Research Methods in Crime and Justice Chapter 3 The Ethical Principles that Guide Researchers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ethics BHV 390: Research Methods Kimberly Porter Martin, Ph.D.
Advertisements

Allyn & Bacon 2003 Social Work Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches Topic 5: Ethics and Politics in Social Work Research.
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Evaluation and Human Subjects Research Julie M. Aultman, Ph.D. Chair, Institutional Review Board Associate Professor, Family and Community Medicine Northeast.
RESEARCH ETHICS Research Methods University of Massachusetts at Boston ©2011 William Holmes 1.
1 Ch. 3: Becoming an Ethical Researcher (pp )
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
BHS Methods in Behavioral Sciences I May 28, 2003 Chapter 14 (Ray) Ethics.
Conducting Ethical Research Slides Prepared by Alison L. O’Malley Passer Chapter 3.
Research Ethics The American Psychological Association Guidelines
Behavioral Research Chapter Three Ethical Research.
THE ETHICS OF HUMAN PARTICIPANT RESEARCH Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University.
1 CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH ETHICS ETHICS: “The study of right and wrong conduct” (Dooley, 2001) “… from the Greek word ethos, meaning ‘custom.’ … refers.
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
Ethics in Research.
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.
Ethics and Politics of Social Research
Ethics in research involving human subjects
Chapter 3 Ethics in research.
Ethics in Social Research
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Ethics and Informed Consent
SOCW 671 #3 Research Ethics and Diversity. Class Session Objectives Selecting and informing persons participating in research Preventing and detecting.
The Goals and Principles of Human Participant Protection Part 4: Vulnerable Populations.
Ethical Concerns in Research
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Ethics and Research Chapter Four.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Making Sense of the Social World 4th Edition
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research. Ethics in Nursing Research Scientific Misconduct – a fabrication, falsification, plagiarism or other practice that.
Ethics in Research: APA code & Review Boards. Definition the study of proper action Morality right versus wrong it is the shared responsibility of the.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Chapter 5 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research.
Ethics & Research Dr. Guerette. Defining Ethics Deal with matters of right and wrong. Deal with matters of right and wrong. May be defined as behavior.
Institutional Review Board Protecting Human Research Subjects.
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research Back to Class 2.
ETHICS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
Objective 9/23/15 Today we will be completing our research methods unit & begin reviewing for the upcoming unit assessment 9/25. Agenda: -Turn in all homework.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Ethics: Doing the Right Thing
Ethics in Business Research
Chapter 10 Research in the Schools: Ethical-Legal Issues Jacob, Decker, & Hartshorne 1.
M6728 Ethics in Research Informed Consent/IRBs Reporting Research Results.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Statistical Fundamentals: Using Microsoft Excel for Univariate and Bivariate Analysis Alfred P. Rovai Data Ethics PowerPoint Prepared by Alfred P. Rovai.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 7 Ethics in Nursing Research.
Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Program Evaluation. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Federal mandate for IRBs –Concern during 1970s about unethical research.
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.
The Ethics of Communication Research. Conducting Research Ethically Participation must be voluntary Participation must be voluntary Participants must.
Chapter 3: Ethical guidelines for psychological research.
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
Chapter 3 Ethics in Research
Ethics in Social Psychology
CHAPTER 2 Ethics in Psychological Research
Chapter 5 Research Ethics
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE CONDUCT OF HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH
BE-5305 Ethics in Research.
Ethics: Doing the Right Thing
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 14
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 14
Presentation transcript:

Research Methods in Crime and Justice Chapter 3 The Ethical Principles that Guide Researchers

Ethics in Social Science Research Social science researchers are obliged to improve the human condition through research. Ethical behavior is often determined by the particular circumstances of a research project. There are, however, seven enduring ethical principles that should guide researchers.

Principle 1: Do No Harm Neither the research process nor the researcher should do anything that would put another person at risk of harm. – Physical harm – Psychological harm – Legal harm Researchers should develop contingencies to mitigate potential harm and even abandon potentially harmful research projects.

Principle 2: Ensure Privacy Privacy is the right to be left alone. In research we differentiate between two types of privacy. – Confidentiality – that researchers know but agree not to divulge the identity of research subjects. – Anonymity – occurs when the researcher does not and cannot know the identity of research subjects.

Principle 3: Obtain Voluntary and Informed Consent Research subjects must consent to participate in research projects. Consent must be; – Voluntary – subjects are completely free to participate or not participate without threat, and – Informed – subjects are told what is expected of them and the risks associated with the research.

