CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Special Education Self-

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 © 2008 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association Valenzuela/California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Lawsuit Settlement California.
Advertisements

The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
Mississippi Special Education Advisory Panel Annual Report to the State Board of Education July 2009.
Slide 1 of 12 Extended School Year (ESY): Legal Foundation Adapted from Region IV Presentation August 28, Slides.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Upload/Submit Files to CDE Refer to pages of the Detailed Software Manual for complete.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Special Education Self-
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Special Education Self-
Service Provider Title VI Training Civil Rights Act of 1964 Presented By: Tennessee Department of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
Building a Special Education Infrastructure Through a Joint Power Authority.
Monitoring Accommodations in Florida Karen Denbroeder Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services.
CHARTER SCHOOL TRAINING March 3, 2015 Nancy Hughes, Executive Director Financial Accounting / OCAS/Audits (405)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction EDUCATION CODE CHANGES THAT MAY AFFECT YOU.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 LOW INCIDENCE FUNDING GUIDELINES FOR PRESENTATION TO: California Transcribers and Educators.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Uniform Complaint Procedures Monitoring Requirements Training.
Section 4 – Supplement Maintenance Management System (MMS) (WAC 136 – 11) Larry Pearson, Maintenance Programs Manager.
Scenario – Practical Applications of School Law JESSAMY GUERRERO.
The Next Decade: Special Education and Oregon Charter Schools COSA Fall Conference October 2009.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Infant Program Funding in Special Education – A Refresher.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
April 2010 Copyright © 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Mattie T. Updated Timeline and Goals.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Funding Assistive Technology for Students with Visual Impairments with Low Incidence Funds.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education Verification Review (VR) 2013−14 TRAINING.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Program Guidelines for Students who are Visually Impaired PRESENTATION TO: California Transcribers.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA) Office of Non-Public Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Office of Special.
New Charter School Training April 24, 2012 Presented by Iona Martin, Financial Specialist Financial Accounting / OCAS & Auditing.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Overview of Changes related to AB 114 Transition from AB 3632.
Module #3 Budgeting. What is Budgeting? Budgeting is the process of allocating resources to the prioritized needs of a school district. Budgeting is the.
School Budget (Draft)
Fiscal Monitoring and Oversight Tecumseh Local School District January 8, 2013 Roger Hardin, Assistant Director Finance Program Services (614)
TITLE I COMPARABILITY Determinations & Reporting Title I Technical Assistance Session School Improvement Grant Programs October 6, 2011.
Training Module 7. What You’ll Learn In This Module In what areas may Conservation Districts enter into a contractual agreement with Michigan Department.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Effects of the Passage of ABX4 2 on California-Adopted Instructional.
New York State Education Department Charter School Office Initial Statement January 2013.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Methods of Administration MOA Element 3 Assurances.
School Site Council (SSC) Essentials in brief An overview of SSC roles and responsibilities Prepared and Presented by Wanda Chang Shironaka San Juan Unified.
PARENT & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT GRACIELA AVILA DIVISION OF INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT OFFICE OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT, ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
@CharterSELPA /EDCOECharterSELPA Steering Breakout Session: Independent Study, Home Instruction, & Home Hospital.
South Hunterdon Regional School District Consolidated Monitoring Report (CMR) Presentation to the SHRSD Board of Education on October 26, 2015 Audit from.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
2013.  Familiarize staff with parent involvement requirements  Learn process to involve parents in the development of activities and policies  Learn.
C HAPTER 5 Individuals With Disabilities EDAD 859 By: Group 2.
Policy Guidance. I.Policy Statement II.Purpose III.Definitions IV.Standards V.Responsibilities VI.Authorization VII.Legal References VIII.History Policy.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
RICHMOND COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM COMMUNITY MEETING GLENN HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL JANUARY 7, 2015 School System Flexibility Options.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidentiality of Records and Interagency Sharing of Educational Records.
Section 504 training.
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Department of Exceptional Student Education
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Santa Barbara County SELPA Parentally Placed Students in Private School Training & Meaningful Consultation for Private School Representatives and Parent.
Karen Ann Breslow, MA, SELPA Program Coordinator
Oregon Department of Education
READ Act Reporting and Budget Planning
Title 5 Regulations and Distance Education Guidelines
Low Incidence Funding CTEBVI Conference April 4, 2014
ESEA Programs | December 2018
Roles and Responsibilities
What is OAL? The Office of Administrative Law (OAL) ensures that agency regulations are clear, necessary, legally valid, and available to the public. OAL.
Nevada County SELPA Local Plan Update
Presentation transcript:

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Special Education Self- Review Training Policy and Procedure Review SELPA Governance Review March 2008

