Bridging Project Vermont Reads Institute at UVM. Consultants  Nancy Woods, Coordinator  Pam Chomsky-Higgins  Sue Biggam  Loralyn LeBlanc  Gayle Moskowitz.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Mary O’Brian Ms. Susan Grzanich Ms. Michelle Coconate
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Instructional Decision Making
When Students Can’t Read…
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Leading the Learning Final Project What does a literacy-rich classroom look like?
LITERACY STRATEGY P Loddon Mallee Region.
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Winchester School District In Need of Improvement Plan DINI Team: Mel Harrison, Valerie Wilber, Hannah Gagnon, Dee Salonen, Amanda Nordberg, Jane Cardinale,
So, What IS a Standards-based
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Pioneer High School Our Journey: Becoming and Sustaining a Professional Learning Community.
Professional Learning Communities and Response to Intervention Yorktown High School Action Plan.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Secondary Intensive Reading Block Evan Lefsky, Ph.D. Reading Specialist, 6-12.
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Coaching Framework Improving Teaching and Learning Literacy District More than Literacy.
Building a Data Culture Data Guru Roles, Responsibilities & Expectations.
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
Academic Intervention Services: Deepening the Conversation District 75 NYCDOE.
English Language Arts Program Update Dr. Lisa M. White School Committee Meeting January 24, 2011.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Florida Secondary School Redesign Initiative: Eventually, Change Turns into Work ! Presented by: Barbara McClamma Christine Crocco Senior Program Associates.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Guidance from the CSDE on SRBI Implementation May 14, 2010 CAPSS Assistant Superintendents’ Meeting Mary Anne Butler, Education Consultant Iris White,
RtI/DI Intervention Model for The Public Schools of Petoskey Building Strong, Life-long Learners.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
BALANCED LITERACY The Whys and Whats Lori Butler, Literacy Coach Harding Elementary School.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Cultural Competency and the Inclusive Classroom Professional Development Session Kalyn Estep.
The Rural Early Literacy Initiative Effective Professional Development for Rural Kindergarten and First Grade Teachers Steve Amendum Marnie Ginsberg Lynne.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
Lanphier High School The Future of Our SIG Efforts.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
PIIC/PLN UPDATES AIU3 Coaches’ Workshop September 11, 2014.
Response to Intervention: What is it?. RtI is… … a process for providing high quality instruction, assessment, and intervention that allows schools to.
Office of Service Quality
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
COST/SST Referral Process The Pyramid of Interventions.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Project Outcomes (separate handout)
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Bridging Project Vermont Reads Institute at UVM

Consultants  Nancy Woods, Coordinator  Pam Chomsky-Higgins  Sue Biggam  Loralyn LeBlanc  Gayle Moskowitz  Kathleen Harrington  Mary Beth Monahan  Cathy White

Purpose  To build and support teacher knowledge, expertise, and instruction in literacy  To support sustainable school growth in literacy over time

Bridging Project as Action Research  We collect both quantitative and qualitative data over the course of a school’s participation in the project: Gates-MacGinitie, NECAP results, consultant field notes, steering committee minutes, self-assessment, year-end surveys, and exit survey  We examine this data to better understand and refine our work with schools  Participants contribute to and benefit from this research—building knowledge and expertise of successful schools across the state

Factors for Success  Through our own research and substantiated by other national and local studies, the Bridging Project has supported schools in the following four areas:  School Commitment and Stability  Responsive School Community  Opportunity to Read  Teacher Knowledge and Expertise  We also have recognized two additional areas based on our current research of successful schools:  Assessment  Support for Struggling Readers

School Commitment and Stability  Definition: The leadership promotes a school-wide commitment to literacy and literacy improvement and supports that commitment over a sustained period of time.  How the Bridging Project Supports: Literacy Consultants engage with the administration on a variety of topics to encourage their professional development as literacy leaders. Consultants also work with the leadership to allocate the time, resources, and materials necessary for the work to be effective and enduring.

Responsive School Community  Definition: There is a shared vision or goal for the whole faculty. The faculty is involved in data-driven discussions at grade levels and across grade levels. There is a strong focus on communication and collaboration amongst all faculty and support services.  How the Bridging Project Supports:  Literacy Steering Committee with all grade levels represented  Grade level team meeting attendance and support  Consistent, sustained approaches and protocols for examining student work, digging into assessment data, and building consensus around next steps for teachers and support service providers

Opportunity to Read  Definition: All students have extensive opportunities to engage in grade appropriate, instructional, and independent reading, and there is an established climate that values wide reading.  How the Bridging Project Supports: Literacy Consultants work with teachers to optimize schedules, curriculum frameworks, and organization of the literacy block. Consultants also support the development of classroom libraries, increasing student access to varying texts (both instructional level and grade level)

Teacher Knowledge and Expertise  Definition: Teachers are reflective decision makers and provide instruction that is balanced, lively, differentiated, and includes best practice in the components of literacy.  How the Bridging Project Supports: Literacy Consultants offer teachers numerous embedded learning experiences: modeling, demonstrating, coaching, observing, providing resources, and presenting workshops tailored to the needs of the faculty.

Assessment  Definition: Teachers gather formal and informal data to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of students’ learning in order to inform instruction.  How the Bridging Project Supports: Literacy consultants work with teachers to develop an assessment plan to monitor what is learned and to inform instruction. Through analysis of assessment results, consultants support teachers in identifying patterns and specific needs of students, and in determining next steps for instruction.

Struggling Readers  Definition: Struggling learners require explicit instructional support of varying levels of intensity to prevent failure and accelerate their progress.  How the Bridging Project Supports: Literacy consultants work with teachers to develop interventions for struggling readers- -that are based on assessment information, targeted to individual needs, monitored, and adjusted for increasing intensity, as needed. Consultants also work with the administration and staff to schedule opportunities for teachers and support services to communicate, collaborate, and coordinate instruction for struggling readers.

Bridging Project Requirements  Participating Schools are required to:  Complete the self-assessment  Commit to 2 hours of release time a month for teachers to participate in professional development  Send a team of at least 3 teachers to the VRI at UVM Summer Institute  Administer the Gates-MacGinitie as a screener each September  Establish a literacy steering committee with grade level representation that meets once a month  Agree to data collection and analysis of the Project’s work in the school  Commit to building a 90-minute literacy block  Ensure that all faculty in the participating grades are committed to engaging in the work