David C. Paris, Executive Director New Leadership Alliance for Student Learning and Accountability Professor of Government Hamilton College Zaneeta E.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

Understanding MSCHE Expectations for Governance Ellie A. Fogarty, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education 2010 Annual Conference Philadelphia,
Cathy Jordan, PhD Associate Professor of Pediatrics Director, Children, Youth and Family Consortium University of Minnesota Member, Community Campus Partnerships.
The Future of the Academy– Societal Changes; Accreditation; Accountability APLG/FSA 2008: Strategies for a Complex World Jon Wergin Antioch University.
. . . a step-by-step guide to world-class internal auditing
Service to the University, Discipline and Community Academic Promotions Briefing Session Chair, Academic Board Peter McCallum.
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
THE NEW LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE FOR STUDENT LEARNING AND ACCOUNTABILITY DAVID C. PARIS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PROFESSOR OF GOVERNMENT, HAMILTON COLLEGE PROFESSIONAL.
Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year Defining and Measuring Excellence in the Beginning College Experience Betsy O. Barefoot & John N.
Service to the University, Discipline and Community Academic Promotions Briefing Session Chair, Academic Board Peter McCallum.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
The Role of the National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation (NAQAAE) in Egyptian Education   The National Authority for Quality Assurance.
Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards 77th Annual Congress Orlando, Florida Accreditation 101 & Panel Discussion Saturday May 3, :00 – 10:00.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Office of Academic Affairs June 1, 2007 Academic Priorities: Next Steps Spring Symposium 2007.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
CRICOS Provider No 00025B Strategies for enhancing teaching and learning: Reflections from Australia Merrilyn Goos Director Teaching and Educational Development.
Moving Forward with Student Learning Assessment Linda Suskie Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education University of Nevada Las Vegas.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Essential Concepts for School for Prevention First Patricia Berry, M.A. CSAP Essential Concepts for School m 1 BUILDING THE 5 ESSENTIAL.
SLIDE 1 Innovations Conference March SLIDE 2 The National Lone Star Report Aligning Technology with Student Success.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
DIXIE STATE UNIVERSITY The Faculty Role in Student Retention
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Quality Breakfast/ Tea April 1 – 8:30 am April 3 – 4:00pm.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Evolving Oregon Educational Policy Courtesy of Pat Burk, Ph.D. Department of Educational.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
Promoting the Success of a New Academic Librarian Through a Formal Mentoring Program The State University of West Georgia Experience By Brian Kooy and.
MSCHE Expectations for Governance Mary Ellen Petrisko, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education Annual Conference December 12, 2011.
Inspiring Oregonians… to do what it takes to make our schools among the nation’s best.
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
2009 Pitt Community College CCSSE Results September 21, 2009 Report to the Campus College CCSSE Results Pitt Community College Dr. Brian Miller, Assistant.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
OUR MOVEMENT: UNDERSTANDING THE BIG PICTURE. 2 OVERVIEW Theory of Change Programmatic Approach.
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
Overview What do we mean by a Learning Organisation? Why did we develop a People Development Framework? What was the process involved in building the.
Appalachian State University Strategic Planning November 2, 2012 A look at the Higher Education landscape.
Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015.
Western Carolina University Office of Assessment A Division of the Office of the Provost.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Assessment Presentation Day For Faculty Cindy J. Speaker, Ph.D. Wells College August 21, 2006.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
Monitoring and Oversight: College Completion and Attainment Dr. Kevin Reilly & Dr. Sheila Stearns AGB Consultants December 7th, 2015.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Tempus project UM JEP “QUASYS” University of Zagreb Prof. Helena Jasna Mencer, Ph. D. Coordinator “Development of Quality Assurance System in.
KSU’s Quality Enhancement Plan.  Current Core Requirement 2.12  The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1)
Human Resources Office of 1 Summary of Results College of Design Dean’s Reports.
AACN – Manatt Study In February 2015, the AACN Board of Directors commissioned Manatt Health to conduct a study on how to position academic nursing to.
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
CSWE Overview This resource highlights key aspects of the mission of the Commission on Research and its goals for the next 5 years. It will then.
PROFESSIONAL NURSING ORGANIZATIONS
HLC Criterion Two Primer Tuesday Sept. 8, Criterion Two. Integrity: Ethical and Responsible Conduct The institution acts with integrity; its conduct.
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Principles of Good Governance
Accreditation 101 Tim Brown, ACCJC Commissioner
Why some schools succeed ?
Presentation transcript:

David C. Paris, Executive Director New Leadership Alliance for Student Learning and Accountability Professor of Government Hamilton College Zaneeta E. Daver, Associate Director New Leadership Alliance for Student Learning and Accountability Keeping the Focus on Quality

WEBINAR: WHAT YOU SEE

WEBINAR: INTERACT WITH US Open and hide your control panel Join audio Submit questions Raise your hand

WEBINAR GOALS 1.Answer the question, Why is keeping the focus on quality important? 2.Introduce the New Leadership Alliance for Student Learning & Accountability 3.Discuss Committing to Quality: Guidelines for Assessment and Accountability in Higher Education 4.Explain how to become a member of the Presidents’ Alliance

PRESSURE ON HIGHER EDUCATION Two questions you should always ask… The history question: How did we reach this point, come to consider a problem or proposal? What were people thinking…? The conceptual/political question: What is the problem for which this (policy, proposal, organization…) is an appropriate response or even a solution?

A BIT OF HISTORY WHY THIS, WHY NOW?:. the Feds A golden age (sorta) in American higher education ( ): expansion, opportunity/meritocracy, fiscal support, political deference, and self-regulation via accreditation. Growing dissatisfaction ( ): cost/waste, ideological antagonism, constrained finances/tax resistance, new demographics, questions about quality…..Pew survey-- “crisis of confidence”? Reauthorizations as occasions for criticisms, possible regulation.

The Spellings Commission report (2006): A Nation at Risk goes to college and flirts with No Child Left Behind (testing, testing). Raising the question of quality. A narrow escape - Lamar Alexander and his warning, “If colleges and universities do not accept more responsibility for assessment and accountability, the federal government will do it for them.” Quality as a central concern: key to persistence and completion, cost and access— meaningful degrees and the value proposition. Legitimate questions of quality, stewardship, and authority, “Are Students Learning?” (they might not be). What should “WE” do? Who are “WE” anyway? A BIT OF HISTORY WHY THIS, WHY NOW?:. the Feds

WHY HAVEN’T “WE” RESPONDED? structure and culture

WHY HAVEN’T “WE” RESPONDED? a decentralized, diverse, diffuse industry

WHY HAVEN’T “WE” RESPONDED? autonomy among and within institutions (academic freedom, collegial governance )

WHY HAVEN’T “WE” RESPONDED? THE GANDHI PROBLEM: CUI BONO? Reporter: What do you think of Western civilization? Gandhi: I think it would be a good idea.

WHY HAVEN’T “WE” RESPONDED? professional definitions and two kinds of doctors

THE PROFESSORS’ PROFESSION? AAUP 1940 “Statement of Principles,” self-regulation and tenure: the academic as judge/scholar and appropriate professional norms. What kind of profession are we now? The scholar and teacher in a future of mass higher education? The need for norms appropriate to our profession as it is now and will be. The need for norms that focus on the quality of student learning. A (teaching) profession with assessment and accountability as paths to professionalism.

SO WHY HAVEN’T “WE” RESPONED? Not enough “we”—too much pluribus, not enough unum, concerning quality and accountability. Lack of common understandings in the profession around the teaching role and its relationship to evidence—privatized, fragmented instruction and assessment. Inevitable tensions between conflicting demands, assessment vs. accountability. THUS The temptation to regulate via or apart from accreditation. Who governs “us”?

KEEPING THE FOCUS ON QUALITY What are “we” going to do about the threat of regulation and the demands for assessment and accountability (quality assurance)? January-May 2008: AAC&U and CHEA publish and promote the publication, New Leadership for Student learning and Accountability: A Statement of Principles, Commitments to Action. October 2008-March 2009: Now what? Who’s “we”? Creating an Alliance to answer the question, “Are students Learning?”