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Purpose Policy and procedures are reviewed to ensure that districts and SELPAs meet federal requirements to have policies and procedures in place. In June 2007, all SELPAs submitted a new Annual Service and Budget Plan. The new Service and Budget plan included policy statements covering each of the required areas. For the purposes of these reviews, no other policy statements are required to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements. However, these plans included assurance that policies and procedures related to these areas were on file locally. Thus, the focus of this Policy and Procedure Review is to review: –Any additional local (board) policies that may further clarify District or SELPA policy; and –Local procedures/guidelines/practices that are used to carry out SELPA and District policies.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction The Review of Policies and Procedures is Focused The focus is on those areas that are generated through the software (frequent non-compliance and Monitoring Plan items). When reviewing policies and procedures, it is important to note that the absence of a written procedure or clarifying policy is not evidence of non-compliance Non-compliance is established by identifying written policies and procedures that do not comply or, in the absence of written policies and procedures, practices that are contrary to the requirements of state or federal law and regulations. Use the Policy and Procedures forms (generated by the Database Software) to review procedures/guidance documents.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction The Policy and Procedure form includes the same information as the Student Record form: Item No., Compliance Test, Compliance Standard and Guidance. The reviewer should assess policies and procedures using the Compliance Test and Legal Citations primarily, as the Compliance Standard and Other Guidance are written chiefly for Student Record Review use.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction SELPA Governance Review Activities

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction SELPA Governance Review Activities Local Plan Policies and Procedures Implementation of the Local Plan Budget and Service Plans Mental Health Agreement

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 30 EC 56205(a) Each special education local plan area submitting a local plan to the Superintendent under this part shall ensure, in conformity with subsection (a) of Section 1412 of, and paragraph (1) of subsection (a) of Section 1413 of Title 20 of the United States Code, that it has in effect policies, procedures, and programs that are consistent with state laws, regulations, and policies governing the following: (22 areas required by state and federal law). Local Plan Policies and Procedures

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Purpose In June 2006, all SELPAs submitted a new Local Plan. This Local Plan included policy statements covering each of the required areas. For the purposes of these reviews, no other policy statements are required to demonstrate compliance with federal requirements. However, these plans included assurance that policies and procedures related to these areas were on file locally. Thus, the focus of this Policy and Procedure review is to review whether the SELPA has procedures, or ensures that each LEA has procedures to address the activities in each of the federal requirement areas.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Compliance Test – Local Plan

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Implementation of the Local Plan 30 EC In addition to the provisions required to be included in the local plan pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 56205), each special education local plan area that submits a local plan... shall develop written agreements to be entered into by entities participating in the plan...These agreements shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (c) Regionalized services to local programs, including, but not limited to, all of the following: (6) Provision for ongoing review of programs conducted, and procedures utilized, under the local plan, and a mechanism for correcting any identified problem.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Compliance Test – Implementation of the Local Plan

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Annual Budget Plan 30 EC 56205(b) Each local plan submitted to the Superintendent under this part shall also contain all the following: (1) An annual budget plan that shall be adopted at a public hearing held by the special education local plan area… The annual budget plan shall identify expected expenditures for all items required by this part which shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (A) Funds received in accordance with Chapter 7.2 (commencing with Section 56836). (B) Administrative costs of the plan. (C) Special education services to pupils with severe disabilities and low incidence disabilities. (D) Special education services to pupils with nonsevere disabilities. (E) Supplemental aids and services to meet the individual needs of pupils placed in regular education classrooms and environments. (F) Regionalized operations and services, and direct instructional support by program specialists in accordance with Article 6 (commencing with Section ) of Chapter 7.2. (G) The use of property taxes allocated to the special education local plan area pursuant to Section 2572.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Compliance Test – Annual Budget Plan

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Annual Service Plan 30 EC 56205(b)(2) An annual service plan shall be adopted at a public hearing held by the special education local plan area…The annual service plan shall include a description of services to be provided by each district and county office, including the nature of the services and the physical location at which the services will be provided, including alternative schools, charter schools, opportunity schools and classes, community day schools operated by school districts, community schools operated by county offices, and juvenile court schools, regardless of whether the district or county office is participating in the local plan. This description shall demonstrate that all individuals with exceptional needs shall have access to services and instruction appropriate to meet their needs as specified in their individualized education programs.

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Compliance Test – Annual Service Plan

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Mental Health Agreement Mental Health issues are examined in several ways in the review: –CASEMIS data re: 3632 (Dec 1 count); –Mental Health Service Provider Data (separate software); –IEP Implementation (District Review); –Interagency Agreement (SELPA Review).

JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Partial Compliance Test – Agreement with Mental Health