Principle 4: Get Permission Researchers must seek and obtain permission to access research subjects. Vulnerable populations – comprised of individuals who are less able to manage their own affairs. – Children – Mentally ill – Inmates Additional safeguards must be in place when working with a vulnerable population.

Principle 5: Avoid Sponsorship Bias and Suppression Sponsorship bias – occurs when the sponsor of a research project attempts to influence the study’s design of interpretation of the data for the sponsor’s own benefit. Suppression – occurs when a research sponsor fails to disclose findings that shed an unfavorable light on the sponsor’s products or services.

Principle 6: Prevent Misrepresentation Occurs in many forms – Misrepresentation – is purposeful lying. – Research fraud – is an extreme form of misrepresentation that may involved lying about or fabricating data and research findings. – Plagiarism – a form of misrepresentation involving the presentation of another person’s intellectual property as one’s own. – Deception – occurs when a researcher lends credibility to an unscrupulously produce research project.

Principle 7: Ensure the Safety of Researchers Extends the do no harm principle to researchers and their assistants. Criminal justice researchers often find themselves in the presence of dangerous people and situations. Researchers should develop contingency plans to insure their safety as well as that of their assistants.

Minimizing Ethical Dilemmas Most of the ethical principles have been codified into legislation, regulations and codes of conduct. Collectively, these rules represent the minimum standard of ethical conduct.

Legislation and Policy Oversight Researchers are bound by; – International treaties, – Federal laws and regulations, and – Institutional procedures. When their research involves collecting data from human subjects.

Institutional Review Boards Institutional review boards (IRBs) – Supported by most universities and research organizations. – Staffed with experienced researchers. – Review proposed research to be sure the human subjects involved will not be harmed by the research.

Levels of an IRB Review The intensity of an IRB review is determined by the potential harm the research project could have on humans. – Expedited review – occur when very little potential for harm is anticipated (e.g. an anonymous survey). – Full reviews – occur when the proposed research could cause substantial harm to the human subjects involved (e.g. requesting highly personal information from research subjects).

Codes of Ethics Many scholarly, academic and professional organizations publish codes of ethics. These codes govern the research behavior of their members.

Getting to the Point Social science researchers should be concerned about ethics because ultimately their obligation is to improve the human condition through research. What constitutes ethical behavior often depends on the particular circumstances of individual research projects.

Getting to the Point The principle of doing no harm means that researchers should never subject research participants to physical danger, cause them psychological harm or expose them to legal liability. Researchers should build contingencies into the research plan to prevent or mitigate potential harm. In extreme cases, they should abandon the research project altogether.

Getting to the Point Privacy means the right to be left alone and free from public scrutiny. There are two types of privacy in research. – Confidentiality means that the researcher knows who the research subjects are, but does not disclose their identity to others. – Anonymity means that nobody, not even the researcher, knows the identity of the research subjects.

Getting to the Point Researchers must obtain consent from research subjects prior to collecting information from them. This consent must be given; – Voluntarily meaning that the research subjects must be completely free to participate or not participate without threat, and – Informed meaning that the researcher must inform the research subjects about the research and any risks associated with participation in the research.

Getting to the Point Researchers must seek and obtain permission to work with individuals who are considered vulnerable by virtue of their diminished capacity to direct their own affairs. Vulnerable populations include children, the mentally ill, the infirm, the elderly and prisoners.

Getting to the Point Sponsorship bias occurs when the sponsor of a research project attempts to influence the study design or interpretation of data for its own benefit. Suppression occurs when a research sponsor fails to disclose findings that shed an unfavorable light on the sponsor’s products or services.

Getting to the Point Research misrepresentation involves lying about data, results and authorship in research. Research fraud is fabricating research data or results. Plagiarism is presenting the intellectual property of another as your own Deception is lending one’s name and/or reputation to a research project that one does not know much about.

Getting to the Point The principle of doing no harm extends to the safety of researchers. Research supervisors should ensure the physical, psychological and legal safety of researchers. Researchers have an ethical obligation to report criminal activity that could cause harm to themselves or others.

Getting to the Point Researchers are subject to numerous international treaties, federal and state laws, and institutional regulations that are designed to protect human research subjects.

Getting to the Point Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) review research proposals that involve human subjects. The level of scrutiny depends on the potential for human harm.

Getting to the Point Many professional organizations and most universities publish formally written codes of ethics. These codes are intended to provide guidance to professionals and members of organizations on how to behave ethically.

Research Methods in Crime and Justice Chapter 3 The Ethical Principles that Guide Researchers