PERFORMER KO MEETING NICE - 12 th & 13 th September 2013 WP1short presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why does ERA Need to Flourish
Advertisements

HOW TO DESIGN THE TRAINING CONTENT Training Unit 7.2 The fundamental elements of training contents.
SAFEFOODERA – SSA – integration project Expansion of SAFEFOODERA – Fully integrated or Associated partnership in 12 months.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Management and Coordination.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET. July 2002Project presentation REGNET 2 WP 7 - Management Task 7.1 – Project Management Task 7.2 – Quality.
1 GEOSS Monitoring & Evaluation. 2 1st GEOSS M&E WG meeting outcomes Agreed on 1.the final draft of Terms of Reference for the M&E WG 2.The plan for delivery.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
DICODE-FP7 Project WP6 - Validation & Assessment.
Overview and Further Planning of WP5 Integration Moderated Discussion Sunday 12 th February – Chaired by Prof. A. Moropoulou - Prof. R.
1/23 Dipl.-Ing. (EUR ING) Jan Kai Dobelmann MSc DGS-Vize-Präsident MicroCHEAP Kopenhagen MicroCheap Work Package 5.
Episode 3 / CAATS II joint dissemination event Gaming Techniques Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Patricia López Aena Episode 3 Brussels,
EUROCHIP 3 WP1 and WP3 Meeting Feeding the project Evaluation 17 September 2010 Sofia, Bulgaria.
TENCompetence Management Issues: WP1 Eric Kluijfhout.
Committed to connecting the world Overview of ITU-T Study Group 5 “Environment and Climate Change” Ahmed ZEDDAM France Telecom Orange Chairman, ITU-T Study.
FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP VALORISATION & SUSTAINIBILITY PLAN Budapest, June 2007.
2009 – E. Félix Security DSL Toward model-based security engineering: developing a security analysis DSML Véronique Normand, Edith Félix, Thales Research.
RES-H Policy Background and Objectives of the Project 1. Project Meeting Freiburg, 21 October 2008 Veit Bürger
FPS HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT 1 Joint Action on Health Workforce Planning and Forecasting Zuzana Matlonova Brussels – April 11th, 2013.
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the Seventh Framework Programme Large-scale integrating projects (IPs)
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the Seventh Framework Programme Support actions.
SAFe Automotive aRchItecture SAFARI. SAFARI_Presentation_Short_v1.ppt 2 / /P. Cuenot/ © Continental AG ARTEMIS/Call2 R&D Project Proposal Project.
PERFORMER WP2 INTRODUCTION 13th of September 2013 CSTB Sophia Antipolis, France.
CAST Project funded by the European Commission, Directorate-General Energy & Transport, under the 6th RTD Framework Programme CAST Plenary Meeting 30 September.
Holistic and Optimized Life-cycle Integrated SupporT for Energy-Efficient building design and Construction Elisabetta Delponte D’Appolonia S.p.A Genova,
LEADER -The acronym ‘LEADER' derives from the French words "Liaison Entre Actions de Développement de l'Économique Rurale“ which means, ‘Links between.
RENAISSANCE : a CONCERTO project financed by the European Commission on the six framework program RENAISSANCE - LYON - FRANCE 1 RENAISSANCE LYON WP 1 Progress.
Program Participants: Department Managers, Project Leaders, Senior officers, Black Belt candidates and anyone who desires an understanding of Lean Six.
Participative Methods on Cultural Value Management in Rural Areas György Fekete Central Transdanubian Regional Innovation Agency Nonprofit Ltd. Budapest,
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
The Preparatory Phase Proposal a first draft to be discussed.
‘One Sky for Europe’ EUROCONTROL © 2002 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) Page 1 VALIDATION DATA REPOSITORY Overview.
Mantychore Oct 2010 WP 7 Andrew Mackarel. Agenda 1. Scope of the WP 2. Mm distribution 3. The WP plan 4. Objectives 5. Deliverables 6. Deadlines 7. Partners.
Intelligent Cargo in Efficient and Sustainable Global Logistics Operations WP5 – Open End-to-End Pilots Implementation Jose Gato Luis –
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
AdriaMed Expert Consultation Interactions between capture fisheries and aquaculture Rome, Italy November st Coordination Committee (2000)
WP7 - Architecture and implementation plan Objectives o Integrating the legal, governance and financial plans with technological implementation through.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
Tenerife, July 27th 2001 INNOCONS Kick-off Meeting KICK-OFF DEFINITION PHASE PRESENTATION.
1DEN/DSOE Romania september 2006 HOTLABSSA “The EU 6 th FP Support Specific Action HOTLABSSA: a new step towards an European Network on Hot Laboratories”
Quality Management (WP5) Roman CHIRCA Agency for Innovation and Technological Transfer TecTNet ………... This project has been funded with support from the.
1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.
RHS 303. TRANSITION OF THEORY AND TREATMENT nature of existence and gives meaning to and guides the action Philosophical Base: Philosophy of occupational.
1 Introduction to Software Engineering Lecture 1.
CAST Project funded by the European Commission, Directorate-General Energy & Transport, under the 6th RTD Framework Programme.
PERFORMER & CEA 12/09/2013 Nice, France. Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission Direction of CEA Technology Science Defense Security Military.
1 Key elements of a good project ECVET contact seminar October 2010 Brussels LEONARDO DA VINCI.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Object-Oriented Software Engineering using Java, Patterns &UML. Presented by: E.S. Mbokane Department of System Development Faculty of ICT Tshwane University.
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Evaluation and Review of Experience from UNEP Projects.
Work Package 6 L2C Kick-off meeting Fontainebleau, March 7th 2006.
WP4 – Policies, strategies, plans and innovative energy efficient solutions in urban transport Steering Committee Meeting Rijeka, Croatia 26/02/2015 Presented.
NCP training session 30 October 2002 Integrated information system on RTD in Europe Gwenda Jeffreys-Jones, DG RTD European Commission.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
Eric Peirano, Ph.D., TECHNOFI, COO
Mikolt Csap (Unit G.2 – Creativity)
Eric Peirano, Ph.D., TECHNOFI, COO
Work Package 2 TECHNOLOGICAL HARMONISATION Reporting period
WP1 – Smart City Energy Assessment and User Requirements
WP2 INERTIA Distributed Multi-Agent Based Framework
ICT PSP 2011, 5th call, Pilot Type B, Objective: 2.4 eLearning
WG1: RELIABLE, ECONOMIC AND EFFICIENT SMART GRID SYSTEM
Funded by the Erasmus+ Programme EPP JO-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP Lina Tsakalou
Behavior-based Safety (BBS)
Eric Peirano, Ph.D., TECHNOFI, COO
Mandate of the Eurostat Working Group
Partner Implications from Seminar: New Approaches to Capacity Development Break-out Group: Role of Assessment frameworks.
Behavior-based Safety (BBS)
Presentation transcript:

PERFORMER KO MEETING NICE - 12 th & 13 th September 2013 WP1short presentation

WP 1 content PERFORMER concept  WP1 aims at providing the set of required scientific methodologies to support the global framework for energy performance assessment

WP 1 content OBJECTIVES : providing a global framework as well as a set of methodologies for in situ energy performance characterization, measurement and assessment Task 1.1 : Define a comprehensive and coherent framework for the global quality process of performance assessment  Definition of a quality process ensuring the monitoring of building energy consumptions and the achievement of targeted performances (based on commissioning)  Definition of appropriate indicators, characterization of the buildings properties, characterization of « in use » conditions Task 1.2 : Develop methodologies as well simulation models and tools to assess the in situ intrinsic performance of the buildings envelops  Development of a methodology to assess intrinsic performance of the envelope at the end of the construction during a short period  Development of a methodology to assess intrinsic performance of the envelope using long term monitoring during operation phase Task 1.3 : Develop methodologies to propose a cost optimized measurement assessment plan  Specification for a tool aiming at providing cost-optimized energy performance measurement plan enable to support PERFORMER solutions Task 1.4 : methodologies for energy management, fault detection and diagnosis  Specifications for a set of relevant tools to manage energy consumption and ensure continuity of the performances during the operation phase  Fault detection and diagnosis, performance monitoring, real time management and optimized control, visualization and reporting tools

