Integrated Assessment Working group or coordinated activity?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CAC Meeting May 20, 2008 Computer Modeling of Impacts.
Advertisements

Nick Beresford (CEH) & David Copplestone (Stirling Univ.)
1 PROTECT: Numerical Benchmarks Workshop, May 2008 Update of UNSCEAR 1996 Presented To: Workshop on Numerical Benchmarks for Protecting Biota Against Radiation.
Radiation protection of the environment – an introduction
Application of ERICA outputs and AQUARISK to evaluate radioecological risk of effluents from a nuclear site J. Twining & J. Ferris Objectives of this study.
David Copplestone Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster October 2011.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
Introduction to the ERICA Tool
4/2003 Rev 2 I.1.1 – slide 1 of 13 Session I.1.1 Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 1Introduction Session 1Learning Objectives, Course Table of Contents.
The Need for Requirements and Guidance for Protection of Biota: Basis for DOE’s Biota Dose Limits and Guidance Biota Dose Assessment Committee Meeting.
Use of reference biospheres to prove long-term safety of repositories for radioactive waste Workshop, Berlin, August 2008.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster 27 th – 29 th June 2012.
Nick Beresford (CEH).  Give an overview of what may impact on assessment results using the available approaches  In part based on things we know are.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster October 2011.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – Lancaster 27 th – 29 th June 2012.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – Lancaster 27 th – 29 th June 2012.
WSC Radioecology Research Group A new methodology for the assessment of radiation doses to biota under non-equilibrium conditions J. Vives i Batlle, R.C.
PROTECTFP Screening tier comparisons ERICA, RESRAD-BIOTA & EA R&D128 Follow-up actions from Vienna workshop.
Dose Assessments for Wildlife in England & Wales.
PROTECT Work Package 2 Meeting (June 2007) Institute for Sustainable Water Integrated Management and Ecosystem Research (SWIMMER) 1 Experiences of applying.
IAEA EMRAS Biota working group Future (suggested) plans.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014 David Copplestone & Nick Beresford.
Biota Modelling Group WG Leader: Nick Beresford Participants: Participants: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czech Rep., France, Korea, Norway, Russia, Spain,
Wildlife transfer handbook WG leader: Brenda Howard.
PROTECT FP CEH SSI IRSN NRPA (+ UMB) EA Protection of the Environment from Ionising Radiation in a Regulatory Context.
PROTECT Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context Oslo meeting, January 2008 OSPAR Convention for the Protection.
PROTECTFP Radioprotection of the environment in France: IRSN current views and workplan K. Beaugelin-Seiller, IRSN Vienna IC, June 2007.
PROTECTFP Work Package 1:- results from questionnaire and overview of tools for chemical assessment.
The UK Approach - the Initial Radiological Assessment Methodology Laura Newsome Scientist – Environment Agency September 2009.
PROTECTFP CEH, UK (Co-ordinator) SSI, Sweden IRSN, France NRPA, Norway EA, England & Wales.
IAEA EMRAS II : background and introduction. Environmental Modelling for RAdiation Safety (EMRAS II) General aim of programme To improve capabilities.
Tamara Yankovich Division of Transport Radiation and Waste Safety
Brenda Howard (CEH)  Historical perspective – previous ICRP guidance  Why this has changed - prime motivations  International initiatives at the EC,
Experiences from testing the ERICA Integrated Approach Case study application of the ERICA Tool and D-ERICA.
Module 8: Risk Assessment. 2 Module Objectives  Define the purpose of Superfund risk assessment  Define the four components of the human health risk.
“to provide and apply an integrated approach of addressing scientific, managerial and societal issues surrounding environmental effects of ionising.
IAEA plans with respect to environmental protection EC PROTECT Workshop Oslo, Norway, 28–30 January 2008.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
EFFECTS WORKING GROUP Tom Hinton; IRSN; France Dose – Effect Modelling to assist Risk Assessments Mathematical Derivation of Screening Level Values / Protection.
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster October 2011 Brenda Howard.
Environmental Protection Waste Safety Section, Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety Department of Nuclear Safety and Security.
 The IAEA EMRAS programme has compared predictions of various models, to each other and to site data.  Model-model intercomparison showed considerable.
Introduction to the ERICA Tool Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
EMRAS Biota Working Group – Main findings. IAEA EMRAS Biota Working Group Regular participants: Belgium - SCK·CEN; Canada – AECL; France – IRSN; Japan.
RADIATION PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster October 2011 David Copplestone & Nick Beresford.
Working Group 1 Reference and Graded Approaches for Assessing the Impact of Radioactive Discharges.
INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION —————————————————————————————————————— ICRP And Protection of The Environment Dr Jack Valentin Scientific.
Environmental Impact Assessment University of Santo Tomas College of Architecture SP2 Ecological Construction Environmental Architecture.
Supported by the European Commission, contract number: Fission , and the Research.
First Technical Meeting on EMRAS II - proposal for a new working group / sub group Astrid Liland and Malgorzata Sneve, Norwegian Radiation.
TREE project, Challenges and Future Updates Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
Management Effectiveness Training Seminar: Europarc 2008 Management effectiveness assessments – a tool for maintaining high standards in protected area.
BIOPROTA Biosphere modelling for waste repositories This presentation Objectives Participation and management What it has done and publications Projects.
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
TIDE & Natura 2000: A partnership for sustainable tidal river development? Antwerp, 18 February 2010 François Kremer European Commission DG Environment,
PROTECTFP PROTECT recommendations – application in practice.
56th Regular Session of the IAEA General Conference
Nick Beresford & David Copplestone Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
CONSEQUENCE ASSESSMENT. Consequence Assessment Definition: The analysis, evaluation, and interpretation of available information associated with an actual.
PROTECTFP Recommendations of Work Package 1 David Copplestone.
Brenda Howard (CEH) Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
Measuring Norwegian reindeer radiation exposure under field conditions Phakphum Aramrun (Moo) Supervisors : Dr Mike Wood, Prof Nick Beresford, Prof Robert.
RCA Project on Establishing a Benchmark for Assessing the Radiological Impact of Nuclear Power Activities on the Marine Environment in the Asia and Pacific.
Plenary Meeting of the Network on  Environmental 
Work Programme 2012 COOPERATION Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Challenge 6.4 Protecting citizens from environmental hazards European.
C. LEFAURE Portoroz Workshop April 2002
Presentation transcript:

Integrated Assessment Working group or coordinated activity?

Objectives To demonstrate that human and biota assessments fit into a consistent framework for radiological protection –Generate guidance –Familiarity in use of biota assessments –Biota included as routine in assessments

Why needed? Environmental (conservation) legislation requires explicit demonstration of protection ICRP make more reference to protection of the environment & have Committee 5 IAEA – recognition of ‘expectations’, revised BSS contains reference to environmental protection through Environmental Impact Assessments European BSS to include chapter on EP

Used for assessments: –ERICA: Sweden, UK, Finland, OSPAR, parameters used in other approaches –EA R&D128: England & Wales >700 authorisations (Natura 2000 sites) and Scotland – all Natura 2000 sites in Scotland –RESRAD-BIOTA: US(DOE) sites –FASSET/EPIC: elements used in various approaches (inc. below) –Number of other approaches used in assessments in Canada, France, Lithuania

Human Assessment TOTAL ABSORBED DOSE HABITS INFORMATION ‘REFERENCE’ MAN RADIONUCLIDE SOURCE IMPACT PATHWAY OF EXPOSURE Application of a weighting factor for RBE Compare predicted dose to radiological criteria based on known biological effects

Human Assessment TOTAL ABSORBED DOSE HABITS INFORMATION ‘REFERENCE’ MAN RADIONUCLIDE SOURCE IMPACT PATHWAY OF EXPOSURE Application of a weighting factor for RBE Compare predicted dose to radiological criteria based on known biological effects Dispersion model e.g. SRS-19

Biota Assessment TOTAL ABSORBED DOSE ECOLOGICAL PARAMETERS ‘REFERENCE’ ORGANISM RADIONUCLIDE SOURCE IMPACT PATHWAY OF EXPOSURE Application of a weighting factor for RBE Compare predicted dose to known biological or ecological effects & guideline values Dispersion model e.g. SRS-19

Biota Assessment TOTAL ABSORBED DOSE ECOLOGICAL PARAMETERS ‘REFERENCE’ ORGANISM RADIONUCLIDE SOURCE IMPACT PATHWAY OF EXPOSURE Application of a weighting factor for RBE Compare predicted dose to known biological or ecological effects & guideline values Dispersion model e.g. SRS-19

Biota Assessment TOTAL ABSORBED DOSE ECOLOGICAL PARAMETERS ‘REFERENCE’ ORGANISM RADIONUCLIDE SOURCE IMPACT PATHWAY OF EXPOSURE Application of a weighting factor for RBE Compare predicted dose to known biological or ecological effects & guideline values e.g. 10 µGy/h Dispersion model e.g. SRS-19

Examples RESRAD – Part of suite: Offsite, build, biota, chemical etc Models being put together e.g. dispersion (MEAD), dosimetry and biota models for Sellafield EA Initial Radiological Assessment Tool

Suggested Plan Training/familiarisation with biota models during next EMRAS meeting (Jan 2010)

Suggested Plan Training/familiarisation with biota models during next EMRAS meeting (Jan 2010) Theme 1 working groups developing scenarios Consider whether biota assessment appropriate to scenario & potential participants in Jan 2010

Suggested Plan Training/familiarisation with biota models during next EMRAS meeting (Jan 2010) Theme 1 working groups developing scenarios Consider whether biota assessment appropriate to scenario & potential participants in Jan 2010 Participants run biota models, mid year meeting to discuss results (Jun 2010)