Assessment Boards and Assessment Regulations Board Terms of Reference Secretary’s role.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Changes to the Assessment Procedures Manual for Quality and Standards Office.
Advertisements

Departmental/Divisional Administrator Briefing
External Examiners’ Conference Context Professor Mary Watkins.
External Examining at Keele University
External Examiners’ Conference Context Professor Pauline Kneale Pro-Vice Chancellor, Teaching and Learning.
Operation of Central Progression and Award Boards Laurence Fuller Head of Student Records and Examinations Planning and Academic Administration.
Operation of Subject Examination Boards Sarah Lane Senior School Manager, School of Law.
EXTERNAL EXAMINERS’ INDUCTION 20 NOVEMBER 2013.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY CONTINUOUS AUDIT BRIEFING Quality Assurance Services.
External Examiners’ Briefing  Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
Friday, April 17, 20151MA Academic Practice Assessment Regulations 2011 / 2012 Peggy Cooke Head of Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement.
Operation of Central Progression and Award Boards Laurence Fuller Head of Student Records and Examinations Planning and Academic Administration.
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners February 2013
Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS Faculty / Quality Assurance Services.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services.
Assessment Boards External Examiner Training 13 May 2015.
Programme Leader’s event The framework and progression.
The External Examiner at Anglia Ruskin Anglia Ruskin’s Organisational Structure 5 faculties 29 departments 50+ programmes numerous pathways and modules.
External Examiners Induction
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
Edinburgh Napier University External Examiner Induction & Training Session April 27 th 2015 Caroline Turnbull, Assistant Dean, Faculty of Engineering,
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Cheating, Plagiarism and Unfair Practice Franchise Delivery Quality Assurance Services.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS FOR ACADEMIC STAFF Quality Assurance Services.
Operation of Subject Examination Boards Sarah Lane Senior School Manager, School of Law March 2015.
Institutional Overview of Quality Frameworks, Quality Assurance and Enhancement Dr Anne Craven, Head of Quality and Academic Partnerships 25/04/2014.
OCNLR arrangements for final external moderation and the AVA awards board Summer 2010.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
Information for External Examiners involved in Academic Collaborative Provision - 12 Nov 2014.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
External examiner induction Alison Coates QA Manager (Validation & Review)
Cheating, Plagiarism Unfair Practiceaterials Quality Assurance Services Collaborations and Partnerships Group.
OPERATION OF ASSESSMENT BOARDS Academic year 2012/2013.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
The Role of the Internal and External Evaluators in Student Assessment Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic.
Student and Academic Services Implementation of the Senate Regulations for Assessment & Award Open Briefings for Colleges 3-9 May 2013.
External Examiners’ Seminar 2011/12 Academic Regulations Lynn Jones Regulations, Assessment and Awards Manager Academic Registry.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Assessment in DE contexts.
© University of South Wales The Academic Standards and Quality Framework: An Introduction Hayley Burns Head of Quality Unit.
Forum for New External Examiners. Enid Ashdown, Principal Administrator, Academic Quality Alan Gregg, Academic Coordinator, Academic Quality Vashti Hutton,
EXTERNAL EXAMINERS’ INDUCTION February - March 2017
External Examining Induction Event for new Examiners February 2017
Examination Boards – briefing for secretaries
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
External Examiner Workshop Subject / School Boards
Postgraduate Examination Board Briefing
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
Duties of External Examiner
Examination Board Briefing
External Examiners Induction
Taught Award Regulations
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
External Examiners’ Briefing
External Examiner Induction
External examining at Solent university
External Examiners Induction Academic Regulations
Their role within Schools and Colleges
Compliance, Policy and Regulations
Progression and Advancement
Their role within Schools and Colleges
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
External Examiners Induction Academic Regulations
Validation Programme Developers
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners March 2014
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Boards and Assessment Regulations Board Terms of Reference Secretary’s role

Appointment of Secretary Heads of Faculty / Campus SAS (or nominee) will ensure that Secretaries are –appointed to Assessment Boards –trained in assessment processes and the University Regulations

Appointment of Board Chairs Deans of Faculty (or equivalent) will nominate Chairs of Assessment Boards, who will be senior academics of the University Deans will ensure that Chairs of Assessment Boards are trained to undertake the role

Membership – Unit Boards The Chair, a senior member of academic staff (Head of Department or Principal Lecturer), nominated by the Dean The Subject External Examiner(s) for each programme / course owned by the Unit Assessment Board The Programme/ Course Leader(s) for programme / course owned by the Board as representatives of all the units owned by the programme / course

