How strong is strong Confidence intervals for measures of associations FETP India.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Estimating Population Values
Advertisements

Critical review of significance testing F.DAncona from a Alain Morens lecture 2006.
Statistical Significance and Population Controls Presented to the New Jersey SDC Annual Network Meeting June 6, 2007 Tony Tersine, U.S. Census Bureau.
Lecture 2 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE: AN INTRODUCTION
Chapter 7 Sampling and Sampling Distributions
Measures of disease frequency (II). Calculation of incidence Strategy #2 ANALYSIS BASED ON PERSON-TIME CALCULATION OF PERSON-TIME AND INCIDENCE RATES.
Biostatistics course Part 13 Effect measures in 2 x 2 tables Dr. Sc. Nicolas Padilla Raygoza Department of Nursing and Obstetrics Division Health Sciences.
Biostatistics Unit 10 Categorical Data Analysis 1.
Test of significance for proportions FETP India
How would you explain the smoking paradox. Smokers fair better after an infarction in hospital than non-smokers. This apparently disagrees with the view.
© 2014 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All Rights Reserved HLTH 300 Biostatistics for Public Health Practice, Raul.
1 Epidemiologic Measures of Association Saeed Akhtar, PhD Associate Professor, Epidemiology Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Aga Khan University,
Confidence Intervals Objectives: Students should know how to calculate a standard error, given a sample mean, standard deviation, and sample size Students.
Statistical Analysis SC504/HS927 Spring Term 2008
Confidence intervals for means and proportions FETP India
Estimation of TLD dose measurement uncertainties and thresholds at the Radiation Protection Service Du Toit Volschenk SABS.
Sample size estimation
1 2 Two-samples tests, X 2 Dr. Mona Hassan Ahmed Prof. of Biostatistics HIPH, Alexandria University.
KRUSKAL-WALIS ANOVA BY RANK (Nonparametric test)
Data Analysis Basics for Analytic Epidemiology Session 3, Part 3.
The strength of the association Measures of association FETP India.
Principles of case control studies Part I Nature of the design of case control studies Odds ratio as the measurement of association Piyanit Tharmaphornpilas.
Parameter Estimation Chapter 8 Homework: 1-7, 9, 10 Focus: when  is known (use z table)
Review Find the mean square (MS) based on these two samples. A.26.1 B.32.7 C.43.6 D.65.3 E M A = 14 M B = Flood.
Random error, Confidence intervals and p-values Simon Thornley Simon Thornley.
Introduction to Risk Factors & Measures of Effect Meg McCarron, CDC.
BCOR 1020 Business Statistics Lecture 17 – March 18, 2008.
Following the roman soldiers Cohort studies FETP India.
1 Psych 5500/6500 Statistics and Parameters Fall, 2008.
Are exposures associated with disease?
Thomas Songer, PhD with acknowledgment to several slides provided by M Rahbar and Moataza Mahmoud Abdel Wahab Introduction to Research Methods In the Internet.
Estimation Goal: Use sample data to make predictions regarding unknown population parameters Point Estimate - Single value that is best guess of true parameter.
AP Statistics Section 13.1 A. Which of two popular drugs, Lipitor or Pravachol, helps lower bad cholesterol more? 4000 people with heart disease were.
Hadpop Calculations. Odds ratio What study applicable? Q. It is suggested that obesity increases the chances on an individual becoming infected with erysipelas.
1 Occupational Air Sampling Strategies – who, when, how…. Lecture Notes.
Measure of impact FETP India
Confidence Intervals Nancy D. Barker, M.S.. Statistical Inference.
Estimation of Statistical Parameters
Population All members of a set which have a given characteristic. Population Data Data associated with a certain population. Population Parameter A measure.
Hypothesis Testing Field Epidemiology. Hypothesis Hypothesis testing is conducted in etiologic study designs such as the case-control or cohort as well.
What should we expect? Choice of a control group FETP India.
Smart designs Case control studies FETP India. Competency to be gained from this lecture Design a case control study.
Contingency tables Brian Healy, PhD. Types of analysis-independent samples OutcomeExplanatoryAnalysis ContinuousDichotomous t-test, Wilcoxon test ContinuousCategorical.
The binomial applied: absolute and relative risks, chi-square.
Introduction to Inferential Statistics Statistical analyses are initially divided into: Descriptive Statistics or Inferential Statistics. Descriptive Statistics.
Measures of Association and Impact Michael O’Reilly, MD, MPH FETP Thailand Introductory Course.
Understanding Your Data Set Statistics are used to describe data sets Gives us a metric in place of a graph What are some types of statistics used to describe.
1 Basic epidemiological study designs and its role in measuring disease exposure association M. A. Yushuf Sharker Assistant Scientist Center for Communicable.
Section 6.4 Inferences for Variances. Chi-square probability densities.
A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 6: Precision Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University Wellington, New Zealand.
Chapter Seven Point Estimation and Confidence Intervals.
Dr.Theingi Community Medicine
Confidence Intervals.
Lecture Slides Elementary Statistics Twelfth Edition
EPID 503 – Class 12 Cohort Study Design.
Sample size calculation
Significance testing and confidence intervals
ESTIMATION.
Comparison of three Observational Analytical strategies
Effect Size.
The binomial applied: absolute and relative risks, chi-square
Lecture 8 – Comparing Proportions
Random error, Confidence intervals and P-values
Class session 13 Case-control studies
Chapter 18 Part B: Case-Control Studies and Test for Trend
Interpreting Basic Statistics
Chapter 7 Lecture 3 Section: 7.5.
Sample size.
Interpreting Epidemiologic Results.
Research Techniques Made Simple: Interpreting Measures of Association in Clinical Research Michelle Roberts PhD,1,2 Sepideh Ashrafzadeh,1,2 Maryam Asgari.
Presentation transcript:

How strong is strong Confidence intervals for measures of associations FETP India

Competency to be gained from this lecture Calculate the confidence intervals of the measure of association that corresponds to a study design

Confidence intervals for measures of associations Exact method (Requires computer)  Provides largest confidence intervals  Maximizes the beta error Semi-exact (Taylor’s series)  Based on the variance of the Log of the measure of association  Described in this lecture Test-based (Miettinen)  Based on the Chi-square  Provides the most narrow confidence interval  Maximizes the power

Key areas Cohort studies (cumulative incidence) Cohort studies (incidence density) Case control studies

Cohort study for calculation of cumulative incidence Cumulative risk cohorts

IllNon illTotal ExposedabL 1 Non exposedcd L 0 Totala+cb+d L 1 + L 0 Risk among exposed and unexposed in a cohort study Risk among exposed : R 1 = a/L 1 Risk among unexposed : R 0 = c/L 0 Cumulative risk cohorts

IllNon illTotal Exposed20424 Non exposed Total Risk of anthrax among persons exposed and unexposed to slaughtering cows, Sarkarpara, Murshidabad, West Bengal Risk among exposed : R 1 = a/L 1 = 83% Risk among unexposed : R 0 = c/L 0 = 9% Relative risk = 83% / 9% = 9.1 Cumulative risk cohorts

Interpretation of the relative risk Those exposed to cow slaughtering have a risk of illness that is 9.1 greater than those who were not exposed The sample size is limited Could this association be an effect of chance alone?  Calculation of the confidence interval Cumulative risk cohorts

Formula of the 95% confidence interval Confidence interval of relative risk Formula of the variance Cumulative risk cohorts

IllNon illTotal Exposed20424 Non exposed Total Risk of anthrax among persons exposed and unexposed to slaughtering cows, Sarkarpara, Murshidabad, West Bengal Cumulative risk cohorts

IllNon illTotal Exposed20424 Non exposed Total Risk of anthrax among persons exposed and unexposed to slaughtering cows, Sarkarpara, Murshidabad, West Bengal Lower limit: Upper limit: Cumulative risk cohorts

