Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numbers Treasure Hunt Following each question, click on the answer. If correct, the next page will load with a graphic first – these can be used to check.
Advertisements

1 A B C
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
1 ZonicBook/618EZ-Analyst Resonance Testing & Data Recording.
Variations of the Turing Machine
AP STUDY SESSION 2.
1
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Addition and Subtraction Equations
Properties Use, share, or modify this drill on mathematic properties. There is too much material for a single class, so you’ll have to select for your.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
We need a common denominator to add these fractions.
Process a Customer Chapter 2. Process a Customer 2-2 Objectives Understand what defines a Customer Learn how to check for an existing Customer Learn how.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
Multiplying binomials You will have 20 seconds to answer each of the following multiplication problems. If you get hung up, go to the next problem when.
1 1  1 =.
1  1 =.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
The 5S numbers game..
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
Look at This PowerPoint for help on you times tables
Bellwork Do the following problem on a ½ sheet of paper and turn in.
Exarte Bezoek aan de Mediacampus Bachelor in de grafische en digitale media April 2014.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
1..
Adding Up In Chunks.
FAFSA on the Web Preview Presentation December 2013.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
Before Between After.
25 seconds left…...
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Test Results for Proposed Cargo.
NexGen Burner Comparative Testing
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Development of a New Flammability.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Developing an In-flight Fire Condition.
Federal Aviation Administration Evacuation Slide Test Method: Round Robin 3 Results 0 Evacuation Slide Test Method: Comparison Test Results Federal Aviation.
NexGen Burner Update International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting October 21, 2009 Atlantic City, NJ.
1 hi at no doifpi me be go we of at be do go hi if me no of pi we Inorder Traversal Inorder traversal. n Visit the left subtree. n Visit the node. n Visit.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Essential Cell Biology
Converting a Fraction to %
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Clock will move after 1 minute
PSSA Preparation.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Lial/Hungerford/Holcomb/Mullins: Mathematics with Applications 11e Finite Mathematics with Applications 11e Copyright ©2015 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Select a time to count down from the clock above
1.step PMIT start + initial project data input Concept Concept.
Patient Survey Results 2013 Nicki Mott. Patient Survey 2013 Patient Survey conducted by IPOS Mori by posting questionnaires to random patients in the.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
Federal Aviation Administration Burnthrough Update International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting June 17, 2009 Köln, Germany.
Presented to: IAMFTWG, Renton, WA By: Robert Ochs Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing.
Presented to: IAMFTWG By: Tim Salter Date: October 19-20, 2011, Atlantic City, NJ Federal Aviation Administration Seat Cushion Test Method Update.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Task Group Session on Revised.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Seat Test Round Robin Materials Working Group Patricia Cahill June 26, 2007 Interim.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Test Cell Airflow Study For Cargo.
Presentation transcript:

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Meeting Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round Robin Update International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group Tim Salter, FAA Technical Center June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland

2 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round Robin Update IAMFTWG, June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland Introduction Previous interlab studies had shown the NexGen burner test results to be less repeatable than originally thought –Within a single lab, as well as among multiple test labs In the case of the Park burner, the stator and turbulator inside the burner draft tube could be adjusted to compensate for any irregularities in burner performance which might impact test results The NexGen burner was designed to be setup in a standardized configuration, meaning that there are no adjustments to be made in order to simplify NexGen burner test rig setup Flames coming from the NexGen burner cone were often bias to the left or right side, rather than exiting evenly from the cone It was thought that redesigning the internal components of the NexGen burner may help reduce flame bias and increase test repeatability

3 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round Robin Update IAMFTWG, June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland Old Vs. New Burner Internals The original concept was to retain the same internals from the Park burner for use in the NexGen burner in order to keep burner performance similar After trialing the igniterless stator design with no success, other options were considered Oil burners on the market today no longer use stators and turbulators to direct the flow of air through the burner Flame retentions heads (FRH) are now used in their place –Generate a more efficient and complete combustion –Simpler in design –Relatively easier to produce Turbulator Static PlateStator Flame Retention Head

4 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round Robin Update IAMFTWG, June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland FRH vs. Stator and Turbulator Flame Retention Head Stator and Turbulator

5 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round Robin Update IAMFTWG, June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland NexGen Burner Settings for 2013 Seat Cushion Flammability Round Robin Face of FRH to nozzle tip: 1-1/8” Fuel nozzle adapter to static plate: 2-3/8” Static Plate Angle: centerline of igniters at 0° –Looking into the cone of the burner, the centerline between the igniters will be at 0° on the burner reference Fuel pressure: 108 psi (+/- 4 psi) –This pressure is to be used as a starting point when flow checking the fuel flow rate Air pressure: 45 psi Air Temperature: 40-60°F Fuel Temperature: 32-52°F

6 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round Robin Update IAMFTWG, June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland Test Materials All participating labs provided with cushions for testing purposes 3 different foam cushion types will be provided –Airflex fire hardened foam –Dax fire hardened foam –Fire retarded polyurethane foam with a fire blocking layer There will be 3 cushion sets of each cushion type provided –9 samples total Testing should be performed as described in the Rule or Fire Test Handbook

7 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round Robin Update IAMFTWG, June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland FAA Initial Test Results using the FRH with the NexGen Burner % Weight Loss for each Cushion Sample Set Tested using Delavan W nozzle and 45 psi air pressure AirflexFireblockDax Sample #17.50%7.42%6.58% Sample #27.25%7.64%7.43% Sample #36.93%6.12%7.72% Average7.22%7.06%7.24% Stdev %Stdev

8 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round Robin Update IAMFTWG, June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland 2013 Round Robin Test Results

9 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round Robin Update IAMFTWG, June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland 2013 Round Robin Test Results

10 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round Robin Update IAMFTWG, June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland 2013 Round Robin Test Results

11 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round Robin Update IAMFTWG, June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland 2013 Round Robin Test Results

12 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round Robin Update IAMFTWG, June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland 2013 Round Robin Test Results No average weight loss % failures have been experienced in a lab for the 2013 round robin %Stdev results are above the preferred 10% limit when comparing all lab’s results Average Weight Loss % Results FireblockDaxAirflex Lab A Lab B Lab C Lab D Lab E Lab F Lab G Lab H Lab I Lab J Avg Stdev %Stdev

13 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round Robin Update IAMFTWG, June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland 2013 Round Robin Test Results The data on the previous slide shows the %Stdev among the participating labs to be elevated Results are likely due to different configurations of labs (test area size, ventilation, etc.) However, when examining the results of one lab at a time, there appears to be much higher consistency The graph shown (right) shows the %Stdev for weight loss percent within each particular lab Variations in test results not likely caused by burner

14 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round Robin Update IAMFTWG, June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland Conclusion of 2013 Seat Cushion Round Robin Turbulator Static Plate Stator Flame Retention Head

15 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round Robin Update IAMFTWG, June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland Questions?

16 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round Robin Update IAMFTWG, June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland 2012 Round Robin Test Results FireblockDaxAirflex Lab A Lab B Lab C Lab D Lab E Lab F Lab G Lab H Avg stdev %stdev FAA is Lab A

17 Federal Aviation Administration Seat Cushion Oil Burner Round Robin Update IAMFTWG, June 25-26, 2014, Solothurn, Switzerland 2012 Round Robin Test Results Lab at far left is FAA Technical Center