSES IN MAINE. Business Transactions Contracts Metering Usage History Enrollments & Drops Billing, Collections & Payments.
2011 Tax Levy Hearing Board of Education Meeting December 19,
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
BAL-001-TRE-1 Primary Frequency Response in the ERCOT Region
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
Reload PFV September 12, Reload PFV  Concern that need to be addressed:  The RC need to have an option in PFV to allow gradual reload of markets.
Learning Curves McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
5.1.  When we use the midpoint rule or trapezoid rule we can actually calculate the maximum error in the calculation to get an idea how much we are off.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
Hour Ahead Dispatchable Loads Applicable Updates to Procedures Presentation to the Market Operations Standing Committee April 23, 2003
TYPE OF ENERGY AUDIT Energy Audit can be classified into the following two types. i) Preliminary Audit ii) Detailed Audit The type of Energy Audit to.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
Weather Sensitive ERS Training Presenter: Carl Raish Weather Sensitive ERS Training Workshop April 5, 2013.
NEEA DEI Study Data Analysis Plan October 28, 2005 RLW Analytics, Inc. Roger L. Wright, Chairman, and Principal Consultant.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
© Property of ERCOT /17/20041 RTCA, CAM, and SFT Presented by: John Adams November 17, 2004.
NPRR 571 ERS Weather Sensitive Loads Requirements Carl Raish, ERCOT QSE Managers Working Group November 5, 2013.
Notes Over 2.3 The Graph of a Function Finding the Domain and Range of a Function. 1.Use the graph of the function f to find the domain of f. 2.Find the.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
MCWG Update to WMS 11/13/2013. MCWG Update to WMS General Update - October 30 th Joint MCWG/CWG Meeting Review September 25 Meeting Minutes - Approved.
The credit exposure impact of higher system-wide offer caps was estimated using an internal ERCOT model under four scenarios: 1.(Base Case) “Normal” summer.
Business Case NPRR 351 Floyd Trefny Amtec Consulting Brenda Crockett Champion Energy Services.
G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. Southwest Connecticut RFP Markets Committee November 14, 2003.
Solar Profiling Interstate Renewable Energy Council presentation to the ERCOT Profiling Working Group Jan. 22, 2008.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
Building Blocks for Premise Level Load Reduction Estimates ERCOT Loads in SCED v2 Subgroup July 21, 2014.
Update: 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS) Pilot Project Mark Patterson, ERCOT October 7, 2013.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.1 Financial & Managerial Accounting 2002e Belverd E. Needles, Jr. Marian Powers Susan Crosson.
Money and Banking Lecture 11. Review of the Previous Lecture Application of Present Value Concept Internal Rate of Return Bond Pricing Real Vs Nominal.
Metering and Measuring of Multi-Family Pool Pumps, Phase 1 March 10, 2016 Presented by Dan Mort & Sasha Baroiant ADM Associates, Inc.
AEMO: DR Mechanism Baseline Methodology DRM Working Group July 2013.
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Learning Objective © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. LO5 Estimate the cost of merchandise inventory.
JOINT WORKSHOP ON MULTIPLE-USE APPLICATIONS. AMS’S 50 MW FLEET FOR SO. CAL EDISON MULTIPLE USE CASE #5: BEHIND- THE-METER DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES.
Black Start Service in New England System Operator’s Perspective Robert B. Burke ISO New England Inc. July 23, 2002 IEEE - Chicago, Illinois.
Smart Grid Tariff Changes
Cengage – Century 21 Accounting -- Edited for Advanced Accounting
2017 Seasonal Adjustment Factors
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
SMUD - Whole Foods Energy Storage System
Emergency Response Service Baselines
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
Review of System Alerts
Financial Assets Chapter 7 Chapter 7: Financial Assets.
ISO New England System R&D Needs
Flexible Forward Contracts for Renewable Energy Generators
Managerial Accounting 2002e
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Presentation transcript:

Allowing Events To Be Used As Audits When RTEG Is Not Activated Robert B. BurkeNew Asset Auditing Discussions Principal AnalystSeptember 27, 2012 Market Development

Issue Under the existing simultaneous audit requirement, the assets of a RTDR resource activated for an actual event would not be able to use that event as an audit if the RTEG assets associated with the same facility were not activated at the same time. –RTDR resources are activated pursuant to OP-4, Action 2. –RTEG resources are activated pursuant to OP-4, Action 6. –Extremely rare for OP-4, Actions 2 and 6 to be in effect simultaneously. New Asset Auditing Concept © 2012 ISO New England Inc. 2

Purpose of Proposal Develop a methodology to manage the use of RTDR activations used as a seasonal audit and to accurately estimate the additional load that an RTEG asset at the same facility can take off the New England power grid. –RTDR assets would be dispatched before RTEG assets when OP-4 is implemented. –The additional load that an RTEG asset could take off the system after the RTDR is dispatched will be less than the total facility load prior to OP-4. –Auditing the RTEG separately from the RTDR may overstate the additional load that the RTEG could take off the New England power grid under actual OP-4 conditions. New Asset Auditing Concept © 2012 ISO New England Inc. 3

Classic Example – RTDR & RTEG Baseline and Performance New Asset Auditing Concept © 2012 ISO New England Inc. 4 5-Minute Interval Performance Period

Proposed Performance Calculation How can RTEG performance be accurately estimated (neither under- nor over-estimated) when RTDR is activated and not RTEG? Calculate RTEG imputed performance –Take the average total reduction from last like simultaneous seasonal audit –Calculate average reductions provided by RTDR during the event –The difference equals the RTEG imputed performance: Average total reduction from last like simultaneous seasonal audit - Average reduction provided by RTDR during the event = RTEG imputed performance RTEG imputed performance –Cannot exceed the average reduction provided by RTEG from last like simultaneous seasonal audit. –Cannot be less than zero. –Cannot exceed Total Facility Load (includes push back during PRD transition). New Asset Auditing Concept © 2012 ISO New England Inc. 5

Real Performance New Asset Auditing Concept © 2012 ISO New England Inc. 6

Example of Performance Calculation Total performance during simultaneous audit in a previous year: –Average total reductions provided by asset = 122 kW –Average reduction provided by RTDR = 50 kW –Average reduction provided by RTEG = 72 kW Compute RTEG imputed performance: –Take average total reduction from last like simultaneous seasonal audit (i.e., 122 kW) –Calculate average reductions provided by RTDR during the event –The difference equals the RTEG imputed performance: Average total reduction from last like simultaneous seasonal audit - Average reduction provided by RTDR during the event = RTEG imputed performance Examples: Higher RTDR PerformanceLower RTDR Performance 122 kW previous simultaneous audit - 75 kW RTDR current performance - 40 kW RTDR current performance 47 kW RTEG imputed performance 72 kW RTEG imputed performance (Note: maximum cap applies) New Asset Auditing Concept © 2012 ISO New England Inc. 7

Intent of Proposed Design Allows providers to use RTDR events as their seasonal audit and to establish boundaries for the RTEG assets potential performance where both assets are located behind the same retail delivery point, but not audited simultaneously. The methodology accurately estimates the additional load that an RTEG asset at the same facility can take off the New England power grid given that RTDR assets would be dispatched before RTEG assets when OP-4 is implemented. RTEG must still perform a seasonal audit. New Asset Auditing Concept © 2012 ISO New England Inc. 8

Questions New Asset Auditing Concept © 2012 ISO New England Inc. 9