Interpretation of the 95% confidence interval of the relative risk Those exposed to cow slaughtering have a risk of illness that is 9.1 greater than those who were not exposed While this estimate is based upon a sample, there is a 95% probability that the real relative risk lies between 6.0 and 14 The same formula applies for analytical cross sectional studies Cumulative risk cohorts

Cohort study for calculation of incidence density Incidence density cohorts

EventsPerson-yearsRate ExposedaPT 1 Rate 1 Non exposedcPT 0 Rate 0 Totala+cPT Rate Calculation of a relative rate in a cohort study Relative rate = Rate 1 /Rate 0 = (a/PT 1 ) / (c/PT 0 ) Incidence density cohorts

EventsPerson-yearsRate Exposed3212,000Rate 1 Non exposed2015,000Rate 0 Totala+c27,000 Rate Calculation of a relative rate in a cohort study Rate 1 = 32/ 12,000 = 2.6 per 1,000 PY Rate 0 = 20/ 15,000 = 1.33 per 1,000 PY Relative rate = 2.6/ 1.33 = 1.95 Incidence density cohorts

Interpretation of the relative rate Those exposed have a rate of illness that is 1.95 greater than those who were not exposed The sample size is limited Could this association be an effect of chance alone?  Calculation of the confidence interval Incidence density cohorts

Confidence interval of relative rate Formula of the variance Formula of the 95% confidence interval Incidence density cohorts

EventsPerson-yearsRate Exposed3212,000Rate 1 Non exposed2015,000Rate 0 Totala+c27,000 Rate Calculation of a relative rate in a cohort study Incidence density cohorts

EventsPerson-yearsRate Exposed3212,000Rate 1 Non exposed2015,000Rate 0 Totala+c27,000 Rate Calculation of a relative rate in a cohort study Lower limit: Upper limit:

Interpretation of the 95% confidence interval of the relative rate Those exposed have a rate of illness that is 1.95 greater than those who were not exposed While this estimate is based upon a sample, there is a 95% probability that the real relative rate lies between 1.1 and 3.4 Incidence density cohorts

Case control study for calculation of odds ratios Case control studies

Cases ControlsTotal ExposedabN/A Non exposedcdN/A Totala+cb+dN/A Odds ration in a case control study OR = ad/bc Case control studies

Cases ControlsTotal Exposed3726N/A Non exposed314N/A Total4040N/A Consumption of pump A water among cholera cases and controls, Barwai, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India, 2006 OR = ad/bc = (37x14)/ (3x26) = 6.6 Case control studies

Interpretation of the odds ratio The odds of exposure to the pump water is 6.6 higher for cholera cases than for controls Since the disease is rare, we infer that the risk of cholera is 6.6 higher for those who drank water from the pump The sample size is limited Could this association be an effect of chance alone?  Calculation of the confidence interval Case control studies

Confidence interval of odds ratio Formula of the variance Formula of the 95% confidence interval Case control studies

Cases ControlsTotal Exposed3726N/A Non exposed314N/A Total4040N/A Consumption of pump A water among cholera cases and controls, Barwai, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India, 2006 Case control studies

Cases ControlsTotal Exposed3726N/A Non exposed314N/A Total4040N/A Consumption of pump A water among cholera cases and controls, Barwai, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India, 2006 Lower limit: Upper limit: Case control studies

Interpretation of the 95% confidence interval of the odds ratio Those exposed to the water from pump A have a risk of illness that is 6.6 greater than those who were not exposed While this estimate is based upon a sample, there is a 95% probability that the real relative risk lies between 1.76 and 25 Case control studies

Formula for the test-based 95% confidence intervals (For larger studies) Cohort study Case control study

Take home messages The 95% confidence interval generates a range of measures of association within which 95% of the values will fall Three main methods are available, with an increasing degree of risk of alpha error (and decreasing degree of risk of beta error) Statistical calculators (e.g., Epi-Info Statcalc) allow these calculations from a 2x2 table