Terms of Reference – Unit Boards To confirm that student assessment has been conducted in accordance with the University’s Assessment Regulations and criteria published to students in unit guides To confirm that moderation processes have been employed in the setting and marking of assessment To approve unit assessment results for all students enrolled and registered for units belonging to the Board To ensure that reassessment arrangements are determined for students who need to redeem failure To provide a summary of unit performance based on statistics generated from the SRS Assessment Module in order to allow the comparison of performance of units and for use in the Continuous Monitoring process Where appropriate, to nominate students for prizes and to report to the relevant Progression and Awards Board To ensure summary accounts are made of the business of the Boards

Responsibilities at Unit Boards All members shall prepare for and attend scheduled meetings and undertake any actions required of them by the Board The Chair of the Board shall follow up any actions deemed necessary by the Board prior to the Progression and Awards Board The Programme/Course Leader shall work with Unit Coordinators and F/C staff to ensure the completeness and accuracy of all marks prior to the meeting of the Unit Results Board. S/he will monitor progress with marks entry, ensuring SRS Assessment Module is updated as soon as work is marked, and will follow up any missing marks The Secretary shall ensure the necessary updates to the SRS Assessment Module records for marks/grades identified at the Board and shall provide a record of the business of the Board. S/he shall assist the Chair to finalise any actions and updates necessary before the Progression and Awards Board and forward any nominations for prizes to the Progression and Awards Board

Documentation required by Unit Boards Documentary requirements include –a record of Chair’s actions since the last meeting –a copy of the University Regulations for Undergraduate and Taught Postgraduate Programmes of Study –the Unit Results Board Reports for all units owned by the Board –the data sets for each unit provided by the SRS Assessment Module including median and interquartile range

Membership Progression & Award Boards The Chair, a senior member of academic staff (normally a Head of Department), nominated by the Dean The Award External Examiner for each set of programmes / courses owned by the Progression and Award Board Programme / Course Leader for programmes / courses owned by the Board Examination or Assessment Officers where appropriate

Terms of Reference Progression and Award Boards General: To confirm that University and Programme/Course regulations have been applied consistently and fairly for all students undertaking study on programmes/courses belonging to the Board To agree condonement for students who meet the conditions To provide opportunities for the monitoring of quality and standards through the consideration of data in relation to progression and achievement To apply decisions made by the relevant Exceptional Factor Panel(s) To apply decisions made by the relevant Assessment Disciplinary Committee

Terms of Reference Progression and Award Boards Progression : To confirm resit prescriptions for students unable to proceed, taking into account any condonements To confirm a student’s right to progress on the programme / course for which s/he is enrolled To consider progression and condonement statistics for programmes / courses belonging to the Board and recommend future strategy, where appropriate To review performance trends

Terms of Reference Progression and Award Boards Award: To confirm each student’s award and classification To consider student achievement using classification statistics To agree the recommendation of an interim award for students unable to achieve their award aim under the University / Programme / Course Regulations To confirm recipients of prizes

Responsibilities of Progression and Award Boards All members shall prepare for and attend scheduled meetings, shall be proficient in the course and University Assessment Regulations for students whose profiles will be examined and shall undertake any actions required of them by the Board The Secretary shall provide a record of actions agreed by the Board and make changes to the SRS Assessment Module records as required by the Board The Senior F/C SAS Officer shall ensure the formal endorsement of decisions shall be obtained from the External Examiner of the Progression and Award Board (Tier 2) The Chair shall report to the Head of Faculty and Campus SAS the names of recipients of Faculty or Department prizes

Documentation required by Progression and Award Boards Documentary requirements include –a record of Chair’s actions since the last meeting –a copy of the University Regulations for Undergraduate and Taught Postgraduate Programmes of Study –profiles of the performance for all students gaining awards or progressing on courses owned by the Board

Role of Secretary Key responsibilities: To establish the dates of meetings in advance at the start of each academic year, arrange the meetings and inform the members To make all administrative arrangements for the Board including liaison with the External Examiner To circulate standard agendas to all members prior to the Board To check the completeness of profiles for students before the Board meets To prepare and provide all Board documentation including: –To provide all Board members with a Board Report of unit marks –To retain a version of the Board Report detailing all unit and element marks available to the Board for consultation where necessary To produce a record of actions agreed by the Board and make changes to the SRS Assessment Module records as required by the Board To record the conditions of re-assessment To prepare results letters

Role of Chair (1) The Chair should be a senior member of academic staff with excellent knowledge of the regulations and assessment policy Key responsibilities: To ensure all members of the Board are properly briefed To liaise closely with Secretary to ensure that the marks presented are full and correct To ensure that the External Examiner has seen an appropriate sample of the assessed work of the students To ensure discussion takes place about the performance on units and awards, taking into account the views of the External Examiner To guide the Board towards clear recommendations / decisions To consider and initiate such actions as s/he thinks necessary on advice given by the External Examiners