THE ALLIANCE The New Leadership Alliance for Student Learning and Accountability leads the higher education community in calling for voluntary efforts to gather, use, and publicly report evidence of student learning at U.S. colleges and universities. Members of the Alliance’s board of directors lead organizations that represent thousands of colleges and universities.

READ, SHARE, DISCUSS & USE Committing to Quality: Guidelines for Assessment and Accountability in Higher Education provides colleges and universities with a framework for using evidence- based improvement to improve student learning. By following the guidelines, a college or university can establish an institution-wide assessment plan that will allow them to demonstrate the quality of the degrees it offers and reaffirm the value of graduating from the institution. Committing to Quality is endorsed by 33 national higher education organizations that represent thousands of colleges and universities. More than 15,000 copies have been distributed and it is available for free on the Alliance’s website.

COMMITTING TO QUALITY Is your institution setting ambitious goals?

COMMITTING TO QUALITY Is your institution gathering evidence of student learning?

COMMITTING TO QUALITY Is your institution using evidence to improve student learning?

COMMITTING TO QUALITY Is your institution reporting evidence and results?

MAKE A PUBLIC COMMITMENT The Presidents’ Alliance for Excellence in Student Learning and Accountability is a group of more than 100 college and university presidents who believe that it is important to ensure that college degrees reflect a high level of student achievement. Institutions commit, by establishing yearly Action Plans and reporting on progress, to improving strong assessment and accountability practices so that they are fully integrated into the culture of their campuses.

PRESIDENTS’ ALLIANCE Encouraging excellence in undergraduate education in preparation for work, life, and responsible citizenship as a core commitment of your institution. Recognizing the need to establish, strengthen, and integrate assessment practices that support continuous improvement of student learning. Being a part of collaborative initiative that will work towards improving the higher education system by influencing thinking and positively changing practices nationally.

PRESIDENTS’ ALLIANCE Commitment Text As a member of the Presidents’ Alliance for Excellence in Student Learning and Accountability, my institution commits to improve significantly its assessment of, and accountability for, student learning outcomes. The faculty and administrators on my campus recognize the need to establish, strengthen, and integrate assessment practices that support continuous improvement of student learning in order to ensure educational excellence. As a member of the Alliance, I will also take leadership on these issues to help organize and mobilize the higher education community in ways that influence thinking and positively change practices nationally.

PRESIDENTS’ ALLIANCE Commitment Text Excellence in undergraduate education in preparation for work, life, and responsible citizenship is a core commitment for my institution, and for that reason the leadership, faculty, and administrators at my institution commit to: Make continuous improvement of student learning assessment and student learning a priority on our campus. Establish new and strengthen existing assessment practices, as indicated in our Action Plan, in order to integrate student learning assessment into the culture of our institution. Use assessment findings when making decisions about educational improvement efforts. Join the appropriate reporting template for our institutional type and/or participate in externally benchmarked data collection processes. Work with the New Leadership Alliance for Student Learning and Accountability to share and publicize our work. In this spirit, I am pleased to join the Presidents’ Alliance for Excellence in Student Learning and Accountability.

PRESIDENTS’ ALLIANCE Steps to becoming a member 1.Assign a liaison. 2.Create a profile in our online Membership and Reporting System. 3.Complete an institutional profile. 4.Complete an audit of your institution’s current efforts. 5.Complete an Action Plan which describes what your institution will commit to improving over the next year. The Action Plan includes setting goals for improvement over the next 12 months and describing the steps that will be taken to accomplish those goals. 6.Submit a commitment Form signed by the institution’s CEO.

LOOK FOR FUTURE INITIATIVES Self-assessment Tool How good is your institutional assessment process? Certification Recognition for an excellent institutional assessment process. Universal Reporting Template The next generation of current templates that all institutions can use.

JOIN US QUESTIONS?

JOIN US To stay connected to the Alliance and receive our newsletter please visit and click on the “Get Involved” tab. We are also on Facebook and LinkedIn. STAY CONNECTED TO THE ALLIANCE