Senator Brad Ashford One Hundred First Legislature Legislative Bill 800 Addressing the Needs of At-Risk Children.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL Lunch and Learn Families and Children Engaged in Services (FACES); a reform of the CHINS law January 23, 2013.
Advertisements

Oklahoma Highway Safety Office Annual Forum and Impaired Driving Prevention Summit March 21, 2013 Patrick Boulden, City Attorney, Bixby, Oklahoma.
Truancy Court Of Randolph County
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE STATE TASK FORCE FOR THE PREVENTION OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE STATE TASK FORCE FOR THE PREVENTION OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING.
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
Donna Monk MAPPA Co-ordinator.  Understand the purpose and function of MAPPA  Understand the language and terminology of MAPPA  Explore the framework.
OSCODA COUNTY Ending The School to Prison Pipeline.
Office of Public Defense Sunset Review Proposed Final Report Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee January 9, 2008 Fara Daun.
A court dedicated to protecting children and promoting families
Misdemeanor Sanctions
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
Legislative Rule-Making Process. Three Different Processes Higher Education 29A-3A-1 et seq State Board of Education 29A-3B-1 et seq All other state agencies.
National Institute of Corrections/ Washington College of Law Elements of Good State Laws July 11-16, 2004.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
ANGELA BELL, ESQUIRE RJIP TASK FORCE FACILITATOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT COORDINATOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY.
Chapter 15: Part 3 Young People and the Law ©2005 Clairmont Press Georgia and the American Experience.
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association December 9, 2005 (revised January 4, 2006)
Law Enforcement Response. Historically ● Beating one’s wife was not a crime ● Police were not allowed to make arrests in misdemeanor cases - - UNLESS.
"The Changing Expectations of Juvenile Justice in Texas"
Youth and Crime: Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA – 2003) Law 12 MUNDY 2009.
To what extent is the justice system fair and equitable for youth?
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
State Government. The state and federal government have a relationship… established through a constitution – A constitution sets up the framework of a.
Texas Judicial System Consists of : Courts Judges Law enforcement agencies Serves the purposes of: Supporting a system for the trial and punishment of.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
JJDPA Reauthorization 2009: An Update DMC Action Network Annual Meeting May 15, 2009.
Juvenile Justice System. The Juvenile Justice System, 6 th ed. Dean J. Champion Presented by: D. Romeo 2 The Juvenile Justice System CRCT pp 193 The Juvenile.
Chapter 16: Juvenile Justice
Georgia and the American Experience
Truancy Program Overview Lompoc Valley Middle School in conjunction with the Santa Barbara County District Attorney’s Office.
Failure to Attend School. Terminal Objective Upon completion of this module, the participant will be able to identify and understand Texas law with regards.
Reducing Truancy by Engaging Civic Partners Ohio 8 Summit on Urban Education in Ohio Dayton Public Schools - City of Dayton - Dayton Police Department.
Oregon Branches of Government Executive Branch Judicial Branch Legislative Branch.
Combating Truancy Knox County Truancy Initiative and the
10/7/ Welcome Nancy Vaniman Broward Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative Coordinator Florida Department of Juvenile Justice 10/7/20152.
Canadian Criminal Justice Association Congress October, 2011 COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES A PARTNERSHIP APPROACH TO PUBLIC SAFETY David Pisapio, Correctional.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
Chapter 28-2: Texas Judicial Branch and Courts Systems
Juvenile Justice in America, 5 th Edition ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Bartollas/Miller Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Chapter 6:
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives September 30 – October 1, 2014 Twin Falls,
 The District uses the ESchool Plus management system to manage attendance records throughout the District.  Mr. Peter Velocci, Data Systems Manager.
JUVENILE ASSESSMENT CENTER FY Budget Worksession July 18, 2007 Scott Bradstreet Deputy Chief of Operations.
Institute for Criminal Justice Studies Texas Family Code.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
CHAPTER 15 Georgia Government Review. According to the constitution of Georgia where does power originate from?
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
Your Vote Counts, Preferences For The Future. Should courts, prosecutors, defenders, probation officers and detention services be provided with increased.
Navigating the Justice System. 4-1  Describe the seven phases of the criminal justice process.  Identify at least two key victims’ rights in each phase.
In the Matter of C.H., A Youth under the age of Eighteen - Supreme Court of Montana On December 9, 1981, declared C.H., 14 years old, youth in need of.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
Texas: Not Just Death Row The Juvenile Justice System By: Avery Moore, Nick Rubino, Calyn Jones, and Nick Hogan.
Chapter 28-2: Texas Courts Systems Guided Notes. Texas Judicial System A. Consists of : 1)Courts 2)Judges 3)Law enforcement agencies B. Serves the purposes.
Procedures in Juvenile Court.  Delinquent or Status Offenses  Police have a broad authority to release or detain the juvenile Minor offense  Issue.
Sentencing and Punishment Court Systems and Practices.
Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis.
The Weed and Seed Program AJS 270 Week Five. The Beginning Established by the U.S. Department of Justice in Established by the U.S. Department of.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
At virtually every point in the process, law enforcement personnel are empowered to consider alternative to trials and jail time. However, judges have.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidentiality of Records and Interagency Sharing of Educational Records.
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Florida Civil Citation: History and Advocacy
RECOMMENDATIONS STATE TASK FORCE FOR THE PREVENTION OF HUMAN
Region 7 Education Service Center
Region 7 Education Service Center
2017 Proposed Juvenile Justice Legislation
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
Texas Judicial System Consists of : Courts Judges
Presentation transcript:

Senator Brad Ashford One Hundred First Legislature Legislative Bill 800 Addressing the Needs of At-Risk Children

 Senator Ashford introduced LB 800 to address the needs of at risk youth through early intervention and prevention.  During the past four years the Judiciary Committee has identified inefficiencies in the processing of juvenile cases and strategies to keep non-violent offenders out of detention while ensuring that juveniles do not remain in detention unnecessarily; the new law adopted under LB 800 is the culmination of this work.

 LB 800 contains several provisions to encourage alternatives to detention including the authority for probation to impose graduated sanctions and the civil citation pilot program.  The new law encourages greater collaboration on matters of truancy and established the Truancy Intervention Task Force.  The process of sealing juvenile records, which often create barriers to employment, scholarships and admission to schools or the military, was streamlined and expanded.  The Legislature reauthorized $350, for grants to grassroots organizations working with at risk youth in our communities. The State Office of Violence Prevention and the Nebraska Crime Commission is administering the grants.

Provisions to keep offenders who are not a danger to themselves or others out of the juvenile court and out of secure detention:  Authorizing the establishment of a civil citation pilot project in Omaha.  Phasing out the practice of sending status offenders into secure detention for violating a valid court order by January 1,  Codifying the authority for probation officers to impose graduated sanctions on juveniles who violate their conditions of probation.  Prioritizing the use of grant money awarded under the County Juvenile Services Aid Program for programs that will reduce the juvenile detention population.

Provisions to enhance efficiency:  Imposing a timeline on the court to hold hearings on the results of evaluations within ten days after the court receives a completed evaluation.  Authorizing the use of videoconferencing for juvenile proceedings if the court approves and both parties agree.  Eliminating the use of the three-judge review panel for appeals of juvenile cases in which the court order implements a plan different from the plan recommended by DHHS.  Adding language to emphasize the need to place juveniles in the least restrictive environment possible.

Provisions for truancy intervention and prevention:  School districts must report truancy cases to the county attorney after 20 days of absence regardless of whether any of the absences were excused.  School districts must collaborate with the county attorney in developing their truancy policies.  School districts must report to the Department of Education on a monthly basis indicating the occurrence of and reason for excessive absence, suspension, expulsion, referral to the county attorney and contact with law enforcement.

Continued:  Establishing the Truancy Intervention Task Force to examine the data collected by the department and to make recommendations to the Legislature on how to reduce truancy.  Authorizing the juvenile court to suspend driving privileges of truant juveniles and other law violators and to issue fines not exceeding $500 or order community service for parents of truant juveniles.  Allowing law enforcement to take a juvenile into temporary custody when there are reasonable grounds to believe the juvenile is truant in order to deliver the juvenile back to school.

Sealing of juvenile records  LB 800 includes the provisions of LB 923 to provide a clear and comprehensive process for sealing records of interaction with the juvenile justice system.  Such records create barriers to employment, receiving scholarships and admission to schools or the military.  The bill would allow more juveniles to have their records sealed and clarify the process by defining what it means to have a record sealed and providing guidance on how to respond to questions about the records once they are sealed.  Sealed records would not be available to the public except by order of the court for good cause shown.  However, sealed records would be available to the court, law enforcement and prosecuting attorneys for the purpose of prosecuting and sentencing criminal defendants.  When applying for jobs, the person whose record has been sealed may respond to questions as if no record exists.

 LB 800 requires frequent reporting of data to the Department of Education involving truancy, suspensions, expulsions, and other in school driven risk factors.  Other data exists in law enforcement agencies, Health and Human Services, and the Justice system that is critical to the effective response to needs of at-risk youth.  It is critical to develop a plan for the implementation of a real time data analysis software to address at-risk youth.

For questions or more information, please contact Stacey Conroy in Senator Ashford’s office, at: (402)