Role of Chair (2) Key responsibilities: In close collaboration with Secretary, ensure that marks and award recommendations as confirmed by the Board are prepared and checked Following the Board to check and approve the reports as a true record of the proceedings To ensure that the students receive appropriate notification of the results To raise any points of procedure with the Senior Faculty and Campus SAS

Chair’s Action Very exceptionally, there may be a need for the Unit Results Board or a Progression and Awards Board to take action to amend or confirm a decision after the Board meets In such circumstances the Chair may act on behalf of the Board to ensure that requisite University documentation is completed A summary of actions taken in this way should be reported to the next meeting of the Board The circumstances when Chair’s Action may be taken are detailed within the ‘Guidelines for the Operation of Chair’s Action in Assessment Boards’ The procedures and reporting conventions to be followed for Chair’s Action are also outlined in this document

UG Regulations* commonly clarified Assessment Regulation: B4 Progression Regulations: B6, B9 & B10 Reassessment Regulations: B12, B13, B16, B17& B18 Section C: Award and Classification –Bachelor’s degrees with Hons –Awards other than the Bachelor’s degree with Hons *Level 3 & Level 4 (except BA (Hons) Architecture) of UG Programmes Study and Level 5 of BA (Hons) Public Services

UG Regulations* commonly clarified Section E.1, paragraph 1.2 Section E.2, paragraphs 2.5, 2.8 & 2.11 Section E.3, paragraphs 3.1, 3.3, 3.6, 3.12 & 3.13 Section F.1, paragraphs 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6 & 1.7 Section F.2, paragraphs 2.2, 2.4, 2.5 & 2.6 *Level 4 of BA (Hons) Architecture and Level 5 (except BA (Hons) Public Services) and Level 6 of UG Programmes of Study

Tier 1 Board documentation Board Report R:\SAS\Faculty&CampusSAS\ASSC\SMT\Assessment Boards\Mock Board documents\1.Faculty Tier 1 Board Report For 454Z% F Train 1112.pdf Unit Performance Report –noted at the end of the Board to highlight issues that might need further discussion at Programme Committees and should feed into the Continuous Monitoring process R:\SAS\Faculty&CampusSAS\ASSC\SMT\Assessment Boards\Mock Board documents\2.Faculty Tier 1 Unit Performance Report F_454Z%_2011_12.pdf Board can only make recommendations not decisions

Tier 2 Board documentation (1) Progression Report for each level of each course (EQAL & non-EQAL) –PP (Pass & Proceed) & REF1 (Referred 1 st Resit, Aug/Sept) R:\SAS\Faculty&CampusSAS\ASSC\SMT\Assessment Boards\Mock Board documents\6.Faculty Tier 2 Progression Report PP REF F 1011.pdf –Decision Required R:\SAS\Faculty&CampusSAS\ASSC\SMT\Assessment Boards\Mock Board documents\7.Faculty Tier 2 Progression Report Decision Required F 1011.pdf

Tier 2 Board documentation (2) Course Progression Performance Report (EQAL & non-EQAL) –noted at the end of the Board to highlight issues that might need further discussion at Programme Committees and should feed into the Continuous Monitoring process R:\SAS\Faculty&CampusSAS\ASSC\SMT\Assessment Boards\Mock Board documents\8.Faculty Tier 2 Progression Performance Report F 1011_Train[1].pdf Classification Report 1 and Report 2 R:\SAS\Faculty&CampusSAS\ASSC\SMT\Assessment Boards\Mock Board documents\9.Faculty Tier 2 Classification Report F 1011.pdf R:\SAS\Faculty&CampusSAS\ASSC\SMT\Assessment Boards\Mock Board documents\10.Faculty Tier 2 Classification Report F 1011.pdf Award Performance Report –noted at the end of the Board to highlight issues that might need further discussion at Programme Committees and should feed into the Continuous Monitoring process R:\SAS\Faculty&CampusSAS\ASSC\SMT\Assessment Boards\Mock Board documents\11.Faculty Tier 2 Award Performance Report F 1011 _Train[1].pdf

Unit Boards: notes & explanations Unit Board Report: –at the end of each Unit the elements of assessment & weighting are detailed –at the end of the Board Report is an explanation of each column heading, the shading (if any) and the values for column R Unit Grade: –P = Pass, F = Fail, A = Absent –CG = Condonable Grade (Has the student met the Unit Learning Outcomes? Is the Unit condonable?)

Progression & Award Boards: notes & explanations Progression Report (PP & REF1): –at the end of the Board Report is an explanation of Provisional Decision codes & a list of Units Progression Report (Decision Required) –at the end of the Report is an explanation of each column heading, the shading (if any) and the values for column R A list detailing the title & weighting of each element of assessment

Questions?