4 WP 1 content Objectives : providing a global framework as well as a set of methodologies for in situ energy performance characterization, measurement and assessment WP 1: Specify & Define PERFORMER Framework & Methodologies Duration: 1-15 monthsLead: CSTB Task / DeliverableLeadContributors Deliver by Define a PERFORMER quality process that guarantees;  Monitoring of all energy consumption in any building  Achievement of building energy performance targets CSTBECG, UPL, GDF BRE, ASM, DRA CU & CEA Month Specify tools for the measurement of the intrinsic energy performance of building envelopes. - Subtask : Quick assessment at the end of the construction phase Subtask leader : CSTB - Subtask : Long term assessment during the operation phase Subtask leader : SG CSTBSG, BRE, GDF, UPL, ECG & DRA Define a robust method to identify a cost optimized performance measurement plan & produce specifications for tools to be developed on WP2 that will be applied to pilot buildings. ECGCSTB, CEA, GDF, BRE & UPL Specify methodologies for energy consumption management and ensuring continuity of the performance during the operation phase - Subtask : Fault detection and diagnosis functionalities based on expert rules Subtask leader : GDF - Subtask : Performance monitoring exploiting machine learning techniques Subtask leader : CEA - Subtask : Real time energy management and optimized control Subtask leader : CU - Subtask : Visualization and reporting tools Subtask leader : CSTB CSTBBRE, CEA, CU, GDF & ECG 15

5 WP 1 content Objectives : providing a global framework as well as a set of methodologies for in situ energy performance characterization, measurement and assessment WP 1: Specify & Define PERFORMER Framework & Methodologies Duration: 1-15 monthsLead: CSTB Task / DeliverableLeadContributors Deliver by Define a PERFORMER quality process that guarantees;  Monitoring of all energy consumption in any building  Achievement of building energy performance targets CSTBECG, UPL, GDF BRE, ASM, DRA CU & CEA Month Specify tools for the measurement of the intrinsic energy performance of building envelopes.CSTB 15 - Subtask : Quick assessment at the end of the construction phase Subtask leader : CSTB CSTBSG, BRE, DRA, UPL? - Subtask : Long term assessment during the operation phase Subtask leader : SG SGCSTB, BRE, GDF, ECG UPL? UPLCSTBCEACUBREDRAECGGDFSGASMSIGMA Person-months per participant

6 WP 1 content Objectives : providing a global framework as well as a set of methodologies for in situ energy performance characterization, measurement and assessment WP 1: Specify & Define PERFORMER Framework & Methodologies Duration: 1-15 monthsLead: CSTB Task / DeliverableLeadContributors Deliver by Define a robust method to identify a cost optimized performance measurement plan & produce specifications for tools to be developed on WP2 that will be applied to pilot buildings. ECGCSTB, CEA, GDF, BRE & UPL? Month Specify methodologies for energy consumption management and ensuring continuity of the performance during the operation phase CSTB 15 - Subtask : Fault detection and diagnosis functionalities based on expert rules Subtask leader : GDF GDFCEA, CU, CSTB, UPL, GDF & ECG - Subtask : Performance monitoring exploiting machine learning techniques Subtask leader : CEA CEACEA, ? - Subtask : Real time energy management and optimized control Subtask leader : CU CUCU, CSTB? - Subtask : Visualization and reporting tools Subtask leader : CSTB CSTBCU, GDF & ECG, UPL? UPLCSTBCEACUBREDRAECGGDFSGASMSIGMA Person-months per participant

7 Dependencies & Dependents for WP1 WP1/WP2  A high level of interaction is required in order to ensure the transfer of the methodologies to WP2  Proposition to provide intermediate deliverables for WP2 WP1/WP3&4  WP1 has to support WP3 for the deployment of the PERFORMER methodologies on demonstrators (indicators for perfromance assessment, characterization of the building and « in use » conditions and occupant’s behavior) WP1/WP5  WP1 has to provide relevant inputs for WP5, in particular general principles replicable for the development of a business model for the exploitation of the PERFORMER solution Intermediate deliverable for WP2

For the first 6 months, main stakes are :  Task 1.1 (Global Framework - T0 ->T0+12) :  Interact with WP3 in order to ensure the consistency with PERFORMER demonstrators  Ensure to provide a « european view » required for a replication strategy (WP5)  Fist step : All participants send to CSTB contribution about state of art  Task 1.2 (Intrinsic performance - T0 –> T0+15) :  Develop the 2 PERFORMER methodologies for intrinsic performance assessment  Identify the way of validation (in situ experimentation and/or mockup)  Task 1.3&1.4 (Cost optimized measurement plan and energy consumption management - T0+5 –> T0+15)  Set up dedicated work team for the 4 subtasks,  Identify the PERFORMER scientific methods (state of art required)  Identify the better way of interaction with WP2 to transfer the methodologies developped WP1 implementation plan for first 6 months Asking for 3 months more in order to reinforce the link with WP2? Interaction with other WPs:  WP1/WP2 : asking for 3 months more for tasks 1.2,1.3&1.4 in order to reinforce the link with WP2

CSTB offers its services to all players in the construction sector to improve the quality and safety of buildings.