Applying the DELTA-FAIRMODE tool to support AQD: the validation of the TCAM Chemical Transport Model C. Carnevale, G. Finzi, A. Pederzoli, P. Thunis, E.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DEA - Università degli Studi di Brescia TCAM model configuration for POMI simulations C. Carnevale, G. Finzi, E. Pisoni, M. Volta Dipartimento di Elettronica.
Advertisements

PREV AIR : An operational system for air quality monitoring and forecasting presented by Laurence Rouïl.
POMI Po Valley Model Intercomparison Exercise CAMx model overview In cooperation with AMA - MI.
Integrated modelling and monitoring for use in forecasting Jørgen Brandt and Finn Palmgren National Environmental Research Institute Department of Atmospheric.
Institute for Environment and Sustainability1 POMI Kick-off Meeting 07/03/2008.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre AMS 2010 Air Quality Forecasting using a Numerical Weather Prediction Model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
DEA - Università degli Studi di Brescia Aerosol long term simulation using TCAM model C. Carnevale, G. Finzi, E. Pisoni, M. Volta Department for Electronics.
Technical Guidance on Biomass Combustion John Abbott.
CHIMERE air quality forecasts : results during Pays de la Loire summer 2004 experiment and end-user point of view ! Arnaud REBOURS - AIR PAYS DE LA LOIRE.
Jenny Stocker, David Carruthers & Sam Royston Comments on DELTA version 3.2 with the ADMS-Urban London dataset & updates to the PASODOBLE Myair Model Evaluation.
Whitecaps, sea-salt aerosols, and climate Magdalena D. Anguelova Physical Oceanography Dissertation Symposium College of Marine Studies, University of.
An experience on modelling-based assessment of the air quality within the Air Quality Directive framework Ana Isabel Miranda, Isabel Ribeiro, Patrícia.
The Regional Chemical Transport Model over Northeast Asia Area Operated by Japan Meteorological Agency A. Kamada*, M. Ikegami, H. Naoe, M. Kajino, M. Deushi,
FAIRMODE SG4: Benchmarking & modelling quality objectives P. Thunis, JRC Antwerp,
An Investigation of Ammonia and Inorganic Particulate Matter in California during the CalNex Campaign AGU Fall Meeting 5 December 2012 Luke D. Schiferl,
N emissions and the changing landscape of air quality Rob Pinder US EPA Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division.
Photochemical Model Performance for PM2.5 Sulfate, Nitrate, Ammonium, and pre-cursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at Background Monitor Locations in the.
Perspectives in Designing and Operating a Regional Ammonia Monitoring Network Gary Lear USEPA Clean Air Markets Division.
Incorporation of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (MADRID) into CMAQ Yang Zhang, Betty K. Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
CMAQ and REMSAD- Model Performance and Ongoing Improvements Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS December 3, 2002.
PREV ’AIR : An operational system for large scale air quality monitoring and forecasting over Europe
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
Title Performance of the EMEP aerosol model: current results and further needs Presented by Svetlana Tsyro (EMEP/MSC-W) EMEP workshop on Particulate Matter.
DEA - Università degli Studi di Brescia Multi-objective optimization to select effective PM10 control policies in Northern Italy C. Carnevale, E. Pisoni,
G. Pirovano – CESIRICERCA, Italy Comparison and validation of long term simulation of PM10 over 7 European cities in the frame of Citydelta project Bedogni.
Atmospheric modelling activities inside the Danish AMAP program Jesper H. Christensen NERI-ATMI, Frederiksborgvej Roskilde.
Evaluation of the AIRPACT2 modeling system for the Pacific Northwest Abdullah Mahmud MS Student, CEE Washington State University.
Session 9, Unit 17 UAM and CAMx. UAM and CAMx UAM - Urban Airshed Model Currently available versions:  UAM-V 1.24  UAM-V 1.30  Available from Systems.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
The Sensitivity of Aerosol Sulfate to Changes in Nitrogen Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds Ariel F. Stein Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.
WG2 Meeting, SG4 Models Benchmarking SMHI, Norrkoping, 14 th June 2011 DELTA tool testing for a Portuguese City Ana Miranda and Helena Martins University.
Modelling of Acid deposition in South Asia Magnuz Engardt Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI) Introduction to Acid deposition.
The Euro- and City-Delta model intercomparison exercises P. Thunis, K. Cuvelier Joint Research Centre, Ispra.
Presents:/slides/greg/PSAT_ ppt Effects of Sectional PM Distribution on PM Modeling in the Western US Ralph Morris and Bonyoung Koo ENVIRON International.
4. Atmospheric chemical transport models 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Box model 4.3 Three dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model.
EANET activities and the applicability to model development Kazuhide Matsuda ADORC.
Using CMAQ-AIM to Evaluate the Gas-Particle Partitioning Treatment in CMAQ Chris Nolte Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
Regional Modeling of The Atmospheric Fate and Transport of Benzene and Diesel Particles with CMAQ Christian Seigneur, Betty Pun Kristen Lohman, and Shiang-Yuh.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
Impact of high resolution modeling on ozone predictions in the Cascadia region Ying Xie and Brian Lamb Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Department of.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
Analysis of Ozone Modeling for May – July 2006 in PNW using AIRPACT3 (CMAQ) and CAMx. Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. EPA Region 10 Nov CMAQ O 3 Prediction.
THE MODELS-3 COMMUNITY MULTI- SCALE AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) MODEL: 2002 RELEASE – NEW FEATURES Jonathan Pleim, Francis Binkowski, Robin Dennis, Brian Eder,
A Five-Year Performance Evaluation of Environment Canada’s Operational Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System M.D. Moran 1, J. Zhang 1, R.
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF MADRID: A NEW AEROSOL MODULE IN MODELS-3/CMAQ Yang Zhang*, Betty Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shiang-Yuh Wu and Christian.
Extending Size-Dependent Composition to the Modal Approach: A Case Study with Sea Salt Aerosol Uma Shankar and Rohit Mathur The University of North Carolina.
Estimating background ozone in surface air over the United States with global 3-D models of tropospheric chemistry Description, Evaluation, and Results.
Georgia Institute of Technology SAMI Aerosol Modeling: Performance Evaluation & Future Year Simulations Talat Odman Georgia Institute of Technology SAMI.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
___________________________________________________________________________CMAQ Basics ___________________________________________________Community Modeling.
D EVELOPMENT OF A NATIONAL METHODOLOGY FOR ESTIMATING POPULATION EXPOSURE Maxime Beauchamp, Laurent Létinois, Laure Malherbe*, Frédéric Tognet
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
HARMO13, 1-4June 2010, Paris, France1 Institute for Environment and Sustainability Procedure.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy Jonathan Pleim, Shawn Roselle,
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Albert Oliver, Raúl Arasa, Agustí Pérez-Foguet, Mª Ángeles González HARMO17 Budapest May 2016 Simulating large emitters using CMAQ and a local scale finite.
Development of a Multipollutant Version of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Shawn Roselle, Deborah Luecken, William Hutzell,
Charles University in Prague
Changes to the Multi-Pollutant version in the CMAQ 4.7
10th CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC 2010 October 11-13
Urban Emissions and Projections
7th Annual CMAS Conference
A. Aulinger, V. Matthias, M. Quante, Institute for Coastal Research
VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological Research
Alison Redington* and Derrick Ryall* Dick Derwent**
EURODELTA III RCG-Model
PM modelling assessment in Northern Italy
C. Carnevale1, G. Finzi1, E. Pisoni1, P. Thunis2, M. Volta1
Presentation transcript:

Applying the DELTA-FAIRMODE tool to support AQD: the validation of the TCAM Chemical Transport Model C. Carnevale, G. Finzi, A. Pederzoli, P. Thunis, E. Pisoni, M. Volta

Outline 1.Methodology 2.TCAM model 3.Results 4.Conclusions

MODEL PERFORMANCE CRITERIA (MPC): “minimum level of quality to be achieved by a model for policy use” (Boylan and Russell, 2006) MPC definition

Model evaluation: Main Statistical Indicators

Model Performance Criteria

Modeling Setup Measures: 50 monitoring sites (suburban, urban and rural background) Model: TCAM Year:2005 Domain resolution:6x6km 2 (POMI exercise) Pollutants: O3 – PM10

Eulerian 3D model Terrain-following coordinate system Horizontal Transport Module: Chapeau Function + Forester Filter Vertical Transport Module: Crank-Nicholson hybrid solver based on the vertical diffusivity coefficient Deposition Module: Dry/Wet Gas Chemistry: SAPRC 97 (Modified Version) Aerosol: –Chemical Species: 21 (12 inorganics) –Size Classes: 10 (from 0.01  m to 50  m) –Thermodynamic module: ISORROPIA TCAM: Transport and Depostion Module

Target diagram: PM10 daily mean Systematic error: Bias <0 (underestimation) 69% of sites respect the MPC RMSE

Issue: What data to be used? (1/3) 1.Selecting a subset of station? Limited number of stations Different regimes 2.Selecting a subset of data for each stations? Considering only the X% of the best data (X-th percentiles)

Issue: What data to be used? (2/3) 90% Stations90% Data

Issue: What data to be used? (3/3) Default Setup90% Data85% Data 80% Data

On the meaning of “good”… 90% of station inside the “acceptance region” Good Very Good Excellent

Target Plot: O3 8hmax 1.Worse than PM10? 2.Similar to other POMI model O3NO2, PM10 k=1.44 k=2

Issue: coverage factor k value? k=1.44k=1.75k=2.00 Similar to PM10

Land use Topography Prognostic output PROMETEO TCAM Continental scale model output BOUNDY Boundary and Initial condition 3D concentration fields POEM-PM Emission inventories Emission Fields 3D wind and temperature fields Turbolence and Boundary Layer parameters VOC speciation Profiles Temporal Profiles Output Where using Delta? PM size and chemical speciation Profiles GAMES: Gas Aerosol Modelling Evaluation System

WS Uncertainty constant (0.5 m/s) below 5m/s (WMO) Uncertainty proportional to WS (10%) above 5m/s (WMO) Rounding (to integer) effects accounted for ParameterValue Alpha0.88 U RV 0.14 RV5 EC4MACS 2009 (450 st) R0.78 Bias36%1.3 m/s NMSD63% MQO extension to meteorology: WS

TEMP Instrument uncertainty on test-bank  0.1K Instrument uncertainty in the field  K Uncertainty including meteo-housing structure  1K ParameterValue Alpha1.0 U RV 0.04 RV25 EC4MACS 2009 (460 st) R0.96 Bias2K NMSD26% MQO extension to meteorology: TEMP

Conclusions & Discussions About Delta tool –Very valuable tool for the model (of different type…) validation/comparison –Continuously improving/generalizing (Thanks!!!) About MPC –Issue1: Considering all the data? –Issue2: Free paramenters (k) in the computation of U? About TCAM –Quite interesting and good performances PM10: Very good O3: comparable to other model –Are the performances good enough?

Thank you